Renal oncocytoma—are there sufficient grounds to consider surveillance following prenephrectomy histologic diagnosis

Molecular Characterization of Metastatic Oncocytoma With Exceptional Response to Treatment: A Case Report

Comprehensive molecular characterization and effective therapy in a rare case of metastatic renal oncocytoma.

Renal Oncocytoma: The Diagnostic Challenge to Unmask the Double of Renal Cancer

Renal oncocytoma represents the most common type of benign neoplasm that is an increasing concern for urologists, oncologists, and nephrologists due to its difficult differential diagnosis and frequent overtreatment. It displays a variable neoplastic parenchymal and stromal architecture, and the defining cellular element is a large polygonal, granular, eosinophilic, mitochondria-rich cell known as an oncocyte. The real challenge in the oncocytoma treatment algorithm is related to the misdiagnosis due to its resemblance, at an initial radiological assessment, to malignant renal cancers with a completely different prognosis and medical treatment. Unfortunately, percutaneous renal biopsy is not frequently performed due to the possible side effects related to the procedure. Therefore, the majority of oncocytoma are diagnosed after the surgical operation via partial or radical nephrectomy. For this reason, new reliable strategies to solve this issue are needed. In our review, we will discuss the clinical implications of renal oncocytoma in daily clinical practice with a particular focus on the medical diagnosis and treatment and on the potential of novel promising molecular biomarkers such as circulating microRNAs to distinguish between a benign and a malignant lesion.

Bilateral Renal Oncocytoma: Active Surveillance Versus Partial Nephrectomy

Renal oncocytomas (ROs) are benign tumors comprising 16% of renal masses. Due to the overlapping phenotypes seen in RO and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and lack of specific clinical and laboratory characteristics of RO, physicians face a challenge when arriving at a definitive diagnosis of RO. ROs additionally appear indistinct from RCCs on CT scan, contributing further to the difficulty of arriving at a clear diagnosis of RO. 

This is a case report of a 66-year-old man who presented with flank pain found to be related to bilateral ROs and underwent bilateral partial nephrectomies.

ROs are benign small renal masses that often pose a diagnostic challenge since preoperative diagnosis can be difficult to achieve. Given advancements in technology, active surveillance with core renal biopsy is a promising approach to accurately diagnose and manage ROs conservatively. The application of these techniques has wide-reaching implications for patients and physicians by reducing the need for a potentially harmful surgery and creating a cost-effective way to manage a diagnosis.

Validation of aorta-lesion-attenuation difference on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan to differentiate between malignant and benign oncocytic renal tumors

OBJECTIVES

We previously noted that the aorta-lesion-attenuation difference (ALAD) determined on CT scan discriminated well between chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma. The current evaluation seeks to validate these initial findings in a second cohort of nephrectomy patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of preoperative CT scans and surgical pathology was performed on patients undergoing nephrectomy for small, solid renal masses. ALAD was calculated by measuring the difference in Hounsfield units (HU) between the aorta and the lesion of interest on the same image slice on preoperative CT scan. The discriminative ability of ALAD to differentiate malignant pathology from oncocytoma was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under curve (AUC) using ROC analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one preoperative CT scans and corresponding pathology reports were reviewed and included in the validation cohort. ALAD values were calculated during the excretory and nephrographic phases. Compared to the training cohort, patients in the validation cohort were significantly older (62 versus 59 years old), had larger tumors (3.7 versus 2.7 cm), and higher stage disease (59% versus 79% T1a disease). Nephrographic ALAD was able to differentiate malignant pathology from oncocytoma in the training and validation cohorts with a sensitivity of 84% versus 73%, specificity of 86% and 67%, PPV of 98% versus 91%, and NPV of 33% versus 35%. The AUC for malignant pathology versus oncocytoma in the validation cohort was 0.72 (95% CI 0.63-0.82). Nephrographic ALAD was able to differentiate chromophobe RCC from oncocytoma in the training and validation cohorts with a sensitivity of 100% versus 67%, specificity of 86% versus 67%, PPV of 75% versus 43%, and NPV of 100% versus 84%. The AUC for chromophobe RCC versus oncocytoma in the validation cohort was 0.72 (95% CI 0.48-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

The ability of ALAD to discriminate between chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma was diminished in the validation cohort compared to the training cohort, but remained significant. The current findings support further investigation in the role of ALAD in the management of patients with indeterminate diagnoses of oncocytic neoplasm.

