Immunotherapy for prostate cancer using prostatic acid phosphatase loaded antigen presenting cells

Ectophosphatase activity in the triple-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in the female population worldwide, and its development is thought to be associated with genetic mutations that lead to uncontrolled and accelerated growth of breast cells. This abnormal behavior requires extra energy, and indeed, tumor cells display a rewired energy metabolism compared to normal breast cells. Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is a glycolytic substrate of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and has an important role in cancer cell proliferation. For cells to obtain Pi, ectoenzymes in the plasma membrane with their catalytic site facing the extracellular environment can hydrolyze phosphorylated molecules, and this is an initial and possibly limiting step for the uptake of Pi by carriers that behave as adjuvants in the process of energy harvesting and thus partially contributes to tumor energy requirements. In this study, the activity of an ectophosphatase in MDA-MB-231 cells was biochemically characterized, and the results showed that the activity of this enzyme was higher in the acidic pH range and that the enzyme had a K_m  = 4.5 ± 0.5 mM para-nitrophenylphosphate and a V_max  = 2280 ± 158 nM × h^-1  × mg protein^-1 . In addition, classical acid phosphatase inhibitors, including sodium orthovanadate, decreased enzymatic activity. Sodium orthovanadate was able to inhibit ectophosphatase activity while also inhibiting cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration, which are important processes in tumor progression, especially in metastatic breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells that have higher ectophosphatase activity than MCF-7 and MCF-10 breast cells.

Trial watch: Naked and vectored DNA-based anticancer vaccines

One type of anticancer vaccine relies on the administration of DNA constructs encoding one or multiple tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). The ultimate objective of these preparations, which can be naked or vectored by non-pathogenic viruses, bacteria or yeast cells, is to drive the synthesis of TAAs in the context of an immunostimulatory milieu, resulting in the (re-)elicitation of a tumor-targeting immune response. In spite of encouraging preclinical results, the clinical efficacy of DNA-based vaccines employed as standalone immunotherapeutic interventions in cancer patients appears to be limited. Thus, efforts are currently being devoted to the development of combinatorial regimens that allow DNA-based anticancer vaccines to elicit clinically relevant immune responses. Here, we discuss recent advances in the preclinical and clinical development of this therapeutic paradigm.

A molecular description of acid phosphatase

Acid phosphatase is ubiquitous in distribution in various organisms. Although it catalyzes simple hydrolytic reactions, it is considered as an interesting enzyme in biological systems due to its involvement in different physiological activities. However, earlier reviews on acid phosphatase reveal some fragmentary information and do not give a holistic view on this enzyme. So, the present review summarizes studies on biochemical properties, structure, catalytic mechanism, and applications of acid phosphatase. Recent advancement of acid phosphatase in agricultural and clinical fields is emphasized where it is presented as potent agent for sustainable agricultural practices and diagnostic marker in bone metabolic disorders. Also, its significance in prostate cancer therapies as a therapeutic target has been discussed. At the end, current studies and prospects of immobilized acid phosphatase are included.

Update: immunological strategies for prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in US men. Along with initial therapy using surgery, radiotherapy, or cryotherapy, hormonal therapy is the mainstay of treatment. For men with advanced (metastatic) disease, docetaxel-based chemotherapy is US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, and provides a significant survival advantage. This relative paucity of treatment options drives an ongoing quest for additional treatment modalities; among these is immunotherapy. The concept that prostate cancer is a malignancy that can be targeted by the immune system may seem counterintuitive; certainly kidney cancer and melanoma are more traditionally thought of as immune responsive cancers. However, prostate cancer arises in a relatively unique organ and may express a number of proteins (antigens) against which an immune response can be generated. More importantly, several of these agents have now demonstrated a significant survival benefit in randomized controlled clinical trials, and one agent in particular (Sipuleucel-T, Dendreon Corporation, Seattle, WA) could be FDA-approved in 2010. This update summarizes recent clinical developments in the field of prostate cancer immunotherapy, with a focus on dendritic cell vaccines, virus-based vaccines, DNA-based vaccines, and cell-based vaccines. In addition, the notion of agents that target immune checkpoints is introduced. Enthusiasm for prostate cancer immunotherapy is founded upon its potential to mediate targeted, specific, tumor cell destruction without significant systemic toxicity; however, this has yet to be fully realized in the clinical arena.

