Immunogenicity and safety of the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine MenACWY-TT co-administered with a combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine versus their separate administration in adolescents and young adults: A phase III, randomized study

Safety and immunogenicity of an indigenously developed tetanus toxoid, diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in adults, adolescents, and children in India

BACKGROUND

This study assessed safety and immunogenicity of Serum Institute of India Pvt Ltd (SIIPL)'s tetanus toxoid (TT), diphtheria toxoid (DT), and acellular pertussis booster vaccine (Tdap).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this Phase II/III, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, open-label study, 1500 healthy individuals, aged 4-65 years, were randomized to receive a single dose of SIIPL Tdap or comparator Tdap vaccine (Boostrix®; GlaxoSmithKlines, India). Adverse events (AEs) during initial 30 minutes, 7-day, 30-day post-vaccination were assessed. Blood samples were taken before and 30 days post-vaccination for immunogenicity assessment.

RESULTS

No significant differences in incidence of local and systemic solicited AEs were observed between the two groups; no vaccine-related serious AEs were reported. SIIPL Tdap was non-inferior to comparator Tdap in achieving booster responses to TT and DT in 75.2% and 70.8% of the participants, respectively, and to pertussis toxoid (PT), pertactin (PRN), and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) in 94.3%, 92.6%, and 95.0% of the participants, respectively. Anti-PT, anti-PRN, and anti-FHA antibody geometric mean titers in both the groups, were significantly higher post-vaccination compared to pre-vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Booster vaccination with SIIPL Tdap was non-inferior to comparator Tdap with respect to immunogenicity against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis and was well tolerated.

Immunogenicity and safety of MenACWY-TT, a quadrivalent meningococcal tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine recently licensed in the United States for individuals ≥2 years of age

Vaccination offers the best way to prevent invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). As demonstrated in countries with national immunization programs (NIPs) against IMD, meningococcal conjugate vaccines have contributed to significant declines in incidence. Since some meningococcal vaccines are associated with modest immunogenicity in infants, possible immunological interference upon concomitant administration with some pediatric vaccines, and administration errors resulting from improper reconstitution, opportunities for improvement exist. A quadrivalent conjugate vaccine, MenQuadfi® (Meningococcal [Serogroups A, C, Y, and W] Conjugate Vaccine; Sanofi, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania), was approved in 2020 for the prevention of IMD caused by meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y in individuals ≥2 years of age in the United States. Five pivotal studies and one ancillary study supported approval in the United States; clinical trials in infants are ongoing. Data on the immunogenicity and safety of this vaccine are presented, and its potential value in clinical practice is discussed.

A novel vaccine to prevent meningococcal disease beyond the first year of life: an early review of MenACYW-TT

INTRODUCTION

Although quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines have been effective in preventing invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by serogroups A, C, W, and Y across age groups from infants to adults, data on their efficacy and safety in adults ≥56 years of age are lacking. Moreover, multiple available quadrivalent conjugate vaccines require reconstitution prior to administration, introducing the potential for error. A novel quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MenACYW-TT (MenQuadfi®) was approved in 2020 for use in individuals ≥12 months of age as a single dose in the European Union and some other countries and in individuals ≥2 years of age in the United States.

AREAS COVERED

The findings of Phase II/III studies that included >6600 individuals and evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of MenACYW-TT beyond the first year of life are comprehensively summarized and discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Extensive data on immunogenicity and safety, co-administration with routine vaccines, elicitation of robust booster responses, and significantly higher Men C responses versus monovalent MenC or MenACWY standard-of-care vaccines in toddlers suggest that MenACYW-TT may be suitable for inclusion in National Immunization Programs (NIPs) globally. The authors provide their perspectives on the clinical use of MenACYW-TT across age groups from toddlers through adults.

MenQuadfi (MenACWY-TT): A New Vaccine for Meningococcal Serogroups ACWY

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews data encompassing the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of MenACWY-TT (MenQuadfi), a conjugate vaccine to prevent meningococcal disease from serogroups A, C, W, Y.

