1
|
Wang X, Waldman L, Silberman Y, Wang M, Tackey C, Hanna L, Vesprini D, Emmenegger U, Eisen A, Smoragiewicz M. Mainstream Model of Genetic Testing for Prostate Cancer at a Large Tertiary Cancer Centre. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102052. [PMID: 38461085 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An estimated 20% to 30% of men with advanced prostate cancer carry a mutation in DNA damage repair genes, of which half are estimated to be germline. Eligibility criteria for germline genetic testing expanded significantly for Ontario patients in May 2021 and many centers adopted a "mainstream" model, defined as oncologist-initiated genetic testing. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review to report on the first-year mainstream experience of a large tertiary oncologic center, the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre. All patients who underwent mainstream at the discretion of their treating physician were included. A subset underwent somatic profiling as part of clinical trial screening. Descriptive statistics were used to report baseline clinicopathologic characteristics and treatments received. RESULTS Between May 1, 2021, and May 30, 2022, 174 patients with prostate cancer underwent mainstream germline genetic testing with a 19-gene panel. Median age was 75 (IQR 68-80), and 82% of patients were diagnosed with either de novo metastatic or high-risk localized prostate adenocarcinoma. Fourteen patients (8%; 95% CI 4%-12%) were found to have a deleterious germline mutation, including pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, ATM, CHEK2, PMS2, RAD51C, HOXB13, and BRIP1. Forty-nine patients (28%; 95% CI 21%-35%) were found to have a variant of uncertain significance. Thirty-four patients also had next-generation sequencing (NGS) of their somatic tissue. Among this subset, 8 of 34 (23%) had an alteration in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Of the 14 patients with a germline mutation, none had a prior personal history of malignancy and 6 (43%) did not have any first- or second-degree relatives with history of prostate, pancreatic, breast, or ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION We report on the real-world characteristics of prostate cancer patients who underwent mainstream germline genetic testing. Personal history and family history of cancer cannot reliably stratify patients for the presence of pathogenic germline variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Larissa Waldman
- Cancer Genetics and High-Risk Program, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yael Silberman
- Cancer Genetics and High-Risk Program, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Bio-Medical Science, Guelph University, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caleb Tackey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian Hanna
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Urban Emmenegger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Cancer Genetics and High-Risk Program, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Smoragiewicz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu H, Wu Y, He P, Liang J, Xu X, Ji C. A meta-analysis for the diagnostic accuracy of SelectMDx in prostate cancer. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0285745. [PMID: 38329970 PMCID: PMC10852267 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
To overview the diagnostic accuracy of SelectMDx for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and to review sources of methodologic variability. Four electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies investigating the diagnostic value of SelectMDx compared with the gold standard. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Included studies were assessed according to the Standards for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The review identified 14 relevant publications with 2579 patients. All reports constituted phase 1 biomarker studies. Pooled analysis of findings found an area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis curve of 70% [95% CI, 66%-74%], a sensitivity of 81% [95% CI, 69%-89%], and a specificity of 52% [95% CI, 41%-63%]. The positive likelihood ratio was 1.68, and the negative predictive value is 0.37. Factors that may influence variability in test results included the breath collection method, the patient's physiologic condition, the test environment, and the method of analysis. Considerable heterogeneity was observed among the studies owing to the difference in the sample size. SelectMDx appears to have moderate to good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating patients with clinically significant prostate cancer from people at high risk of developing prostate cancer. Higher-quality clinical studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SelectMDx for clinically significant cancer are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanting Wu
- School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yanling Wu
- Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Peijie He
- School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Juan Liang
- School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiujuan Xu
- Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Conghua Ji
