Up-to-date coverage with meningococcal vaccine among adolescents age 17 years: Patterns and correlates in the United States, 2017

The impact of regional disparities on the availability of meningococcal vaccines in the US

BACKGROUND

In the United States (US), three types of vaccines are available to prevent invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), a severe and potentially fatal infection: quadrivalent conjugate vaccines against serogroups A, C, W, Y (MenACWY), and monovalent vaccines against serogroup B (MenB) as well as a newly licensed pentavalent vaccine (MenABCWY) protecting against serogroup A, B, C, W, and Y. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) routinely recommends MenACWY vaccine for all 11- to 12-year-olds with a booster dose at 16 years. MenB vaccination is recommended based on shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) for 16- to 23-year-olds. Recently, the pentavalent meningococcal vaccine (MenABCWY) was recommended by the ACIP. Meningococcal vaccine uptake is suboptimal across the country, particularly among individuals with lower socioeconomic status (SES), despite these recommendations. The objective of the spatial analyses was to assess the relationship between stocking of MenACWY and MenB vaccines, area-level SES, and state-level policies.

METHODS

The number of MenACWY and MenB doses stocked by vaccinators was obtained from IQVIA and the CDC's Vaccine for Children (VFC) program and compiled into a county-level dataset from 2016 to 2019. SES, as measured using the CDC's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), state-level school recommendations, and universal purchasing programs were among the main county-level covariates included to control for factors likely influencing stocking. Data were stratified by public and private market. Bayesian spatial regression models were developed to quantify the variations in rates of stocking and the relative rates of stocking of both vaccines.

RESULTS

After accounting for county-level characteristics, lower SES counties tended to have fewer doses of MenB relative to MenACWY on both public and private markets. Lower SES counties tended to have more supply of public vs. private doses. Universal purchasing programs had a strong effect on the markets for both vaccines shifting nearly all doses to the public market. School vaccination strategy was key for improving stocking rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the results show that MenACWY has greater stock relative to MenB across the US. This difference is exacerbated in vulnerable areas without school entry requirements for vaccination and results in inequity of vaccine availability. Beyond state-level policy and SES differences, SCDM recommendations may be a contributing factor, although this was not directly assessed by our model.

Inequities in COVID-19 vaccination coverage for adolescents with and without disability, national immunization Survey-Child COVID module, July 22, 2021-February 26, 2022

BACKGROUND

Some people with disabilities are likely at increased risk of health impacts from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

OBJECTIVE

To describe parent-reported COVID-19 vaccination status of adolescents (aged 13-17 years) and parental intent to get their child vaccinated, among adolescents with versus without disability.

METHODS

National Immunization Survey-Child COVID Module data from interviews conducted July 22, 2021-February 26, 2022, were analyzed to assess disability status and type and COVID-19 vaccination status for adolescents (n = 12,445). Prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated; T-tests were conducted.

RESULTS

A lower percentage of adolescents with disability received ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine compared to adolescents without disability (52.5% vs. 58.6%), [those with cognition (50.8%) or not performing errands independently (49.5%) disabilities were significantly lower]; and a higher percentage of parents reported intent to definitely vaccinate (9.9% vs. 6.5%) and definitely not vaccinate (14.9% vs. 11.8%) their adolescent. Among the unvaccinated adolescents, parents of those with disability were more likely to report difficulty getting their child vaccinated (19.1% vs. 12.9%), inconvenient vaccination-site operating hours (7.6% vs. 3.9%), difficulty knowing where to get their child vaccinated (7.2% vs. 2.7%), and difficulty getting to vaccination sites (6.0% vs. 3.0%), than parents of those without disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with disability had lower vaccination coverage compared to adolescents without disability. Parents of adolescents with disability reported higher intent to get their adolescents vaccinated, but among unvaccinated adolescents with disability, parents reported greater difficulty in accessing COVID-19 vaccines. Findings highlight the need for prioritized outreach to increase COVID-19 vaccination for this population.

