An Outcomes Comparison Between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate, Open Simple Prostatectomy, and Robotic Simple Prostatectomy for Large Gland Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

Benign prostate hyperplasia over 150cm3: Should we perform an endoscopic enucleation of the prostate or robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy?

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition in ageing men, often resulting in significant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that impact quality of life. For patients with huge prostate volumes (>150mL), surgical management presents challenges. Traditionally, open simple prostatectomy (OSP) was the gold standard; however, minimally invasive approaches such as robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP), especially holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), offer similar or superior outcomes with reduced morbidity.

METHODS

This review analyzed studies comparing the perioperative, functional, and complication outcomes of RASP and HoLEP in treating very large prostates (>150mL). A comprehensive literature search was performed to evaluate evidence on surgical efficacy, complication rates, and recovery profiles.

RESULTS

Both RASP and HoLEP demonstrated excellent perioperative outcomes, with HoLEP providing reduced operative time and hospital stays. HoLEP also showed lower blood loss and a reduced need for transfusions, while RASP offered advantages in terms of precision and surgeon control, especially for anatomically complex cases. Functional outcomes, including improvement in urinary flow and symptom scores, were comparable between the two techniques. However, complications such as transient incontinence were more commonly reported with HoLEP.

CONCLUSION

Both RASP and HoLEP are effective and safe for the management of very large prostates. HoLEP offers significant advantages in perioperative recovery and reduced morbidity, whereas RASP provides excellent outcomes in complex cases requiring precise dissection. The choice between these techniques should be guided by patient-specific factors and surgical expertise. Future studies should focus on long-term functional outcomes to refine surgical recommendations further.

The impact of kidney disease on peri-operative outcomes of novel BPH surgeries across the board: a propensity score matched analysis using the ACS-NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

Pre-operative kidney disease was shown to impact peri-operative outcomes of endoscopic BPH surgeries. We aim to assess the effect of novel surgical techniques (Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (LEP) and Laser Vaporization of the Prostate (LVP)) compared to Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP), on post-operative outcomes stratified based on kidney function.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP database was reviewed from 2008 to 2021 for 83,020 patients that underwent TURP, LEP, and LVP. Pre-operative variables were compared across kidney function groups: G1(normal/high function); G2-G3(mild/moderate kidney disease); and G4-G5(severe kidney disease). Multivariate logistic regression was performed on 30-day peri-operative complications adjusting for pre-operative variables. Propensity score matching was done between LEP and LVP to TURP.

RESULTS

LEP showed a protective effect against UTIs (p < 0.05) in the G1 and G2-G3 categories but lost that protective effect in the G4-G5 category when compared to TURP. It had longer operative time (p < 0.05) across all kidney function groups, and demonstrated shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05) in the G1 and G2-G3 categories compared to TURP. LVP had a persistent protective effect against bleeding (p < 0.05) across all kidney function groups and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05) when compared to TURP. LVP had a protective effect against return to OR (p < 0.05) in the G1 and G2-G3 kidney function group but lost that protective effect in the G4-G5 category. LVP had significant protective effect against thromboembolic events (p < 0.05) in the G2-G3 category and against cardiac complications (p < 0.05) in the G4-G5 category.

CONCLUSION

LEP and LVP are superior to TURP in terms of post-operative complications. The type of endoscopic surgery technique should be tailored according to patient's pre-operative kidney status and risk.

