Functional and oncological outcomes of open nephron-sparing surgery for complex renal masses

Outcomes and Techniques of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) for Renal Hilar Masses: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex renal tumors. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate and assess the results of RAPN when dealing with entirely central hilar masses and to examine the various methods used to address the surgical difficulties associated with them. Methods: A thorough literature search in September 2023 across various databases focused on RAPN for renal hilar masses, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary goal was to evaluate RAPN's surgical and functional outcomes, with a secondary aim of examining different surgical techniques. Out of 1250 records, 13 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. Results: Evidence is growing in favor of RAPN for renal hilar masses. Despite a predominance of retrospective studies and a lack of long-term data, RAPN shows positive surgical outcomes and preserves renal function without compromising cancer treatment effectiveness. Innovative suturing and clamping methods are emerging in surgical management. Conclusions: RAPN is a promising technique for managing renal hilar masses in RCC, offering effective surgical outcomes and renal function preservation. The study highlights the need for more long-term data and prospective studies to further validate these findings.

Clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with renal hypothermia perfusion by renal artery balloon catheter in treating patients with complex renal tumors

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of renal hypothermic perfusion by renal artery balloon catheter during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (P-RALPN) for patients with complex renal tumors.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified 45 patients with complex renal tumors who received standard robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (S-RALPN) and 11 patients treated with P-RALPN from September 2017 to October 2021. Preoperative patients’ characteristics and intraoperative surgical parameters including operating time, blood loss, hospitalization, pre- and post-surgical glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and postoperative survival time were collected and compared between the two groups. The patients’ body temperature, real-time kidney temperature, and short-term renal function were analyzed in the P-RALPN group.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference on median intraoperative estimated blood loss and postoperative hospitalization between the two groups. Patients who received P-RALPN had a slightly longer operative time than those who received S-RALPN (103.1 versus 125.9; p = 0.09). In the P-RALPN group, the volume of perfusion solution was 533.2 ml (range, 255.0–750.0 ml), the median temperature of kidney was 22.6°C (range, 21.7–24.1°C) after the kidney cools down, and the median minimum intraoperative temperature of patients was 36.1°C (range 35.2–36.7°C). The ischemia time in the S-RALPN group was markedly lower than that in the P-RALPN group (21.5 versus 34.8; p < 0.01). However, the loss of GFR was much higher for the S-RALPN group after the surgery. (28.9 versus 18.4; p < 0.01). Importantly, patients had similar postoperative survival time between the two groups (p = 0.42; HR = 0.27).

Conclusion

P-RALPN is a safe and feasible surgery in the treatment of patients with complex renal tumors, which provides a new operative approach for clinicians to treat these patients.

Open partial nephrectomy: current review

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is increasingly considered the gold standard treatment for localized renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) where technically feasible. The advantage of nephron-sparing surgery lies in preservation of parenchyma and hence renal function. However, this advantage is counterbalanced with increased surgical risk. In recent years with the popularization of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (laparoscopic and robotic), the contemporary role of open PN (OPN) has changed. OPN has several advantages, particularly in complex patients such as those with a solitary kidney, multi-focal tumors, and significant surgical history, as well as providing improved application of renoprotective measures. As such, it is a technique that remains relevant in current urology practice. In this article we discuss the evidence, indications, operative considerations and surgical technique, along with the role of OPN in contemporary nephron-sparing surgery.

Trifecta Outcomes in Renal Hilar Tumors: A Comparison Between Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To report a comparative analysis of outcomes in patients who underwent excisions of renal hilar tumors using both open and robotic approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed robotic and open patients who underwent partial nephrectomy of renal hilar tumors between 2011 and 2016. "Trifecta" was defined as negative surgical margins, no complications, and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) preservation of ≥90% at last follow-up. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to equilibrate treatment groups, minimize selection bias, and optimize inference on the basis of each patient's clinicodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

One hundred robotic and 64 open patients had sufficient data for IPTW. After weighting, there were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (p < 0.05). On adjusted analyses, robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) achieved equivalent rates of trifecta to open surgery (21.1% vs 13.9%, respectively, p = 0.387). There were no differences between robotic and open cohorts for negative margin rates (72.8% vs 90.4%, p = 0.124), absence of complications (68.6% vs 75.2%, p = 0.587), or GFR ≥90% (39.4% vs 21.6%, p = 0.111). The robotic cohort had a shorter mean length of stay (3.8 vs 5.0 days, p = 0.012), and no difference in estimated blood loss (253.3 vs 357.1, p = 0.091) or operating time (199.8 vs 200.4, p = 0.961).

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis both open and RPN for hilar tumors were equally likely to achieve a low "trifecta" outcome with a shorter mean length of stay in the robotic cohort.

Comparison of 3-dimensional laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in the treatment of complex renal tumor with partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matching analysis

To compare the efficacies of 3-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors. The complex renal tumors was defined as Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an anatomical (PADAU) ≥10, including some cT1b tumors.This was a retrospective analysis of patients with local complex renal tumors who presented to our hospital from January 2014 to January 2018. All patients were managed with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) or 3-dimensional partial nephrectomy (3DLPN).There were 48 patients in the LPN group and 60 in the 3DLPN group. In the matched groups, demographic and tumor characteristics including Charlson Comorbidity Index, PADUA, based on the preoperative images, were similar. By contrast, 3DLPN achieved better results in terms of warm ischemia time (19 vs 27 minutes), operation time (105 vs 128 minutes), postoperative complications (14.9% vs 23.4%), and marginal width (0.6 cm vs 0.4 cm). We found statistically significant differences in terms of length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), positive surgical margin (PSM), and conversion to open or radical nephrectomy (RN). Median follow-up time was 17 and 18.5 months for the LPN and 3DLPN groups, respectively. The recovery of renal function (% change eGFR, 0 vs -8.7) was significantly different between the 3DLPN and LPN groups, whereas 12-month recurrence-free survival did not differ.Both 3-dimensional laparoscopic nephron-sparing nephrectomy and conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are safe, effective, and acceptable approaches to treating complex renal tumors, while the former may facilitate tumor resection and renorrhaphy for challenging cases, offering a minimally invasive surgical option for patients who may otherwise require open surgery.