Palpable Abdominal Mass is a Renal Oncocytoma: Not All Large Renal Masses are Malignant

A 59-year-old woman presented with abdominal pain and a palpable abdominal mass. Initial imaging revealed a 14cm solid, enhancing renal mass and suspicion for liver and bone metastases. Family history included a brother with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and mother with glioblastoma multiforme. After liver biopsy was inconclusive, she underwent radical nephrectomy with final pathologic diagnosis of oncocytoma. Renal oncocytoma is the most common benign renal tumor but remains difficult to distinguish clinically and radiographically from renal cell carcinoma. Should urologists use renal mass biopsy even more frequently prior to surgical intervention?

Treatment approaches to small renal masses in patients of advanced age (≥75 years)

The elderly population is increasing in Turkey and across the world. With the frequent use of imaging modalities, the detection rate of coincidental small renal mass has also increased. Since small renal masses are generally not malignant, most of them can be followed up by active surveillance. In the current study, we examined the treatment options that can be offered to elderly patients with small renal masses. The optimum treatment method for patients of advanced age presenting with renal masses should be determined based on the presence of comorbidities such as age, renal function, and tumor characteristics.

Current Role of Renal Biopsy in Urologic Practice

Most small renal masses (SRMs) are indolent. In fact, only approximately 80% of SRMs are malignant. Furthermore, SRMs are commonly detected in elderly and comorbid patients. Therefore, opportunities for better care intensity calibration exist. Renal mass biopsy (RMB), when appropriately used, is a valuable clinical tool to help with critical clinical decision-making in patients with SRM. This article summarizes the role of modern RMB in helping gauge care for patients with SRM.

Surgical histopathology for suspected oncocytoma on renal mass biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To estimate the proportion of oncocytic renal neoplasms diagnosed on renal mass biopsy (RMB) confirmed on surgical pathology, a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane databases (1997 to 1 July 2016) was conducted quantifying all cases of reported oncocytic renal neoplasms on RMB suggestive of an oncocytoma. In addition, institutional data was assessed to identify additional cases. Concordance with surgical histopathology (positive predictive value [PPV]) was evaluated for patients undergoing surgery by performing a meta-analysis. In all, 10 RMB series, including institutional data, were included in the meta-analysis with 205 RMBs identifying oncocytic renal neoplasms and 46 (22.4%) proceeding to surgery. One additional study identified two neoplasms not captured by the primary RMB series for a total of 48 unique lesions included in the analysis. Surgical pathology showed oncocytoma (64.6%), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC; 12.5%), other RCC (12.5%), hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumour (6.3%), and other benign lesions (4.2%). PPV of oncocytoma on RMB was 67% (95% confidence interval 34-94%) with significant heterogeneity between studies (I² = 71.8%, P < 0.01). Risk of bias was judged to be low for four of the 10 series. Confidently diagnosing a localised renal mass as a benign lesion, such as an oncocytoma, has implications for the ultimate management strategy a patient will undergo. RMB was found to be unreliable in confidently diagnosing a localised renal mass as an oncocytoma, with one in four found to be RCC on surgical pathology. Patients and physicians should be aware of the uncertainty in diagnosis when considering management strategies.

Dilemmas in diagnosis and natural history of renal oncocytoma and implications for management

INTRODUCTION

Oncocytomas have traditionally been treated with surgical excision; however, their excellent long-term prognosis has popularized conservative and minimally invasive ablative techniques. We evaluated the evolving management and natural history of renal oncocytomas and investigated the relationship between radiological and histopathological diagnosis.

METHODS

We performed a 17-year retrospective cohort study on all patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of renal oncocytoma. The primary outcome variables were long-term outcomes, coexistence with renal cell carcinoma, and development of metastatic disease.

RESULTS

A total of 38 oncocytomas were reported in 36 patients. Of the 36 patients, 29 (81%) were diagnosed incidentally. Oncocytoma was considered in the differential diagnosis in 4 oncocytomas (10.5%). In total, 34 patients underwent early surgical intervention; of these, 27 (79.4%) underwent radical nephrectomy and 7 underwent partial nephrectomy (20.6%). Four patients (11.1%) were managed conservatively with surveillance. No patients developed recurrence or metastatic disease after a median follow-up of 84 months (range: 4-178).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy for imaging modalities in renal oncocytoma is poor. Surveillance or minimally invasive ablative techniques are appropriate in selected patients with biopsy-proven oncocytoma that are not increasing in size.

