1
|
Kaplan-Marans E, Zhang TR, Hu JC. Oncologic Outcomes of Testosterone Therapy for Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Population-based Analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 60:36-43. [PMID: 38375342 PMCID: PMC10874869 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective There is insufficient evidence on the oncologic risks of testosterone therapy for men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. We carried out a retrospective study to assess the effect of testosterone therapy on oncologic outcomes for men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Methods Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data were used to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2008 to 2017 who were managed with active surveillance and received testosterone (n = 167) or no testosterone (n = 6658) therapy. Outcomes included conversion from active surveillance to active treatment (radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy, radiation, or androgen deprivation therapy), prostate cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality. Statistically significant factors on univariable analysis were included in a Cox proportional-hazards regression model for multivariable analysis. Key findings and limitations The median age was 71 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 68-74) in the testosterone group and 72 yr (IQR 69-75) in the no-testosterone group, with corresponding median follow-up after prostate cancer diagnosis of 5.2 yr (IQR 3.4-7.8) and 4.7 yr (IQR 3.2-6.9). There were no prostate cancer-specific deaths in the testosterone group and 39 (0.6%) in the no-testosterone group. Testosterone therapy was not associated with conversion to active treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.97; p = 0.033) or overall mortality (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.68-1.53; p > 0.9). Conclusions and clinical implications In the first population-based, nationally representative study of testosterone therapy for men on active surveillance for prostate cancer, testosterone therapy did not increase the risk of conversion to active therapy or worsen mortality. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. Patient summary For men on active surveillance for prostate cancer, we assessed the effect of testosterone therapy. We found that testosterone therapy did not increase the risk of proceeding to active therapy or of death from prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tenny R. Zhang
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Siltari A, Murtola TJ, Kausz J, Talala K, Taari K, Tammela TL, Auvinen A. Testosterone replacement therapy is not associated with increased prostate cancer incidence, prostate cancer-specific, or cardiovascular disease-specific mortality in Finnish men. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1898-1904. [PMID: 37971326 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2278189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns have been expressed over the safety of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in men with late-onset hypogonadism (LOH). Previous studies have shown controversial results regarding the association of TRT with the risk of cardiovascular events or prostate cancer (PCa) incidence, aggressiveness, and mortality. This study explores the overall risk of PCa and risk by tumor grade and stage, as well as mortality from PCa and cardiovascular disease (CVD), among men treated with TRT compared to men without LOH and TRT use. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 78,615 men of age 55-67 years at baseline from the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC). Follow-up started at randomization and ended at death, emigration, or a common closing date January 1st, 2017. Cox proportional hazards regression model with time-dependent variables and adjustment for age, trial arm, use of other medications, and Charlson comorbidity index was used. Comprehensive information on TRT purchases during 1995-2015 was obtained from the Finnish National Prescription Database. PCa cases were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry and causes of death obtained from Statistics Finland. RESULTS Over the course of 18 years of follow-up, 2919 men were on TRT, and 285 PCa cases were diagnosed among them. TRT users did not exhibit a higher incidence or mortality rate of PCa compared to non-users. On the contrary, men using TRT had lower PCa mortality than non-users (HR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.3-0.91). Additionally, TRT users had slightly lower CVD and all-cause mortality compared to non-users (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.75-1.01 and HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.87-1.0, respectively). No time- or dose-dependency of TRT use was evident in any of the analyses. CONCLUSION Men using TRT were not associated to increased risk for PCa and did not experience increased PCa- or CVD-specific mortality compared to non-users. Further studies considering blood testosterone levels are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aino Siltari
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teemu J Murtola
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Josefina Kausz
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Kimmo Taari
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teuvo Lj Tammela
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Tampere University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Testosterone therapy in prostate cancer: is it still a controversy? Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:598-606. [PMID: 36081393 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The benefits of testosterone therapy (TTh) in the hypogonadal male can be dramatic. Historically, TTh has been contraindicated in prostate cancer (PCa). Current evidence has redefined our understanding of the influence serum testosterone has on prostatic androgen activity. Increasing numbers of hypogonadal men with coexisting PCa emphasizes the importance of describing those who may safely receive TTh. This review aims to present literature that evaluates the efficacy and safety of TTh in men with coexisting PCa. RECENT FINDINGS Our study, a comprehensive review of published literature regarding TTh in men with a history of PCa, consisted of studies conducted from the 1940s to 2022. Our review discusses evidence in accordance with previous studies that TTh has a role in patients with localized PCa as it has not been reported to increase rates of recurrence or progression of PCa. SUMMARY The use of TTh in hypongonadal men with a localized PCa has been shown to have positive clinical outcomes without increasing the rate of disease progression or recurrence. Further research, in a randomized controlled setting, is warranted.