Comparative Outcomes of En-Bloc Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Transvesical Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Background: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) have emerged as the two surgical treatments of medication-refractory benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The comparative outcomes of en-bloc HoLEP with early apical release and RASP with modified Freyer's technique remain unexplored. Methods: Between 2018 and 2022, patients with medication-refractory BPH and prostate volume ≥80 g underwent HoLEP or RASP depending on clinical characteristics, patient choice, and surgeon preference. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis was performed with prostate volume and preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as the matching variables to eliminate selection bias. Trifecta outcome was defined as complete urinary continence, Qmax >15 mL/second, and no postoperative complications at 3 months. After an initial univariable analysis to predict factors associated with the trifecta outcome, variables with significance levels of ≤0.1 were included in a multivariable model. Results: Of 416 patients with medication-refractory BPH, 158 underwent HoLEP, whereas 258 underwent RASP. Following matching, 80 patients in each group were included in the analysis. There was no difference in the median postoperative IPSS score, median postoperative Qmax, and continence rate at 3 months. The percentage of patients who attained the trifecta outcome in the HoLEP and RASP groups was 71.25% and 63.75%, respectively (p = 0.4). Patients in the HoLEP group had shorter postoperative stay (HoLEP: 1 [IQR 1-2] vs RASP: 2 [IQR 1-2], p = 0.04) and catheterization time (HoLEP: 2 [IQR 1.75-3] vs RASP: 5 [IQR 5-5], p < 0.001). A multivariable regression did not identify any factors predictive of trifecta outcomes. Conclusion: Given its comparable efficacy to RASP, HoLEP is the preferred treatment for BPH in large prostates because of its shorter hospital stay and catheterization time. Future randomized controlled trials are required to solidify indications for these treatment modalities and standardize treatment protocols for patients with medication-refractory BPH.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Standard (≤149 ml) Versus Very Large (≥150 ml) Prostate Glands: Retrospective Analysis of a Propensity Score Matched Cohort of 326 Patients

Background and objective

Our objective was to evaluate whether a very large prostate volume significantly affects the incidence of perioperative complications and compromises outcomes among patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data for 1815 adult patients who underwent HoLEP at Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge, Berlin, between January 2019 and May 2024. Patients were divided into two groups according to their prostate volume: ≤149 ml (group A) and ≥150 ml (group B). Propensity score matching on age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and the presence of an indwelling catheter was used to balance baseline differences. A Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous variables between the groups, and a χ2 test for comparison of categorical variables, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Postoperative complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Key findings and limitations

After propensity score matching, 163 matched cases per group were analyzed. Group B had significantly longer median total operative time (76 vs 47 min; p < 0.001), enucleation time (42 vs 26 min; p < 0.001), coagulation time (11 vs 6 min; p < 0.001), and morcellation time (15 vs 7 min; p < 0.001). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIb complications (8.7% vs 1.2%; p = 0.02) and blood transfusion (2.5% vs 0%; p = 0.045) were significantly more frequent in group B. Catheterization time (1.9 vs 2.0 d; p = 0.01) and the proportion of patients with postoperative residual urine volume ≤50 ml (85.2% vs 80.2%; p = 0.18) were comparable between the groups. Limitations include the retrospective and single-center study design.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Prostate volume ≥150 ml is associated with a longer operative time, a higher rate of major complications, and a more frequent need for blood transfusion. Therefore, HoLEP for prostate glands ≥150 ml should be performed in experienced high-volume centers.

Patient summary

We compared outcomes of laser surgery for enlarged prostate glands of different sizes. We found that while the surgery is generally effective for very large prostates, it takes longer and has a higher risk of complications in comparison to more typical prostate sizes. However, this procedure is still the best treatment available for prostate enlargement and should be carried out in high-volume hospitals specializing in this treatment.

Comparative analysis of the long-term efficacy and safety of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (>80 mL)

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (MISP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) are appropriate candidates for the large prostate. However, their comparative effectiveness and safety remain unclear. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of MISP and EEP.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies comparing MISP and EEP. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I and the ROB2.0 assessment tool.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The results of analyzing 13 studies involving 2271 patients showed that EEP had significant lower operative time (MD [CI]: 41.59 [14.62-68.56]), catheterization time (MD [CI]: 4.35 [3.31-5.38]), length of stay (MD [CI]: 2.16 [0.70-3.61]), and Hb decreases (MD [CI]: 0.46 [0.06-0.87]). MISP demonstrated significantly better long-term (MD [CI]: -0.46 [-0.89; -0.03]) and short-term QoL (MD [CI]: -0.38 [-0.66; -0.10]) and short-term Qmax (MD [CI]: 2.04 [0.06-4.03]). Efficacy outcomes were comparable in postoperative IPSS, PVR and PSA between MISP and EEP procedures. No significant differences were observed in resection weight, overall complications, blood transfusions, or urinary incontinence between MISP and EEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, EEP and MISP are both effective treatment options for large-volume BPH, providing comparable efficacy outcomes and long-term maintenance. EEP, on the other hand appears to have better perioperative outcomes, but it has a higher rate of short-term postoperative incontinence.

