1
|
Park JJ, Tiefenbach J, Anwar MM, Narayanan S, Ope B, Bin Han SS, Ale BM, Adeloye D, Rudan I. Estimating the Global and Regional Burden of Streptococcus pneumoniae Meningitis in Children: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e50678. [PMID: 39012685 PMCID: PMC11289570 DOI: 10.2196/50678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) has been a leading cause of bacterial meningitis in children. The most recent estimation of the global burden of Spn meningitis indicates a positive trajectory in eliminating Spn through the implementation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. However, continuous monitoring and assessment of the disease burden are necessary due to the evidence of serotype replacement, antibiotic resistance, and the impact of the recent COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review is to provide an updated and focused assessment of the global and regional burden of Spn meningitis in children, which can guide policies and strategies to reduce the disease burden. METHODS Population-based studies published from January 1, 2000, to January 1, 2022, were preliminarily searched from the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Global Health (CABI), and CINAHL Plus without any language restrictions. Studies were included if they reported the incidence, prevalence, mortality, or case-fatality ratio (CFR) for Spn meningitis in children aged 0-4 years; meningitis was confirmed by cerebrospinal fluid culture; the study period was a minimum of 1 year; the number of reported cases was at least 10; and the study had no methodological ambiguities. The article screening process follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Characteristics including study period, setting, World Health Organization region, income level, vaccination information, and participant data (age, number of cases, deaths, sequelae, and risk factors) will be extracted from the included studies. Search results will be updated and incorporated into our review prior to finalizing the extraction of data. Generalized linear mixed models meta-analysis will be performed to estimate the pooled incidence and CFR. We will further assess the risk of bias and heterogeneity, and will perform subgroup and sensitivity analyses to provide a meaningful interpretation of the current burden and literature for pneumococcal meningitis. RESULTS Our preliminary search in December 2021 yielded 9295 articles. Out of 275 studies that were assessed with our eligibility criteria, 117 articles were included. Data extraction and analysis are expected to be complete by January 2025. We plan to publish the results from the full study, including an updated search in 2024, by March 2025. CONCLUSIONS Given that the major burden of Spn meningitis affects children under the age of 5 years, this systematic review will provide a thorough understanding of the global burden of Spn meningitis in this vulnerable population over a span of 2 decades. Insights into incidence trends, geospatial distribution, risk factors, and sequelae will be valuable for stakeholders, policy makers, and the academic community. This information will aid in the ongoing monitoring of the disease and in enhancing targeted vaccine programs to further mitigate the impact of the disease on children worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021293110; https://tinyurl.com/kc3j5k4m. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/50678.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay J Park
- Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Edinburgh Global Health Interest Group, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Jakov Tiefenbach
- Edinburgh Global Health Interest Group, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Mohammed Ma'arij Anwar
- Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sandhya Narayanan
- Edinburgh Global Health Interest Group, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Barnardo's, Barkingside, United Kingdom
| | - Beatrice Ope
- Association for Reproductive and Family Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | - Boni Maxime Ale
- Edinburgh Global Health Interest Group, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Holo Healthcare Limited, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Davies Adeloye
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Igor Rudan
- Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Edinburgh Global Health Interest Group, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre of Global Health, Edinburgh Medical School, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feng S, McLellan J, Pidduck N, Roberts N, Higgins JP, Choi Y, Izu A, Jit M, Madhi SA, Mulholland K, Pollard AJ, Procter S, Temple B, Voysey M. Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-109. [PMID: 39046101 PMCID: PMC11284620 DOI: 10.3310/ywha3079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccination of infants with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines is recommended by the World Health Organization. Evidence is mixed regarding the differences in immunogenicity and efficacy of the different pneumococcal vaccines. Objectives The primary objective was to compare the immunogenicity of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10 versus pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13. The main secondary objective was to compare the seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10 versus pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and trialsearch.who.int up to July 2022. Studies were eligible if they directly compared either pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-7, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10 or pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 in randomised trials of children under 2 years of age, and provided immunogenicity data for at least one time point. Individual participant data were requested and aggregate data used otherwise. Outcomes included the geometric mean ratio of serotype-specific immunoglobulin G and the relative risk of seroinfection. Seroinfection was defined for each individual as a rise in antibody between the post-primary vaccination series time point and the booster dose, evidence of presumed subclinical infection. Each trial was analysed to obtain the log of the ratio of geometric means and its standard error. The relative risk of seroinfection ('seroefficacy') was estimated by comparing the proportion of participants with seroinfection between vaccine groups. The log-geometric mean ratios, log-relative risks and their standard errors constituted the input data for evidence synthesis. For serotypes contained in all three vaccines, evidence could be synthesised using a network meta-analysis. For other serotypes, meta-analysis was used. Results from