Active Surveillance for Renal Neoplasms with Oncocytic Features is Safe

PURPOSE

Oncocytomas are benign tumors often diagnosed incidentally on imaging. Small case series have suggested that the growth kinetics of oncocytomas are similar to those of malignant renal tumors. Biopsy material may be insufficient to exclude a diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. We evaluated and compared the growth rates of oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma to improve our understanding of their natural history.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective study of patients diagnosed with lesions suggestive of oncocytoma or chromophobe renal cell carcinoma between 2003 and 2014. The growth rates were estimated using a mixed effect linear model. Patient and lesion characteristics were tested using a similar model for association with growth rate.

RESULTS

Of the 95 lesions (oncocytoma 81, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 14) included in the analysis 98% were diagnosed on biopsy. The annual growth rate was 0.14 cm and 0.38 cm for oncocytoma (median followup 34 months) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (median followup 25 months), respectively (p=0.5). Baseline lesion size was significantly associated with growth (p <0.001). The majority of oncocytomas (74%) and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (67%) followed up to the 3-year mark had grown. Of these, 8 underwent surgery (6 in the chromophobe renal cell carcinoma group). The initial diagnosis was confirmed in all. Overall 5 patients died, all of nonrenal related causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the majority of oncocytic renal neoplasms will grow with time, surveillance appears to remain safe. Patients opting for this strategy should be made aware that a diagnosis of oncocytoma following biopsy is associated with some degree of uncertainty due to the difficulty of differentiating them from other oncocytic renal neoplasms.

Understanding pathologic variants of renal cell carcinoma: distilling therapeutic opportunities from biologic complexity

CONTEXT

Once believed to represent a uniform malignant phenotype, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is now viewed as a diverse group of cancers that arise from the nephron.

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathologic characteristics, clinical behavior, molecular biology, and systemic therapy options of recognized RCC histologic subtypes.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of English-language articles was performed using the Medline and Web of Science databases. Manuscripts were selected with consensus of the coauthors and evaluated using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The major findings of the evaluated manuscripts are discussed with an emphasis on the description of the pathologic features, clinical behavior, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Classification schemes for kidney cancer have undergone dramatic changes over the past two decades. Improvements in these classification schemes are important, as pathologic variants differ not only in disease biology, but also in clinical behavior, prognosis, and response to systemic therapy. In the era of genomic medicine, further refinements in characterization of RCC subtypes will be critical to the progress of this burgeoning clinical space.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Kidney cancer can be subdivided into related but different cancers that arise from the kidney's tubules. In this article we review current classifications for kidney cancer, discuss their characteristics, and provide an overview of each subtype's clinical behavior and treatment. We stress that each subtype harbors unique biology and thus responds differently to available treatment strategies.

Coexisting hybrid malignancy in a solitary sporadic solid benign renal mass: implications for treating patients following renal biopsy

PURPOSE

Concern regarding coexisting malignant pathology in benign renal tumors deters renal biopsy and questions its validity. We examined the rates of coexisting malignant and high grade pathology in resected benign solid solitary renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using our prospectively maintained database we identified 1,829 patients with a solitary solid renal tumor who underwent surgical resection between 1994 and 2012. Lesions containing elements of renal oncocytoma, angiomyolipoma or another benign pathology formed the basis for this analysis. Patients with an oncocytic malignancy without classic oncocytoma and those with known hereditary syndromes were excluded from study.

RESULTS

We identified 147 patients with pathologically proven elements of renal oncocytoma (96), angiomyolipoma (44) or another solid benign pathology (7). Median tumor size was 3.0 cm (IQR 2.2-4.5). As quantified by the R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior and location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score, tumor anatomical complexity was low in 28% of cases, moderate in 56% and high in 16%. Only 4 patients (2.7%) were documented as having hybrid malignant pathology, all involving chromophobe renal cell carcinoma in the setting of renal oncocytoma. At a median followup of 44 months (IQR 33-55) no patient with a hybrid tumor experienced regional or metastatic progression.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of patients with a solitary, sporadic, solid benign renal mass fewer than 3% of tumors showed coexisting hybrid malignancy. Importantly, no patient harbored coexisting high grade pathology. These data suggest that uncertainty regarding hybrid malignant pathology coexisting with benign pathological components should not deter renal biopsy, especially in the elderly and comorbid populations.