1
|
Hausdorff WP, Madhi SA, Kang G, Kaboré L, Tufet Bayona M, Giersing BK. Facilitating the development of urgently required combination vaccines. Lancet Glob Health 2024; 12:e1059-e1067. [PMID: 38636529 PMCID: PMC11099297 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00092-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
The essence of a vaccine lies in its ability to elicit a set of immune responses specifically directed at a particular pathogen. Accordingly, vaccines were historically designed, developed, registered, recommended, procured, and administered as monopathogen formulations. Nonetheless, the control and elimination of an astonishing number of diseases was realised only after several once-separate vaccines were provided as combinations. Unfortunately, the current superabundance of recommended and pipeline vaccines is now at odds with the number of acceptable vaccine administrations and feasible health-care visits for vaccine recipients and health-care providers. Yet, few new combinations are in development because, in addition to the scientific and manufacturing hurdles intrinsic to coformulation, developers face a gauntlet of regulatory, policy, and commercialisation obstacles in a milieu still largely designed for monopathogen vaccines. We argue here that national policy makers and public health agencies should prospectively identify and advocate for the development of new multipathogen combination vaccines, and suggest ways to accelerate the regulatory pathways to licensure of combinations and other concrete, innovative steps to mitigate current obstacles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William P Hausdorff
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Washington, DC, USA; Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Shabir A Madhi
- South African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Lassané Kaboré
- PATH, Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, Dakar, Senegal; Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Birgitte K Giersing
- WHO Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fleming JA, Gurley N, Knudson S, Kabore L, Bawa JT, Dapaah P, Kumar S, Uranw S, Tran T, Mai LTP, Odero C, Obong'o C, Aburam K, Wanjiru S, Hanh NTM, Dung LP, Hausdorff WP. Exploring Shigella vaccine priorities and preferences: Results from a mixed-methods study in low- and middle-income settings. Vaccine X 2023; 15:100368. [PMID: 37636544 PMCID: PMC10457597 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Shigella is the leading bacterial cause of diarrheal mortality in children and can cause long-term effects on growth and development. No licensed Shigella vaccines currently exist but several promising candidates are in development and could be available in the next five years. Despite Shigella being a well-known public health target of the World Health Organization for decades, given current burden estimates and competing preventable disease priorities in low-income settings, whether the availability of an effective Shigella vaccine will lead to its prioritization and widespread introduction among countries at highest risk is unknown. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods study of national stakeholders and healthcare providers in five countries in Asia and Africa and regional stakeholders in the Pan American Health Organization to identify preferences and priorities for forthcoming Shigella vaccines. Results In our study of 89 individuals, diarrhea was the most frequently mentioned serious health concern for children under five years. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was more often considered very concerning than diarrhea or stunting. Shigella awareness was high but not considered a serious health concern by most stakeholders. Most participants were willing to consider adding a new vaccine to the routine immunization schedule but expressed reservations about a Shigella vaccine because of lower perceived burden relative to other preventable diseases and an already crowded schedule; interest was highest among national stakeholders in countries receiving more financial support for immunization. The priority of a Shigella vaccine rose when participants considered vaccine impacts on reducing stunting and AMR. Participants strongly preferred oral and combination vaccines compared to injectable and a single-antigen presentations, citing greater perceived community acceptability. Conclusions This study provides a critical opportunity to hear directly from country and regional stakeholders about health priorities and preferences around new vaccines. These findings should inform ongoing Shigella vaccine development efforts and eventual vaccine introduction and implementation planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nikki Gurley
- PATH, Seattle, 2201 Westlake Ave, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Sophia Knudson
- PATH, Seattle, 2201 Westlake Ave, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Lassane Kabore
- PATH, Senegal, Fann Résidence, Rue Saint John Perse X F, Dakar, Senegal
| | | | | | - Sandeep Kumar
- PATH, India, 15th Floor, Dr. Gopal Das Bhawan 28, Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi 110001, India
| | - Surendra Uranw
- B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Buddha Road, Dharan 56700, Nepal
| | - Thang Tran
- PATH, Viet Nam, #1101, 11th Floor, Hanoi Towers, 49 Hai Ba Trung, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Le Thi Phuong Mai
- National Institute of Hygiene & Epidemiology, 1 P. Yec Xanh, Phạm Đình Hổ, Hai Bà Trưng, Hà Nội 100000, Viet Nam