Determinants of Meningococcal Vaccination Coverage and Adherence: A Targeted Literature Review Supporting a 16-year-old Healthcare Visit

We conducted a targeted literature review to understand the determinants of meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y (MenACWY) and meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination coverage and adherence to vaccination schedules in the USA, and to identify evidence to support improvement of MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage and adherence in older adolescents. Sources published since 2011 were considered, with sources published since 2015 given preference. Out of 2355 citations screened, 47 (46 studies) were selected for inclusion. Determinants of coverage and adherence ranging from patient-level sociodemographic factors to policy-level factors were identified. Four determinants identified were associated with improved coverage and adherence: (1) well-child, preventive, or vaccination-only appointments (particularly for older adolescents); (2) provider-initiated, provider-driven vaccine recommendations; (3) provider education about meningococcal disease and vaccine recommendations; and (4) state-level school-entry immunization policies. This robust review of the literature sheds light on the continued low MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage and adherence among older adolescents (16-23 years of age) compared with that of younger adolescents (11-15 years of age) in the USA. The evidence supports a renewed call to action by local and national health authorities and medical organizations urging healthcare professionals to implement a healthcare visit for 16-year-olds and focus on vaccination as a key component of the visit.

Understanding the Factors Influencing Health Care Provider Recommendations about Adolescent Vaccines: A Proposed Framework

Health care provider recommendations are among the most important factors influencing parents' decisions to vaccinate their adolescents. However, delivery of high-quality health care provider recommendations for vaccination is not universal. There is wide variation in the strength, timeliness and consistency of the delivery of recommendations for all adolescent vaccines. The factors that influence health care providers' recommendations are multi-level and can be conceptualized in much the same way as vaccine acceptance among parents. Health care providers are influenced by their own attitudes and beliefs about a vaccine and also by the patient they are treating and by the community in which they practice as well as state and national level vaccine policy. We propose a multi-level framework for understanding the factors that influence health care providers' recommendations at the individual, interpersonal and community level to both develop and adapt interventions to improve providers' recommendations.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Meningococcal Vaccination Awareness, Delivery, and Coverage in Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review

Vaccines remain a fundamental intervention for preventing illness and death. In the United States, suboptimal vaccine uptake in adolescents and young adults has been observed for meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) and serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccines, particularly among marginalized communities, despite current recommendations by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, Cochrane, PsychInfo, and CINAHL databases to identify both drivers of, and barriers to, MenACWY and MenB vaccine uptake in adolescents and young adults. A total of 34 of 46 eligible studies that presented outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status were selected for review. Results showed MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage in adolescents and young adults is impacted by racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities. Gaps also exist in insurance for, or access to, these vaccines in adolescents and young adults. Moreover, there was variability in the understanding and implementation of the shared decision-making recommendations for the MenB vaccine. Disease awareness campaigns, increased clarity in accessing all meningococcal vaccines, and further research on the relationships between measures of marginalization and its impact on vaccine coverage in adolescents and young adults are needed to reduce the incidence of severe infections.

Meningococcal disease and vaccination in college students

Neisseria meningitidis is a bacterial pathogen capable of causing rapidly progressing illness from nonspecific symptoms to end-organ failure or death in a matter of hours to days. Despite the availability of meningococcal vaccines, there remains a notable disease incidence peak among individuals aged 18-19 years, with college students at increased risk for disease relative to non-college students. Between 2007 and 2017, as many as one in five colleges in the United States experienced an outbreak of meningococcal disease at their own or a nearby institution. Evidence-based strategies to promote meningococcal vaccination among students can be adapted for the college setting, but barriers exist that limit widespread implementation of these strategies by colleges. In this article, we review meningococcal disease characteristics and epidemiology among US college students, vaccination indications and coverage levels among US college students, as well as college vaccination policies and practices that can impact students' vaccine uptake.

Factors Associated With Receipt of Meningococcal B Vaccine Among United States Adolescents, National Immunization Survey-Teen, 2017-2018

PURPOSE

In this study, we evaluated factors associated with receipt of meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine among adolescents in the United States.

METHODS

We used public use data files from the National Immunization Survey-Teen from 2017 to 2018. Logistic regression was used to model associations among sociodemographic, healthcare, and vaccination variables of interest and MenB vaccine receipt (≥1 vs. 0 dose). To explore associations between state-level meningococcal vaccination requirements and MenB vaccine uptake, we performed a secondary analysis stratified by presence of a quadrivalent meningococcal (MenACWY) vaccination requirement for secondary school attendance in the adolescent's state of residence (no requirement vs. a one- or two-dose requirement).