Single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: functional and continence outcomes

BACKGROUND

Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) is recommended for the treatment of large prostate glands. The introduction of the Single-Port (SP) platform in 2018 has enabled transvesical approach to SP-RASP with promising outcomes. Our aim was to describe the functional and urinary continence outcomes of SP-RASP.

METHODS

Clinical and surgical data from all consecutive patients who underwent transvesical SP-RASP between February 2020 and March 2024 were collected in a prospectively maintained institutional dataset and retrospectively analyzed. All procedures were performed using the da Vinci SP platform without any conversions to open surgery. Postoperative outcomes were gathered and analyzed, with a particular focus on the incidence of urinary incontinence (UI) and the time to continence recovery.

RESULTS

Overall, 89 patients underwent SP-RASP, with a median prostate size of 110 grams (90-171.5) and a median PSA level of 5.5 mg/dl (2.77-10.93). All patients were on at least one prostate medication prior to surgery. Preoperative evaluations showed a median International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) of 23 (20-27), Quality of Life (QoL) of 4 (3-5), and Post-voiding Residual (PVR) of 153 ml (60-400). The median operative time was 180 min (164-200), with a median estimated blood loss of 100 ml (30-180). Postoperatively, no patients required continuous bladder irrigation. The median postoperative opioid intake was 6.5 morphine equivalents (0-10), with over 78% not requiring narcotics after discharge. Overall, 77.5% were same day discharged. No Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications were recorded. The median follow-up time was 18 (7-35) months. At the last postoperative urological evaluation, the median IPSS was 5 (3-7), QoL was 1 (0-2), and PVR was 10 ml (0-25). Only 4 patients (4.5%) experienced UI postoperatively, and all were continent within 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The UI incidence rate and functional outcomes of SP-RASP are very encouraging, likely due to precise adenoma and urethra dissection and bladder neck reconstruction. This approach also allows for same-day discharge.

Streamlined surgical approach for coexistent urethral stricture and benign prostatic enlargement: feasibility, safety and patency results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and patency results of a simultaneous surgical approach to repair urethral stricture and treat benign prostatic enlargement endoscopically in a highly selected group of patients at a tertiary referral center. We hypothesize that this is technically feasible, safe, and does not affect urethroplasty outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of adult men who underwent simultaneous urethroplasty and endoscopic prostatic surgery between May 2017 and May 2024 at our institution was conducted. Patients with strictures < 15 French and prostates with adverse prognostic features of response to medical treatment were included. The primary outcome was technical feasibility and safety. The secondary outcome was stricture-free survival.

RESULTS

Twenty men were treated during the study period. The median length of the urethral stricture was 3.0 cm (IQR 2.0-5.0), and the median size of the prostate was 95.0 cc (IQR 63.3-128.3). All patients were treated successfully with a median operative time of 194.5 min (IQR 180.0-246.8), and no procedures required conversion to a staged procedure or open prostatectomy. There were seven Clavien-Dindo I-II complications and one Clavien-Dindo IIIb complication (hematuria requiring endoscopic clot evacuation). At 22 months follow-up, two cases of urethral re-stricture were diagnosed, with one case requiring redo urethroplasty, though none had previous major complications.

CONCLUSION

The combination of urethroplasty and endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic enlargement at the same stage appears to be technically viable and safe, and it does not compromise medium-term urethral patency results in a carefully selected group of patients.