seroefficacy analyses were incorporated into a mathematical model of pneumococcal transmission dynamics to compare the differential impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10 and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 introduction on invasive pneumococcal disease cases. The model estimated the impact of vaccine introduction over a 25-year time period and an economic evaluation was conducted. Results In total, 47 studies were eligible from 38 countries. Twenty-eight and 12 studies with data available were included in immunogenicity and seroefficacy analyses, respectively. Geometric mean ratios comparing pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 versus pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10 favoured pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 for serotypes 4, 9V and 23F at 1 month after primary vaccination series, with 1.14- to 1.54-fold significantly higher immunoglobulin G responses with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13. Risk of seroinfection prior to the time of booster dose was lower for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 for serotype 4, 6B, 9V, 18C and 23F than for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10. Significant heterogeneity and inconsistency were present for most serotypes and for both outcomes. Twofold higher antibody after primary vaccination was associated with a 54% decrease in risk of seroinfection (relative risk 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.96). In modelled scenarios, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 or pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10 introduction in 2006 resulted in a reduction in cases that was less rapid for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10 than for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13. The pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 programme was predicted to avoid an additional 2808 (95% confidence interval 2690 to 2925) cases of invasive pneumococcal disease compared with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10 introduction between 2006 and 2030. Limitations Analyses used data from infant vaccine studies with blood samples taken prior to a booster dose. The impact of extrapolating pre-booster efficacy to post-booster time points is unknown. Network meta-analysis models contained significant heterogeneity which may lead to bias. Conclusions Serotype-specific differences were found in immunogenicity and seroefficacy between pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-10. Higher antibody response after vaccination was associated with a lower risk of subsequent infection. These methods can be used to compare the pneumococcal conjugate vaccines and optimise vaccination strategies. For future work, seroefficacy estimates can be determined for other pneumococcal vaccines, which could contribute to licensing or policy decisions for new pneumococcal vaccines. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019124580. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 17/148/03) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 34. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Feng
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julie McLellan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicola Pidduck
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nia Roberts
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julian Pt Higgins
- Population Health Science, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yoon Choi
- Modelling and Economics Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Alane Izu
- South African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Mark Jit
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Shabir A Madhi
- South African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Wits Infectious Diseases and Oncology Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kim Mulholland
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Andrew J Pollard
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon Procter
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Beth Temple
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Merryn Voysey
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feng S, McLellan J, Pidduck N, Roberts N, Higgins JP, Choi Y, Izu A, Jit M, Madhi SA, Mulholland K, Pollard AJ, Temple B, Voysey M. Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of 10-valent and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 61:102073. [PMID: 37425373 PMCID: PMC10328810 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccination of infants with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) is recommended by the World Health Organization. Evidence is mixed regarding the differences in immunogenicity and efficacy of the different pneumococcal vaccines. Methods In this systematic-review and network meta-analysis, we searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, Global Health, Medline, clinicaltrials.gov and trialsearch.who.int up to February 17, 2023 with no language restrictions. Studies were eligible if they presented data comparing the immunogenicity of either PCV7, PCV10 or PCV13 in head-to-head randomised trials of young children under 2 years of age, and provided immunogenicity data for at least one time point after the primary vaccination series or the booster dose. Publication bias was assessed via Cochrane's Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence tool and comparison-adjusted funnel plots with Egger's test. Individual participant level data were requested from publication authors and/or relevant vaccine manufacturers. Outcomes included the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of serotype-specific IgG and the relative risk (RR) of seroinfection. Seroinfection was defined for each individual as a rise in antibody between the post-primary vaccination series time point and the booster dose, evidence of presumed subclinical infection. Seroefficacy was defined as the RR of seroinfection. We also estimated the relationship between the GMR of IgG one month after priming and the RR of seroinfection by the time of the booster dose. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO, ID CRD42019124580. Findings 47 studies were eligible from 38 countries across six continents. 28 and 12 studies with data available were included in immunogenicity and seroefficacy analyses, respectively. GMRs comparing PCV13 vs PCV10 favoured PCV13 for serotypes 4, 9V, and 23F at 1 month after primary vaccination series, with 1.14- to 1.54- fold significantly higher IgG responses with PCV13. Risk of seroinfection prior to the time of booster dose was lower for PCV13 for serotype 4, 6B, 9V, 18C and 23F than for PCV10. Significant heterogeneity and inconsistency were present for most serotypes and for both outcomes. Two-fold higher antibody after primary vaccination was associated with a 54% decrease in risk of seroinfection (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.96). Interpretation Serotype-specific differences were found in immunogenicity and seroefficacy between PCV13 and PCV10. Higher antibody response after vaccination was associated with a lower risk of subsequent infection. These findings could be used to compare PCVs and optimise vaccination strategies. Funding The NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Feng
