Does teaching of robotic partial nephrectomy affect renal function and perioperative outcomes?

Achieving trifecta outcomes in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy within a fellowship training centre

To assess the robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) trifecta rate within a fellowship program. Patients undergoing RAPN 01/01/2010-01/07/2023 were enrolled from a prospectively maintained database. All cases were performed jointly with surgical fellows, except when privately insured. Patients were excluded if they were converted to open or radical nephrectomy. The primary outcome was achieving the 'trifecta' of negative surgical margins, no complications < 30 days post-operatively and warm ischaemia time (WIT) < 25 min. The secondary outcomes were factors associated with trifecta success. Ethics approval was obtained. In the enrolment period, 355 patients underwent intended RAPN, of whom seven were excluded due to conversion to conversion to radical nephrectomy (6 patients) or conversion to open (one). Amongst the 348 eligible patients, median age was 60 years, 115 (33%) were female and 19 were private patients. WIT was < 25 min for 324/337 patients (96%), surgical margins were negative in 325 (93%), 294 (84%) were complication-free at 30 days and 301/320 (94%) had a < 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3-6 months postoperatively. Subsequently, trifecta outcomes were achieved in 253/337 (75%) patients. Comparing with patients without those with trifecta success were similar in all thirteen measured patients and tumour factors. In a teaching hospital, with a fellowship training programme, trifecta outcome is achievable for most RAPN patients, and at a rate comparable to international standards. Fellowship centres should monitor their outcomes to ensure high patient outcomes are maintained alongside training requirements.

Evaluation of Peri-operative Outcomes Associated With Resident Involvement on Tumor Resection and Renorrhaphy During Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perioperative outcomes of resident trainee involvement in tumor resection and renorrhaphy during robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 500 consecutive RAPN in a single surgeon prospectively maintained database. Cases with resident performed tumor resection and renorrhaphy (N = 71) were case matched on R.E.N.A.L. score and RAPN year using a greedy matching algorithm. Perioperative variables were compared to attending cases.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in high grade postoperative complications (resident: 3% vs attending: 6%, P = .68), positive margins (resident: 1% vs attending: 3%, P = .31), length of stay (resident: 2.0 vs attending: 2.0 days, P = .73), and 30 day readmission (resident: 7% vs attending: 11%, P = .56). However, residents had a statistically significant longer warm ischemia time (median 21 vs 15 minutes, P <.001), thus less likely to achieve trifecta (66% vs 85%, P = .02). Resident involvement had longer median operative time (197 vs 184 minutes, P = .03). No statistically significant difference in functional volume loss (P = .12) or surface intermediate base margin score (P = .66) between residents and attending was found. No difference in post-operative creatinine change was found at 1 day and 1 month (resident: 0.2 vs attending: 0.1 mg/dL, P = .4 and resident: 0.1 vs attending: 0.1 mg/dL, P = .6, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Supervised resident console involvement in tumor resection and renorrhaphy during RAPN is safe and does not increase rates of complications. Residents have longer median warm ischemia time compared to attending only cases, but this does not appear to impact post-operative renal function.