Is sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity associated with clinical and pathological outcomes in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy?

The role of sarcopenic obesity for the prediction of prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenic obesity (SO) in patients with gastrointestinal cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of SO in patients with gastrointestinal cancer, as well as the diagnostic cut-off value of SO in patients with gastrointestinal cancer among Chinese population.

METHODS

We conducted a consecutive cohort study. Between January 2017 and January 2019, 289 patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer were included in our study. Skeletal muscle area, total fat area, and subcutaneous fat area were measured by CT scan. All patients were followed up for 5 years. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were adopted to determine the cut-off values of visceral fat obesity for the prediction of sarcopenia. Based on the cut-off values, patients with sarcopenia combined with visceral fat obesity were divided into the SO group, and the others were divided into the non-sarcopenic obesity (NSO) group. Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were employed to explore the associations of body composition profiles with 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

Obtained from Youden's Index for ROC for the prediction of 5-year survival, skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) ≤40.02 cm2/m2 with VFA ≥ 126.30 cm2 in men and SMI ≤32.05 cm2/m2 with VFA ≥72.42 cm2 in women indicate a risk of poor prognosis in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer. Patients with SO had poorer 5-year overall survival (OS) than patients with NSO (6.74% vs. 82.84%, p < 0.001), and poorer 5-year DFS (6.74% vs. 81.82%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, we found that the long-term mortality risk was approximately 13-fold higher among patients in the SO group compared to those with no conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative assessment of SO is useful not only for monitoring nutritional status but also for predicting 5-year OS in gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Sarcopenic obesity in cancer

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenic obesity is a relatively new term. It is a clinical condition characterized by sarcopenia (loss of muscle mass and function) and obesity (increase in fat mass) that mainly affects older adults. As the incidence of sarcopenia and obesity increases worldwide, sarcopenic obesity is becoming a greater problem also in cancer patients. In fact, sarcopenic obesity is associated with poorer treatment outcomes, longer hospital stays, physical disability, and shorter survival in several cancers. Oxidative stress, lipotoxicity, and systemic inflammation, as well as altered expression of skeletal muscle anti-inflammatory myokines in sarcopenic obesity, are also associated with carcinogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in cancer varies because of heterogeneity in definitions and variability in diagnostic criteria used to estimate the prevalence of sarcopenia and obesity. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the definitions, prevalence, and diagnostic criteria as well as the mechanisms that cancer has in common with sarcopenic obesity.

Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgeons have historically used age as a preoperative predictor of postoperative outcomes. Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass due to disease or biological age, has been proposed as a more accurate risk predictor. The prognostic value of sarcopenia assessment in surgical patients remains poorly understood. Therefore, the authors aimed to synthesize the available literature and investigate the impact of sarcopenia on perioperative and postoperative outcomes across all surgical specialties.

METHODS

The authors systematically assessed the prognostic value of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to 1st October 2022. Their primary outcomes were complication occurrence, mortality, length of operation and hospital stay, discharge to home, and postdischarge survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Sensitivity analysis was performed by focusing on studies with an oncological, cardiovascular, emergency, or transplant surgery population and on those of higher quality or prospective study design.

RESULTS

A total of 294 studies comprising 97 643 patients, of which 33 070 had sarcopenia, were included in our analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly poorer postoperative outcomes, including greater mortality, complication occurrence, length of hospital stay, and lower rates of discharge to home (all P <0.00001). A significantly lower survival rate in patients with sarcopenia was noted at 1, 3, and 5 years (all P <0.00001) after surgery. Subgroup analysis confirmed higher rates of complications and mortality in oncological (both P <0.00001), cardiovascular (both P <0.00001), and emergency ( P =0.03 and P =0.04, respectively) patients with sarcopenia. In the transplant surgery cohort, mortality was significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia ( P <0.00001). Among all patients undergoing surgery for inflammatory bowel disease, the frequency of complications was significantly increased among sarcopenic patients ( P =0.007). Sensitivity analysis based on higher quality studies and prospective studies showed that sarcopenia remained a significant predictor of mortality and complication occurrence (all P <0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia is a significant predictor of poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Preoperative assessment of sarcopenia can help surgeons identify patients at risk, critically balance eligibility, and refine perioperative management. Large-scale studies are required to further validate the importance of sarcopenia as a prognostic indicator of perioperative risk, especially in surgical subspecialties.

Evaluation of sarcopenia in patients receiving intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is associated with adverse outcomes for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but less is known about its impact in the setting of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Sarcopenia, skeletal muscle density, and adipose tissue area have been studied as markers of malnutrition and can be determined radiographically. The purpose of this study is to characterize the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with NMIBC receiving intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG).

METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, patients with NMIBC having received intravesical BCG were identified using institutional pharmacy records. Patients having undergone computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis within 90 days of treatment were included in the analysis. Using sliceOmatic 5.0 software, skeletal muscle area (cm2) was measured at the L3 level to calculate skeletal muscle index (SMI), a marker of sarcopenia. Subcutaneous, visceral, and intramuscular adipose tissue areas in addition to skeletal muscle density were also measured. Frailty was evaluated as a secondary aim using the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5). Using predefined cutoffs, the prevalence of sarcopenia was determined. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize frailty and secondary body composition characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia on recurrence rate and progression.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients having received BCG between 2015 and 2020 were identified, of which 90 met criteria for analysis. Nearly all (94%) patients completed at least 5 out of 6 BCG induction instillations. Median body mass index (kg/m2) was 27.64 (IQR 24.9, 30.5) for females and 27.7 (IQR 24.9, 30.66) for males. Median SMI (cm2/m2) was 49.44 (IQR 39.39, 55.17) for females and 49.58 (IQR 40.25, 55.58) for males. A majority (61%) of patients were found to be sarcopenic. High-risk frailty was identified 36% of patients. There was no association between sarcopenia and recurrence rate or progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia and frailty are highly prevalent amongst patients with NMIBC. A diagnosis of NMIBC represents a window of opportunity to identify and intervene on modifiable risk factors such as sarcopenia and frailty, which are associated with adverse outcomes in more advanced disease states.

Sarcopenia Predicts Disease Progression in Patients with T1 High-grade Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin: Implications for Decision-making?

Background

Skeletal muscle loss (sarcopenia) has been linked to cancer cachexia and can predict survival in several tumors, including advanced genitourinary malignancies.

Objective

To investigate the predictive and prognostic role of sarcopenia in patients with T1 high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treated with adjuvant intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG).

Design setting and participants

Oncological outcomes were evaluated for 185 patients with T1 HG NMIBC treated with BCG at two European referral centers. Sarcopenia, identified from computed tomography scans performed within 2 mo after surgery, was defined as a skeletal muscle index of <39 cm²/m² for women and <55 cm²/m² for men.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The main endpoint was the association between sarcopenia and disease recurrence and progression. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models were built, and the clinical value of any association was assessed using Harrell's C index and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results and limitations

Sarcopenia was present in 130 patients (70%). On multivariable Cox regression analyses that accounted for the effect of standard clinicopathological prognosticators, sarcopenia was independently associated with disease progression (hazard ratio 3.41; p = 0.02). Addition of sarcopenia to a standard model for prediction of disease progression improved the discrimination of the model from 62% to 70%. DCA revealed superior net benefits for the proposed model in comparison to the strategies of treating all or no patients with radical cystectomy, and in comparison to the existing predictive model. Limitations are inherent to the retrospective design.

Conclusions

We demonstrated the prognostic role of sarcopenia in T1 HG NMIBC. Pending external validation, this tool could be easily incorporated into existing nomograms for prediction of disease progression to improve clinical decision-making and patient counseling.

Patient summary

We looked at the role of loss of skeletal muscle (sarcopenia) as a factor in predicting prognosis for stage T1 high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We found that sarcopenia is a ready-to-use, cost-free marker that could be used to guide treatment and follow-up in this disease, although the results need to be confirmed in other studies.

Sarcopenia is associated with survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with systemic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia impacts perioperative outcomes and prognosis in various carcinomas. We aimed to investigate whether sarcopenia at the time of chemotherapy induction in patients with urothelial carcinoma is associated with prognosis.

METHODS

We evaluated patients treated with chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma between April 2013 and February 2018 at our institution and affiliated centers. Skeletal muscle mass (total psoas muscle, paraspinal muscle, and total skeletal muscle areas) were used to calculate the total psoas muscle index, paraspinal muscle index, and skeletal muscle index. All participants were grouped as per cutoff points set at the median value for each sex. Overall survival was evaluated using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 240 patients, 171 were men and 69 were women; mean age during chemotherapy was 71 years (range: 43-88); and 36, 56, and 148 patients were at stages II, III, and IV, respectively. Paraspinal muscle index was most associated with the prognosis; groups with lower paraspinal muscle index were defined as sarcopenic (men: ≤ 20.9 cm²/m², women: ≤ 16.8 cm²/m²). The overall survival was significantly longer in the non-sarcopenia group including all stages (p = 0.001), and in stage III (p = 0.048) and IV (p = 0.005) patients. There was no significant difference among stage II patients (p = 0.648). After propensity score matching, survival was still significantly longer in the non-sarcopenia group (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Paraspinal muscle index measurements obtained during chemotherapy induction for urothelial carcinoma were independent prognostic factors. The absence of sarcopenia may lead to long-term survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma.

Impact of Body Composition in Overweight and Obese Patients With Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

To investigate the impact of body composition on morbidity and mortality at the initial diagnosis of localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with overweight or obesity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sarcopenia was defined using sex-specific cut-off points and other body composition parameters by median values with computed tomography imaging.

RESULTS

Among the 96 patients, 40 had sarcopenia (43.0%) at diagnosis. Body composition had no effect on morbidity and 5-year disease-free survival contrary to the classic factors (p<0.05). In the subgroup of obese patients, those with sarcopenia had a poor prognosis (p=0.04) but not in the population with overweight (p=0.9).