HLA Class II Antigen Presentation in Prostate Cancer Cells: A Novel Approach to Prostate Tumor Immunotherapy

Prostate cancer is a deadly disease that is in drastic need of new treatment strategies for late stage and metastatic prostate cancer. Immunotherapy has emerged as a viable option to fill this void. Clinical trials have been conducted that induce tumor clearance through cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activation, these studies have had mixed outcomes with the overlying problem being the lack of a complete immune response with sustained killing and the formation of tumor specific memory cells. To overcome this, we have outlined the need for activating the HLA class II pathway in inducing a sustained CD8+ T cell response and the development of effective memory. We have also discussed the ability of prostate cancer cells to express stable HLA class II molecules that can be manipulated for tumor antigen (Ag) processing and presentation. This review also sets to outline new directions that exist for the use of class II-restricted Ags/peptides in devising cancer vaccines as well as combined chemoimmunotherapy. A better understanding of these concepts will improve future cancer vaccine studies and further the field of cancer immunobiology.

Cellular immunotherapy of cancer

Standard therapies for many common cancers remain toxic and are often ineffective. Cellular immunotherapy has the potential to be a highly targeted alternative, with low toxicity to normal tissues but a high capacity to eradicate tumor. In this chapter we describe approaches that generate cellular therapies using active immunization with cells, proteins, peptides, or nucleic acids, as well as efforts that use adoptive transfer of effector cells that directly target antigens on malignant cells. Many of these approaches are proving successful in hematologic malignancy and in melanoma. In this chapter we discuss the advantages and limitations of each and how over the next decade investigators will attempt to broaden their reach, increase their efficacy, and simplify their application.

Tumor-Associated Antigens and Biomarkers in Cancer and Immune Therapy

Cancer has currently overtaken heart disease as the major cause of mortality in the United States. The Human Genome Project, advances in informatics, miniaturization of sample collection, and increased knowledge of cell signaling pathways has revolutionized the study of disease. Genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics are currently being used to develop molecular signatures for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic efficacy. Tumor-associated antigens discovered by these methods are being used to develop passive (humoral) as well as active immunotherapy strategies to stimulate the immune system. Development and validation of biomarkers on a parallel track with therapeutics can speed development times by accurate screening of patient populations and substituting surrogate markers that correlate well with clinical outcomes.

Measuring therapeutic efficacy in the changing paradigm of castrate-resistant prostate cancer

One of the current challenges in the evaluation of novel agents for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer is the identification of a surrogate end point for overall survival (OS). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have been used as a screening tool and a biomarker of response to both hormonal and cytotoxic agents. However, PSA levels do not seem to be a suitable surrogate end point for OS in trials of targeted agents for castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). These findings suggest the need for adopting measures of efficacy that more accurately reflect the mechanisms of action of these agents in phase II trials, in order to realize improvements in OS in the phase III setting. The Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) have recently made recommendations for the design of future trials and advised that PSA levels should not be the sole criterion on which to base clinical decisions. Here, we appraise the end points that have been used in phase II and III trials in patients with CRPC, and highlight the need for the adoption of the PCWG2 guidelines, the recommendations of which include radiographic imaging, in addition to bone scintigraphy, and symptomatic or radiographic disease progression criteria.

Molecular markers in prostate cancer. Part II: potential roles in management

Predicting treatment responses in advanced prostate cancer (PCa) currently centres on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics and on being able to visualize measurable changes in imaging modalities. New molecular markers have emerged as potential diagnostic and prognostic indicators; these were summarized in Part I of this review in the Asian Journal of Andrology. A number of molecular markers are now being used to enhance PCa imaging and staging. However, management options for advanced and hormone-resistant PCa (HRPC) are limited and additional therapeutic options are needed. Molecular markers have been proposed as potential therapeutic targets using gene therapy and immunomodulation. Additionally, markers identified in early PCa and precursor lesions may offer novel targets for chemoprevention and vaccine development. This review summarizes the current advances regarding the roles of these markers in the management of PCa.

