Development and introduction of a ready-to-use pediatric pentavalent vaccine to meet and sustain the needs of developing countries – Quinvaxem®: The first 5 years

Immunogenicity of the pentavalent DTwP-HB-Hib vaccine (Shan-5) used in the Thai Expanded Program on Immunization compared to the hexavalent DTaP-HB-Hib-IPV and DTwP-HB-Hib (Quinvaxem) vaccines administered to infants at 2, 4, 6 months of age

BACKGROUND

The pentavalent DTwP-HB-Hib (Shan-5) vaccine was first introduced into the Thailand Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) in 2019. The Shan-5 vaccine is administered to infants at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, after initial vaccination with monovalent hepatitis B (HepB) and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccines at birth. This study compared the immunogenicity of the HepB, diphtheria, tetanus, and Bordetella pertussis antigens incorporated in the EPI Shan-5 vaccine versus the optional pentavalent (DTwP-HB-Hib) Quinvaxem and hexavalent (DTaP-HB-Hib-IPV) Infanrix-hexa vaccine.

METHODS

Three-dose Shan-5-vaccinated children were prospectively enrolled at the Regional Health Promotion Centre 5, Ratchaburi province, Thailand, between May 2020 and May 2021. Blood sampling was performed at months 7 and 18. The levels of HepB surface antibody (anti-HBs), anti-diphtheria toxoid (DT) IgG, anti-tetanus toxoid (TT) IgG, and anti-pertussis toxin (PT) IgG were evaluated using commercially available enzyme-linked immunoassays.

RESULTS

Anti-HBs levels of ≥10 mIU/mL were achieved in 100 %, 99.2 %, and 99.2 % of infants in the Shan-5 EPI group, hexavalent group and Quinvaxem group one month after four dose immunization (at 0, 2, 4, 6 months of age), respectively. The geometric mean concentrations of the EPI Shan-5 and hexavalent groups were comparable but were higher than those of the Quinvaxem group. At one month after primary vaccination (month 7), infants in the Shan-5 EPI group had significantly higher levels of anti-DT IgG, anti-TT IgG, and anti-PT IgG than infants in the hexavalent and Quinvaxem groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunogenicity of the HepB surface antigen in the EPI Shan-5 vaccine was similar to that achieved by the hexavalent vaccine, but was higher than that achieved by the Quinvaxem vaccine. The Shan-5 vaccine is highly immunogenic and generates robust antibody responses after primary immunization.

Strategies for vaccine-product innovation: Creating an enabling environment for product development to uptake in low- and middle-income countries

Vaccine-product innovations that address barriers to immunization are urgently needed to achieve equitable vaccine coverage, as articulated in the new Immunization Agenda 2030 and the Gavi 5.0 strategy. In 2020, the Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy (VIPS) prioritized three innovations, namely microarray patches (MAPs), heat-stable and controlled-temperature chain (CTC) enabled liquid vaccine formulations and barcodes on primary packaging. These innovations were prioritized based on the priority immunization barriers that they may help overcome in resource constrained contexts, as well as by considering their potential impact on health, coverage and equity, safety, economic costs and their technical readiness and commercial feasibility. VIPS is now working to accelerate the development and lay the foundation for future uptake of the three priority vaccine-product innovations, with the long term-goal to ensure equitable vaccine coverage and increased impact of vaccines in low- and middle- income countries. To inform our strategic planning, we analyzed four commercially available vaccine product-innovations and conducted interviews with individuals from 17 immunization organizations, and/or independent immunization experts. The findings are synthesized into an 'innovation conundrum' that describes the challenges encountered in developing vaccine-product innovations and a vaccine-product innovation 'theory of change', which highlights actions that should be undertaken in parallel to product development to incentivize sustainable investment and prepare the pathway for uptake and impact.

DTwP-HB-Hib: antibody persistence after a primary series, immune response and safety after a booster dose in children 18-24 months old

Background

The new combination of DTwP-HB-Hib vaccines has been developed in Indonesia following World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation and integrated into national immunization program. The aims of the study were to measure 1) antibody persistence 12–18 months after a primary series, 2) immune response and safety after a booster dose of DTwP-HB-Hib.

Methods

This was a multi-center, open-labeled, prospective, interventional study. Subjects who had received complete primary dose of DTwP-HB-Hib vaccine from the previous phase III trial were recruited in this trial. Subjects were given one dose of DTwP-HB-Hib (Pentabio®) booster at age 18–24 months old. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Hemophilus influenza type B antibodies were measured before and after booster to determine antibody persistence and immune response. Vaccine adverse events were assessed immediately and monitored until 28 days after the booster recorded with parent’s diary cards.

Results

There were 396 subjects who completed the study. Increased proportion of seroprotected subjects from pre-booster to post-booster were noted in all vaccine antigens: 74.5 to 99.7% for diphtheria; 100 to 100% for tetanus; 40.4 to 95.5% for pertussis; 90.2 to 99.5% for hepatitis B; and 97.7 to 100% for Hib. Common systemic adverse events (AEs) were irritability (23.7–25%) and fever (39.9–45.2%). Local AEs such as redness, swelling, and induration were significantly less common in the thigh group (7.7, 11.3, and 7.1%) than in the deltoid group (28.9, 30.7, and 25%) (P < 0.001). Most AEs were mild and resolved spontaneously within three-day follow-up period.