The Correlation of Clinicopathological Features With the Status of Surgical Margins in Renal Cell Cancer Patients Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of various clinicopathological variables with positive surgical margins (PSMs) in renal cell cancer (RCC) patients after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was performed to identify studies that compared PSMs with negative surgical margins (NSMs) and were published up to December 2018. Outcomes of interest included perioperative and postoperative variables, and the data were pooled by odds ratios (ORs)/standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the strength of such associations. STATA 12.0 software was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 13 studies including 47,499 patients with RCC were analyzed. The results showed that higher Furhman grade (pooled OR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.14-1.37; P < 0.001), higher pathological stage (pooled OR = 2.67; 95% CI: 2.05-3.50; P < 0.001), non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC) histology (pooled OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.84; P < 0.001), and non-white race (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82-0.99; P = 0.026) were significantly associated with high risk of PSMs. However, age (pooled SMD = 0.09; 95% CI: -0.01-0.20; P = 0.078), gender (female vs. male) (pooled OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.96-1.12; P = 0.377), tumor laterality (left vs. right) (pooled OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.84-1.42; P = 0.501), tumor focality (unifocal vs. multifocal) (pooled OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.23-1.90; P = 0.445), tumor size (pooled SMD = 0.03; 95% CI: -0.10-0.15; P = 0.685), and surgical approach (open vs. non-open) (pooled OR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.62-1.42; P = 0.763) had no relationship with PSMs. Sensitivity analysis showed that all models were stable, and no publication bias was observed in our study. Conclusions: The present findings demonstrate that the presence of PSMs was associated with higher Furhman grade and higher pathological stage. Additionally, non-white patients with non-ccRCC histology had a high risk of PSMs after NSS. Further multicenter and long-term follow-up studies are required to verify these findings.

The impact of comorbidities, sex and age on the occurrence of acute kidney injury among patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery

Background

The aim of this study was to report the impact of patients' baseline characteristics on the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for localized kidney cancer.

Patients and methods

Data from our kidney cancer database were retrospectively extracted to include 402 patients who underwent NSS between March 2000 and June 2016, and had sufficient data. Definition of AKI was based on the postoperative serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) magnitude, which were measured during the 72 h after surgery.

Results

Based on RIFLE and AKIN criteria, the overall rate of postoperative AKI was 35%. The average decrease in eGFR among patients who developed AKI was 20% as compared with the non-AKI subgroup (2%). In univariate analysis, variables that were associated with AKI included right-sided tumors (p = 0.014), male sex (p = 0.01), hypertension (p = 0.003), baseline eGFR (p = 0.009) and history of nephrolithiasis (p = 0.039). However, multivariate analysis revealed that the only independent predictors of postoperative AKI were hypertension (p = 0.009) and cigarette smoking (p = 0.024).

Conclusion

AKI is a common complication of NSS affecting about one-third of the patients. The most important risk factors are hypertension and smoking.

Comparison of robot-assisted and open partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumours: a single centre experience

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open PN (OPN) for completely endophytic renal tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1 230 consecutive cases, consisting of 823 RAPNs and 407 OPNs, performed for renal mass at a single academic tertiary centre between 2011 and 2016. Of these, data on 87 RAPN and 56 OPN cases for completely endophytic renal tumours were analysed. Patient and tumour characteristics, operative, postoperative, functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Apart from a higher prevalence of solitary kidney among OPN cases (RAPN, 5.7% vs OPN, 21.4%; P = 0.005), demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in tumour size (P = 0.07), tumour stage (P = 0.3), margin status (P = 0.48), malignant tumour subtypes (P = 0.51), and grades (P = 0.61) between the groups. Also, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups for warm ischaemia time (P = 0.15), cold ischaemia time (P = 0.28), and intraoperative (P = 0.75) or postoperative (Clavien-Dindo Grade I-V, P = 0.08; Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V, P = 0.85) complication rates. The patients in the RAPN group had a shorter length of stay (P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), and lower intraoperative transfusion rates (0% vs 7.1%, P = 0.02). No local recurrences occurred during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 15.2 (7-27.2) and 18.1 (8.2-30.9) months in the RAPN and OPN groups, respectively. There was no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation rates between groups for the early (P = 0.26) and latest (P = 0.22) functional follow-up.

CONCLUSION

For completely endophytic renal tumours, both OPN and RAPN have excellent outcomes when performed by experienced surgeons at a high-volume centre. For skilled robotic surgeons, RAPN is a safe and effective alternative to OPN with the advantages of shorter length of stay and less blood loss.

Emerging surgical treatments for renal cell carcinoma

Treatment of renal cell carcinoma has evolved considerably over the last few years. While total nephrectomy is necessary at times, nephron-sparing surgery, with a goal of renal function preservation, should always be considered. Although open partial nephrectomy is considered the gold standard approach for nephron-sparing surgery, laparoscopic- or robotic-assisted techniques allow urologists to perform renal surgery less invasively, with excellent long-term oncological outcomes. Cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation are less invasive management approaches for carefully selected patients with small renal masses. Active surveillance should be considered in elderly or patients who are unfit for surgery. Ultimately, the method chosen for management of a renal mass is an informed decision made by the physician and patient.