Postoperative urinary incontinence following BPH surgery: insights from a comprehensive national database analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) is a feared complication of BPH surgery. Our study aims to investigate the incidence of UI among patients undergoing different procedures for BPH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using a large national database, containing patient records between 2011 and 2022. The most employed surgical procedures for BPH were considered, including TURP, Transurethral Incision of the Prostate (TUIP), Holmium/Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP/ThuLEP), Open Simple Prostatectomy (OSP), minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (Lap/Rob SP), Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP), Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL), Robotic Waterjet Treatment (RWT - Aquablation®), Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (WVTT - Rezum®) and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE). Rates of any type of UI, including stress UI (SUI), urge UI (UUI) and mixed UI (MUI) were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors of "persistent" postoperative UI, defined as the presence of an active UI diagnosis at 12 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Among 274,808 patients who underwent BPH surgery, 11,017 (4.01%) experienced persistent UI. UUI rates varied between 0.62% (PAE) and 2.71% (PVP), SUI ranged from 0.04% (PAE) and 2.75% (Lap/Rob SP), while MUI between 0.11% (PAE) and 1.17% (HoLEP/ThuLEP). On multivariable analysis, HoLEP/ThuLEP (OR 1.612; 95% CI: 1.508-1.721; P<0.001), PVP (OR 1.164; 95% CI:1.122-1.208; P<0.001), Open SP (OR 1.424; 95% CI:1.241- 1.624; P<0.001), and Lap/Rob SP (OR 1.667; 95% CI:1.119-2.384; P<0.01) showed significant higher likelihood of UI compared to TURP. PUL (OR 0.604; 95% CI:0.566-0.644; P<0.001), WVTT (OR 0.661; 95% CI:0.579-0.752; P<0.001), RWT (OR 0.434; 95% CI:0.216-0.767; P<0.01), and PAE (OR 0.178; 95% CI:0.111-0.269; P<0.001) were associated with lower likelihood of UI.

CONCLUSIONS

UI remains a concerning complication following BPH surgery, but it is an uncommon event affecting <5% of patients. Some differences in UI rates and risk might exist among various BPH procedures. These findings underscore the need for thorough patient selection and counseling.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery: A Snapshot of Trends, Costs, and Surgical Retreatment Rates in the USA

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of novel surgical treatments (NSTs) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been proposed over time to achieve similar functional outcomes, but better perioperative and sexual outcomes than traditional procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the trends in the utilization and costs of BPH surgical procedures over the past decade, and to analyze the need for surgical retreatment after each procedure.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective observational population-based analysis was conducted using the PearlDiver Mariner (PearlDiver Technologies, Colorado Springs, CO, USA) database, including all-payer nationally available claims records collected from 2011 to 2022.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The number and type of BPH surgical procedures per year, costs associated with each BPH surgical treatment, incidence of BPH surgical retreatment rate, and time to BPH surgical retreatment were assessed. Negative binomial regression and Cochran-Armitage test were used for the temporal trend analysis. A multivariable logistic regression analysis evaluated the predictors of BPH surgical retreatment.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In the study period, 274 808 patients received surgical treatment for BPH. The most common procedure was transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; 71.7%). The overall utilization of BPH surgical treatment increased over the study period. Traditional surgery remained most performed for the entire period (87.8%), but a statistically significantly rising trend of NSTs was recorded. The mean reimbursements paid per procedure was 1.43 times higher (p < 0.001) for NSTs than for traditional procedures. The surgical retreatment rate was 9.4%. The mean time to surgical retreatment was 25.3 mo, with 85.5% of cases re-treated within 5 yr. At the multivariable analysis, transurethral incision of the prostate, photoselective vaporization of the prostate, prostatic urethral lift, convective water vapor energy, and prostatic artery embolization had a significantly greater likelihood of surgical retreatment than TURP. Holmium/thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP/ThuLEP), open simple prostatectomy (SP), and laparoscopic/robot-assisted SP were associated with a lower probability of resurgery than TURP, but a similar probability between these procedures. Retrospective design and a lack of relevant clinical data were the main limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past decade, there has been a progressive increase in the adoption of NSTs. The rate of surgical retreatment appears <10%, with patients undergoing SP and HoLEP/ThuLEP experiencing a statistically significantly lower probability of surgical retreatment.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We investigated the trends, costs, and surgical retreatments of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Transurethral resection of the prostate remains the most common procedure. Novel surgical treatments are associated with an upward trend, despite appearing more expensive overall. Retreatment is necessary in <10% of patients and generally within 5 yr.

