1
|
Robesti D, Moschini M, Pio Tenace N, Burgio G, Re C, Leni R, De Angelis M, Scilipoti P, Pellegrino F, Cannoletta D, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Gallina A, Doglioni C, Colecchia M, Salonia A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Lucianò R. The Impact of Second Opinion Expert Pathology Review in Patient Management at the Time of Transurethral Resection of the Bladder. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00096-8. [PMID: 38937195 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Pathological features in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer specimens are pivotal in determining correct patients' therapeutic management. Sparse data exist regarding the importance of second opinion performed by an expert uropathologist. This study aimed to assess the importance of a second opinion by an expert uropathologist in the management of bladder cancer. METHODS The study relied on 272 bladder cancer specimens from 231 patients seeking a pathology second opinion after transurethral resection of the bladder for a clinical suspicion of bladder cancer, relapse, or second-look procedure. Pathology second opinion was offered by an experienced fellowship-trained uropathologist. Discrepancies were recorded considering primary tumor staging, the presence of muscularis propria, and the presence of histological variants. Cases were categorized as no significant discordance, major discordance without management change, and major discordance with management change according to the European Urology Association (EAU) guidelines. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Among 272 second opinion cases, 39% (108/272) had major discordance and 28% (75/272) had major discordance with change in management according to the EAU guidelines. Upstaging and downstaging were reported in 66 (24%) patients. Improper identification of the presence of muscularis propria was found in 46 (17%) cases, of which 11 (4%) were deemed clinically relevant. Differences regarding the presence of histological variants were diagnosed in 40 cases (15%), resulting in eight (3%) changes in clinical management. In ten specimens (4%), multiple clinically relevant discrepancies were found. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The second opinion evaluation changed the clinical management in 25% of the cases. These results support the importance of specimen review by an expert uropathologist as a major driver in the correct bladder cancer management. PATIENT SUMMARY We investigated the importance of a second opinion performed by an expert uropathologist in the management of bladder cancer. We found that 25% had their treatment plan changed due to the revised pathological report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marco Moschini
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giusy Burgio
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario De Angelis
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Claudio Doglioni
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Salonia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Lucianò
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waraich TA, Khalid SY, Ali A, Kathia UM. Comparative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e50646. [PMID: 38229790 PMCID: PMC10790112 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer poses a significant clinical challenge that necessitates effective therapeutic interventions. Radical cystectomy is a primary treatment option, but a comprehensive understanding of its outcomes is crucial for informed clinical decision-making. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate and summarize the outcomes associated with radical cystectomy as a primary treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a focus on survival rates, complications, and quality of life. A systematic search across databases-PubMed, Google Scholar, and others-covered studies from 2017 onwards. Included were studies reporting survival rates, complications, and quality of life post-radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, including randomized controlled trials, cohort, and observational studies. Multidimensional analysis revealed promising findings regarding the efficacy of radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Survival outcomes, including overall survival and disease-specific mortality, have demonstrated significant improvements, particularly in recent randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Complications associated with the surgical procedure, such as positive surgical margins and lymph node yields, were generally acceptable. Quality of life outcomes post-radical cystectomy exhibited positive trends, although variations were noted in the emotional and social domains. This review underscores radical cystectomy's role in enhancing overall survival and reducing disease-specific mortality in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Despite reported complications, recent studies support its acceptable risk profile. Detailed examination of various factors contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the procedure. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized treatment approaches in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, considering both oncological efficacy and perioperative outcomes. Radical cystectomy remains fundamental in urological oncology, with ongoing advancements refining its significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Syed Yousaf Khalid
- Department of Urology, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, IRL
| | - Azfar Ali
- Department of Urology & Kidney Transplantation, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK
| | - Usama Muhammad Kathia
- Department of Urology & Kidney Transplantation, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK
| |
Collapse
|