| | - Chris Odero
- PATH, Kenya, ACS Plaza, 4th Floor Lenana and Galana Road, P.O. Box 76634-00508, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Christopher Obong'o
- PATH, Kenya, ACS Plaza, 4th Floor Lenana and Galana Road, P.O. Box 76634-00508, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kofi Aburam
- PATH, Ghana, PMB CT 307 Cantonments, Accra, Ghana
| | - Stella Wanjiru
- PATH, Kenya, ACS Plaza, 4th Floor Lenana and Galana Road, P.O. Box 76634-00508, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Nguyen Thi My Hanh
- National Institute of Hygiene & Epidemiology, 1 P. Yec Xanh, Phạm Đình Hổ, Hai Bà Trưng, Hà Nội 100000, Viet Nam
| | - Luu Phuong Dung
- National Institute of Hygiene & Epidemiology, 1 P. Yec Xanh, Phạm Đình Hổ, Hai Bà Trưng, Hà Nội 100000, Viet Nam
| | - William P. Hausdorff
- PATH, Washington, DC, 455 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20001, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Debellut F, Pecenka C, Hausdorff WP, Clark A. Potential impact and cost-effectiveness of injectable next-generation rotavirus vaccines in 137 LMICs: a modelling study. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2040329. [PMID: 35240926 PMCID: PMC9009916 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2040329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
While current live, oral rotavirus vaccines (LORVs) are reducing severe diarrhea everywhere, their effectiveness is lower in high burden settings. Alternative approaches are in advanced stages of clinical development, including injectable next-generation rotavirus vaccine (iNGRV) candidates, which have the potential to better protect children, be combined with existing routine immunizations and be more affordable than current LORVs. In an effort to better understand the real public health value of iNGRVs and to help inform decisions by international agencies, funders, and vaccine manufacturers, we conducted an impact and cost-effectiveness analysis examining 20 rotavirus vaccine use cases. We evaluated several currently licensed LORVs, one neonatal oral NGRV (oNGRV), one iNGRV, and one iNGRV-DTP (iNGRV comprising part of a DTP-containing combination) over a ten-year timeframe in 137 low- and middle-income countries. The most promising use case identified was a high efficacy iNGRV-DTP, predicted to have the lowest vaccine program cost (US$1.4 billion), the highest vaccine benefit (750,000 rotavirus deaths averted, 13 million rotavirus hospital admissions averted, US$ 2.7 billion health-care cost averted), and most favorable cost-effectiveness (cost-saving). iNGRV-DTP vaccine remained the most affordable, safe, and cost-effective option even when it was assumed to have equivalent efficacy to the current LORVs. This study shows that while the development of iNGRVs with superior efficacy to currently licensed LORVs would be ideal, iNGRVs with similar efficacy to LORVs would offer substantial public health value. It also highlights the economic value of accelerating the development of DTP-based combination vaccines that include iNGRV to provide rotavirus protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Clint Pecenka
- PATH, Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - William P. Hausdorff
- PATH, Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, Washington, DC, USA
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrew Clark
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen J, Grow S, Iturriza-Gómara M, Hausdorff WP, Fix A, Kirkwood CD. The Challenges and Opportunities of Next-Generation Rotavirus Vaccines: Summary of an Expert Meeting with Vaccine Developers. Viruses 2022; 14:v14112565. [PMID: 36423174 PMCID: PMC9699535 DOI: 10.3390/v14112565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The 2nd Next Generation Rotavirus Vaccine Developers Meeting, sponsored by PATH and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, was held in London, UK (7-8 June 2022), and attended by vaccine developers and researchers to discuss advancements in the development of next-generation rotavirus vaccines and to consider issues surrounding vaccine acceptability, introduction, and uptake. Presentations included updates on rotavirus disease burden, the impact of currently licensed oral vaccines, various platforms and approaches for next generation rotavirus vaccines, strategies for combination pediatric vaccines, and the value proposition for novel parenteral rotavirus vaccines. This report summarizes the information shared at the convening and poses various topics worthy of further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie Chen
- Enteric & Diarrheal Diseases, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Stephanie Grow
- Enteric & Diarrheal Diseases, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | | | - William P. Hausdorff
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- PATH, Washington, DC 20001, USA
| | | | - Carl D. Kirkwood
