“Real-world” evaluation of 18F-Choline PET/CT practices in prostate cancer patients and impact on changes in therapeutic strategy

Effectiveness of 11C-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer surveillance

AIM

Our aim was to analyse the performance of [¹¹C]choline PET/CT in prostate cancer (PCa) surveillance, especially in patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 1 ng/mL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-nine [¹¹C]choline PET/CT examinations from 191 patients (68.2 ± 7.2 years) submitted for PCa surveillance or biochemical recurrence were retrospectively evaluated. PSA at study was 13.0 ± 84.2 ng/mL. Main initial treatment was radical prostatectomy (RP) in 81 patients, and other treatments (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonotherapy) in 110. PET/CT was acquired 20' after injection of 555-740 MBq of [¹¹C]choline. Minimum follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

Two hundred and nineteen (66.6%) out of the 329 PET/CT examinations were positive. The percentage of positive examinations was significantly higher in patients with other initial treatment than RP compared to patients with RP (85.6% vs. 43.6%, respectively). One hundred and thirty PET/CT (59.4%) showed local recurrence, 48 (21.9%) distant recurrence, and 41 (18.7%) local plus distant recurrence. Initial therapeutic approach was changed in 139 cases (63.5%). In the subgroup of 81 [¹¹C]choline PET/CT scans performed with PSA < 1 ng/mL, 23 (28.4%) showed a positive result. Initial therapeutic approach was changed in 9 (11.1%). Three (4.8%) out of 63 patients died as per PCa.

CONCLUSION

[¹¹C]choline PET/CT demonstrated its effectiveness in PCa surveillance and restaging, even in patients with serum PSA < 1 ng/mL. The diagnostic performance was different depending on the initial treatment, been higher in patients with non-surgical treatment.

The Role of [18F]F-Choline PET/CT in the Initial Management and Outcome Prediction of Prostate Cancer: A Real-World Experience from a Multidisciplinary Approach

Initial staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is usually performed with conventional imaging (CI), involving computed tomography (CT) and bone scanning (BS). The aim of this study was to analyze the role of [¹⁸F]F-choline positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the initial management and outcome prediction of PCa patients by analyzing data from a multidisciplinary approach. We retrospectively analyzed 82 patients who were discussed by the uro-oncology board of the University Hospital of Ferrara for primary staging newly diagnosed PCa (median age 72 (56-86) years; median baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) equal to 8.73 ng/mL). Patients were divided into three groups based on the imaging performed: group A = only CI; group B = CI + [¹⁸F]F-choline PET/CT; group C = only [¹⁸F]F-choline PET/CT. All data on imaging findings, therapy decisions and patient outcomes were retrieved from hospital information systems. Moreover, we performed a sub-analysis of semiquantitative parameters extracted from [¹⁸F]F-choline PET/CT to search any correlation with patient outcomes. The number of patients included in each group was 35, 35 and 12, respectively. Patients with higher values of initial PSA were subjected to CI + PET/CT (p = 0.005). Moreover, the use of [¹⁸F]F-choline PET/CT was more frequent in patients with higher Gleason score (GS) or ISUP grade (p = 0.013). The type of treatment performed (surgery n = 33; radiation therapy n = 22; surveillance n = 6; multimodality therapy n = 6; systemic therapy n = 13; not available n = 2) did not show any relationship with the modality adopted to stage the disease. [¹⁸F]F-choline PET/CT induced a change of planned therapy in 5/35 patients in group B (14.3%). Moreover, patients investigated with [¹⁸F]F-choline PET/CT alone demonstrated longer biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (30.8 months) in comparison to patients of groups A and B (15.5 and 23.5 months, respectively, p = 0.006), probably due to a more accurate selection of primary treatment. Finally, total lesion choline kinase activity (TLCKA) of the primary lesion, calculated by multiplying metabolic tumor volume and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), was able to more effectively discriminate patients who had recurrence after therapy compared to those without (p = 0.03). In our real-world experience [¹⁸F]F-choline PET/CT as a tool for the initial management of PCa had a relevant impact in terms of therapy selection and was associated with longer BCR-free survival. Moreover, TLCKA of the primary lesion looks a promising parameter for predicting recurrence after curative therapy.

[De novo or secondary metastatic prostate cancer management in France: Observational study from "sentinel multidisciplinary meeting" of the French Association of Urology]

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is an heterogeneous disease. Metachronous mPCa (MM) seems to have a better prognosis than synchronous mPCa (SM). However, it is difficult to analyze their specificities from national registries. Data from the so-called "sentinel multidisciplinary meeting" (SMDM) would represent a "real life" data collection. The objective of this national pilot study was to evaluate the concept of SMDM through the description and comparison of the diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with synchronous or metachronous mPCa in 2018.

METHODS

A survey covering clinical, biological, radiological data as well as treatment initiated and follow-up at 3 and 6 months was sent to the SMDM. All patients diagnosed with metastatic disease (SM or MM) between 01/01/2018 and 11/30/2018 were included.

RESULTS

In total, 780 patients from 39 centers were included, 408 SM and 372 MM. SM were more symptomatic and had a higher metastatic burden than MM. PET were mostly performed in MM without a prior standard staging. SM patients received more chemotherapy than MM patients whereas new generation androgen deprivation therapy was mostly given to MM patients. At 6 months, there were no more significant difference in clinical presentation between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Specificities of SM and MM patients in terms of clinical presentation, metastatic burden and management were described, validating the concept of SMDM as a source of reliable informations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Impact of pelvic dynamic acquisition on final reading of 18 F-Fluorocholine positron emission tomography in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma: True need or unnecessary burden?

INTRODUCTION

Despite the increasing use of ¹⁸ F-fluorocholine (¹⁸ F-FCH) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with prostate cancer, the acquisition protocol remains debated. We have evaluated the influence of the pelvic dynamic phase on the final reading of whole-body ¹⁸ F-FCH PET, to assess the need for a two-stage protocol. Reading the physician's experience and patient's previous treatment profile was also considered as potential influencing factors on final PET interpretation.

METHODS

All ¹⁸ F-FCH PET/CT performed from January 2018 to September 2019 in patients with prostate cancer and including a pelvic dynamic phase followed by a delayed whole-body acquisition were retrospectively retrieved. PET/CT were analysed by one expert nuclear medicine physician and one resident. The whole-body scan was analysed blinded (first reading) and nonblinded from the results of the dynamic phase.

RESULTS

221 consecutive PET/CT were selected from 201 patients previously treated by radical prostatectomy (n = 31), pelvic radiation therapy (n = 60), or both (n = 94). 24 patients had no previous treatments, and 12 benefited from other focal treatments. In the whole population, dynamic acquisition modified final interpretation of 32/221 scans (14.5%) for residents, 26 (11.8%) for experts and 19 (8.6%) for consensual reading. No influence of previous treatments was found. The availability of a dynamic phase would have been responsible for treatment modification in 5/221 scans (2.3%). Considering only the prostate bed, dynamic acquisition modified the final interpretation in 7/125 (5.6%) studies (consensual reading) from patients with previous prostatic surgery and 4/84 (4.8%) scans from patients without a history of prostatic surgical intervention. No significant influence of dynamic acquisition was found on the final PET interpretation on prostate lodge accordingly to previous prostatic surgery.

CONCLUSION

The dynamic phase changes the interpretation of ¹⁸ F-FCH PET in about 9% of cases and the therapeutic strategy in <3% of patients. The influence of the early phase reduces with physician experience. Patient's treatment profile does not appear to have a significant influence on the variability of interpretation, also including the prostate bed.