Perspectives on the Role of Biopsy for Management of T1 Renal Masses: Survey Results from Two Regional Quality Improvement Collaboratives

The evolving management of small renal masses

Small renal masses (SRMs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours with varying metastatic potential. The increasing use and improving quality of abdominal imaging have led to increasingly early diagnosis of incidental SRMs that are asymptomatic and organ confined. Despite improvements in imaging and the growing use of renal mass biopsy, diagnosis of malignancy before treatment remains challenging. Management of SRMs has shifted away from radical nephrectomy, with active surveillance and nephron-sparing surgery taking over as the primary modalities of treatment. The optimal treatment strategy for SRMs continues to evolve as factors affecting short-term and long-term outcomes in this patient cohort are elucidated through studies from prospective data registries. Evidence from rapidly evolving research in biomarkers, imaging modalities, and machine learning shows promise in improving understanding of the biology and management of this patient cohort.

Diagnostic Biopsy for Small Renal Tumours: A Survey of Current European Practice

Background and objective

Renal tumour biopsy (RTB) can help in risk stratification of renal tumours with implications for management, but its utilisation varies. Our objective was to report current practice patterns, experiences, and perceptions of RTB and research gaps regarding RTB for small renal masses (SRMs).

Methods

Two web-based surveys, one for health care providers (HCPs) and one for patients, were distributed via the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist Renal Cancer Working Group and the European Society of Residents in Urology in January 2023.

Key findings and limitations

The HCP survey received 210 responses (response rate 51%) and the patient survey 54 responses (response rate 59%). A minority of HCPs offer RTB to >50% of patients (14%), while 48% offer it in <10% of cases. Most HCPs reported that RTB influences (61.5%) or sometimes influences (37.1%) management decisions. Patients were more likely to favour active treatment if RTB showed high-grade cancer and less likely to favour active treatment for benign histology. HCPs identified situations in which they would not favour RTB, such as cystic tumours and challenging anatomic locations. RTB availability (67%) and concerns about delays to treatment (43%) were barriers to offering RTB. Priority research gaps include a trial demonstrating that RTB leads to better clinical outcomes, and better evidence that benign/indolent tumours do not require active treatment.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Utilisation of RTB for SRMs in Europe is low, even though both HCPs and patients reported that RTB results can affect disease management. Improving timely access to RTB and generating evidence on outcomes associated with RTB use are priorities for the kidney cancer community.

Patient summary

A biopsy of a kidney mass can help patients and doctors make decisions on treatment, but our survey found that many patients in Europe are not offered this option. Better access to biopsy services is needed, as well as more research on what happens to patients after biopsy.

The Utility of Renal Mass Biopsy in Shared Decision-Making for Renal Mass Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of renal mass biopsy (RMB) in shared decision-making for renal mass treatment. Underutilization of RMB for patients with renal masses is due in part to physicians believing that results have limited clinical utility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study of all patients referred for RMB from October 2019 to October 2021. Patients and physicians completed pre- and post-RMB questionnaires. Questionnaires assessed both parties' perceived utility of RMB and the impact of biopsy results on treatment preference using Likert scales.

RESULTS

We enrolled 22 patients with a mean age of 66years (SD 14.5) and mean renal tumor size 3.1 cm (SD 1.4). Five were lost to follow-up (three pre-RMB, two post-RMB). Pre-RMB, 100% of patients believed that a biopsy would help them choose a treatment and 45% were unsure of their treatment preferences. After RMB, 92% perceived their biopsy results as useful and only 9% were unsure of treatment preference. Overall, 100% of patients were glad they had a biopsy. Results led patients and physicians to change their treatment preference in 57% and 40% of cases, respectively. Patients and physicians disagreed about treatment in 81% of cases prior to biopsy, but in only 25% of cases after biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Discordance between patient and physician treatment preference for renal masses is higher in the absence of RMB data. Select patients are willing to undergo RMB and RMB data can increase patient confidence and comfort in a shared decision-making approach for renal mass treatment.

[Impact of delay before partial nephrectomy of a localized kidney tumor]

INTRODUCTION

Partial nephrectomy is the treatment of choice for small localized renal tumors. In case of doubt, a biopsy can confirm the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a delayed time to partial nephrectomy on cancer development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our single center study enrolled localized renal tumor patients who underwent a partial nephrectomy between 2015 and 2020; the collected data were included in the uroCCR prospective database. The histopathological stage of the tumors and the recurrence rate in patients treated with surgery >90 days after diagnosis were investigated. The impact a preoperative biopsy on was also explored. Statistical significance was tested using Student's t-test and Chi-squared test (SPSS software).

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 179 patients, among which 41 (23 %) received a preoperative biopsy. 89 patients (50 %) were treated surgically >3 months after diagnosis. The median time to nephrectomy was 86 days (13-1 037). A delayed time to surgery did not lead to significantly higher recurrence rates (P=0.66). Preoperative biopsy led to a doubling time to surgery (P<0.001) but was neither correlated to a more severe tumor stage (P=0.944) nor to a higher recurrence rate (P=0.08). Tumor growth was not significantly different with or without the presence of a biopsy (P=0.122).

CONCLUSION

Our data evidence that a substantial delayed time to partial nephrectomy does not result in a negative impact on cancer prognosis in localized renal tumor patients.