1
|
Olson-Chen C, Swamy GK, Gonik B, Forsyth K, Heininger U, Hozbor D, von König CHW, Chitkara AJ, Top KA, Muloiwa R, van der Schyff M, Tan TQ. The current state of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world, with recommendations for improved care: Consensus statements from the Global Pertussis Initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 165:860-869. [PMID: 38251722 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Bordetella pertussis, which causes a respiratory disease known as pertussis ("whooping cough") remains an important global challenge, with the incidence in pertussis cases increasing in recent years. Newborns and infants are at increased risk for severe morbidity and mortality from this bacterium. Vaccination in pregnancy has become an important strategy to both passively transfer immunity as well as prevent infection in pregnant persons, who are a major source of newborn infection, thus attempting to decrease the impact of this serious disease. It is considered safe for the pregnant person, the developing fetus, and the infant, and during the first 3 months of life it has been shown to be highly effective in preventing pertussis. There are a variety of strategies, recommendations, and adherence rates associated with pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world. We summarize the 2021 Global Pertussis Initiative Annual Meeting that reviewed the current global status of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and remaining medical and scientific questions, with a focus on vaccination challenges and strategies for obstetric and gynecologic healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Olson-Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bernard Gonik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Kevin Forsyth
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Hozbor
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | | | - Amar J Chitkara
- Department of Pediatrics, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Karina A Top
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rudzani Muloiwa
- Department of Paediatrics and Child health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Malikah van der Schyff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Constantiaberg Mediclinic, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tina Q Tan
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Briga M, Goult E, Brett TS, Rohani P, Domenech de Cellès M. Maternal pertussis immunization and the blunting of routine vaccine effectiveness: a meta-analysis and modeling study. Nat Commun 2024; 15:921. [PMID: 38297003 PMCID: PMC10830464 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44943-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
A key goal of pertussis control is to protect infants too young to be vaccinated, the age group most vulnerable to this highly contagious respiratory infection. In the last decade, maternal immunization has been deployed in many countries, successfully reducing pertussis in this age group. Because of immunological blunting, however, this strategy may erode the effectiveness of primary vaccination at later ages. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature on the relative risk (RR) of pertussis after primary immunization of infants born to vaccinated vs. unvaccinated mothers. The four studies identified had ≤6 years of follow-up and large statistical uncertainty (meta-analysis weighted mean RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.38-1.32). To interpret this evidence, we designed a new mathematical model with explicit blunting mechanisms and evaluated maternal immunization's short- and long-term impact on pertussis transmission dynamics. We show that transient dynamics can mask blunting for at least a decade after rolling out maternal immunization. Hence, the current epidemiological evidence may be insufficient to rule out modest reductions in the effectiveness of primary vaccination. Irrespective of this potential collateral cost, we predict that maternal immunization will remain effective at protecting unvaccinated newborns, supporting current public health recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Briga
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Elizabeth Goult
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias S Brett
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Pejman Rohani
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
- Center of Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pehlivan T, Dinleyici EC, Kara A, Kurugöl Z, Tezer H, Aksakal NB, Biri A, Azap A. The Present and Future Aspects of Life-Long Pertussis Prevention: Narrative Review with Regional Perspectives for Türkiye. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:2495-2512. [PMID: 37815753 PMCID: PMC10651609 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00876-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Pertussis, caused by Bordetella pertussis, remains one of the most widespread, contagious, and vaccine-preventable diseases. It results in notable morbidity and mortality as well as severe medical, social, and economic burden. Despite high global vaccine coverage, pertussis continues to be a significant epidemiologic problem, with outbreak episodes every few years just as in the pre-vaccination era. In Türkiye, there is a lack of comprehensive data on the current burden of pertussis in different age and risk groups, leading to underdiagnosis and underreporting of the disease, especially in adults who are often not considered at risk. Available data from Türkiye also reveal inadequate levels of protective antibodies in preterm newborns, emphasizing the need for additional preventive measures. Authors stated that improving physician awareness of pertussis symptoms in patients with prolonged cough, increasing access to routine pertussis tests, and conducting surveillance studies would aid in accurate diagnosis and reporting in Türkiye. As the Turkish Ministry of Health Antenatal Care Management Guide suggests routine second and third pregnancy check-up visits at weeks 18-24 and 28-32 correspondingly, this period can be considered the ideal vaccination time for Türkiye. Introducing a booster dose of Tdap at around 10 years of age or during national military service would reduce transmission and protect susceptible individuals. Identifying individuals at high risk of severe pertussis and prioritizing them for a booster dose is also crucial in Türkiye. Enhancing surveillance systems, increasing healthcare professionals' awareness through training, and organizing catch-up visits for missed vaccinations during the COVID-19 pandemic are mentioned as additional strategies to improve pertussis prevention in Türkiye. This review focuses on the global and regional burden of pertussis and obstacles to effective prevention and evaluates existing strategies to achieve lifelong pertussis prevention. Literature and current strategies were also discussed from a Turkish national standpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamer Pehlivan
- Public Health, Remedium Consulting Group, Izmir, Türkiye.