- Department of Paediatrics, Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julie McLellan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicola Pidduck
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nia Roberts
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julian P.T. Higgins
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yoon Choi
- Modelling and Economics Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Alane Izu
- South African Medical Research Council MRC Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, Infectious Diseases and Oncology Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Mark Jit
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Shabir A. Madhi
- South African Medical Research Council MRC Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, Infectious Diseases and Oncology Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Wits Infectious Diseases and Oncology Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kim Mulholland
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Andrew J. Pollard
- Department of Paediatrics, Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Beth Temple
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Merryn Voysey
- Department of Paediatrics, Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beissbarth J, Smith-Vaughan HC, Cheng AC, Morris PS, Leach AJ. BIGDATA: A Protocol to Create and Extend a 25-Year Clinical Trial and Observational Data Asset to Address Key Knowledge Gaps in Otitis Media and Hearing Loss in Australian Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Children. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:804373. [PMID: 35498792 PMCID: PMC9047683 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.804373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Otitis media (OM) is a common childhood illness, often resolving without intervention and acute and long-term complications are rare. However, Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander infants and children experience a high burden of OM and are at high risk of complications (tympanic membrane perforation and chronic infections). Bacterial OM is commonly associated with Streptococcus pneumoniae, non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. BIGDATA is a data asset combining over 25 years of microbiology and OM surveillance research from the Ear Health Research Program at Menzies School of Health Research (Northern Territory, Australia), including 11 randomized controlled trials, four cohort studies, eight surveys in over 30 remote communities (including data from Western Australia), and five surveys of urban childcare centers including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous children. Outcome measures include clinical examinations (focusing on OM), antibiotic prescriptions, pneumococcal vaccination, modifiable risk factors such as smoking and household crowding, and nasopharyngeal and ear discharge microbiology including antimicrobial resistance testing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The initial series of projects are planned to address the following key knowledge gaps: (i) otitis media prevalence and severity over pre pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) and three eras of increasing PCV valency; (ii) impact of increasing valency PCVs on nasopharyngeal carriage dynamics of pneumococcal serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance; (iii) impact of increasing valency PCVs on nasopharyngeal carriage dynamics and antimicrobial resistance of other otopathogens; and (iv) serotype specific differences between children with acute OM and OM with effusion or without OM. These data will be utilized to identify research gaps, providing evidence-based prioritization for ongoing research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Data asset creation and priority analyses were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research (EC00153, 18-3281), the Child and Adolescent Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee and Western Australian Aboriginal Health Ethics Committee. Dissemination will be through peer review publication and conference presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemima Beissbarth
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | | | - Allen C Cheng
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter S Morris
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.,Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Amanda J Leach
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pneumococcal Vaccines: Past Findings, Present Work, and Future Strategies. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9111338. [PMID: 34835269 PMCID: PMC8620834 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9111338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The importance of Streptococcus pneumoniae has been well established. These bacteria can colonize infants and adults without symptoms, but in some cases can spread, invade other tissues and cause disease with high morbidity and mortality. The development of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) caused an enormous impact in invasive pneumococcal disease and protected unvaccinated people by herd effect. However, serotype replacement is a well-known phenomenon that has occurred after the introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) and has also been reported for other PCVs. Therefore, it is possible that serotype replacement will continue to occur even with higher valence formulations, but the development of serotype-independent vaccines might overcome this problem. Alternative vaccines are under development in order to improve cost effectiveness, either using proteins or the pneumococcal whole cell. These approaches can be used as a stand-alone strategy or together with polysaccharide vaccines. Looking ahead, the next generation of pneumococcal vaccines can be impacted by the new technologies recently approved for human use, such as mRNA vaccines and viral vectors. In this paper, we will review the advantages and disadvantages of the addition of new polysaccharides in the current PCVs, mainly for low- and middle-income countries, and we will also address future perspectives.