- School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cussenot O, Renard-Penna R, Montagne S, Ondet V, Pilon A, Guechot J, Comperat E, Hamdy F, Lamb A, Cancel-Tassin G. Clinical performance of magnetic resonance imaging and biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis in men at high genetic risk. BJU Int 2023; 131:745-754. [PMID: 36648168 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate different scenarios for the management of early diagnosis of cancer (PCa) in men at high genetic risk, using recently developed blood and urinary molecular biomarkers in combination with clinical information alongside multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 322 patients with a high genetic risk (familial or personal history of cancers or a predisposing germline variant) were included in this study. The primary outcome was the detection rates of PCa (positive biopsy) or clinically significant PCa (biopsy with International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade >1). Clinical parameters included age, body mass index, ancestry, and germline mutational status, mpMRI, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), Prostate Health Index and urinary markers (Prostate Cancer Associated 3, SelectMdx™ and T2:ERG score) were assessed. Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each marker at their recommended cut-off for clinical practice were calculated. Comparison between diagnoses accuracy of each procedure and scenario was computed using mutual information based and direct effect contribution using a supervised Bayesian network approach. RESULTS A mpMRI Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥3 showed higher Se than mpMRI PI-RADS score ≥4 for detection of PCa (82% vs 61%) and for the detection of ISUP grade >1 lesions (96% vs 80%). mpMRI PI-RADS score ≥3 performed better than a PSA level of ≥3 ng/mL (Se 96%, Sp 53% vs Se 91%, Sp 8%) for detection of clinically significant PCa. In case of negative mpMRI results, the supervised Bayesian network approach showed that urinary markers (with the same accuracy for all) and PSAD of ≥0.10 ng/mL/mL were the most useful indicators of decision to biopsy. CONCLUSIONS We found that screening men at high genetic risk of PCa must be based on mpMRI without pre-screening based on a PSA level of >3 ng/mL, to avoid missing too many ISUP grade >1 tumours and to significantly reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. However, urinary markers or a PSAD of ≥0.10 ng/mL/mL when mpMRI was negative increased the detection of ISUP grade >1 cancers. We suggest that a baseline mpMRI be discussed for men at high genetic risk from the age of 40 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Cussenot
- CeRePP, Paris, France
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Raphaele Renard-Penna
- CeRePP, Paris, France
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Montagne
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Valerie Ondet
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Pilon
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, AP-HP Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Jerome Guechot
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, AP-HP Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Eva Comperat
- CeRePP, Paris, France
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Freddie Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alastair Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Geraldine Cancel-Tassin
- CeRePP, Paris, France
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Novel Germline Mutations in a Cohort of Men with Familial Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153623. [PMID: 35892882 PMCID: PMC9332384 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Germline mutations in BRCA2 are associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Additional information regarding the clinical phenotype of germline pathogenic variants in other prostate cancer predisposition genes is required. Clinical testing has been limited by evidence, further restricting knowledge of variants that contribute to prostate cancer development. Objective: Prostate cancer patients who were first- and second-degree relatives from multi-case prostate cancer families underwent a gene panel screen to identify novel (non-BRCA) germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes and define clinical phenotypes associated with each gene. Methods: The germline genomic DNA (gDNA) of 94 index cases with verified prostate cancer from families with a minimum of two verified prostate cancer cases was screened with an 84-cancer-gene panel. Families were recruited for multi-case breast/ovarian cancer (n = 66), or multi-case prostate cancer (n = 28). Prostate cancer characteristics associated with each gene were compared with prostate cancer cases of confirmed non-mutation carriers (BRCAX), also from multi-case prostate cancer families (n = 111), and with data from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry (PCOR). Results: Ninety-four prostate cancer index cases underwent gene panel testing; twenty-two index cases (22/94; 23%) were found to carry a class 4-5 (C4/5) variant. Six of twenty-two (27%) variants were not clinically notifiable, and seven of twenty-two (31.8%) variants were in BRCA1/2 genes. Nine of twenty-two (40.9%) index cases had variants identified in ATM (n = 4), CHEK2 (n = 2) and HOXB13G84 (n = 3); gDNA for all relatives of these nine cases was screened for the corresponding familial variant. The final cohort comprised 15 confirmed germline mutation carriers with prostate cancer (ATM n = 9, CHEK2 n = 2, HOXB13G84 n = 4). ATM and CHEK2-associated cancers were D'Amico intermediate or high risk, comparable to our previously published BRCA2 and BRCAX prostate cancer cohort. HOXB13G84 carriers demonstrated low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In the BRCAX cohort, 53.2% of subjects demonstrated high-risk disease compared with 25% of the PCOR cohort. Conclusions:ATM and CHEK2 germline mutation carriers and the BRCAX (confirmed non-mutation carriers) cohort demonstrated high risk disease compared with the general population. Targeted genetic testing will help identify men at greater risk of prostate-cancer-specific mortality. Data correlating rare variants with clinical phenotype and familial predisposition will strengthen the clinical validity and utility of these results and establish these variants as significant in prostate cancer detection and management.