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia was frequently associated with localised RCC at the initial diagnosis. Body composition did not affect morbidity or outcomes. BMI was involved in morbidity and there was paradoxically longer survival in the obesity group.

Is Sarcopenic Obesity an Indicator of Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Surgery? A Cohort Study in a Western Population

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of sarcopenic obesity in gastric cancer surgery remains debated. We aimed to evaluate the impact on outcomes of body composition and sarcopenic obesity after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Skeletal muscle mass and visceral adipose tissue were evaluated by preoperative computed tomography to define sarcopenia and obesity. Patients were classified in body composition groups according to the presence or absence of sarcopenia and obesity. Prognostic factors for survival were assessed by multivariate Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 198 patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer, 90 (45.4%) patients were sarcopenic, 130 (67.7%) obese, and in the subclassification for body composition categories: 33 (17%) nonsarcopenic nonobesity, 75 (38%) non sarcopenic obesity, 35 (17%) sarcopenic nonobesity, and 55 (28%) sarcopenic obesity. No category of body composition was a predictor of postoperative complications and worse overall and disease-free survival outcomes. Multivariable analysis identified ASA III classification, preoperative weight loss > 10%, postoperative surgical re-intervention, and advanced tumor stage as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, and patients aged 75 years or older, preoperative weight loss > 10%, elevated netrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and advanced tumor stage as independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia, obesity, and sarcopenic obesity were not associated with worse outcomes after gastric cancer surgery.

Comparison of major definitions of sarcopenia based on the skeletal muscle index in patients with urothelial carcinoma

For the past decade, sarcopenia has been actively investigated in various cancers, including urothelial carcinoma (UC). Although skeletal muscle index (SMI) is the main parameter used to evaluate sarcopenia in oncology, the optimal definition of SMI-based sarcopenia is not entirely standardized. We recently highlighted the potential limitations of current definitions of SMI-based sarcopenia in another journal. In this study, we reviewed studies that assessed sarcopenia in UC patients. We then performed a comparative validation of three major SMI-based definitions of sarcopenia, including Prado's, the international and Martin's definitions in metastatic UC patients. We believe that the standardization of the sarcopenia definition is an urgent issue in oncology, and this paper discusses a possible new direction to address this issue.

Impact of musculoskeletal degradation on cancer outcomes and strategies for management in clinical practice

The prevalence of malnutrition in patients with cancer is one of the highest of all patient groups. Weight loss (WL) is a frequent manifestation of malnutrition in cancer and several large-scale studies have reported that involuntary WL affects 50-80% of patients with cancer, with the degree of WL dependent on tumour site, type and stage of disease. The study of body composition in oncology using computed tomography has unearthed the importance of both low muscle mass (sarcopenia) and low muscle attenuation as important prognostic indications of unfavourable outcomes including poorer tolerance to chemotherapy; significant deterioration in performance status and quality of life (QoL), poorer post-operative outcomes and shortened survival. While often hidden by excess fat and high BMI, muscle abnormalities are highly prevalent in patients with cancer (ranging from 10 to 90%). Early screening to identify individuals with sarcopenia and decreased muscle quality would allow for earlier multimodal interventions to attenuate adverse body compositional changes. Multimodal therapies (combining nutritional counselling, exercise and anti-inflammatory drugs) are currently the focus of randomised trials to examine if this approach can provide a sufficient stimulus to prevent or slow the cascade of tissue wasting and if this then impacts on outcomes in a positive manner. This review will focus on the aetiology of musculoskeletal degradation in cancer; the impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy tolerance, post-operative complications, QoL and survival; and outline current strategies for attenuation of muscle loss in clinical practice.

Effects of weight loss and sarcopenia on response to chemotherapy, quality of life, and survival

It has frequently been shown that patients with cancer are one of the largest hospital patient groups with a prevalence for malnutrition. Weight loss is a frequent manifestation of malnutrition in patients with cancer. Several large-scale studies over the past 35 y have reported that involuntary weight loss affects 50% to 80% of these patients with the degree of weight loss dependent on tumor site and type and stage of disease. The aim of this review was to determine the consequences of malnutrition, weight loss, and muscle wasting in relation to chemotherapy tolerance, postoperative complications, quality of life, and survival in patients with cancer. The prognostic impact of weight loss on overall survival has long been recognised with recent data suggesting losses as little as 2.4% predicts survival independent of disease, site, stage or performance score. Recently the use of gold-standard methods of body composition assessment, including computed tomography, have led to an increased understanding of the importance of muscle abnormalities, such as low muscle mass (sarcopenia), and more recently low muscle attenuation, as important prognostic indicators of unfavourable outcomes in patients with cancer. Muscle abnormalities are highly prevalent (ranging from 10-90%, depending on cancer site and the diagnostic criteria used). Both low muscle mass and low muscle attenuation have been associated with poorer tolerance to chemotherapy; increased risk of postoperative complications; significant deterioration in a patients' performance status, and poorer psychological well-being, overall quality of life, and survival.