| | - Ener Cagri Dinleyici
- Department of Pediatrics, Eskisehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskisehir, Türkiye
| | - Ateş Kara
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Zafer Kurugöl
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Hasan Tezer
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Nur Baran Aksakal
- Department of Public Health, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Aydan Biri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Koru Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Alpay Azap
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tessier E, Newport D, Tran A, Nash SG, Mensah AA, Yun Wang T, Shantikumar S, Campbell H, Amirthalingam G, Todkill D. Pertussis immunisation strategies to optimise infant pertussis control: A narrative systematic review. Vaccine 2023; 41:5957-5964. [PMID: 37658001 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Countries routinely offering acellular pertussis vaccine, where long-term protection is not sustained, have the challenge of selecting an optimal schedule to minimise disease among young infants. We conducted a narrative systematic review and synthesis of information to evaluate different pertussis immunisation strategies at controlling pertussis disease, hospitalisation, deaths, and vaccine effectiveness among young infants. METHODS We conducted a review of the literature on studies about the primary, booster, and/or maternal vaccination series and synthesised findings narratively. Countries offering the first three doses of vaccine within six-months of life and a booster on or before the second year or life were defined as accelerated primary and booster schedules, respectively. Countries offering primary and booster doses later were defined as extended primary and booster schedules. All search results were screened, and articles reviewed and reconciled, by two authors. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Intervention tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. FINDINGS A total of 98 studies were included in the analyses and the following recurring themes were described: timing of vaccination, vaccine coverage, waning immunity/vaccine effectiveness, direct and indirect effectiveness, switching from an accelerated to extended schedule, impact of changes in testing. The risk of bias was generally low to moderate for most studies. CONCLUSION Comparing schedules is challenging and there was insufficient evidence to that one schedule was superior to another. Countries must select a schedule that maintains high vaccine coverage and reduced the risk of delaying the delivery vaccines to protect infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Newport
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anh Tran
- UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Todkill
- UK Health Security Agency, London, UK; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calvert A, Amirthalingam G, Andrews N, Basude S, Coleman M, Cuthbertson H, England A, Greening V, Hallis B, Johnstone E, Jones CE, Karampatsas K, Khalil A, Le Doare K, Matheson M, Peregrine E, Snape MD, Vatish M, Heath PT. Optimising the timing of whooping cough immunisation in mums (OpTIMUM) through investigating pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: an open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. MICROBE 2023; 4:e300-e308. [PMID: 37080224 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(22)00332-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is recommended in many countries to provide protection to young infants. The best timing for this vaccination is uncertain. In the UK, vaccination is recommended between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation. In this trial we aimed to investigate the equivalence of three time periods for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. METHODS In this open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial to investigate equivalence of different time windows for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) to receive a pertussis-containing vaccine (Boostrix-inactivated poliovirus vaccine) in one of three gestational age groups, comprising group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), group 2 (24-27 weeks + 6 days), and group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) using a computer-generated randomisation list. The primary outcome was concentration of pertussis-specific antibodies in the infant born at term at birth. Maternal blood sampling was done before and 2 weeks after vaccination and at delivery, together with a cord sample, and an infant sample was collected at least 4 weeks after primary vaccination. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after vaccination. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03908164). FINDINGS Between May 7, 2019, and Feb 13, 2020, of 1010 women assessed for eligibility, 364 women were recruited and 351 received the intervention (120 in group 1, 119 in group 2, and 112 in group 3). Equivalence of time periods was demonstrated for anti-pertussis toxin and anti-pertactin IgG concentrations. The cord blood geometric mean concentrations of anti-filamentous haemagglutinin IgG were higher with increasing gestational age at vaccination, such that for infants in group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), equivalence to group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) was not shown. Reported rates of fever were similar between study groups. INTERPRETATION Pertussis vaccination at three different time intervals in pregnancy resulted in equivalent concentrations of IgG antibodies in infants against two of the three pertussis antigens assessed. Overall, these findings support recommendations to vaccinate any time between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation. FUNDING The Thrasher Research Fund and the National Immunisation Schedule Evaluation Consortium through the National Institute for Health and Care Research policy research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Calvert
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Nick Andrews
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Sneha Basude
- University Hospital Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew Coleman
