|
1
|
Prata F, Basile S, Tedesco F, Ragusa A, Pira M, Iannuzzi A, Fantozzi M, Civitella A, Scarpa RM, Papalia R. Skill Transfer from Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy to the Hugo™ RAS System: A Novel Proficiency Score to Assess Surgical Quality during the Learning Curve. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2226. [PMID: 38673499 PMCID: PMC11050920 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The absence of validated tools to assess the skill transfer from laparoscopy to robotic surgery remains an unsolved issue in the context of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We aimed to describe and validate a novel proficiency score to critically evaluate the surgical quality of RAPN with the Hugo™ RAS System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Methods: Between October 2022 and September 2023, 27 consecutive patients underwent off-clamp RAPN for localized renal tumors at our institution. To analyze the learning curve (LC), the cohort was chronologically divided into two phases of 6 months each. Proficiency was defined as the achievement of trifecta while maintaining a comparable intraoperative time in the interquartile range of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed by the same surgeon. A logistic binary regression model was built to identify predictors of proficiency achievement. Results: A proficiency score was achieved in 14 patients (74.1%). At univariable analysis, number of consecutive procedures > 12 (OR 13.7; 95%CI 2.05-21.1, p = 0.007), pathological tumor size (OR 0.92; 95%CI 0.89-0.99, p = 0.04) and essential blood hypertension (OR 0.16; 95%CI 0.03-0.82, p = 0.02) were found to be predictors of proficiency score. At multivariable analysis, after adjusting for potential confounding factors, number of consecutive procedures > 12 (OR 8.1; 95%CI 1.44-14.6, p = 0.03) was the only independent predictor of proficiency score achievement. Conclusions: Our results showed that the skills of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon are transferrable to the novel Hugo™ RAS System in the context of nephron-sparing surgery. Improved surgical quality may be expected after completing the first 12 consecutive procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Prata
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.B.); (F.T.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (A.I.); (M.F.); (A.C.); (R.M.S.); (R.P.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Aveta A, Iossa V, Spena G, Conforti P, Pagano G, Dinacci F, Verze P, Manfredi C, Ferro M, Lasorsa F, Spirito L, Napolitano L, Tufano A, Fiorenza A, Russo P, Crocerossa F, Lucarelli G, Perdonà S, Sanseverino R, Siracusano S, Cilio S, Pandolfo SD. Ablative Treatments for Small Renal Masses and Management of Recurrences: A Comprehensive Review. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:450. [PMID: 38672721 PMCID: PMC11050889 DOI: 10.3390/life14040450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This review focuses on ablative techniques for small renal masses (SRMs), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), and irreversible electroporation (IRE), and discusses recurrence management. Through an extensive literature review, we outline the procedures, outcomes, and follow-up strategies associated with each ablative method. The review provides a detailed examination of these techniques-RFA, CA, MWA, and IRE-elucidating their respective outcomes. Recurrence rates vary among them, with RFA and CA showing comparable rates, MWA demonstrating favorable short-term results, and IRE exhibiting promise in experimental stages. For managing recurrences, various strategies are considered, including active surveillance, re-ablation, or salvage surgery. Surveillance is preferred post-RFA and post-CA, due to slow SRM growth, while re-ablation, particularly with RFA and CA, is deemed feasible without additional complications. Salvage surgery emerges as a viable option for larger or resistant tumors. While ablative techniques offer short-term results comparable to surgery, further research is essential to understand their long-term effects fully. Decisions concerning recurrence management should consider individual and tumor-specific factors. Imaging, notably contrast-enhanced ultrasounds, plays a pivotal role in assessing treatment success, emphasizing the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach for optimal outcomes. The lack of randomized trials highlights the need for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achille Aveta
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy; (V.I.); (R.S.)
| | - Vincenzo Iossa
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy; (V.I.); (R.S.)
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Spena
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Paolo Conforti
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Giovanni Pagano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Fabrizio Dinacci
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.M.); (L.S.)
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 71013 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Lorenzo Spirito
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.M.); (L.S.)
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Alessandra Fiorenza
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Pierluigi Russo
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Division of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Roberto Sanseverino
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy; (V.I.); (R.S.)
| | | | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Pandolfo SD, Wu Z, Campi R, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Mari A, Verze P, Manfredi C, Franco A, Ditonno F, Cerrato C, Ferro M, Lasorsa F, Contieri R, Napolitano L, Tufano A, Lucarelli G, Cilio S, Perdonà S, Siracusano S, Autorino R, Aveta A. Outcomes and Techniques of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) for Renal Hilar Masses: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:693. [PMID: 38398084 PMCID: PMC10886610 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex renal tumors. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate and assess the results of RAPN when dealing with entirely central hilar masses and to examine the various methods used to address the surgical difficulties associated with them. Methods: A thorough literature search in September 2023 across various databases focused on RAPN for renal hilar masses, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary goal was to evaluate RAPN's surgical and functional outcomes, with a secondary aim of examining different surgical techniques. Out of 1250 records, 13 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. Results: Evidence is growing in favor of RAPN for renal hilar masses. Despite a predominance of retrospective studies and a lack of long-term data, RAPN shows positive surgical outcomes and preserves renal function without compromising cancer treatment effectiveness. Innovative suturing and clamping methods are emerging in surgical management. Conclusions: RAPN is a promising technique for managing renal hilar masses in RCC, offering effective surgical outcomes and renal function preservation. The study highlights the need for more long-term data and prospective studies to further validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67010 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy; (R.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.)
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy;
| | - Andrea Mari
- Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy; (R.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Urology Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, IRCCS—European Institute of Oncology, 71013 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy;
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | | | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Achille Aveta
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Zhang G, Wang B, Liu H, Jia G, Tao B, Zhang H, Wang C. How many cases are required to achieving early proficiency in purely off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? Front Surg 2024; 10:1309522. [PMID: 38234451 PMCID: PMC10792019 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1309522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (Offc-RAPN) is a technically challenging procedure that can effectively avoid renal ischemia owing to the absence of hilar vessel preparation and clamping. However, data on the learning curve (LC) for this technique are limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the LC of Offc-RAPN and compare the perioperative outcomes between different learning phases. Methods This retrospective study included 50 consecutive patients who underwent purely Offc-RAPN between January 2022 and April 2023. Multidimensional cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis method was used to assess LC. Spearman's correlation and LOWESS analysis were performed to analyze the continuous variables of perioperative outcomes. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2-test, t-test and U-test. Results CUSUM analysis identified two LC phases: phase I (the first 24 cases) and phase II (the subsequent 26 cases). Phase II showed significant reductions in mean operative time (133.5 vs. 115.31 min; p = 0.04), mean console time (103.21 vs. 81.27 min; p = 0.01), and mean postoperative length of stay (5.33 vs. 4.30 days; p = 0.04) compared to phase I. However, no significant differences were observed in other perioperative outcomes or baseline characteristics between the two LC phases. Conclusions Offc-RAPN performed by a surgeon with experience in laparoscopic and robotic surgeries achieved early proficiency in 24 cases. Moreover, Offc-RAPN alone is safe and feasible even in the initial phase of the LC for an experienced surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Chunyang Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|