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie T, Song XL, Wang C, Yu YZ, Wang JQ, Chen ZS, Zhao SC. The role of androgen therapy in prostate cancer: from testosterone replacement therapy to bipolar androgen therapy. Drug Discov Today 2021; 26:1293-1301. [PMID: 33561465 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is the primary treatment for male testosterone deficiency. This therapy raises concerns over the risk of prostate cancer (PC), because testosterone has historically been considered the fuel for PC. We discuss the re-evaluation of the relationship between androgen and PC, and highlight the safety of TRT in the treatment of symptomatic men with testosterone deficiency who have low-risk disease after treatment for localized PC with surgery or radiation. Furthermore, we review the clinical application and potential mechanisms of bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) in the treatment of castration-resistant PC, emphasizing that much remains to be done before BAT can be broadly applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Xie
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China; Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510500, China
| | - Xian-Lu Song
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Chong Wang
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Yu-Zhong Yu
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Jing-Quan Wang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA
| | - Zhe-Sheng Chen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA.
| | - Shan-Chao Zhao
- Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510500, China; Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alshehri SZ, Alshahrani OS, Almsaoud NA, Al-Ghamdi MA, Alqahtani AM, Almurayyi MM, Autwdi AS, Al-Ghamdi SA, Zogan MM, Alamri AM. The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020; 57:171-178. [PMID: 32774849 PMCID: PMC7398967 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and subsequent biopsy in monitoring prostate cancer in men on active surveillance (AS) have not been defined clearly. In this systematic review, we aimed to review current literature about the usage of MRI examination in men with low-risk prostate cancer during active surveillance. For that, we searched seven databases to include all studies reporting magnetic resonance imaging in the AS of low-risk prostate cancer. We finally included 11 studies with 1237 patients included. Our results showed an adequate sensitivity and specificity of both modalities to detect disease progression; including disease upgrading and upstaging. However, the performance in the prediction of unfavorable disease was inferior to the detection of upgrading and upstaging. In terms of MRGB, the previous literature agreed on the superiority of using a combination of different biopsy schemes to get a better progression section. Noteworthy, mp-MRI and MRGB had a good predictive value limited to the first year, with TRUSGB showing a superior role in detecting patients with a GS ≥ 7, after that. In conclusion, both of mpMRI and MRGB have shown an adequate performance on assessing disease progression in the AS of low-risk prostate cancer patients. They can be used for disease staging and grading for successful treatment planning. In comparison to the literature, few papers discuss the benefit of MRI screening in low-risk prostate cancer groups. Biopsy is considered more invasive than MRI, thus reducing the burden of such methods on the patients. PSA values can be misinterpreted especially that it can rise in other diseases such as Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sultan Zaher Alshehri
- Department of Urology, Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Aseer Central Hospital, Al Rabwah, 7663, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Omar Safar Alshahrani
- Department of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nazal Ahmed Almsaoud
- Department of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | | - Ali Salem Autwdi
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Central Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lenfant L, Leon P, Cancel-Tassin G, Audouin M, Staerman F, Rouprêt M, Cussenot O. Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and prostate cancer: An updated systematic review with a focus on previous or active localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:661-670. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
7
|
Abstract
Introduction: The use of testosterone therapy (TTh) in men with prostate cancer (PCa) is relatively new, and controversial, due to the longstanding maxim that TTh is contraindicated in men with PCa. Scientific advances have prompted a reevaluation of the potential role for TTh in men with PCa, particularly as TTh has been shown to provide important symptomatic and general health benefits to men with testosterone deficiency (TD), including many men with PCa who may expect to live 30-50 years after diagnosis. Areas covered: This review outlines the historical underpinnings of the historical belief that TTh 'fuels' PCa and the experimental and clinical studies that have radically altered this view, including description of the saturation model. The authors review studies of TTh in men with PCa following radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy, in men on active surveillance, and in men with advanced or metastatic PCa. Expert opinion: TTh provides important symptomatic and overall health benefits for men with PCa who have TD. Although more safety studies are needed, TTh is a reasonable therapeutic option for men with low-risk PCa after surgery or radiation. Data in men on active surveillance are limited, but initial reports are reassuring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Morgentaler