Advances in Outpatient Therapies and Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Comprehensive Review for Men's Health

Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) affects a large number of men and can be treated with behavioral, medical, or surgical treatments. The newest addition to medical therapy is β3-agonists for overactive lower urinary tract symptoms. Multiple new surgical treatments have become available in the past decade, including several clinic-based minimally invasive surgical techniques (eg, UroLift, Rezum, Optilume BPH), OR treatments (eg, Aquablation, single port robotics), and prostate artery embolization. The growth of options allows providers to better tailor BPH treatment to the specific disease factors and patient preferences.

Comparison of perioperative and short-terms outcomes of en-bloc Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has seen an evolution during the last decades. On one hand, en-bloc HoLEP emerged as a valid endoscopic treatment regardless prostate size. On the other hand, robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has gained attention in larger prostates showing encouraging results. Herein, for the first time in the scientific scenario, we sought to compare the outcomes of RASP and en-bloc HoLEP cases after propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively queried our prospectively database of patients treated with HoLEP or RASP between 2017 and 2022 among two high-volume centers. PSM was applied based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, prostate volume and max-flow rate. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon per center. Outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, and 6-month postoperatively and therefore annually. Trifecta definition was used to assess "success" in surgical procedures and was defined as the contemporary presence of: a) no postoperative complications within the first postoperative month; b) 1-month postoperative Qmax >15 ml/s and c) no urinary incontinence at 3-month evaluation.

RESULTS

Overall, 48 HoLEP and 47 RASPs were matched. Operative time, hospitalization time (median 4 vs 5 days) and catheterization time (median 3 vs 2 day) were found to be shorter in the HoLEP group as compared to the counterpart (p < 0.05). Early postoperative complication rate was also lower in the HoLEP cohort (6.2% vs 12.6%; p = 0.03) as well as postoperative haemoglobine blood level drop (1.4 vs 2.4 g/dL; p = 0.03). On the other hand, postoperative antegrade ejaculation (55.3% vs 6.8%) 1-month max flow (median 28 vs 24 ml/sec) and continence rates (0% vs 20.8%) favored RASP (p < 0.05). Overall, Trifecta rate was similar in the two groups (76.1% vs 82.6%).

CONCLUSION

Both HoLEP and RASP are safe and effective treatments for symptomatic BPH. HoLEP demonstrated to have lower perioperative risks while is affecting by a higher probability of transient early UI. On the other hand, RASP is more effective in reducing postoperative ejaculatory dysfunction.

Incidence and management of BPH surgery-related urethral stricture: results from a large U.S. database

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Urethral stricture (US) is a well-known complication after surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study aimed to evaluate the contemporary incidence of the US after different types of BPH surgery, to identify associated risk factors and to assess its management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the PearlDiver™ Mariner database, containing de-identified patient records compiled between 2011 and 2022. Specific International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were employed to identify population characteristics and outcomes. All the most employed surgical procedures for BPH treatment were considered. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to evaluate factors associated with diagnosis of post-operative US.

RESULTS

Among 274,808 patients who underwent BPH surgery, 10,918 developed post-operative US (3.97%) within 12 months. Higher incidence of US was observed following TURP (4.48%), Transurethral Incision of the Prostate (TUIP) (3.67%), Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP) (3.92%), HoLEP/ThuLEP (3.85%), and open Simple Prostatectomy (SP) (3.21%). Lower incidence rates were observed after laparoscopic\robot-assisted SP (1.76%), Aquablation (1.59%), Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) (1.07%), Rezum (1.05%), and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) (0.65%). Multivariable analysis showed that patients undergoing PUL, Rezum, Aquablation, PAE, and PVP were associated with a reduced likelihood of developing US compared to TURP. US required surgical treatment in 18.95% of patients, with direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) and urethroplasty performed in 14.55% and 4.50% of cases, respectively. Urethral dilatation (UD) in an outpatient setting was the primary management in most cases (76.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present analysis from a contemporary large dataset suggests that the incidence of US after BPH surgery is relatively low (<5%) and varies among procedures. Around 94% of US cases following BPH surgery are managed using minimally invasive treatment approaches such as UD and DVIU.

