External validation of the REMARCC model for the selection of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nephrectomy is the surgical removal of all or part of a kidney. When the aim of nephrectomy is to reduce tumor burden in people with established metastatic disease, the procedure is called cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). CN is typically combined with systemic anticancer therapy (SACT). SACT can be initiated before or immediately after the operation or deferred until radiological signs of disease progression. The benefits and harms of CN are controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone or watchful waiting in newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, two trial registries, and other gray literature sources up to 1 March 2024. We applied no restrictions on publication language or status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated SACT and CN versus SACT alone or watchful waiting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. Primary outcomes were time to death from any cause and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were time to disease progression, treatment response, treatment-related mortality, discontinuation due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search identified 10 records of four unique RCTs that informed two comparisons. In this abstract, we focus on the results for the two primary outcomes. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone Three RCTs informed this comparison. Due to the considerable heterogeneity when pooling across these studies, we decided to present the results of the prespecified subgroup analysis by type of systemic agent. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus interferon immunotherapy versus interferon immunotherapy alone CN plus interferon immunotherapy compared with interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 0.89; I²= 0%; 2 studies, 326 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Assuming 820 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive interferon immunotherapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 132 fewer all-cause deaths (237 fewer to 37 fewer) per 1000 people who receive CN plus interferon immunotherapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy alone We are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy compared with TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.37; 1 study, 450 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Assuming 574 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive TKI therapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 38 more all-cause deaths (38 fewer to 115 more) per 1000 people who receive CN plus TKI therapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy One study evaluated CN followed by TKI therapy (immediate CN) versus three cycles of TKI therapy followed by CN (deferred CN). Immediate CN compared with deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.53; 1 study, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence). Assuming 620 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive deferred CN, the effect estimate corresponds to 173 more all-cause deaths (18 more to 294 more) per 1000 people who receive immediate CN. We found no evidence to assess quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CN plus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy versus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause. However, we are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus SACT in the form of TKI therapy versus SACT in the form of TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause. Immediate CN versus deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause. We found no quality of life data for any of these three comparisons. We also found no evidence to inform any other comparisons, in particular those involving newer immunotherapy agents (programmed death receptor 1 [PD-1]/programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] immune checkpoint inhibitors), which have become the backbone of SACT for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. There is an urgent need for RCTs that explore the role of CN in the context of contemporary forms of systemic immunotherapy.

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the targeted therapy and immunological therapy era: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains controversial. In addition, several unanswered questions regarding the use of CN remain: Can CN provide survival benefits for patients with mRCC? Where do we place CN in the treatment sequence paradigm among patients with mRCC? How do we best stratify patients with mRCC for CN therapy?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search strategy was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Studies were included only in the English language. The risk of bias assessment was made by using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions) and RoB 2 (Risk of Bias 2) tools. The expected outcomes were analyzed by meta-analyses with the fixed-effects model or random effects model, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The measure of effect was the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% CI, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the reliability of the final results.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The HR for OS was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.50-0.61), and PFS was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.80), favoring CN compared with no CN. The upfront CN plus targeted therapy (TT) group had superior OS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.64) compared with the TT alone group. Furthermore, upfront CN plus systemic therapy (ST) was associated with numerically inferior OS compared with ST plus deferred CN in patients with mRCC (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.98-1.74). Finally, the leave-one-out test of sensitivity analysis indicated that the results of this meta-analysis were stable and reliable in the overall HR estimates for these survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

First, CN was associated with better survival than no CN in patients with mRCC. Second, the combination of upfront CN and TT may lead to superior survival outcomes compared to TT alone in patients with mRCC. Survival outcomes were similar between the upfront CN+ST group and the ST+deferred CN group in patients with mRCC. Exact patient selection based on baseline prognostic factors is needed to promise maximal survival for patients with mRCC.

Hot topics in renal cancer pathology: implications for clinical management

INTRODUCTION

The updated European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines issued a weak recommendation for adjuvant pembrolizumab for patients with high-risk operable clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC). High risk of recurrence was defined, as per protocol-criteria, as T2 with nuclear grade 4 or sarcomatoid differentiation, T3 or higher, regional lymph node metastasis, or stage M1 with no evidence of disease. Considering the heterogeneous population included in the recommendation, it has been questioned if adjuvant pembrolizumab may lead to overtreatment of some patients as well as undertreatment of patients with worse prognosis.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the issues related to the assessment of pathological features required to identify those patients harboring a high-risk tumor, highlighting the issue related to interobserver variability and discuss the currently available prognostic scoring systems in ccRCC.

EXPERT OPINION

PPathologist assessment of prognostic features suffers from interobserver variability which may depend on gross sampling and the pathologist's expertise. The presence of clear cell feature is not sufficient criteria by itself to define ccRCC since clear cell can be also found in other histotypes. Application of molecular biomarkers may be useful tools in the near future to help clinicians identify patients harboring tumors with worse prognosis.

Surgical and focal treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A literature review

Accompanied by the development of systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the concept of focal treatment, including surgical treatment, has been changing. Although immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy was essentially considered for synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients, the CARMENA trial and SURTIME trial revealed the negative impact of immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy. Therefore, immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy is currently considered only for a limited number of patients. Besides, deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy seems to have efficacy for overall survival in prior retrospective studies. Two randomized controlled trials, the PROBE trial (NCT04510597) and the NORDIC-SUN trial (NCT03977571), are underway to elucidate deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy. Metastasectomy is also considered in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients because previous studies demonstrated the overall survival benefit of metastasectomy. However, since all reports were retrospective studies, physicians could exclude the patients who were not expected to show the efficacy of metastasectomy. Therefore, an adequate patient selection for metastasectomy is important. A common factor predicting better overall survival was complete resection. Radiotherapies for metastatic lesions during systemic therapy showed approximately 90% local disease control rate at 1 year. However, no report has demonstrated that radiotherapy improves survival so far. Since surgical and focal treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients generally have minimal evidence, further investigations are needed.