Renaming Cancer

Recent Advances in the Classification of Bladder Cancer - Updates from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of the Urinary and Male Genital Tumors

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization Classification (WHO) of Urinary and Male Genital Tumors has recently been updated to its 5th edition. The new edition presents a comprehensive approach to the classification of urinary and male genital tumors with an incorporation of morphologic, clinical, and genomic data.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to update the new classification of bladder cancer in the 5th edition and to highlight important changes in nomenclatures, diagnostic criteria, and molecular characterization, as compared to the 4th edition.

METHODS

The pathologic classification of bladder cancer in the 5th edition of WHO Classification of Urinary and Male Genital Tumours was compared to that in the 4th edition. PubMed was searched using key words, including bladder cancer, WHO 1973, WHO 1998, WHO 2004, WHO 2016, histology, pathology, genomics, and molecular classification in the time frame from 1973 to August of 2022. Other relevant papers were also consulted, resulting in the selection of 81 papers as references.

RESULTS

The binary grading of papillary urothelial carcinoma (UC) is practical, but it may be oversimplified and contribute to "grade migration" in recent years. An arbitrary cutoff (5%) has been proposed for bladder cancers with mixed grades. The diagnosis of papillary urothelial neoplasm with low malignant potential has been dramatically reduced in recent years because of overlapping morphology and treatment with low-grade papillary UC. An inverted growth pattern should be distinguished from true (or destructive) stromal invasion in papillary UC. Several methods have been proposed for pT1 tumor substaging, but it is often challenging to substage pT1 tumors in small biopsy specimens. Bladder UC shows a high tendency for divergent differentiation, leading to several distinct histologic subtypes associated with an aggressive clinical behavior. Molecular classification based on the genomic analysis may be a useful tool in the stratification of patients for optimal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5th edition of WHO Classification of Urinary and Male Genital Tumours has made several significant changes in the classification of bladder cancer. It is important to be aware of these changes and to incorporate them into routine clinical practice.

Biological and clinical perspectives of TERT promoter mutation detection on bladder cancer diagnosis and management

The telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations are associated with increased TERT mRNA and TERT protein levels, telomerase activity, and shorter but stable telomere length. TERT promoter mutation is the most common mutation that occurs in approximately 60-80% of patients with bladder cancer. The TERT promoter mutations occur in a wide spectrum of urothelial lesions, including benign urothelial proliferation and tumor-like conditions, benign urothelial tumors, premalignant and putative precursor lesions, urothelial carcinoma and its variants, and nonurothelial malignancies. The prevalence and incidence of TERT promoter mutations in a total of 7259 cases from the urinary tract were systematically reviewed. Different platforms of TERT promoter mutation detection were presented. In this review, we also discussed the significance and clinical implications of TERT promoter mutation detection in urothelial tumorigenesis, surveillance and early detection, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of treatment responses, and clinical outcome. Identification of TERT promoter mutations from urine or plasma cell-free DNA (liquid biopsy) will facilitate bladder cancer screening program and optimal clinical management. A better understanding of TERT promoter mutation and its pathway would open new therapeutic avenues for patients with bladder cancer.

Perceptions of Paris: an international survey in preparation for The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology 2.0 (TPS 2.0)

INTRODUCTION

An international panel of experts in the field of urinary cytopathology conducted a survey, supported by the American Society of Cytopathology, to seek opinions, gather evidence, and identify practice patterns regarding urinary cytology before and after the introduction of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology (TPS). Results from this survey were utilized in the development of the second edition of TPS (TPS-2.0).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group, originally formed during the 2013 International Congress of Cytology, reconvened at the 2019 annual meeting of the American Society of Cytopathology. To prepare for the second edition of TPS, the group generated a survey that included 43 questions related to the taxonomy and practice of urinary cytology.

RESULTS

A total of 523 participant responses were collected, and 451 from 54 countries passed a qualifying screen. Three hundred ninety-four participants provided information about their work settings. Eighty-two percent (218/266) of responding participants use TPS. One hundred sixty-eight people who responded on their urinary cytology atypia rates reported an average decrease from 21.6% to 16%. Over three fourths of participants felt that the same criteria should be used for upper and lower tract interpretations and for instrumented and voided samples. There were varied opinions on addressing atypical squamous cells and suggestions for an expanded discussion of the issue to be included in TPS 2.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the survey demonstrate strong support for TPS and show a decreased self-reported atypia rate in the laboratories using TPS. The majority of participants related that the criteria put forth for the reporting categories were user-friendly and applied with relative ease. The comment section of the survey included suggestions from the participants for further improvement of TPS. Results of this survey have been useful in fine-tuning and advancing TPS. They were considered along with recent literature to generate the second edition of TPS.