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Men's Health Boston , Boston , MA , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giganti F, Moore CM. Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance-a modern approach. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:116-131. [PMID: 29594026 PMCID: PMC5861284 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, active surveillance has been increasingly adopted as a conservative management approach to low and sometimes intermediate risk prostate cancer, to avoid or delay treatment until there is evidence of higher risk disease. A number of studies have investigated the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in this setting. MpMRI refers to the use of multiple MRI sequences (T2-weighted anatomical and functional imaging which can include diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced imaging, spectroscopy). Each of the parameters investigates different aspects of the prostate gland (anatomy, cellularity, vascularity, etc.). In addition to a qualitative assessment, the radiologist can also extrapolate quantitative imaging biomarkers from these sequences, for example the apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted imaging. There are many different types of articles (e.g., reviews, commentaries, consensus meetings, etc.) that address the use of mpMRI in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. In this paper, we compare original articles that investigate the role of the different mpMRI sequences in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer, in order to discuss the relative utility of the different sequences, and combinations of sequences. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed for manuscripts published from inception to 1st December 2017. The search terms used were (prostate cancer or prostate adenocarcinoma or prostatic carcinoma or prostate carcinoma or prostatic adenocarcinoma) and (MRI or NMR or magnetic resonance imaging or mpMRI or multiparametric MRI) and active surveillance. Overall, 425 publications were found. All abstracts were reviewed to identify papers with original data. Twenty-five papers were analysed and summarised. Some papers based their analysis only on one mpMRI sequence, while others assessed two or more. The evidence from this review suggests that qualitative assessments and quantitative data from different mpMRI sequences hold promise in the management of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches should be considered when assessing mpMRI of the prostate. There is a need for robust studies assessing the relative utility of different combinations of sequences in a systematic manner to determine the most efficient use of mpMRI in men on active surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giganti
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yafi FA, Haney NM, Anaissie J, DeLay KJ, Trost L, Khera M, Hellstrom WJG. Practice Patterns in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypogonadism: A Survey of Sexual Medicine Society of North America Members. Urology 2017; 106:87-95. [PMID: 28479477 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Revised: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of hypogonadism, as the optimal approaches are controversial. Multiple therapeutic options are currently available for hypogonadal men and treatment patterns vary considerably. The safety of testosterone therapy (TTh) remains understudied. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 23-question survey regarding diagnosis and treatment of hypogonadism was sent to all members of the Sexual Medicine Society of North America. Subgroup analyses compared responses between sexual medicine fellows and non-fellows, as well as between academic and nonacademic physicians, using a chi-squared analysis. RESULTS A total of 101 responses were included for analysis. The most common cutoff value used to diagnose hypogonadism was 300 ng/dL (55%, range = 200-400 ng/dL), and 31% felt comfortable giving TTh to a symptomatic patient with normal serum testosterone levels. No respondents felt that TTh increased a cardiovascular event risk. Of those surveyed, 68% would prescribe TTh to a hypogonadal man with severe lower urinary tract symptoms, and 64% would offer TTh to a man with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance. Fellowship-trained physicians were more likely to prescribe TTh to a man with hypogonadism but normal serum testosterone (P = .038), but they differed in the types of therapy they would use for men with hypogonadism who wish to preserve or regain fertility. CONCLUSION Significant variety exists in the diagnosis and treatment of hypogonadism. The majority of physicians will only prescribe TTh in the setting of subnormal serum testosterone levels, despite the presence of symptoms. None of the surveyed physicians reported concern over the risk of cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faysal A Yafi
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, CA
| | - Nora M Haney
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | - James Anaissie
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | - Kenneth J DeLay
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | - Landon Trost
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mohit Khera
- Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Wayne J G Hellstrom
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nörenberg D, Solyanik O, Schlenker B, Magistro G, Ertl-Wagner B, Clevert DA, Stief C, Reiser MF, D'Anastasi M. [MRI of the prostate]. Urologe A 2017; 56:665-677. [PMID: 28424829 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0378-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
New clinical and technological advances in the field of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and targeted image-guided biopsy techniques have significantly improved the detection, localization and staging as well as active surveillance of prostate cancer in recent years. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is currently the main imaging technique for the detection, characterization and diagnostics of metastasizing prostate cancer and is of high diagnostic importance for local staging within the framework of the detection of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Nörenberg
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
| | - O Solyanik
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - B Schlenker
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, München, Deutschland
| | - G Magistro
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, München, Deutschland
| | - B Ertl-Wagner
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - D A Clevert
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - C Stief
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, München, Deutschland
| | - M F Reiser
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - M D'Anastasi
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|