Collapse
|
6
|
Jansen KU, Gruber WC, Simon R, Wassil J, Anderson AS. The impact of human vaccines on bacterial antimicrobial resistance. A review. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS 2021; 19:4031-4062. [PMID: 34602924 PMCID: PMC8479502 DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01274-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
At present, the dramatic rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among important human bacterial pathogens is reaching a state of global crisis threatening a return to the pre-antibiotic era. AMR, already a significant burden on public health and economies, is anticipated to grow even more severe in the coming decades. Several licensed vaccines, targeting both bacterial (Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi) and viral (influenza virus, rotavirus) human pathogens, have already proven their anti-AMR benefits by reducing unwarranted antibiotic consumption and antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains and by promoting herd immunity. A number of new investigational vaccines, with a potential to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens, are also in various stages of clinical development. Nevertheless, vaccines as a tool to combat AMR remain underappreciated and unfortunately underutilized. Global mobilization of public health and industry resources is key to maximizing the use of licensed vaccines, and the development of new prophylactic vaccines could have a profound impact on reducing AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Raphael Simon
- Pfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Pearl River, NY USA
| | - James Wassil
- Pfizer Patient and Health Impact, Collegeville, PA USA
- Present Address: Vaxcyte, 353 Hatch Drive, Foster City, CA 94404 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Horn M, Behre U, Traskine M, Dobbelaere K, Borys D. Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a 12-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine in healthy toddlers: results from a phase I, randomized trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:1463-1469. [PMID: 33175600 PMCID: PMC8078718 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1810493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
As a stepping stone toward evaluation in infants, the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational 12-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine (12vPHiD-CV) was assessed in toddlers. 12vPHiD-CV contains CRM197-conjugated capsular polysaccharides of serotypes 6A and 19A in addition to capsular polysaccharides of the 10 serotypes in PHiD-CV. In this phase I, double-blind, multicenter study (NCT01485406) conducted in Germany, 61 healthy toddlers aged 12–23 months previously primed with three PHiD-CV doses were randomized (1:1) to receive one dose of 12vPHiD-CV or PHiD-CV. Safety and reactogenicity of 12vPHiD-CV were assessed in terms of occurrence of grade 3 vaccination-related solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and vaccination-related serious AEs. Immune responses were evaluated 1 month post-vaccination. Grade 3 solicited local AEs (all considered vaccination-related) were reported for two (6.5%, redness) and three (9.7%, swelling) toddlers in the 12vPHiD-CV group and one (3.4%, swelling) in the PHiD-CV group. Grade 3 vaccination-related solicited general AEs were only reported in the PHiD-CV group. No grade 3 unsolicited or serious AEs were reported. For PHiD-CV serotypes, 100% of toddlers in both groups had antibody concentrations ≥0.2 µg/mL 1 month post-vaccination, and antibody geometric mean concentrations increased from pre-boosting. For serotypes 6A and 19A, antibody responses tended to be higher in the 12vPHiD-CV than the PHiD-CV group. A single dose of 12vPHiD-CV administered in toddlers was well tolerated and no safety concerns were identified. Immune responses were comparable to those induced by PHiD-CV when administered in toddlers previously primed with three doses of PHiD-CV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Magali Traskine
- HPV, Hepatitis and Pneumococcal Vaccines, Clinical R&D, GSK, Wavre, Belgium
| | - Kurt Dobbelaere
- HPV, Hepatitis and Pneumococcal Vaccines, Clinical R&D, GSK, Wavre, Belgium
| | - Dorota Borys