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception up to July 2021, using the search terms MenQuadfi, meningococcal ACWY vaccine, MCV4, and menacwy. Articles from reference lists were included to identify potential relevant literature.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Data were limited to randomized phase II and III clinical studies published in the English language, evaluating the efficacy and safety of MenACWY-TT. Animal studies and studies not utilizing MenACWY-TT were excluded.

DATA SYNTHESIS

One phase II and 4 phase III randomized clinical studies, enrolling approximately 7700 participants, aged 2 years to 97 years old found that MenACWY-TT was noninferior when compared to established MenACWY vaccines, as measured by surrogate immunogenicity end points. In studies evaluating primary dose vaccination, conducted in those aged 2 to 97 years of age, the difference in seroresponse rates, reported by the lower bound of the 95% CI, was (A) 1.1% to 14.8%, (C) 21% to 42.2%, (Y) 7.7% to 24.6%, and (W) 8.9% to 22.5%.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Despite the low incidence of meningococcal disease in the United States, meningococcal disease causes significant morbidity and mortality if not prevented.

CONCLUSION

MenACWY-TT is noninferior to currently approved quadrivalent meningococcal vaccines and shows similar immunogenicity and safety as both an initial vaccine for prevention as well as a booster dose.

Safety of vaccines used for routine immunization in the United States: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Understanding the safety of vaccines is critical to inform decisions about vaccination. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the safety of vaccines recommended for children, adults, and pregnant women in the United States.

METHODS

We searched the literature in November 2020 to update a 2014 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality review by integrating newly available data. Studies of vaccines that used a comparator and reported the presence or absence of key adverse events were eligible. Adhering to Evidence-based Practice Center methodology, we assessed the strength of evidence (SoE) for all evidence statements. The systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020180089).

RESULTS

Of 56,603 reviewed citations, 338 studies reported in 518 publications met inclusion criteria. For children, SoE was high for no increased risk of autism following measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. SoE was high for increased risk of febrile seizures with MMR. There was no evidence of increased risk of  intussusception with rotavirus vaccine at the latest follow-up (moderate SoE), nor of diabetes (high SoE). There was no evidence of increased risk or insufficient evidence for key adverse events for newer vaccines such as 9-valent human papillomavirus and meningococcal B vaccines. For adults, there was no evidence of increased risk (varied SoE) or insufficient evidence for key adverse events for the new adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine and recombinant adjuvanted zoster vaccine. We found no evidence of increased risk (varied SoE) for key adverse events among pregnant women following tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine, including stillbirth (moderate SoE).

CONCLUSIONS

Across a large body of research we found few associations of vaccines and serious key adverse events; however, rare events are challenging to study. Any adverse events should be weighed against the protective benefits that vaccines provide.

Potential public health impact of a Neisseria meningitidis A, B, C, W, and Y pentavalent vaccine in the United States

Objective: Globally, 5 serogroups (A, B, C, W, and Y) cause the majority of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). Vaccines targeting these serogroups are currently part of the US adolescent immunization platform, which includes 1 + 1 dosing of a MenACWY vaccine routinely at ages 11 and 16 years and 2 doses of a MenB vaccine at age 16-23 years under shared clinical decision-making between the patient and healthcare provider. In 2018, MenACWY vaccination coverage was 86.6% for ≥1 dose and 50.8% for ≥2 doses, whereas MenB vaccination coverage was 17.2% for ≥1 dose and <50% for completion of the multidose series. A pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine could simplify immunization schedules and improve vaccination coverage. We estimated the public health impact of a pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine using a model that considers meningococcal carriage and vaccination coverage.Methods: A population-based dynamic model estimated the 10-year reduction in IMD from implementing a MenABCWY vaccine within the existing US meningococcal immunization platform. Five vaccination schedules (4 new, 1 existing) were examined to estimate the impact of different recommendations on the overall reduction in the number of IMD cases. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying vaccination coverage at age 16 years.Results: The existing schedule and coverage of MenACWY and MenB vaccines (total 4 doses) could potentially avert 165 IMD cases over 10 years versus no vaccination. Assuming similar MenABCWY and MenACWY vaccination coverage rates at age 16 years, replacing 1 or more MenACWY and/or MenB doses with MenABCWY could avert more cases, ranging from 189 to 256. The most beneficial MenABCWY vaccine schedule was 2 doses at age 11 years and 1 dose at age 16 years.Conclusions: Replacing one or more MenACWY/MenB vaccine doses with MenABCWY could reduce IMD caused by all 5 meningococcal serogroups among the US adolescent population, while also reducing the number of injections required.