Phase 1/2 dose-escalation study of a GM-CSF-secreting, allogeneic, cellular immunotherapy for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

This open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study evaluated multiple dose levels of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The immunotherapy, based on the GVAX platform, consisted of 2 allogeneic prostate-carcinoma cell lines modified to secrete granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

METHODS

Dose levels ranged from 100 x 10(6) cells q28d x 6 to 500 x 10(6) cells prime/300 x 10(6) cells boost q14d x 11. Endpoints included safety, immunogenicity, overall survival, radiologic response, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, and serum GM-CSF pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Eighty men, median age 69 years (range, 49-90 years), were treated. The most common adverse effect was injection-site erythema. Overall, the immunotherapy was well tolerated. A maximal tolerated dose was not established. The median survival time was 35.0 months in the high-dose group, 20.0 months in the mid-dose, group, and 23.1 months in the low-dose group. PSA stabilization occurred in 15 (19%) patients, and a >50% decline in PSA was seen in 1 patient. The proportion of patients who generated an antibody response to 1 or both cell lines increased with dose and included 10 of 23 (43%) in the low-dose group, 13 of 18 (72%) in the mid-dose group, and 16 of 18 (89%) in the high-dose group (P = .002; Cochran-Armitage trend test).

CONCLUSIONS

This immunotherapy was well tolerated. Immunogenicity and overall survival varied by dose. Two phase 3 trials in patients with metastatic HRPC are underway.

Current immunotherapeutic strategies in prostate cancer

For men who have hormone-refractory prostate cancer, current treatment options are somewhat limited, with docetaxel the only agent showing a significant prolongation of survival. Several groups have investigated therapeutic approaches involving stimulation of an immune response against progressive prostate cancer. Several features of prostate cancer suggest that it may be a good target for immunotherapy. Constant pressure by the immune system forces tumors to evolve multiple ways to escape immune assault, however, and it is thus unlikely that single-agent immunotherapy for prostate cancer will achieve maximal clinical benefit. Most likely, successful immunotherapy will eventually require either the combination of multiple immunologic approaches or the combination of immunologic approaches with conventional therapy.

Dendritic cell vaccination

There has been a surge of interest in the use of dendritic cell (DC) vaccination as cellular immunotherapy for numerous cancers. Despite some encouraging results, this therapeutic modality is far from being considered as a therapy for cancer. This review will first discuss preclinical DC vaccination in murine models of cancer, with an emphasis on comparative studies investigating different methods of antigen priming. We will then comment on the various murine DC subsets and how these relate to human DC preparations used for clinical studies. Finally, the methodology used to generate human DCs and some recent clinical trials in several cancers are reviewed.

Prostatic Acid Phosphatase Is Not a Prostate Specific Target

Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) is currently evaluated as a target for vaccine immunotherapy of prostate cancer. This is based on the previous knowledge about secretory PAP and its high prostatic expression. We describe a novel PAP spliced variant mRNA encoding a type I transmembrane (TM) protein with the extracellular NH(2)-terminal phosphatase activity and the COOH-terminal lysosomal targeting signal (YxxPhi). TM-PAP is widely expressed in nonprostatic tissues like brain, kidney, liver, lung, muscle, placenta, salivary gland, spleen, thyroid, and thymus. TM-PAP is also expressed in fibroblast, Schwann, and LNCaP cells, but not in PC-3 cells. In well-differentiated human prostate cancer tissue specimens, the expression of secretory PAP, but not TM-PAP, is significantly decreased. TM-PAP is localized in the plasma membrane-endosomal-lysosomal pathway and is colocalized with the lipid raft marker flotillin-1. No cytosolic PAP is detected. We conclude that the wide expression of TM-PAP in, for instance, neuronal and muscle tissues must be taken into account in the design of PAP-based immunotherapy approaches.

Identification of HLA-DRB1*1501-restricted T-cell epitopes from human prostatic acid phosphatase

BACKGROUND

The crucial role of CD4 T-cells in anti-tumor immune response is widely recognized, yet the identification of HLA class II-restricted epitopes derived from tumor antigens has lagged behind compared to class I epitopes. This is particularly true for prostate cancer. Based on the hypothesis that successful cancer immunotherapy will likely resemble autoimmunity, we searched for the CD4 T-cell epitopes derived from prostatic proteins that are restricted by human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1*1501, an allele associated with granulomatous prostatitis (GP), a disease that may have an autoimmune etiology. One of the antigens implicated in the development of autoimmunity in the prostate is prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), which is also considered a promising target for prostate cancer immunotherapy.