- HPV, Hepatitis and Pneumococcal Vaccines, Clinical R&D, GSK, Wavre, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clarke E, Bashorun A, Adigweme I, Badjie Hydara M, Umesi A, Futa A, Ochoge M, Obayemi D, Edem B, Saidy-Jah E, Onwuchekwa C, Dhere R, Sethna V, Kampmann B, Goldblatt D, Taylor D, Andi-Lolo I, Hosken N, Antony K, Innis BL, Alderson MR, Lamola S. Immunogenicity and safety of a novel ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in healthy infants in The Gambia: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2021; 21:834-846. [PMID: 33516293 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30735-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An affordable pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) is needed to ensure sustainable access in low-income and middle-income countries. This trial examined the immunogenicity and safety of a novel ten-valent PCV (SIIPL-PCV) containing serotypes 1, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 19A, 19F, and 23F compared with the pneumococcal polysaccharide protein D-conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV; Synflorix; GlaxoSmithKline; Brentford, UK). METHODS In this single-centre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial in The Gambia, healthy, PCV-naive infants aged 6-8 weeks were enrolled and assigned using permuted block randomisation to receive one of three lots of SIIPL-PCV or to PHiD-CV in a ratio of 2:2:2:3. Parents and all staff assessing study outcomes were masked to group assignment. Vaccines (0·5 mL SIIPL-PCV or 0·5 mL PHiD-CV) were administered at ages 6, 10, and 14 weeks by intramuscular injection. Primary immunogenicity outcomes, measured at age 18 weeks, were serotype-specific IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and seroresponse rates (IgG ≥ 0·35 μg/mL). Lot-to-lot equivalence (objective 1) was shown if the upper and lower bounds of the two-sided 95% CI around the GMC ratio for each pairwise lot-to-lot comparison was between the 0·5 and 2·0 equivalence margins for all ten serotypes. The immunogenicity of SIIPL-PCV was defined as being non-inferior to that of PHiD-CV (objective 2) if, for at least seven of the ten serotypes in SIIPL-PCV, the lower bound of the 97·5% CI for the GMC ratio was greater than 0·5, or the lower bound of the 97·5% CI for differences in seroresponse rate was greater than -10%. The GMC and seroresponse rates to serotypes 6A and 19A, which are not in PHiD-CV, were compared with those of the serotype in PHiD-CV that had the lowest seroresponse rate. Non-inferiority of the immune responses to antigens in the co-administered Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) vaccines (objective 3) was declared if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference between SIIPL-PCV and PHiD-CV in seroresponse rates, or GMC ratios for pertussis antigens, was greater than -10% (or 0·5 for pertussis antigens) for all vaccine antigens. Safety data were assessed according to treatment received at the first visit in infants who received at least one dose of study vaccine and for whom at least some post-vaccination safety data were available. The primary immunogenicity analysis was in the per-protocol immunogenicity population, which included infants who received all study vaccines and had immunogenicity measurements after vaccination and no major protocol deviations. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03197376). FINDINGS Between June 21, 2017, and Jan 29, 2018, 2250 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive SIIPL-PCV (n=1503; 502 to lot 1, 501 to lot 2, and 500 to lot 3) or PHiD-CV (n=747). 1458 (97·0%) infants assigned to SIIPL-PCV and 724 (96·9%) assigned to PHiD-CV were included in the per-protocol primary immunogenicity analysis. Lot-to-lot equivalence was shown, with the lowest lower bound of the 95% CI for the GMC ratio being 0·52 (for serotype 6B in lot 2 vs lot 3) and the highest upper bound being 1·69 (for serotype 6B in lot 1 vs lot 2). SIIPL-PCV was non-inferior to PHiD-CV in terms of immunogenicity: the lower bound of the 97·5% CI for the GMC ratio was greater than 0·5 (the lowest being 0·67 for serotype 19F) and the lower bound of the 97·5% CI for the difference in seroresponse rate was greater than -10% (the lowest being -2·2% for serotype 6B) for all ten serotypes in SIIPL-PCV. The lowest seroresponse rate after PHiD-CV was to serotype 6B (76·7% [95% CI 73·4-79·7]). This serotype was therefore used for the comparisons with serotype 6A and 19A in SIIPL-PCV. Non-inferiority of immune responses to the EPI vaccines after co-administration with SIIPL-PCV compared with after co-administration with PHiD-CV was shown for all vaccine antigens included in the primary series. The lowest lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference in seroresponse rates was -7·1% for rotavirus antibody and for the GMC ratio for pertussis antigens was 0·62 for anti-pertussis toxoid. 