Immunogenicity and Safety of an Inactivated Enterovirus 71 Vaccine Administered Simultaneously With Hepatitis B Vaccine and Group A Meningococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine: A Phase 4, Open-Label, Single-Center, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND

This study tested the hypothesis that the immunogenicity and safety of the simultaneous administration of enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine (dose 1) with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) on day 1 and EV71 vaccine (dose 2) with group A meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (MenA) on day 30 is not inferior to separate administration of each vaccine.

METHODS

The study was designed as a randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial. A total of 775 healthy infants aged 6 months were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive simultaneous administration of EV71 vaccine (dose 1) and HepB on day 1 and EV71 vaccine (dose 2) and MenA on day 30 (the SI group); administration of doses 1 and 2 of EV71 vaccine on days 1 and 30, respectively (the SE1 group); or administration of HepB and MenA on days 1 and 30, respectively (the SE2 group).

RESULTS

According to the per protocol set, antibody responses against EV71, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and group A meningococcal polysaccharide were similar regardless of administration schedule. With the non-inferiority margin setting at 10%, the seroconversion rates of the three pathogens in the SI group (100% [98.25, 100], 44.84% [38.20, 51.63] and 27.83% [21.91, 34.38]) were not inferior to those in SE1 or SE2 group (100% [98.31, 100], 44.35% [37.82, 51.02] and 29.17% [23.20, 35.72], respectively). Frequencies of adverse reactions to each vaccination regimen were comparable (60.62% in the SI group vs 52.33% in the SE1 group and 56.98% in the SE2 group; P = .16).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous administration of combined EV71 vaccine with HepB and MenA has noninferior immunogenicity and safety, compared with separate administration of these vaccines.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT03274102.

Safety of Co-Administration Versus Separate Administration of the Same Vaccines in Children: A Systematic Literature Review

The growing number of available vaccines that can be potentially co-administered makes the assessment of the safety of vaccine co-administration increasingly relevant but complex. We aimed to synthesize the available scientific evidence on the safety of vaccine co-administrations in children by performing a systematic literature review of studies assessing the safety of vaccine co-administrations in children between 1999 and 2019, in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Fifty studies compared co-administered vaccines versus the same vaccines administered separately. The most frequently studied vaccines included quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) vaccine, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) or tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis adsorbed, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate (DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib) vaccine, measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, and pneumococcal conjugate 7-valent (PCV7) or 13-valent (PCV13) vaccines. Of this, 16% (n = 8) of the studies reported significantly more adverse events following immunization (AEFI) while in 10% (n = 5) significantly fewer adverse events were found in the co-administration groups. Statistically significant differences between co-administration and separate administration were found for 16 adverse events, for 11 different vaccine co-administrations. In general, studies briefly described safety and one-third of studies lacked any statistical assessment of AEFI. Overall, the evidence on the safety of vaccine co-administrations compared to separate vaccine administrations is inconclusive and there is a paucity of large post-licensure studies addressing this issue.

