Alfaxalone for maintenance of anaesthesia in ponies undergoing field castration: continuous infusion compared with intravenous boluses

Recovery of horses from general anaesthesia: A systematic review (2000-2020) of the influence of anaesthetic protocol on recovery quality

BACKGROUND

The recovery phase after equine general anaesthesia (GA) is a time of considerable risk and therefore has been the subject of extensive research over the last 20 years. Various pharmacological interventions have been developed and studied with the objective of improving recovery quality and reducing anaesthetic-related mortality and morbidity. Nevertheless, some controversy remains regarding the influence of anaesthetic protocol choice on recovery quality from GA and its implications for recovery-related mortality and morbidity. A systematic review of the literature investigating the influence of anaesthetic protocol choice on recovery quality is currently lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a detailed evaluation of the equine veterinary literature investigating the effect of anaesthetic protocol choice on equine recovery quality utilising the GRADE framework.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic evaluation of the equine veterinary literature was performed using the GRADE framework.

METHODS

A literature search was performed and studies were assessed for eligibility by both authors utilising PRISMA guidelines. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated by both authors, categorically summarised and the quality of evidence for each sub-topic was assessed using the GRADE framework.

RESULTS

A total of 124 studies were identified which directly assessed the impact of anaesthetic protocol choice on recovery quality after GA in horses. Evaluation of the available evidence indicated that certain partial intravenous anaesthesia (PIVA) agents, cessation of intravenous lidocaine 30 minutes prior to recovery and provision of adequate analgesia improves recovery quality.

MAIN LIMITATIONS

The validity of the results of some studies may have been compromised by missing data and small sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence to indicate that certain PIVA agents, cessation of intravenous lidocaine 30 minutes prior to recovery and provision of adequate analgesia improves recovery quality.

Recovery after General Anaesthesia in Adult Horses: A Structured Summary of the Literature

Simple Summary

Recovery is the most dangerous phase of general anaesthesia in horses. Numerous publications have reported about this phase, but structured reviews that try to reduce the risk of bias of narrative reviews/expert opinions, focussing on the topic are missing. Therefore, the aim of the present article was to publish the first structured review as a summary of the literature focussing on the recovery phase after general anaesthesia in horses. The objective was to summarise the available literature, taking into account the scientific evidence of the individual studies. A structured approach was followed with two experts in the field independently deciding on article inclusion and its level of scientific evidence. A total number of 444 articles, sorted by topics and classified based on their levels of evidence, were finally included into the present summary. The most important findings were summarised and discussed. The present structured review can be used as a compilation of the publications that, to date, focus on the recovery phase after general anaesthesia in adult horses. This type of review tries to minimise the risk of bias inherent to narrative reviews/expert opinions.

Abstract

Recovery remains the most dangerous phase of general anaesthesia in horses. The objective of this publication was to perform a structured literature review including levels of evidence (LoE) of each study with the keywords “recovery anaesthesia horse”, entered at once, in the search browsers PubMed and Web of Science. The two authors independently evaluated each candidate article. A final list with 444 articles was obtained on 5 April 2021, classified as: 41 “narrative reviews/expert opinions”, 16 “retrospective outcome studies”, 5 “surveys”, 59 “premedication/sedation and induction drugs”, 27 “maintenance with inhalant agents”, 55 “maintenance with total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA)”, 3 “TIVA versus inhalants”, 56 “maintenance with partial intravenous anaesthesia (PIVA)”, 27 “other drugs used during maintenance”, 18 “drugs before/during recovery”, 18 “recovery systems”, 21 “respiratory system in recovery”, 41 “other factors”, 51 “case series/reports” and 6 “systems to score recoveries”. Of them, 167 were LoE 1, 36 LoE 2, 33 LoE 3, 110 LoE 4, 90 LoE 5 and 8 could not be classified based on the available abstract. This review can be used as an up-to-date compilation of the literature about recovery after general anaesthesia in adult horses that tried to minimise the bias inherent to narrative reviews.

Evaluation of xylazine-alfaxalone anesthesia for field castration in donkey foals

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the anesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of xylazine-alfaxalone anesthesia in donkey foals undergoing field castration.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

ANIMALS

A group of seven standard donkeys aged [median (range)] 12 (10-26) weeks, weighing 47.3 (37.3-68.2) kg.