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Reproductive Health Research Team, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Anna England
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | - Vanessa Greening
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bassam Hallis
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | - Edward Johnstone
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christine E Jones
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Konstantinos Karampatsas
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK; Medical Research Council and Ugandan Virus Research Institute and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Kampala, Uganda; Makerere University Johns Hopkins University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mary Matheson
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | | | - Matthew D Snape
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Manu Vatish
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Clinical Research Network, Thames Valley and South Midlands
| | - Paul T Heath
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Skoff TH, Deng L, Bozio CH, Hariri S. US Infant Pertussis Incidence Trends Before and After Implementation of the Maternal Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis Vaccine. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177:395-400. [PMID: 36745442 PMCID: PMC10071344 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.5689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Infants younger than 1 year have the highest burden of pertussis morbidity and mortality. In 2011, the US introduced tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination during pregnancy to protect infants before vaccinations begin. Objective To assess the association of maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy with the incidence of pertussis among infants in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants In this ecologic study, a time-trend analysis was performed of infant pertussis cases reported through the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, in the US. Statistical analysis was performed from April 1, 2020, to October 31, 2022. Exposures Maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures Pertussis incidence rates were calculated and compared between 2 periods-the pre-maternal Tdap vaccination period (2000-2010) and the post-maternal Tdap vaccination period (2012-2019)-for 2 age groups: infants younger than 2 months (target group of maternal vaccination) and infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months (comparison group). Incidence rate differences between the 2 age groups were modeled using weighted segmented linear regression. The slope difference between the 2 periods was estimated to assess the association of maternal Tdap vaccination with pertussis incidence among infants. Results A total of 57 460 pertussis cases were reported in infants younger than 1 year between 2000 and 2019; 19 322 cases (33.6%) were in infants younger than 2 months. During the pre-maternal Tdap vaccination period, annual pertussis incidence did not change among infants younger than 2 months (slope, 3.29 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .28) but increased slightly among infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months (slope, 2.10 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .01). There was no change in the difference in incidence between the 2 age groups (slope, 0.08 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .97) during the pre-maternal Tdap vaccination period overall. However, in the post-maternal Tdap vaccination period, incidence decreased among infants younger than 2 months (slope, -14.53 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .001) while remaining unchanged among infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months (slope, 1.42 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .29). The incidence rate difference between the 2 age groups significantly decreased during the post-maternal Tdap vaccination period (slope, -14.43 per 100 000 infants per year; P < .001). Pertussis incidence rate differences were significantly different between the pre-maternal and post-maternal Tdap vaccination periods (slope difference, -14.51 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, following maternal Tdap vaccine introduction, a sustained decrease in pertussis incidence was observed among infants younger than 2 months, narrowing the incidence gap with infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months. These findings suggest that maternal Tdap vaccination is associated with a reduction in pertussis burden in the target age group (<2 months) and that further increases in coverage may be associated with additional reductions in infant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tami H. Skoff
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Li Deng
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Catherine H. Bozio
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Susan Hariri
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vaccination in Pregnancy against Pertussis: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the Global Pertussis Initiative. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10121990. [PMID: 36560400 PMCID: PMC9786323 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10121990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Infants are at high risk for severe morbidity and mortality from pertussis disease during early infancy. Vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy has emerged as the ideal strategy to protect infants during these early, vulnerable, first months of life. On 30 November and 1 December 2021, the Global Pertussis Initiative held a meeting that aimed to discuss and review the most up-to-date scientific literature supporting vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy and outstanding scientific questions. Herein, we review the current and historically published literature and summarize the findings as consensus statements on vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy on behalf of the Global Pertussis Initiative.