- Enteric & Diarrheal Diseases, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McAdams D, Estrada M, Holland D, Singh J, Sawant N, Hickey JM, Kumar P, Plikaytis B, Joshi SB, Volkin DB, Sitrin R, Cryz S, White JA. Concordance of in vitro and in vivo measures of non-replicating rotavirus vaccine potency. Vaccine 2022; 40:5069-5078. [PMID: 35871866 PMCID: PMC9405915 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Rotavirus infections remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among infants residing in low- and middle-income countries. To address the large need for protection from this vaccine-preventable disease we are developing a trivalent subunit rotavirus vaccine which is currently being evaluated in a multinational Phase 3 clinical trial for prevention of serious rotavirus gastroenteritis. Currently, there are no universally accepted in vivo or in vitro models that allow for correlation of field efficacy to an immune response against serious rotavirus gastroenteritis. As a new generation of non-replicating rotavirus vaccines are developed the lack of an established model for evaluating vaccine efficacy becomes a critical issue related to how vaccine potency and stability can be assessed. Our previous publication described the development of an in vitro ELISA to quantify individual vaccine antigens adsorbed to an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant to address the gap in vaccine potency methods for this non-replicating rotavirus vaccine candidate. In the present study, we report on concordance between ELISA readouts and in vivo immunogenicity in a guinea pig model as it relates to vaccine dosing levels and sensitivity to thermal stress. We found correlation between in vitro ELISA values and neutralizing antibody responses engendered after animal immunization. Furthermore, this in vitro assay could be used to demonstrate the effect of thermal stress on vaccine potency, and such results could be correlated with physicochemical analysis of the recombinant protein antigens. This work demonstrates the suitability of the in vitro ELISA to measure vaccine potency and the correlation of these measurements to an immunologic outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David McAdams
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Ave, Seattle, WA 98122, United States
| | - Marcus Estrada
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Ave, Seattle, WA 98122, United States.
| | - David Holland
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vaccine Analytics and Formulation Center, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States.
| | - Jasneet Singh
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Ave, Seattle, WA 98122, United States
| | - Nishant Sawant
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vaccine Analytics and Formulation Center, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States
| | - John M Hickey
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vaccine Analytics and Formulation Center, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States.
| | - Prashant Kumar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vaccine Analytics and Formulation Center, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States.
| | - Brian Plikaytis
- BioStat Consulting, LLC, 10429, Big Canoe, Jasper, GA 30143-5125, United States
| | - Sangeeta B Joshi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vaccine Analytics and Formulation Center, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States.
| | - David B Volkin
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vaccine Analytics and Formulation Center, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States.
| | - Robert Sitrin
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Ave, Seattle, WA 98122, United States.
| | - Stan Cryz
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Ave, Seattle, WA 98122, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mooney J, Price J, Bain C, Bawa JT, Gurley N, Kumar A, Liyanage G, Mkisi RE, Odero C, Seck K, Simpson E, Hausdorff WP. Healthcare provider perspectives on delivering next generation rotavirus vaccines in five low-to-middle-income countries. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270369. [PMID: 35737718 PMCID: PMC9223340 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Live oral rotavirus vaccines (LORVs) have significantly reduced rotavirus hospitalizations and deaths worldwide. However, LORVs are less effective in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Next-generation rotavirus vaccines (NGRVs) may be more effective but require administration by injection or a neonatal oral dose, adding operational complexity. Healthcare providers (HPs) were interviewed to assess rotavirus vaccine preferences and identify delivery issues as part of an NGRV value proposition. OBJECTIVE Determine HP vaccine preferences about delivering LORVs compared to injectable (iNGRV) and neonatal oral (oNGRV) NGRVs. METHODS 64 HPs from Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Peru, and Senegal were interviewed following a mixed-method guide centered on three vaccine comparisons: LORV vs. iNGRV; LORV vs. oNGRV; oNGRV vs. iNGRV. HPs reviewed attributes for each vaccine in the comparisons, then indicated and explained their preference. Additional questions elicited views about co-administering iNGRV+LORV for greater public health impact, a possible iNGRV-DTP-containing combination vaccine, and delivering neonatal doses. RESULTS Almost all HPs preferred oral vaccine options over iNGRV, with many emphasizing an aversion to additional injections. Despite this strong preference, HPs described challenges delivering oral doses. Preferences for LORV vs. oNGRV were split, marked by disparate views on rotavirus disease epidemiology and the safety, need, and feasibility of delivering neonatal vaccines. Although overwhelmingly enthusiastic about an iNGRV-DTP-containing combination option, several HPs had concerns. HP views were divided on the feasibility of co-administering iNGRV+LORV, citing challenges around logistics and caregiver sensitization. CONCLUSION Our findings provide valuable insights on delivering NGRVs in routine immunization. Despite opposition to injectables, openness to co-administering LORV+iNGRV to improve efficacy suggests future HP support of iNGRV if adequately informed of its advantages. Rationales for LORV vs. oNGRV underscore needs for training on rotavirus epidemiology and stronger service integration. Expressed challenges delivering existing LORVs merit further examination and indicate need for improved delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carolyn Bain
- PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | | - Nikki Gurley
- PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | | - Guwani Liyanage
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
| | | | | | | | - Evan Simpson
- PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - William P. Hausdorff
- PATH, Washington, D.C., United States of America, and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hausdorff WP, Scheele S, Giersing BK. What Drives the Value of a Shigella Vaccine? Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:282. [PMID: 35214740 PMCID: PMC8874986 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The development and licensure of a safe and highly efficacious Shigella vaccine has been a priority in international public health circles for decades and would represent a great scientific achievement. Nonetheless, in the context of increasingly crowded and costly childhood immunization programs, and with a myriad of other new and improved vaccines currently or soon on the market, there is no guarantee that even a highly effective Shigella vaccine would become a priority for adoption and introduction by the low- and middle-income countries that could benefit from it the most. We discuss here some of the major determinants and questions regarding the introduction of Shigella vaccines and the importance of developing a succinct, compelling public health value proposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William P. Hausdorff
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 455 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA;
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Suzanne Scheele
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 455 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA;
| | - Birgitte K. Giersing
- Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals Department, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hausdorff WP, Price J, Debellut F, Mooney J, Torkelson AA, Giorgadze K, Pecenka C. Does Anybody Want an Injectable Rotavirus Vaccine, and Why? Understanding the Public Health Value Proposition of Next-Generation Rotavirus Vaccines. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:149. [PMID: 35214608 PMCID: PMC8880741 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Routine infant immunization with live, oral rotavirus vaccines (LORVs) has had a major impact on severe gastroenteritis disease. Nevertheless, in high morbidity and mortality settings rotavirus remains an important cause of disease, partly attributable to the sub-optimal clinical efficacy of LORVs in those settings. Regardless of the precise immunological mechanism(s) underlying the diminished efficacy, the introduction of injectable next-generation rotavirus vaccines (iNGRV), currently in clinical development, could offer a potent remedy. In addition to the potential for greater clinical efficacy, precisely how iNGRVs are delivered (multiple doses to young infants; alongside LORVs or as a booster; co-formulated with Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis (DTP)-containing vaccines), their pricing, and their storage and cold chain characteristics could each have major implications on the resultant health outcomes, on cost-effectiveness as well as on product preferences by national stakeholders and healthcare providers. To better understand these implications, we critically assessed whether there is a compelling public health value proposition for iNGRVs based on potential (but still hypothetical) vaccine profiles. Our results suggest that the answer is highly dependent on the specific use cases and potential attributes of such novel vaccines. Notably, co-formulation of iNGRVs with similar or greater efficacy than LORVs with a DTP-containing vaccine, such as DTP-Hib-HepB, scored especially high on potential impact, cost-effectiveness, and strength of preference by national stakeholders and health care providers in lower and middle income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William P. Hausdorff
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 455 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jessica Price
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 2201 Westlake Ave, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA; (J.P.); (J.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Frédéric Debellut
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Rue de Varembé 7, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Jessica Mooney
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 2201 Westlake Ave, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA; (J.P.); (J.M.); (C.P.)
| | | | - Khatuna Giorgadze
- Linksbridge SPC, 808 5th Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; (A.A.T.); (K.G.)
| | - Clint Pecenka
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 2201 Westlake Ave, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA; (J.P.); (J.M.); (C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|