Comparison of electrocardiographic analysis for risk of QT interval prolongation using safety pharmacology and toxicological studies

Comparison of electrocardiogram and blood pressure recording methods in non-rodent toxicology studies: A retrospective analysis

Our study retrospectively examines 51 non-rodent general toxicology studies conducted over the past 8 years to ascertain the influence of recording methodologies on baseline cardiovascular (CV) parameters and statistical sensitivity. Specifically, our work aims to evaluate the frequency of cardiovascular parameter recording categorized by therapeutic modality and study type, to assess the variability in these parameters based on measurement techniques, and to determine the sample sizes needed for detecting relevant changes in heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and QTc interval in non-human primate (NHP) studies. Results indicate that electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements in dogs and NHP were recorded in 63% of studies, combined with BP recording in 18% of studies, while BP was never recorded alone. Trend analysis reveals a decline in the utilisation of restraint-based methods for ECG measurements post-2017, to the benefit of telemetry-based recordings, particularly Jacketed External Telemetry (JET). There was a marked difference in baseline values, with restraint-based methods showing significantly higher HR and QTc values compared to JET, likely linked to animal stress. Further analysis suggests an unrealistic and unethical sample size requirement in NHP studies for detecting biologically meaningful CV parameter changes using restraint-based methods, while JET methods necessitate significantly smaller sample sizes. This retrospective study indicates a notable shift from snapshots short-duration, restraint-based methods towards telemetry approaches over the recent years, especially with an increased usage of implanted telemetry. The transition contributes to potential consensus within industry or regulatory frameworks for optimal practices in assessing ECG, HR, and BP in general toxicology studies.

Comparison of the effects of propofol and alfaxalone on the electrocardiogram of dogs, with particular reference to QT interval

Cardiac electrical activity is often altered by administration of anesthetic drugs. While the effects of propofol in this regard have previously been described in dogs, to date, there are no reports of the effect of alfaxalone. This study investigated the impact of both propofol and alfaxalone on the ECG of 60 dogs, after premedication with acepromazine and methadone. Heart rate increased significantly in both groups. The PR and QRS intervals were significantly increased following propofol while with alfaxalone the QRS duration was significantly increased and ST segment depression was observed. The QT and JT interval were significantly shorter following induction with alfaxalone, but, when corrected (c) for heart rate, QTc and JTc in both groups were significantly greater following induction. When comparing the magnitude of change between groups, the change in RR interval was greater in the alfaxalone group. The change in both QT and JT intervals were significantly greater following alfaxalone, but when QTc and JTc intervals were compared, there were no significant differences between the two drugs. The similarly increased QTc produced by both drugs may suggest comparable proarrhythmic effects.

Comparison of different QT correction methods for nonclinical safety assessment in ketamine-anesthetized Indian rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

Rhesus monkeys are a non-rodent species employed in the preclinical safety evaluation of pharmaceuticals and biologics. These nonhuman primate species have been increasingly used in biomedical research because of the similarity in their ionic mechanisms of repolarization with humans. Heart rate and QT interval are two primary endpoints in determining the pro-arrhythmic risk of drugs. As heart rate and QT interval have an inverse relationship, any change in heart rate causes a subsequent change in QT interval. This warrants for calculation of a corrected QT interval. This study aimed to identify an appropriate formula that best corrected QT for change in heart rate. We employed seven formulas based on source-species type, clinical relevance, and requirements of various international regulatory guidelines. Data showed that corrected QT interval values varied drastically for different correction formulas. Equations were compared on their slope values based on QTc versus RR plots. The rank order of the slope for different formulas was (closest to farthest from zero) QTcNAK, QTcHAS, QTcBZT, QTcFRD, QTcVDW, QTcHDG, and QTcFRM. QTcNAK emerged to be the best correcting formula in this study. It showed the least correlation with the RR interval (r = -0.01) and displayed no significant difference amongst the sexes. As there is no universally recognized formula for preclinical use, the authors recommend developing a best-case scenario model for specific study designs and individual organizations. The data from this research will be helpful in deciding an appropriate QT correction formula for the safety assessment of new pharmaceuticals and biologics.