1131 (75·2%) of 1503 infants in the SIIPL-PCV group and 572 (76·6%) of 747 in the PHiD-CV group had at least one unsolicited adverse event. 36 (2·4%) participants in the SIIPL-PCV group and 18 (2·4%) in the PHiD-CV group had a serious adverse event; none were considered related to vaccination. In infants who were selected to have solicited adverse events recorded, injection-site induration after primary vaccinations occurred in 27 (4·9%) of 751 infants who received SIIPL-PCV versus 34 (9·4%) of 364 who received PHiD-CV (p=0·0032). There were no other notable differences in the safety profiles of the two vaccines. One infant in the SIIPL-PCV group and two in the PHiD-CV group died during the study. The deaths were not considered to be related to study vaccination or study participation. INTERPRETATION The immunogenicity of SIIPL-PCV was non-inferior to that of PHiD-CV, for which efficacy and effectiveness data against pneumococcal disease are available. The vaccine is safe and can be co-administered with routine EPI vaccines. The data generated in this trial have supported the licensure and pre-qualification of SIIPL-PCV, making the vaccine available for introduction into national immunisation programmes. Generating post-implementation data confirming vaccine impact remains important. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ed Clarke
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia.
| | - Adedapo Bashorun
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Ikechukwu Adigweme
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Mariama Badjie Hydara
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Ama Umesi
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Ahmed Futa
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Magnus Ochoge
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Dolapo Obayemi
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Bassey Edem
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Ebrima Saidy-Jah
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Chukwuemeka Onwuchekwa
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | | | | | - Beate Kampmann
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - David Goldblatt
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elicitation of integrated immunity in mice by a novel pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine conjugated with HBV surface antigen. Sci Rep 2020; 10:6470. [PMID: 32286332 PMCID: PMC7156719 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62185-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The conjugation of polysaccharides with an effective carrier protein is critical for the development of effective bacterial polysaccharide vaccines. Therefore, the identification and optimization of carrier proteins to induce an effective immune response is necessary for developing a combined vaccine. In the current study, we utilized hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) as a novel carrier protein combined with a capsular polysaccharide molecule to develop a new pneumococcal conjugated vaccine. The specific antibodies and T cell immune response against the capsular polysaccharide and HBsAg in the mice immunized with this conjugated vaccine were evaluated. In addition, the unique gene profiles of immune cells induced by this conjugated vaccine in the immunized mice were analyzed. Our results demonstrated that the vaccine consisting of pneumonia type 33 F capsular polysaccharide (Pn33Fps) conjugated with HBsAg can induce strong specific immune responses against both antigens in vivo in immunized mice. Furthermore, the conjugated vaccine induced higher expression of genes related to the activation of immunity and higher antibody titers against Pn33Fps and HBsAg in mice than those obtained via vaccination with a single antigen. Analyses of the dynamic expression changes in immunity-related genes in mice immunized with Pn33Fps_HBs, Pn33Fps, or HBsAg indicated the potent immunogenicity of the conjugated vaccine. In addition, a pathological evaluation of the organs from immunized mice further suggested that the conjugated vaccine is safe. Together, these results indicate that a conjugated vaccine consisting of Pn33Fps with HBsAg is a novel and effective vaccine.