Revisiting the issue of "beach balls" in holmium laser enucleation of prostate: clinical and histological characterization

PURPOSE

To clinically and histologically characterize prostatic nodules resistant to morcellation ("beach balls," BBs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive cohort of 559 holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) procedures performed between January 2020 and November 2023. The BBs group comprised 55 men (10%) and the control group comprised 504 men (90%). The clinical, intraoperative, outcome, and histologic data were statistically processed for the prediction of the presence of BBs and their influence on the perioperative course and outcome.

RESULTS

The BBs group in comparison to the controls was older (75 vs 73 years, respectively, p = 0.009) and had higher rates of chronic retention (51 vs 29%, p = 0.001), larger prostates on preoperative abdominal ultrasound (AUS) (140 vs 80 cc, p = 0.006E-16), longer operating time (120 vs 80 min, p = 0.001), higher weights of removed tissue (101 vs 60 gr, p = 0.008E-10), higher complication rates (5 vs 1%, p = 0.03), and longer hospitalization (p = 0.014). A multivariate analysis revealed that larger prostates on preoperative AUS and older age independently predicted the presence of BBs which would prolong operating time. ROC analyses revealed that a threshold of 103 cc on AUS predicted BBs with 94% sensitivity and 84% specificity. BBs were mostly characterized histologically by stromal component (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

BBs are expected in older patients and cases of chronic retention. Prostatic volume is the most reliable predictor of their presence. They contribute to prolonged operating time and increased risk of complications. The predominantly stromal composition of the BBs apparently confers their resistance to morcellation.

Incidence of complications and urinary incontinence following endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in men with a prostate volume of 80 ml and above: results from a multicenter, real-world experience of 2512 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate complications and urinary incontinence (UI) after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) stratified by prostate volume (PV).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with different energy sources in 14 centers (January 2019-January 2023).

INCLUSION CRITERIA

prostate volume ≥ 80 ml.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, pelvic radiotherapy.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

complication rate.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

incidence of and factors affecting postoperative UI. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1: PV = 80-100 ml; Group 2 PV = 101-200 ml; Group 3 PV > 200 ml. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent predictors of overall incontinence.

RESULTS

There were 486 patients in Group 1, 1830 in Group 2, and 196 in Group 3. The most commonly used energy was high-power Holmium laser followed by Thulium fiber laser in all groups. Enucleation, morcellation, and total surgical time were significantly longer in Group 2. There was no significant difference in overall 30-day complications and readmission rates. Incontinence incidence was similar (12.1% in Group 1 vs. 13.2% in Group 2 vs. 11.7% in Group 3, p = 0.72). The rate of stress and mixed incontinence was higher in Group 1. Multivariable regression analysis showed that age (OR 1.019 95% CI 1.003-1.035) was the only factor significantly associated with higher odds of incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

PV has no influence on complication and UI rates following EEP. Age is risk factor of postoperative UI.

High-power holmium laser versus thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in patients with glands larger than 80 ml: Results from the Prostate Endoscopic EnucLeation study group

Background

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has gained acceptance as an equitable alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Our primary aim is to compare peri-operative outcomes of EEP using thulium fiber laser (TFL) against high-power holmium laser (HPHL) in hands of experienced surgeons for large prostates (≥80 ml in volume). Secondary outcomes were assess complications within 1 year of follow up.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with TFL or HPHL in 13 centers (January 2019-January 2023). Patients with prostate volume ≥80 ml were included, while those with concomitant prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, and pelvic radiotherapy were excluded.