Evaluation of moxifloxacin in canine and non-human primate telemetry assays: Comparison of QTc interval prolongation by timepoint and concentration-QTc analysis

The in vivo correct QT (QTc) assay is used by the pharmaceutical industry to characterize the potential for delayed ventricular repolarization and is a core safety assay mentioned in International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) S7B guideline. The typical telemetry study involves a dose‐response analysis of QTc intervals over time using a crossover (CO) design. This method has proven utility but does not include direct integration of pharmacokinetic (PK) data. An alternative approach has been validated and is used routinely in the clinical setting that pairs pharmacodynamic (PD) responses with PK exposure (e.g., concentration‐QTc (C‐QTc) analysis. The goal of our paper was to compare the QTc sensitivity of two experimental approaches in the conscious dog and non‐human primate (NHP) QTc assays. For timepoint analysis, a conventional design using eight animals (8 × 4 CO) to detect moxifloxacin‐induced QTc prolongation was compared to a PK/PD design in a subset (N = 4) of the same animals. The findings demonstrate that both approaches are equally sensitive in detecting threshold QTc prolongation on the order of 10 ms. Both QTc models demonstrated linearity in the QTc prolongation response to moxifloxacin dose escalation (6 to 46 ms). Further, comparison with human QTc findings with moxifloxacin showed agreement and consistent translation across the three species: C‐QTc slope values were 0.7‐ (dog) and 1.2‐ (NHP) fold of the composite human value. In conclusion, our data show that dog and NHP QTc telemetry with an integrated PK arm (C‐QTc) has the potential to supplement clinical evaluation and improve integrated QTc risk assessment.

The in vivo QTc core assay: An evaluation of QTc variability, detection sensitivity and implications for the improvement of conscious dog and non-human primate telemetry studies

The ICH S7B guideline describes the requirement to conduct an in vitro I_Kr (hERG) and in vivo QTc assay for human risk assessment of new drug products, but the guidance is devoid of recommendations on study execution or quality. In the absence of standard practice, multiple study designs and experimental approaches have been utilized, especially with the nonclinical QTc assay. Since 2009, our approach to the in vivo QTc assay has been consistent for small molecules and yields reproducible and sensitive levels for QTc signal detection. Our database and experience indicate that nonrodent telemetry studies can achieve high sensitivity and a calculated metric of study power can be used to indicate study quality. Using a retrospective statistical power analysis of multiple studies (n = 14 dog; n = 6 NHP), the detection sensitivity for a specific study design (N = 8; double Latin square cross-over) was determined. The output of the power analysis is the minimal detectable effect at 80% power and a 95% probability level. The design provided an average sensitivity to detect a 4.7 (2.0%) and 6.5 (1.9%) msec QTcI change in dog and NHP, respectively. These findings suggest that this experimental approach has a consistent and reproducible sensitivity to enable a robust QTcI risk evaluation and can be used confidently to support an integrated nonclinical-clinical pro-arrhythmia risk assessment. The inclusion of power analysis (i.e., QTc sensitivity) data in a regulatory submission provides key information to critical stakeholders about the quality of the in vivo QTc assessment and its value for human safety testing.

Time for a Fully Integrated Nonclinical-Clinical Risk Assessment to Streamline QT Prolongation Liability Determinations: A Pharma Industry Perspective

Defining an appropriate and efficient assessment of drug‐induced corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation (a surrogate marker of torsades de pointes arrhythmia) remains a concern of drug developers and regulators worldwide. In use for over 15 years, the nonclinical International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) S7B and clinical ICH E14 guidances describe three core assays (S7B: in vitro hERG current & in vivo QTc studies; E14: thorough QT study) that are used to assess the potential of drugs to cause delayed ventricular repolarization. Incorporating these assays during nonclinical or human testing of novel compounds has led to a low prevalence of QTc‐prolonging drugs in clinical trials and no new drugs having been removed from the marketplace due to unexpected QTc prolongation. Despite this success, nonclinical evaluations of delayed repolarization still minimally influence ICH E14‐based strategies for assessing clinical QTc prolongation and defining proarrhythmic risk. In particular, the value of ICH S7B‐based “double‐negative” nonclinical findings (low risk for hERG block and in vivo QTc prolongation at relevant clinical exposures) is underappreciated. These nonclinical data have additional value in assessing the risk of clinical QTc prolongation when clinical evaluations are limited by heart rate changes, low drug exposures, or high‐dose safety considerations. The time has come to meaningfully merge nonclinical and clinical data to enable a more comprehensive, but flexible, clinical risk assessment strategy for QTc monitoring discussed in updated ICH E14 Questions and Answers. Implementing a fully integrated nonclinical/clinical risk assessment for compounds with double‐negative nonclinical findings in the context of a low prevalence of clinical QTc prolongation would relieve the burden of unnecessary clinical QTc studies and streamline drug development.