Conclusions

Booster of DTwP-HB-Hib vaccine at age 18–24 months is required to achieve and maintain optimal protective antibody. The vaccine is safe and immunogenic to be used for booster vaccination.

Trial registration

NCT02095314 (retrospectively registered, March 24, 2014).

Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of pentavalent vaccine Quinvaxem in a compact prefilled auto-disabled (cPAD) injection system versus single-dose vials in healthy infants: a phase 3, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate non-inferiority of three doses of Quinvaxem in a compact prefilled auto-disabled (cPAD) injection system versus Quinvaxem in a single-dose vial administered with conventional syringe in terms of seroconversion/seroprotection rates for all antibodies (anti-hepatitis B (HB), anti-Haemophilus influenzae type b polyribosylribitol phosphate (Hib PRP), anti-diphtheria, anti-tetanus, anti-Bordetella pertussis) at 1 month after primary vaccination.

METHODS

Four hundred healthy infants aged 42-65 days were randomized (1:1) to receive Quinvaxem in cPAD or single-dose vial at 6, 10, and 12 weeks of age. Blood samples were collected before vaccination and at 1 month after the third dose to determine seroconversion/seroprotection rates. Safety was assessed from solicited and unsolicited adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

Of the 400 infants randomized, 395 (98.8%) received all three vaccine doses. In the cPAD vs. single-dose vial groups, seroprotection rates against Hib PRP (both 98.5%), HB (92.9% vs. 93.4%), diphtheria (100% vs. 99%), and tetanus toxoids (both 100%), and seroconversion against B. pertussis (95.4% vs. 97%) were ≥92% at 1 month after the third vaccination (lower limits of 95% confidence intervals simultaneously greater than -10%). Geometric mean concentrations exceeded seroprotection/seroconversion thresholds by large margins. The incidences of induration and erythema were comparable between the groups; tenderness was slightly higher in the cPAD group (85.5% vs. 76.5%). No vaccine-related SAEs occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Quinvaxem in cPAD was non-inferior to single-dose vial with respect to seroprotection/seroconversion rates for all antibodies. Both presentations were well-tolerated.

Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) recommended immunization schedule for children aged 0 through 18 years--India, 2014 and updates on immunization

JUSTIFICATION

There is a need to review/revise recommendations about existing vaccines in light of recent developments in the field of vaccinology.

PROCESS

Following an IAP ACVIP meeting on April 19 and 20, 2014, a draft of revised recommendations for the year 2014 and updates on certain vaccine formulations was prepared and circulated among the meeting participants to arrive at a consensus.

OBJECTIVES

To review and revise recommendations for 2014 Immunization timetable for pediatricians in office practice and issue statements on certain new and existing vaccine formulations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The major changes in the 2014 Immunization Timetable include two doses of MMR vaccine at 9 and 15 months of age, single dose recommendation for administration of live attenuated H2 strain hepatitis A vaccine, inclusion of two new situations in high-risk category of children in context with pre-exposure prophylaxis of rabies, creation of a new slot at 9-12 months of age for typhoid conjugate vaccine for primary immunization, and recommendation of two doses of human papilloma virus vaccines with a minimum interval of 6 months between doses for primary schedule of adolescent/preadolescent girls aged 9-14 years. There would not be any change to the committee's last year's (2013) recommendations on pertussis vaccination and administration schedule of monovalent human rotavirus vaccine. There is no need of providing additional doses of whole-cell pertussis vaccine to children who have earlier completed their primary schedule with acellular pertussis vaccine-containing products. A brief update on the new Indian Rotavirus vaccine, 116E is also provided. The committee has reviewed and offered its recommendations on the currently available pentavalent vaccine (DTwP+Hib+Hepatitis-B) combinations in Indian market. The comments and footnotes for several vaccines are also updated and revised.

A phase III single arm, multicenter, open-label study to assess the immunogenicity and tolerability of a pentavalent DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine in indian infants

Compliance with recommended vaccinations for Indian infants is facilitated by using combination vaccines to minimize the number of required injections. The ready-to-use, preservative free, fully-liquid combination DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine, Quinvaxem(®), offers convenience of administering five important vaccine antigens to infants in a single injection. This phase III, single-arm, multicenter study was designed to assess immunogenicity and safety of three doses of Quinvaxem(®) to Indian infants administered at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Blood samples were taken prior to the first dose and at one month post last vaccination. Infants were observed clinically for any reaction approximately 30 min following each vaccination, and parents completed subject diaries for solicited local, systemic and any adverse events (AEs) following over a 5 d period. DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine elicited strong immune responses that exceeded seroprotection/seroconversion thresholds against all vaccine antigens. At one month after third vaccination, percentages of infants achieving predefined protective antibody levels were 99% diphtheria; 100% tetanus; 98% Hepatitis B; 100% Hib short-term (≥ 0.15 µg/mL); 95% Hib long-term (≥ 1.0 µg/mL) protection; and relevant immune response was 99% for pertussis. The vaccine was well tolerated, with no vaccine-related serious AEs. Only one case of high fever (≥ 40 °C) was reported. The most frequently reported reactions were mild to moderate tenderness and erythema. Frequencies of all AEs declined with subsequent vaccinations. This study demonstrated that this convenient, fully-liquid DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine is highly immunogenic and has a acceptable safety profile for use in Indian infants. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01470287. Clinical Trials Registry of India Number: CTRI/2011/11/002118.