Results

Of 1,929 included patients, HPHL was utilized in 1,459 and TFL in 470. After propensity score matching (PSM) for baseline characteristics, 247 patients from each group were analyzed. Overall operative time (90 [70, 120] vs. 52.5 [39, 93] min, P < 0.001) and enucleation time (90 [70, 105] vs. 38 [25, 70] min, P < 0.001) were longer in the TFL group, with comparable morcellation time (13 [10, 19.5] vs. 13 [10, 16.5] min, P = 0.914). In terms of postoperative outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day complications such as acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection or sepsis. In the PSM cohort, univariable analyses showed that higher age, lower preoperative Qmax, higher preoperative PVRU, and longer operation time were associated with higher odds of postoperative incontinence, while 2-lobe enucleation had lower odds of incontinence compared to 3-lobe enucleation.

Conclusions

This real-world study reaffirms that HPHL and TFL in large prostates are equally efficacious in terms of 30-day complications. TFL with the en-bloc technique has a shorter operative time which significantly improves short- and medium-term functional outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of transurethral thulium laser enucleation versus robot-assisted prostatectomy for large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To compare perioperative outcomes between Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robotic-assisted simple pasta-ectomy (RASP)for large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia(> 80 ml). In August 2023, we undertook a comprehensive search of major global databases including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, focusing solely on articles written in English. Studies that were merely reviews or protocols without any specific published data were omitted. Furthermore, articles that comprised conference abstracts or content not pertinent to our subject of study were also disregarded. To calculate the inverse variances and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables' mean differences, we employed the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel approach along with random-effects models. The findings were denoted in the form of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. A p-value less than 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance. Our finalized meta-analysis incorporated six articles, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and five cohort studies. These studies accounted for a total of 1218 patients, 944 of whom underwent Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and 274 who underwent Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP). The pooled analysis from these six papers demonstrated that compared to RASP, HoLEP had a shorter hospital stay, shorter catheterization duration, and a lower blood transfusion rate. Moreover, HoLEP patients exhibited a smaller reduction in postoperative hemoglobin levels. Statistically, there were no significant differences between the two procedures regarding operative time, postoperative PSA, the weight of prostate specimens, IPSS, Qmax, PVR, QoL, and postoperative complications. (HoLEP) and (RASP) are both effective and safe procedures for treating large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia. HoLEP, with its benefits of shorter catheterization and hospitalization duration, lesser decline in postoperative hemoglobin, and reduced blood transfusion needs, stands as a preferred choice for treating extensive prostate enlargement. However, further validation through more high-quality clinical randomized trials is required.

Advances in lasers for the minimally invasive treatment of upper and lower urinary tract conditions: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Technological advancements in laser lithotripsy are expanding into numerous fields of urology, like ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and benign and malignant soft-tissue treatments. Since the amount of research regarding lasers in urology has grown exponentially, we present a systematic review of the most recent and relevant advances encompassing all lasers used in urological endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using PubMed (May 2023) to obtain information about lasers for urological purposes. We included only recent data from published articles between 2021 and 2023 or articles ahead of print.

RESULTS

Lasers are widely used in lithotripsy for ureteric, renal, and bladder stones, benign prostate surgery, and bladder and upper tract tumor ablation. While the holmium (Ho:YAG) laser is still predominant, there seems to be more emphasis on pulse modulation and newer lasers such as thulium fiber laser (TFL) and pulsed Tm:YAG laser.

CONCLUSION

The use of lasers and related technological innovations have shown increasing versatility, and over time have proven to be invaluable in the management of stone lithotripsy, treatment of benign and malignant prostate diseases, and urothelial tumors. Laser endoscopic treatment is heavily based on technological nuances, and it is essential to know at least the basics of these technologies. Ultimately the choice of laser used depends on its availability, cost, surgeon experience and expertise.