Evaluating Associations Between Nonclinical Cardiovascular Functional Endpoints and Repeat-dose Cardiovascular Toxicity in the Beagle Dog: A Cross-company Initiative

Integrating nonclinical in vitro, in silico, and in vivo datasets holistically can improve hazard characterization and risk assessment. In pharmaceutical development, cardiovascular liabilities are a leading cause of compound attrition. Prior to clinical studies, functional cardiovascular data are generated in single-dose safety pharmacology telemetry studies, with structural pathology data obtained from repeat-dose toxicology studies with limited concurrent functional endpoints, eg, electrocardiogram via jacketed telemetry. Relationships between datasets remain largely undetermined. To address this gap, a cross-pharma collaboration collated functional and structural data from 135 compounds. Retrospective functional data were collected from good laboratory practice conscious dog safety pharmacology studies: effects defined as hemodynamic blood pressure or heart rate changes. Morphologic pathology findings (mainly degeneration, vacuolation, inflammation) from related toxicology studies in the dog (3–91 days repeat-dosing) were reviewed, harmonized, and location categorized: cardiac muscle (myocardium, epicardium, endocardium, unspecified), atrioventricular/aortic valves, blood vessels. The prevalence of cardiovascular histopathology changes was 11.1% of compounds, with 53% recording a functional blood pressure or heart rate change. Correlations were assessed using the Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square trend test, identifying statistically significant associations between cardiac muscle pathology and (1) decreased blood pressure, (2) increased heart rate, and between cardiovascular vessel pathology and increased heart rate. Negative predictive values were high, suggesting few compounds cause repeat-dose cardiovascular structural change in the absence of functional effects in single-dose safety pharmacology studies. Therefore, observed functional changes could prompt moving (sub)chronic toxicology studies forward, to identify cardiovascular liabilities earlier in development, and reduce late-stage attrition.

A Proof-of-Concept Evaluation of JTPc and Tp-Tec as Proarrhythmia Biomarkers in Preclinical Species: A Retrospective Analysis by an HESI-Sponsored Consortium

Introduction:

Based on the ICH S7B and E14 guidance documents, QT interval (QTc) is used as the primary in vivo biomarker to assess the risk of drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP). Clinical and nonclinical data suggest that drugs that prolong the corrected QTc with balanced multiple ion channel inhibition (most importantly the l-type calcium, Cav1.2, and persistent or late inward sodium current, Nav1.5, in addition to human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene [hERG] IKr or Kv11.1) may have limited proarrhythmic liability. The heart rate-corrected J to T-peak (JTpc) measurement in particular may be considered to discriminate selective hERG blockers from multi-ion channel blockers.

Methods:

Telemetry data from Beagle dogs given dofetilide (0.3 mg/kg), sotalol (32 mg/kg), and verapamil (30 mg/kg) orally and Cynomolgus monkeys given medetomidine (0.4 mg/kg) orally were retrospectively analyzed for effects on QTca, JTpca, and T-peak to T-end covariate adjusted (Tpeca) interval using individual rate correction and super intervals (calculated from 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, and 18-24 hours postdose).

Results:

Dofetilide and cisapride (IKr or Kv11.1 blockers) were associated with significant increases in QTca and JTpca, while sotalol was associated with significant increases in QTca, JTpca, and Tpeca. Verapamil (a Kv11.1 and Cav1.2 blocker) resulted in a reduction in QTca and JTpca, however, and increased Tpeca. Medetomidine was associated with a reduction in Tpeca and increase in JTpca.

Discussion:

Results from this limited retrospective electrocardiogram analysis suggest that JTpca and Tpeca may discriminate selective IKr blockers and multichannel blockers and could be considered in the context of an integrated comprehensive proarrhythmic risk assessment.