METHODS

Donkeys were anesthetized with xylazine (1 mg kg-1) intravenously (IV) followed 3 minutes later by alfaxalone (1 mg kg-1) IV. Additional doses of xylazine (0.5 mg kg-1) and alfaxalone (0.5 mg kg-1) IV were administered as needed to maintain surgical anesthesia. Intranasal oxygen was supplemented at 3 L minute-1. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) by oscillometry were recorded before drug administration and every 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) was recorded every 5 minutes after induction. Time to recumbency after alfaxalone administration, time to anesthetic re-dose, time to first movement, sternal and standing after last anesthetic dose and surgery time were recorded. Induction and recovery quality were scored (1, very poor; 5, excellent).

RESULTS

Median (range) induction score was 5 (1-5), and recovery score 4 (1-5). Overall, two donkeys were assigned a score of 1 (excitement) during induction or recovery. HR and MAP during the procedure did not differ from baseline. fR was decreased at 5 and 10 minutes but was not considered clinically significant. SpO2 was <90% at one time point in two animals.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Xylazine-alfaxalone anesthesia resulted in adequate conditions for castration in 12 week old donkeys. While the majority of inductions and recoveries were good to excellent, significant excitement occurred in two animals and may limit the utility of this protocol for larger donkeys. Hypoxemia occurred despite intranasal oxygen supplementation.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous alfaxalone in young Thoroughbred horses premedicated with medetomidine and midazolam

To investigate the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous alfaxalone in young Thoroughbred horses, seven Thoroughbred horses were randomly anaesthetised twice with either 1 or 2 mg/kg of intravenous alfaxalone after premedication with medetomidine (6 µg/kg intravenous) and midazolam (20 µg/kg intravenous). Blood samples were collected at predetermined time points up to two hours after administration. Plasma alfaxalone concentrations were quantified by a liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry method and analysed by non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. Induction and recovery qualities were good to excellent for both doses. Recovery time for the 2 mg/kg (median 90 minutes) was significantly longer than that for the 1 mg/kg (median 50 minutes). Respiratory rate for the 2 mg/kg was significantly lower than that for the 1 mg/kg, resulting in hypoxaemia. The median (range) elimination half-life, total clearance and volume of distribution were 58.2 (42.3-70.7) minutes, 11.6 (10.3-14.5) ml/minute/kg and 0.8 (0.7-0.9) l/kg for the 1 mg/kg and 59.8 (47.5-68.0) minutes, 14.7 (12.1-16.0) ml/minute/kg and 0.9 (0.9-1.2) l/kg for the 2 mg/kg, respectively. Alfaxalone is rapidly eliminated from the plasma in young Thoroughbred horses. Respiratory depression should be especially noted when alfaxalone is used in clinical practice.

Alfaxalone-Xylazine Anesthesia in Laboratory Mice (Mus musculus)

Since its recent reformulation, alfaxalone has gained popularity as an injectable veterinary anesthetic, including promising studies demonstrating the use of alfaxalone-xylazine for anesthesia in mice. Here we sought to expand these studies by testing additional dose ranges, elaborating on physiologic monitoring, testing sex- and strain-associated differences, and evaluating efficacy during actual surgical conditions. C57BL/6J mice showed significant sex-associated differences in anesthetic sensitivity, with males requiring higher doses of alfaxalone (80-120 mg/kg IP alfaxalone with 10 mg/kg IP xylazine) than females (40-80 mg/kg IP alfaxalone with 10 mg/kg IP xylazine) to achieve a surgical plane of anesthesia. In addition, female outbred CD1 mice were less sensitive to alfaxalone than female inbred C57BL/6J mice. When used during actual surgery, alfaxalone-xylazine administered intraperitoneally provided adequate anesthesia for a model of orthopedic surgery, whereas the same anesthetic regimen during laparotomy resulted in unacceptably high mortality; survival during laparotomy increased when drugs were administered subcutaneously. These results indicate that alfaxalone-xylazine may be a viable option for injectable surgical anesthesia in mice, although strain- and sex-associated differences and alternative routes of administration should be considered when optimizing the anesthetic regimen for specific experimental conditions.