1
|
Hentschel V, Horsch C, Mayer B, Thies A, Qian W, Kroschel J, Seufferlein T, Perkhofer L, Müller M. A Systematic Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Induced Anti-S-RBD-Ig Response in a Population of Health Care Workers. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1467. [PMID: 37766143 PMCID: PMC10537165 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11091467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the novel class of mRNA vaccines has been granted first-time approval for active immunization against SARS-CoV-2 alongside the already established viral vector-based vaccines. In this prospective single-center study, we set out to determine the vaccine-induced humoral immune response in a population of 1512 health care employees after the second and third vaccination, respectively. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid antigen antibody concentrations were assessed using commercially available immunoassays. We could show that, in particular, young study subjects aged below 30 years, as well as those with a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, developed significantly higher antibody concentrations. Our data further suggest that being in physically close contact with formerly SARS-CoV-2-positive people positively affects the post-vaccination response. Surprisingly, study subjects with a BMI > 30 produced the highest anti-S-RBD Ig antibody levels if they had recently received their third vaccination. Also, heterologous dual vaccine regimens consisting of a BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 n-CoV-19, a homologous triple combination of BNT162b2, and an application of mRNA-1273 as the third vaccine, were most efficient at eliciting a humoral immune response. Our study substantiates existing evidence, but beyond that, scrutinizes the impact of vaccine agents and their respective combinations, as well as different time intervals on humoral immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoria Hentschel
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (V.H.); (A.T.); (W.Q.); (T.S.); (L.P.)
| | - Cornelia Horsch
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (C.H.); (B.M.)
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (C.H.); (B.M.)
| | - Annsophie Thies
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (V.H.); (A.T.); (W.Q.); (T.S.); (L.P.)
| | - Will Qian
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (V.H.); (A.T.); (W.Q.); (T.S.); (L.P.)
| | - Joris Kroschel
- Central Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (V.H.); (A.T.); (W.Q.); (T.S.); (L.P.)
| | - Lukas Perkhofer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (V.H.); (A.T.); (W.Q.); (T.S.); (L.P.)
- Institute of Molecular Oncology and Stem Cell Biology, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Martin Müller
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (V.H.); (A.T.); (W.Q.); (T.S.); (L.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boyle T, O'Lone E, Phua E, Anderson J, Mather A, Fernando SL. Subsequent COVID-19 Prophylaxis in COVID-19 Associated Glomerulopathies. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1152. [PMID: 37514968 PMCID: PMC10385225 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11071152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Successful vaccination has been the decisive factor in the overall decline of SARS-CoV2 infection related morbidity and mortality. However, global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are ongoing, with reports of glomerular disease occurring in relation to both infection and vaccination. A particular rise in anti-GBM disease has been identified. Information is still emerging regarding the optimal management of such cases. We reviewed anti-GBM antibody detection rates at our test center over the past 5 years. We followed three patients with biopsy confirmed glomerular disease temporally related to COVID-19 vaccination. Each patient proceeded to receive subsequent COVID-19 vaccination as per immunologist recommendations. Further assessment included COVID-19 antibody testing in each case. A three-fold increase in significant anti-GBM antibody results noted at our center was associated with COVID infection in 10% of cases, and COVID vaccination in 25% of cases. We demonstrated that subsequent vaccination did not appear to lead to adverse effects including relapse in our three cases of COVID-19 vaccine-associated GN. We also identified positive COVID-19 antibody levels in two out of three cases, despite immunosuppression. We report a rise in anti-GBM antibody disease incidence. Our small study suggests that COVID-19 antibody testing can help determine COVID prophylaxis requirements, and subsequent vaccination with an alternative vaccine type appears safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Therese Boyle
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Emma O'Lone
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Elaine Phua
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Janet Anderson
- Immunology Laboratory, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Amanda Mather
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Suran L Fernando
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Immunology Laboratory, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park JK, Bhandari S. Literature review on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy in the immunocompromised population, and possible implications to future vaccination in kidney transplant patients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1103699. [PMID: 36817787 PMCID: PMC9931721 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1103699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the emergence of the virulent coronavirus in 2019, efforts to tackle the coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have been made globally. The development of the coronavirus disease (COVID) vaccine was a significant breakthrough in ways to tackle the virus. Various research studies have been conducted to identify how the virus works and ways to manage COVID, including the efficacy of the vaccines. However, there is limited data on how these measures work for the immunocompromised, despite the grave impact of these virulent strains in this population. Specifically, this review aims to focus on kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Studies have suggested that there is significantly lower vaccine response in some immunocompromised groups despite