Detecting drug-induced changes in ECG parameters using jacketed telemetry: Effect of different data reduction techniques

INTRODUCTION

Continuous cardiovascular data is routinely collected during preclinical safety assessment of new medicines. This generates large datasets, which must be summarised to analyse and interpret drug effects. We assessed four methods of data reduction of continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) data and examined the impact on the statistical power of the assay.

METHODS

Continuous ECG data were collected from a validation study in 6 cynomolgus monkeys using jacketed telemetry. Animals received either vehicle or vehicle followed by ascending doses of moxifloxacin each on a different dosing day. Recordings made for 25h on each dosing day were reduced to discrete time-points using: 1-min average snapshots, 15-min average snapshots, large duration averages (0.5-4h) or super-intervals (3.5-9h averages).

RESULTS

There was no difference in the ability to detect moxifloxacin-induced QTc prolongation between the 1- and 15-min snapshots and the large duration averages data reduction methods (minimum detectable change in QTca of 20, 17 and 18ms, respectively at 80% power). The super-intervals method detected slightly smaller changes in QTc (15ms), but did not detect a statistically significant increase in QTc after the lowest dose of moxifloxacin, in contrast to the other methods. There were fewer statistically significant differences between dosing days in animals given vehicle when the large duration averages and super-interval reduction techniques were used.

DISCUSSION

There is no marked difference in the power of detection of drug-induced ECG changes in cynomolgus monkeys when using either small duration average or large duration average data reduction techniques. Use of larger duration averages or super-intervals may facilitate data interpretation by reducing the incidence of spurious significant differences that occur by chance between dosing days.

Opportunities to Apply the 3Rs in Safety Assessment Programs

Before a potential new medicine can be administered to humans it is essential that its safety is adequately assessed. Safety assessment in animals forms an integral part of this process, from early drug discovery and initial candidate selection to the program of recommended regulatory tests in animals. The 3Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement of animals in research) are integrated in the current regulatory requirements and expectations and, in the EU, provide a legal and ethical framework for in vivo research to ensure the scientific objectives are met whilst minimizing animal use and maintaining high animal welfare standards. Though the regulations are designed to uncover potential risks, they are intended to be flexible, so that the most appropriate approach can be taken for an individual product. This article outlines current and future opportunities to apply the 3Rs in safety assessment programs for pharmaceuticals, and the potential (scientific, financial, and ethical) benefits to the industry, across the drug discovery and development process. For example, improvements to, or the development of, novel, early screens (e.g., in vitro, in silico, or nonmammalian screens) designed to identify compounds with undesirable characteristics earlier in development have the potential to reduce late-stage attrition by improving the selection of compounds that require regulatory testing in animals. Opportunities also exist within the current regulatory framework to simultaneously reduce and/or refine animal use and improve scientific outcomes through improvements to technical procedures and/or adjustments to study designs. It is important that approaches to safety assessment are continuously reviewed and challenged to ensure they are science-driven and predictive of relevant effects in humans.

Social housing of non-rodents during cardiovascular recordings in safety pharmacology and toxicology studies

INTRODUCTION

The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) and National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) conducted a survey and workshop in 2015 to define current industry practices relating to housing of non-rodents during telemetry recordings in safety pharmacology and toxicology studies. The aim was to share experiences, canvas opinion on the study procedures/designs that could be used and explore the barriers to social housing.

METHODS

Thirty-nine sites, either running studies (Sponsors or Contract Research Organisations, CROs) and/or outsourcing work responded to the survey (51% from Europe; 41% from USA).

RESULTS

During safety pharmacology studies, 84, 67 and 100% of respondents socially house dogs, minipigs and non-human primates (NHPs) respectively on non-recording days. However, on recording days 20, 20 and 33% of respondents socially house the animals, respectively. The main barriers for social housing were limitations in the recording equipment used, study design and animal temperament/activity. During toxicology studies, 94, 100 and 100% of respondents socially house dogs, minipigs and NHPs respectively on non-recording days. However, on recording days 31, 25 and 50% of respondents socially house the animals, respectively. The main barriers for social housing were risk of damage to and limitations in the recording equipment used, food consumption recording and temperament/activity of the animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the majority of the industry does not yet socially house animals during telemetry recordings in safety pharmacology and toxicology studies, there is support to implement this refinement. Continued discussions, sharing of best practice and data from companies already socially housing, combined with technology improvements and investments in infrastructure are required to maintain the forward momentum of this refinement across the industry.