Collapse
|
10
|
Esposito S, Principi N. Pneumococcal immunization with conjugate vaccines: are 10-valent and 13-valent vaccines similar? Future Microbiol 2019; 14:921-923. [PMID: 31373218 DOI: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Esposito
- Department of Surgical & Biomedical Sciences, Pediatric Clinic, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Umbria, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Temple B, Toan NT, Dai VTT, Bright K, Licciardi PV, Marimla RA, Nguyen CD, Uyen DY, Balloch A, Huu TN, Mulholland EK. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of ten-valent versus 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines among infants in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2019; 19:497-509. [PMID: 30975525 PMCID: PMC6484092 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30734-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Background Few data are available to support the choice between the two currently available pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs), ten-valent PCV (PCV10) and 13-valent PCV (PCV13). Here we report a head-to-head comparison of the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of PCV10 and PCV13. Methods In this parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial, healthy infants from two districts in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, were randomly allocated (in a 3:3:5:4:5:4 ratio), with use of a computer-generated list, to one of six infant PCV schedules: PCV10 in a 3 + 1 (group A), 3 + 0 (group B), 2 + 1 (group C), or two-dose schedule (group D); PCV13 in a 2 + 1 schedule (group E); or no infant PCV (control; group F). Blood samples were collected from infants between 2 months and 18 months of age at various timepoints before and after PCV doses and analysed (in a blinded manner) by ELISA and opsonophagocytic assay. The trial had two independent aims: to compare vaccination responses between PCV10 and PCV13, and to evaluate different schedules of PCV10. In this Article, we present results pertaining to the first aim. The primary outcome was the proportion of infants with an IgG concentration of at least 0·35 μg/mL for the ten serotypes common to the two vaccines at age 5 months, 4 weeks after the two-dose primary vaccination series (group C vs group E, per protocol population). An overall difference among the schedules was defined as at least seven of ten serotypes differing in the same direction at the 10% level. We also assessed whether the two-dose primary series of PCV13 (group E) was non-inferior at the 10% level to a three-dose primary series of PCV10 (groups A and B). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01953510. Findings Of 1424 infants screened between Sept 30, 2013, and Jan 9, 2015, 1201 were allocated to the six groups: 152 (13%) to group A, 149 (12%) to group B, 250 (21%) to group C, 202 (17%) to group D, 251 (21%) to group E, and 197 (16%) to group F. 237 (95%) participants in group C (PCV10) and 232 (92%) in group E (PCV13) completed the primary vaccination series and had blood draws within the specified window at age 5 months, at which time the proportion of infants with IgG concentrations of at least 0·35 μg/mL did not differ between groups at the 10% level for any serotype (PCV10–PCV13 risk difference −2·1% [95% CI −4·8 to −0·1] for serotype 1; −1·3% [–3·7 to 0·6] for serotype 4; −3·4% [–6·8 to −0·4] for serotype 5; 15·6 [7·2 to 23·7] for serotype 6B; −1·3% [–3·7 to 0·6] for serotype 7F; −1·6% [–5·1 to 1·7] for serotype 9V; 0·0% [–2·7 to 2·9] for serotype 14; −2·1% [–5·3 to 0·9] for serotype 18C; 0·0% [–2·2 to 2·3] for serotype 19F; and −11·6% [–18·2 to −4·9] for serotype 23F). At the same timepoint, two doses of PCV13 were non-inferior to three doses of PCV10 for nine of the ten shared serotypes (excluding 6B). Reactogenicity and serious adverse events were monitored according to good clinical practice guidelines, and the profiles were similar in the two groups. Interpretation PCV10 and PCV13 are similarly highly immunogenic when used in 2 + 1 schedule. The choice of vaccine might be influenced by factors such as the comparative magnitude of the antibody responses, price, and the relative importance of different serotypes in different settings. Funding National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Temple
- Division of Global and Tropical Health, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Nguyen Trong Toan
- Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Vo Thi Trang Dai
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Kathryn Bright
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul Vincent Licciardi
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachel Ann Marimla
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cattram Duong Nguyen
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Doan Y Uyen
- Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Anne Balloch
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tran Ngoc Huu
- Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Edward Kim Mulholland
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu DBC, Lee KKC, Lee VWY, Hong LW. Reply to Varghese et al.'s response to Wu et al. - "Cost effectiveness analysis of infant pneumococcal vaccination in Malaysia and Hong Kong". Hum Vaccin Immunother 2016; 12:2681-2684. [PMID: 27715474 PMCID: PMC5085012 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1209279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Revised: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David Bin-Chia Wu
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Li-Wen Hong
- Pfizer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|