Collapse
|
5
|
Palicelli A, Croci S, Bisagni A, Zanetti E, De Biase D, Melli B, Sanguedolce F, Ragazzi M, Zanelli M, Chaux A, Cañete-Portillo S, Bonasoni MP, Ascani S, De Leo A, Giordano G, Landriscina M, Carrieri G, Cormio L, Gandhi J, Nicoli D, Farnetti E, Piana S, Tafuni A, Bonacini M. What Do We Have to Know about PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Literature Review (Part 6): Correlation of PD-L1 Expression with the Status of Mismatch Repair System, BRCA, PTEN, and Other Genes. Biomedicines 2022; 10:236. [PMID: 35203446 PMCID: PMC8868626 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) is allowed in selected metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PC) patients showing microsatellite instability/mismatch repair system deficiency (MSI-H/dMMR). BRCA1/2 loss-of-function is linked to hereditary PCs and homologous recombination DNA-repair system deficiency: poly-ADP-ribose-polymerase inhibitors can be administered to BRCA-mutated PC patients. Recently, docetaxel-refractory metastatic castration-resistant PC patients with BRCA1/2 or ATM somatic mutations had higher response rates to pembrolizumab. PTEN regulates cell cycle/proliferation/apoptosis through pathways including the AKT/mTOR, which upregulates PD-L1 expression in PC. Our systematic literature review (PRISMA guidelines) investigated the potential correlations between PD-L1 and MMR/MSI/BRCA/PTEN statuses in PC, discussing few other relevant genes. Excluding selection biases, 74/677 (11%) PCs showed dMMR/MSI; 8/67 (12%) of dMMR/MSI cases were PD-L1+. dMMR-PCs included ductal (3%) and acinar (14%) PCs (all cases tested for MSI were acinar-PCs). In total, 15/39 (39%) PCs harbored BRCA1/2 aberrations: limited data are available for PD-L1 expression in these patients. 13/137 (10%) PTEN- PCs were PD-L1+; 10/29 (35%) PD-L1+ PCs showed PTEN negativity. SPOP mutations may increase PD-L1 levels, while the potential correlation between PD-L1 and ERG expression in PC should be clarified. Further research should verify how the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant PCs is related to dMMR/MSI, DNA-damage repair genes defects, or PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Palicelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (M.P.B.); (S.P.); (A.T.)
| | - Stefania Croci
- Clinical Immunology, Allergy and Advanced Biotechnologies Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Alessandra Bisagni
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (M.P.B.); (S.P.); (A.T.)
| | - Eleonora Zanetti
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (M.P.B.); (S.P.); (A.T.)
| | - Dario De Biase
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FABIT), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Beatrice Melli
- Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy
| | | | - Moira Ragazzi
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (M.P.B.); (S.P.); (A.T.)
| | - Magda Zanelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (M.P.B.); (S.P.); (A.T.)
| | - Alcides Chaux
- Department of Scientific Research, School of Postgraduate Studies, Norte University, Asuncion 1614, Paraguay;
| | - Sofia Cañete-Portillo
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA;
| | - Maria Paola Bonasoni
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (M.P.B.); (S.P.); (A.T.)
| | - Stefano Ascani
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy;
- Haematopathology Unit, CREO, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, University of Perugia, 06129 Perugia, Italy
| | - Antonio De Leo
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Azienda USL Bologna, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Guido Giordano
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (G.G.); (M.L.)
| | - Matteo Landriscina
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (G.G.); (M.L.)
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (G.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (G.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Jatin Gandhi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - Davide Nicoli
- Molecular Biology Laboratory, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (D.N.); (E.F.)
| | - Enrico Farnetti
- Molecular Biology Laboratory, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (D.N.); (E.F.)
| | - Simonetta Piana
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (M.P.B.); (S.P.); (A.T.)
| | - Alessandro Tafuni
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (M.P.B.); (S.P.); (A.T.)
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy
| | - Martina Bonacini
- Clinical Immunology, Allergy and Advanced Biotechnologies Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.C.); (M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|