Comparison of multiple estimates of efficacy for influenza vaccine

Exploring indirect protection associated with influenza immunization - A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Influenza causes significant annual morbidity and mortality, particularly in older adults, for whom influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) is also lower. Immunizing one group (e.g., children) against influenza may indirectly protect another group (e.g., older adults) against influenza and its complications.

METHODS

We updated previous systematic reviews on indirect protection against influenza by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant human studies published until January 4, 2017. We abstracted and critically appraised English language publications that reported or provided information to calculate indirect VE against influenza, as a percentage, in non-institutional settings. We developed a term called 'estimated actual protection' to explore the relationship between indirect protection and the product of direct VE and relative vaccine coverage. We calculated estimated actual protection for a subset of studies that reported coverage and indirect VE for: laboratory-confirmed influenza; outpatient care for respiratory illness; influenza-associated emergency visits; or influenza-associated hospitalizations. We ran linear mixed models to compare estimated actual protection against indirect VE for the four outcomes, and graphed the data.

RESULTS

Of 2320 unique records identified, we abstracted and appraised 26 articles describing 24 studies. The majority of included studies reported at least one outcome suggesting that immunizing one group reduced influenza-related outcomes in another group. Critical appraisal of the abstracted studies identified recurring methodological weaknesses, such as lack of laboratory-confirmed influenza. Our exploratory analyses of 18 studies indicated a positive but not statistically significant relationship between estimated actual protection and indirect protection for each of the four outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and exploratory analyses suggest influenza immunization provides some level of indirect protection. However, our critical appraisal highlights the need for a standardized and consistently applied approach to measuring indirect protection against influenza to fill existing knowledge gaps. Additionally, the concept of estimated actual protection requires validation.

Determining optimal community protection strategies for the influenza vaccine

Introduction: Seasonal influenza poses a major risk to the health of the population. Optimal strategies for influenza vaccination can help to reduce this risk. Areas covered: Systematic evaluations of the burden of influenza are first reviewed. Key meta-analysis, randomized trials, and observational studies are critically reviewed to provide the best estimates of the efficacy of influenza vaccine. The concept of herd effect is first introduced and this is followed by the rationale and the evidence to support herd effect that can be provided with strategic use of influenza vaccination in populations. Challenges including the effect of repeated influenza vaccination and vaccine hesitancy are reviewed. The citations were selected by the authors based on PubMed searches of the literature. Expert opinion: Efforts to develop new vaccines, including a universal vaccine, offer the best prospects for improved herd effect. Increasing uptake in new populations can increase likelihood of a herd effect.

The crucial role of maternal care providers as vaccinators for pregnant women

Vaccination during pregnancy is increasingly being recognised internationally a useful means of preventing illness in pregnant women and their newborns. It has been used since the 1960s, when it was found that tetanus vaccine was highly effective in preventing neonatal tetanus, but interest has greatly increased over the last few years. As new data become available showing the numerous benefits of maternal immunisation and its potential for improving maternal and neonatal health in relation to a number of infectious conditions, it is being increasingly incorporated into the national vaccination programmes around the world. However, the development of new vaccines, the existence of clinical trials testing the efficacy of vaccinating pregnant women in order to protect newborns against respiratory syncytial virus and group B Streptococcus infections, and the fact that the uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccines during pregnancy is lower than expected in developed countries is making it increasingly clear that existing maternal vaccination programmes need to be strengthened. This reviews addresses the importance of integrating maternal immunisation and standard obstetrical care in order to promote vaccination administration by maternal care providers (MCPs) because the vaccination goals for pregnant women cannot be achieved without appropriate training and extending the role of MCPs as vaccinators. In order to make meaningful progress, it is necessary to develop and refine targeted messages for pregnant women concerning the benefits of maternal immunisation for themselves and their infants.

Advax™, a polysaccharide adjuvant derived from delta inulin, provides improved influenza vaccine protection through broad-based enhancement of adaptive immune responses

Advax™ adjuvant is derived from inulin, a natural plant-derived polysaccharide that when crystallized in the delta polymorphic form, becomes immunologically active. This study was performed to assess the ability of Advax™ adjuvant to enhance influenza vaccine immunogenicity and protection. Mice were immunized with influenza vaccine alone or combined with Advax™ adjuvant. Immuno-phenotyping of the anti-influenza response was performed including antibody isotypes, B-cell ELISPOT, CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferation, influenza-stimulated cytokine secretion, DTH skin tests and challenge with live influenza virus. Advax™ adjuvant increased neutralizing antibody and memory B-cell responses to influenza. It similarly enhanced CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferation and increased influenza-stimulated IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-6, and GM-CSF responses. This translated into enhanced protection against mortality and morbidity in mice. Advax™ adjuvant provided significant antigen dose-sparing compared to influenza antigen alone. Protection could be transferred from mice that had received Advax™-adjuvanted vaccine to naïve mice by immune serum. Enhanced humoral and T-cell responses induced by Advax™-formulated vaccine were sustained 12months post-immunization. Advax™ adjuvant had low reactogenicity and no adverse events were identified. This suggests Advax™ adjuvant could be a useful influenza vaccine adjuvant.