Collapse
|
8
|
An observational, cohort, multi-centre, open label phase IV extension study comparing preschool DTAP-IPV booster vaccine responses in children whose mothers were randomised to one of two pertussis-containing vaccines or received no pertussis-containing vaccine in pregnancy in England. Vaccine 2022; 40:7050-7056. [PMID: 36272877 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
An antenatal pertussis vaccination programme was introduced in 2012 in the UK in the context of a national outbreak of pertussis. It has been shown that a lower antibody response to primary immunisation can be seen for certain pertussis antigens in infants born to women who received pertussis-containing antenatal vaccines, a phenomenon known as blunting. The longer-term impact of this has not been documented previously, and accordingly was evaluated in this study. Children were predominantly recruited from a previous study in which their mothers had received acellular pertussis-containing antenatal vaccines (dTaP3-IPV [diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, three antigen acellular pertussis and inactivated polio] or dTaP5-IPV [diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, five antigen acellular pertussis and inactivated polio]), or no pertussis-containing vaccine. Blood samples were obtained prior to and one month after the acellular pertussis-containing preschool booster (dTaP5-IPV) was given at around age 3 years 4 months. Pre- and post-booster immunoglobulin G (IgG) geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) against pertussis toxin, filamentous haemagglutinin, fimbriae 2 & 3, and pertactin, were compared. Prior to the receipt of the preschool booster, there was no difference in the IgG GMCs against pertussis-specific antigens between children born to women vaccinated with dTaP3-IPV and dTaP5-IPV; however, IgG GMCs against pertussis toxin were significantly lower in children born to women vaccinated with dTaP3-IPV compared with children born to unvaccinated women (geometric mean ratio 0.42 [95 % CI 0.22-0.78], p = 0.03). One month after the receipt of the preschool booster there was no differences between the groups. The blunting effect of antenatal pertussis vaccine on pertussis responses in children can persist until preschool age, although it is overcome by the administration of a booster dose. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03578120.
Collapse
|
9
|
Impact of vaccination during pregnancy on infants' immune responses to vaccinations- definitions and statistical approaches. Vaccine 2022; 40:4292-4295. [PMID: 35750544 PMCID: PMC9217140 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.06.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
10
|
Esposito S, Abu Raya B, Baraldi E, Flanagan K, Martinon Torres F, Tsolia M, Zielen S. RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy? Front Immunol 2022; 13:880368. [PMID: 35572550 PMCID: PMC9096079 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.880368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a spectrum of respiratory illnesses in infants and young children that may lead to hospitalizations and a substantial number of outpatient visits, which result in a huge economic and healthcare burden. Most hospitalizations happen in otherwise healthy infants, highlighting the need to protect all infants against RSV. Moreover, there is evidence on the association between early-life RSV respiratory illness and recurrent wheezing/asthma-like symptoms As such, RSV is considered a global health priority. However, despite this, the only prevention strategy currently available is palivizumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) indicated in a subset of preterm infants or those with comorbidities, hence leaving the majority of the infant population unprotected against this virus. Therefore, development of prevention strategies against RSV for all infants entering their first RSV season constitutes a large unmet medical need. The aim of this review is to explore different immunization approaches to protect all infants against RSV. Prevention strategies include maternal immunization, immunization of infants with vaccines, immunization of infants with licensed mAbs (palivizumab), and immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs (e.g., nirsevimab, MK-1654). Of these, palivizumab use is restricted to a small population of infants and does not offer a solution for all-infant protection, whereas vaccine development in infants has encountered various challenges, including the immaturity of the infant immune system, highlighting that future pediatric vaccines will most likely be used in older infants (>6 months of age) and children. Consequently, maternal immunization and immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs represent the two feasible strategies for protection of all infants against RSV. Here, we present considerations regarding these two strategies covering key areas which include mechanism of action, "consistency" of protection, RSV variability, duration of protection, flexibility and optimal timing of immunization, benefit for the mother, programmatic implementation, and acceptance of each strategy by key stakeholders. We conclude that, based on current data, immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs might represent the most effective approach for protecting all infants entering their first RSV season.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Esposito
- Pediatric Clinic, Pietro Barilla Children’s Hospital, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Bahaa Abu Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Eugenio Baraldi
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman’s and Child’s Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Katie Flanagan
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Tasmanian Vaccine Trial Centre, Clifford Craig Foundation, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| | - Federico Martinon Torres
- Genetics, Vaccines, Infections and Pediatrics Research group (GENVIP), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Maria Tsolia
- Second Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “A&P Kyriakou” Children’s Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Stefan Zielen
- Department for Children and Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|