RESULTS

Among 7,288 adolescents, MenB vaccine receipt was significantly associated with up-to-date human papillomavirus (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.35) and MenACWY (aOR 5.81, 95% CI 4.14-8.13) vaccination status in multivariable analysis. Adolescents with private insurance were less likely to be vaccinated (aOR .61, 95% CI .46-.79) compared to adolescents with other health insurance types. In secondary analyses, health insurance was no longer significantly associated with MenB vaccine uptake among adolescents in states with a MenACWY requirement.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that MenB vaccination is associated with receipt of other vaccines recommended for use in adolescents. Adolescents with private health insurance were less likely to be vaccinated against MenB, although state MenACWY requirements appeared to modify the effect of insurance on MenB vaccine receipt. Further work to understand how these factors may influence delivery and acceptance of MenB vaccine can inform interventions and strategies to improve uptake.

Increasing awareness and uptake of the MenB vaccine on a large university campus

Objective: At a large public university, we aimed to evaluate an intervention designed to increase serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccine uptake and awareness.Methods: Using a pretest-posttest design with a double posttest, we evaluated an intervention conducted by a local foundation and the Florida Department of Health that distributed MenB vaccine on campus and conducted an educational campaign. Prior to intervention activities, we recruited students to complete a survey about their MenB knowledge and attitudes. For survey participants who provided contact information, we sent two follow-up surveys and assessed MenB vaccine records. We used chi-square tests, adjusted for nonindependence, to compare preintervention to postintervention (three-month and one-year) vaccination and attitudes.Results: Among the 686 students with accessible vaccine records, MenB vaccine initiation increased 9% (from 24% to 33%) and completion increased 8% (from 13% to 21%) from before the intervention to one year after the intervention. When restricting to students who completed the relevant follow-up surveys, the percentage of students who heard of the MenB vaccine increased by 15% (p > .001) from before the intervention to three months after (n = 188 students) and maintained a 10% increase (p > .001) one year after the intervention (n = 261 students). Among students that heard of the MenB vaccine, the percentage of students who thought they needed the MenB vaccine even though they received the MenACWY increased 14% (p = .03) by the three-month postintervention survey and up to 18% by the one-year follow-up (p = .002).Conclusions: A university-wide, on-campus vaccination and educational campaign increased college students' MenB vaccine initiation, completion, and knowledge.Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02975596.

Suboptimal uptake of meningococcal vaccines among older adolescents: Barriers, solutions, and future research directions

Over the past 15 y, several vaccines have been added to the recommended immunization schedule for adolescents in the United States. In addition to annual influenza vaccination, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap), meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY), and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for routine administration at ages 11-12 y, and a second dose of MenACWY at age 16. A vaccine against meningococcal disease caused by serogroup B (MenB) is also available and recommended for shared clinical decision-making. Though notable gains in uptake have been achieved for some adolescent vaccines, coverage varies considerably with lower rates for HPV vaccine and second dose of MenACWY. Coverage for MenB is especially low. While extensive research has focused on barriers to and solutions for higher uptake of HPV vaccine, limited attention has been given to the reasons for lower uptake of meningococcal vaccines among older adolescents. This purpose of this commentary is to discuss barriers to and solutions for higher uptake of meningococcal vaccines among older adolescents, and to identify gaps in knowledge that can inform research efforts going forward.

Understanding the impact of state vaccination laws on exemption rates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current state of school-entry vaccination requirements and related exemption policies in the United States and examines recent changes to these policies.

RECENT FINDINGS

With recent infectious disease outbreaks in the United States, there has been heightened awareness on unvaccinated individuals, and the state-level policies that allow individuals to be exempted from school-entry vaccination requirements. Between 2015 and 2017, there have been eleven states that have altered their policies regarding school-entry vaccination requirements and related reporting for which no formal evaluations have been published. One policy change during that period, California SB 277, which became law in 2016, reduced the nonmedical exemption and increased the childhood vaccination coverage rate in that state, though with some evidence of exemption replacement through the use of medical exemptions. Through September 2019, five additional state law changes have been enacted.

SUMMARY

The large number of heterogeneous changes to state-level policies for school-entry vaccination requirements in recent years need rigorous evaluation to identify best practices for balancing public health authority and parental autonomy while seeking to achieve the highest level of infectious disease prevention for children.