Does Resectoscope Sheath Size Influence Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Outcomes? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is routinely performed with a 24F, 26F, or a 28F scope. Proponents of the larger scopes propose that a bigger sheath size allows for superior flow and visibility leading to a more efficient operation and better hemostasis. Those utilizing the smaller scopes suggest that the smaller sheath is less traumatic, resulting in lower stricture rates and temporary incontinence. We sought to compare outcomes of ambulatory HoLEP using the 24F and 28F laser scope. Materials and Methods: From May 2022 to March 2023, we randomized patients undergoing HoLEP (<200 cm3 in size) 1:1 to either a 24F or 28F scope. The primary outcome was differences in surgical duration between groups (minutes). Secondary outcomes included surgeon scope evaluation and postoperative patient results. Results: There was no difference in patient characteristics in those randomized to 28F (n = 76) vs 24F (n = 76) (p > 0.05) scopes. Procedural duration and efficiencies were not different between groups (all p > 0.05). The 28F scope was associated with improved surgeon-graded irrigation flow and visibility (p < 0.001). Patients treated with the 28F scope were more likely to achieve effective same-day trial of void (SDTOV) (28F 94.3% vs 24F 82.1%, p = 0.048) and have a shorter length of stay (LOS) (28F 7.0 vs 24F 11.9 hours, p = 0.014), however, rates of same-day discharge (SDD) were not statistically different (28F 87.8% vs 24F 78.4%, p = 0.126). There was no difference between the cohorts in rates of 90-day emergency room presentations, re-admissions, complications, or functional ouctomes (p > 0.05). Conclusions: We identified no clear advantage of scope size with regard to intraoperative or postoperative outcomes at 3-month follow-up due to scope size. However, if SDD is part of your postoperative pathway, the 28F scope may shorten LOS and increase rates of effective SDTOV. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05308017.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy and laser enucleation of prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia

Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) and robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) are two main treatment methods for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but the superiority between these two methods in treating large BPH is currently unclear. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and the safety of LEP and RASP in treating large BPH. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that compared safety and efficacy outcomes of both LEP and RASP. Review Manager 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis. Six studies with a total of 1235 patients were included in the analysis. Resected adenoma weight was similar in LEP than RASP group. Operative time [mean difference (MD) - 67.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 131.66 to - 4.25; p = 0.04], catheterization time (MD -6.31; 95% CI - 9.44 to - 3.18; p < 0.0001), and length of stay (MD - 2.44; 95% CI - 3.55 to - 1.34; p < 0.0001) were lower in LEP. The International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, prostate-specific antigen, and post-void residual urine volume were also comparable between two groups. Furthermore, LEP demonstrated lesser hemoglobin decrease (MD - 0.50; 95% CI - 0.96 to - 0.05; p = 0.03), lower blood transfusion rate [odd ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.66; p = 0.006], and lower rate of Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ 3 complications (OR 0.435, 95% CI 0.189-0.998; p = 0.049). Finally, there was no significant difference in overall complications between two groups. Current evidence shows that LEP offers favorable perioperative outcomes compared with RASP. However, there was no conclusive evidence that LEP was advantaged in terms of efficacy outcomes.

Mini-HoLEP (MILEP) vs HoLEP: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Minimal invasiveness improves outcome in many surgical fields including urology. We aimed to assess intraoperative performance and clinical outcome of miniaturized holmium laser enucleation of prostate (MiLEP) (22FR).

METHODS

We ran a propensity score-matched analysis among all consecutive laser enucleations of prostate performed between 9/2022 and 2/2023. It resulted in two matched comparison groups: MiLEP 22 FR (n = 40) and holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP 26 Fr) (n = 40). Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

MiLEP was associated with significantly less intraoperative irrigation (20.5 L vs 15 L, p = 0.002E-3), less decrease in body core temperature (0.6°C vs 0.1°C, p = 0.003E-5), and less need for meatal dilation (25% vs 78%, p = 0.01E-3). These parameters were identified as being independent in the multivariate analysis. There was a trend toward less and a shorter period of postoperative stress incontinence (SI) for the MiLEP group compared to the HoLEP group: 15% and 42% (p = 0.01) at 1 month, 8% and 14% (p = 0.07) at 2 months, and 0 and 0.3% (p = 1) at 3 months, respectively. There were no differences in prostatic enucleation effectiveness, operative time, hospital stay, complications, and improvement in the international prostate symptom score and quality of life score.

CONCLUSIONS

MiLEP is feasible and provides better maintenance of body core temperature, reduction in amount of fluid irrigation, and decrease in need for meatal dilation without affecting effectiveness in comparison with HoLEP. MiLEP may reduce early postoperative stress incontinence, thereby shortening the recovery period.