Epidemiologic Trends, Global Shifts in Meningococcal Vaccination Guidelines, and Data Supporting the Use of MenACWY-TT Vaccine: A Review

Neisseria meningitidis is a major cause of meningitis and septicemia with cases, outbreaks, and epidemics reported globally in industrialized and non-industrialized countries. N. meningitidis is categorized into 12 serogroups; however, only 5 serogroups (A, B, C, W, Y) are responsible for the majority of disease. Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) occurs unpredictably; protection is therefore best achieved by initiating proactive vaccination strategies. Vaccines are currently available for the five main disease-causing serogroups. With the evolution of meningococcal vaccines and changes in IMD epidemiology, different vaccination strategies have been used. Recently, the rapid clonal expansion of meningococcal serogroup W (MenW) has been associated with a change in the national and regional vaccination recommendations from monovalent meningococcal serogroup C vaccines to meningococcal serogroup A, C, W, Y (MenACWY) vaccines in several countries. This review highlights these and other changes in IMD epidemiology and meningococcal vaccination recommendations, summarizes information available for currently available conjugate MenACWY vaccines, and focuses on clinical study data for the most recently approved MenACWY conjugate vaccine, MenACWY vaccine conjugated to tetanus toxoid (MenACWY-TT). MenACWY-TT studies spanned multiple age groups and generally demonstrated safety and immunogenicity in comparison with other meningococcal vaccines and under concomitant administration of other routine vaccines. Continuous updates to meningococcal vaccine recommendations in response to changing epidemiology, as have been undertaken for MenW, are necessary to ensure optimal population protection. FUNDING: Pfizer, Inc.

Vaccines Safety in Children and in General Population: A Pharmacovigilance Study on Adverse Events Following Anti-Infective Vaccination in Italy

Background: The concern for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) and anti-vaccination movements that lacked scientific evidence-based supports may reduce vaccine uptake in the general population. Thus, the aims of the present study were to characterize AEFI in general population (all age groups), in terms of frequency, preventability, and seriousness and to define predictors of their seriousness in children.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed on suspected AEFI reports for children and adults who received any form of vaccinations, collected in Tuscany, Italy, between 1 January and 31 December 2017. Patients’ characteristics, suspected vaccines, and AEFI description were collected. Causality and preventability were assessed using WHO and Schumock and Thornton algorithms, respectively. Logistic regression was used to estimate the reporting odds ratios of potential predictors of AEFI seriousness in children.

Results: A total of 223 suspected AEFI reports were collected, and the majority of them were defined as non-serious (76.7%). Reports were mostly related to one vaccine, and to a median of two to five strains/toxoids. The total number of simultaneously administered strains/toxoids and the presence of allergens did not correlate with AEFI seriousness. Considering vaccines with a high number of administered doses (≥60,000 doses), the rates estimated for serious AEFI reports were always very low, ranging between 0.01 and 0.2/1,000 doses. Twenty-four vaccines (8,993 doses) were not related to any AEFI.

Conclusion: Results of present study showed that AEFI were very rare; the vast majority of them was non-serious and, despite the claims of anti-vaccination movements, the simultaneous administration of vaccines was safe and did not influence the risk of reporting a serious AEFI, particularly in children.

Immunogenicity and safety of meningococcal group A, C, W and Y tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine: review of clinical and real-world evidence

Protection by meningococcal group A, C, W and Y (MenACWY) vaccines against four meningococcal disease-causing serogroups is increasingly important because of changing epidemiologic patterns of meningococcal disease, including recent meningococcal serogroup W outbreaks/disease clusters. The MenACWY vaccine conjugated to tetanus toxoid (MenACWY-TT) has been extensively evaluated across the age spectrum (age ≥6 weeks) in randomized Phase II and III and in postmarketing studies. Results support the robust immunogenicity of MenACWY-TT across ages and coadministration with other vaccines. The safety profile is similar regardless of age, primary versus booster vaccination, or concomitant administration; local (swelling, pain, redness) and systemic (fever, fatigue, headache, drowsiness, loss of appetite, irritability) reactogenicity events are most common. These data support use of MenACWY-TT to protect against MenACWY disease.