METHODS

We immunized transgenic (tg) mice engineered to express HLA-DRB1*1501 with human PAP. A library of overlapping 20-mer peptides spanning the entire human PAP sequence was screened in vitro for T-cell recognition by proliferative and interferon (IFN)-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays.

RESULTS

We identified two 20-mer peptides, PAP (133-152), and PAP (173-192), that were immunogenic and naturally processed from whole PAP in HLA-DRB1*1501 tg mice. These peptides were also capable of stimulating CD4 T lymphocytes from HLA-DRB1*1501-positive patients with GP and normal donors.

CONCLUSIONS

These peptides can be used for the design of a new generation of peptide-based vaccines against prostate cancer. The study can also be helpful in understanding the role of autoimmunity in the development of some forms of chronic prostatitis.

Standard treatments induce antigen-specific immune responses in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Prostate tumors express antigens that are recognized by the immune system in a significant proportion of patients; however, little is known about the effect of standard treatments on tumor-specific immunity. Radiation therapy induces expression of inflammatory and immune-stimulatory molecules, and neoadjuvant hormone therapy causes prominent T-cell infiltration of prostate tumors. We therefore hypothesized that radiation therapy and hormone therapy may initiate tumor-specific immune responses.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Pretreatment and posttreatment serum samples from 73 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer and 50 cancer-free controls were evaluated by Western blotting and SEREX (serological identification of antigens by recombinant cDNA expression cloning) antigen arrays to examine whether autoantibody responses to tumor proteins arose during the course of standard treatment.

RESULTS

Western blotting revealed the development of treatment-associated autoantibody responses in patients undergoing neoadjuvant hormone therapy (7 of 24, 29.2%), external beam radiation therapy (4 of 29, 13.8%), and brachytherapy (5 of 20, 25%), compared with 0 of 14 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and 2 of 36 (5.6%) controls. Responses were seen within 4 to 9 months of initiation of treatment and were equally prevalent across different disease risk groups. Similarly, in the murine Shionogi tumor model, hormone therapy induced tumor-associated autoantibody responses in 5 of 10 animals. In four patients, SEREX immunoscreening of a prostate cancer cDNA expression library identified several antigens recognized by treatment-associated autoantibodies, including PARP1, ZNF707 + PTMA, CEP78, SDCCAG1, and ODF2.

CONCLUSION

We show for the first time that standard treatments induce antigen-specific immune responses in prostate cancer patients. Thus, immunologic mechanisms may contribute to clinical outcomes after hormone and radiation therapy, an effect that could potentially be exploited as a practical, personalized form of immunotherapy.

Immunology and immunotherapy approaches for prostate cancer

Several mechanisms that impair the immune response to promote tumour progression are reported. These mechanisms aim to reduce the ability of antigen-presenting cells to present antigen and activate naïve T cells to support an active immune response or to create a suppressive environment that induce non-functional tumour-associated antigen-specific T cells. Prostate cancer (PC) alone accounts for 33% of incident cancer cases and about 9% of all cancer-related deaths among men in the USA during 2006. Whereas androgen deprivation has remained the first line of therapy for advanced PC, other therapies are still required due to progression to an androgen-resistant state and eventually loss of control in patients receiving hormonal therapy. Immunotherapy seems to be a promising approach to enhance tumour-specific T-cell responses in different cancers including prostate. More importantly, clinical trials in advanced PC patients have shown that immunotherapy may generate significant clinical responses. Immunology and immunotherapy aspects of PC with focus on prostate-specific antigen will be presented.

Update on multi-center clinical trials in the United States

This article reviews numerous multi-center clinical trials, either ongoing or in planning stages, which involve diverse clinical applications and emerging technologies in apheresis and transfusion medicine. The investigations summarized herein involve the following specific areas: platelet dosing strategy, thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura, inflammatory bowel disease, seven-day platelet storage, dendritic cell vaccines, and age-related macular degeneration.