additional booster doses, and hence warrants an augmented or alternative protection against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for these patients. This suggests a need for alternative or more tailored approach in providing adequate protection against the COVID-19 in these cohorts. Some suggested ways include withholding immunosuppressants before and/or after vaccination, increasing the vaccine doses or reducing intervals and providing a mixture of monoclonal antibody (mAb) or antiviral therapy. However, the appropriate degree of alteration and augmentation, as well as its safety and effectiveness remains to be determined. Furthermore, continuous emergence of more virulent strains, such as the Omicron and its sub-lineages or the Deltacron, emphasises the need for ongoing research to assess the effectiveness of the current treatment against these new variants. Overall, active interest and appropriate updates to COVID-19 guidelines is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joo Kyung Park
- Department of Renal Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom,Joo Kyung Park, ; orcid.org/0000-0002-7034-4998
| | - Sunil Bhandari
- Department of Renal Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom,Hull York Medical School, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Sunil Bhandari, ; orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-9622
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Factors Associated With COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Transplantation 2022; 106:2068-2075. [PMID: 35761439 PMCID: PMC9521391 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rapid development and universal access to vaccines represent a milestone in combating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, there are major concerns about vaccine response in immunocompromised populations in particular transplant recipients. In the present study, we aim to comprehensively assess the humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in both orthotopic organ transplant and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 96 studies that met inclusion criteria. RESULTS The pooled rates of seroconversion were 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-55%) in transplant recipients and 99% (95% CI, 99%-99%) in healthy controls after the second dose of vaccine. The pooled rate was 56% (95% CI, 49%-63%) in transplant recipients after the third dose. Immunosuppressive medication is the most prominent risk factor associated with seroconversion failure, but different immunosuppressive regimens are associated with differential outcomes in this respect. Calcineurin inhibitors, steroids, or mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid are associated with an increased risk of seroconversion failure, whereas azathioprine or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors do not. Advanced age, short interval from receiving the vaccine to the time of transplantation, or comorbidities confers a higher risk for seroconversion failure. CONCLUSIONS Transplant recipients compared with the general population have much lower rates of seroconversion upon receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Immunosuppressants are the most prominent factors associated with seroconversion, although different types may have differential effects.
Collapse
|
5
|
Krasselt M, Wagner U, Nguyen P, Pietsch C, Boldt A, Baerwald C, Pierer M, Seifert O. Humoral and cellular response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases under real-life conditions. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:SI180-SI188. [PMID: 35143648 PMCID: PMC8903382 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Successful vaccination is key to overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic. Immunosuppressive medication is known to potentially compromise vaccination responses, and expansion of our knowledge on vaccination efficacy in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) is therefore of utmost importance. METHODS We conducted a single-centre observational study and evaluated the efficacy of approved COVID-19 vaccines in 303 adult AIIRD patients. Serum levels of IgG antibodies against the S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins (anti-S IgG) were measured at least two weeks after vaccination. In a subgroup of patients without humoral response, T-cell responses were determined using an interferon-γ gamma release assay. RESULTS Overall seropositivity rate was 78.5% and was significantly lower in patients under immunosuppressive therapy (75.7 vs 93.2%, P = 0.009). No difference regarding the vaccination type was observed. Glucocorticoids, mycophenolate-mofetil, TNF inhibitors, tocilizumab, abatacept and rituximab were all associated with non-response after proper vaccination. The risk was highest under RTX therapy (OR 0.004, 95% CI 0.001, 0.023, P < 0.0001). A strong negative correlation was observed between time since vaccination with an mRNA vaccine and anti-S antibody levels (r=-0.6149, P < 0.0001). In patients without humoral response, a T-cell response was found in 50%. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 vaccination in patients with AIIRD is effective using any approved vaccine. Humoral response might be impaired depending on the individual immunosuppressive medication. The risk of non-response is highest under rituximab therapy. Anti-S IgG antibody levels wane over time after mRNA vaccination. Importantly, 50% of humoral non-responders showed a T-cellular response, suggesting T-cell-mediated protection to a certain extent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Krasselt
- Rheumatology Unit, Clinic for Endocrinology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology
| | - Ulf Wagner
- Rheumatology Unit, Clinic for Endocrinology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology
| | - Phuong Nguyen
- Rheumatology Unit, Clinic for Endocrinology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology
| | | | - Andreas Boldt
- Institute for Clinical Immunology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christoph Baerwald
- Rheumatology Unit, Clinic for Endocrinology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology
| | - Matthias Pierer
- Rheumatology Unit, Clinic for Endocrinology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology
| | - Olga Seifert
- Rheumatology Unit, Clinic for Endocrinology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology
| |
Collapse
|