Non-proliferative and Proliferative Lesions of the Cardiovascular System of the Rat and Mouse

The INHAND Project (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) is a joint initiative of the Societies of Toxicologic Pathology from Japan (JSTP), Europe (ESTP), Great Britain (BSTP) and North America (STP) to develop an internationally-accepted nomenclature for proliferative and non-proliferative lesions in laboratory animals. The primary purpose of this publication is to provide a standardized nomenclature for characterizing lesions observed in the cardiovascular (CV) system of rats and mice commonly used in drug or chemical safety assessment. The standardized nomenclature presented in this document is also available electronically for society members on the internet (http://goreni.org). Accurate and precise morphologic descriptions of changes in the CV system are important for understanding the mechanisms and pathogenesis of those changes, differentiation of natural and induced injuries and their ultimate functional consequence. Challenges in nomenclature are associated with lesions or pathologic processes that may present as a temporal or pathogenic spectrum or when natural and induced injuries share indistinguishable features. Specific nomenclature recommendations are offered to provide a consistent approach.

Incidence of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Prolonged QTc After the Administration of Azithromycin: A Retrospective Study

Background

Azithromycin has been associated with abnormalities of cardiac repolarization and development of torsades de pointes. Observational data suggest that the risk of death from cardiovascular causes is increased in patients taking azithromycin. Little is known regarding the risk of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with prolongation of the corrected QT interval who receive azithromycin.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with prolonged corrected QT (QTc) who subsequently received azithromycin.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the incidence of sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with prolonged QTc (greater than 450 ms) who successively received intravenous (IV) and/or oral azithromycin. Patients hospitalized in a tertiary care teaching hospital between November 2009 and June 2012 were included in the study. The primary outcome was sustained ventricular tachycardia documented in patients on telemetry.

Results

Of the 103 patients enrolled in the study, only one patient experienced the primary outcome (0.97 %). The event occurred 1 day after the administration of a single dose of 500 mg IV azithromycin.

Conclusion

The risk of sustained ventricular tachycardia was 0.97 % in our cohort of patients with prolonged QTc who subsequently received azithromycin. Given the small size of this study, additional research is needed to determine the true incidence of arrhythmia in the population.

Online resources for improving the care and use of non-human primates in research

Published literature and scientific events provide opportunities to expand knowledge and develop skills in the care and use of non-human primates (NHPs) in research. Increasingly, these traditional routes of information exchange are being complemented by dedicated online resources aimed at sharing best practice in NHP care and use, and enhancing the training and professional development of laboratory staff working with NHPs. This article outlines some key online resources from the UK’s National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) and other organisations with an interest in NHP research, and the ways in which the resources can be integrated into staff training and research practices to enhance animal welfare, quality of science and application of the 3Rs.

Inclusion of Safety Pharmacology Endpoints in Repeat-Dose Toxicity Studies

Whereas pharmacological responses tend to be fairly rapid in onset and are therefore detectable after a single dose, some diminish on repeated dosing, and others increase in magnitude and therefore can be missed or underestimated in single-dose safety pharmacology studies. Safety pharmacology measurements can be incorporated into repeat-dose toxicity studies, either routinely or on an ad hoc basis. Drivers for this are both scientific (see above) and regulatory (e.g. ICH S6, S7, S9). There are inherent challenges in achieving this: the availability of suitable technical and scientific expertise in the test facility, unsuitable laboratory conditions, use of simultaneous (as opposed to staggered) dosing, requirement for toxicokinetic sampling, unsuitability of certain techniques (e.g. use of anaesthesia, surgical implantation, food restriction), equipment availability at close proximity and sensitivity of the methods to detect small, clinically relevant, changes. Nonetheless, 'fit-for-purpose' data can still be acquired without requiring additional animals. Examples include assessment of behaviour, sensorimotor, visual and autonomic functions, ambulatory ECG and blood pressure, echocardiography, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic function. This is entirely achievable if the safety pharmacology measurements are relatively unobtrusive, both with respect to the animals and to the toxicology study itself. Careful pharmacological validation of any methods used, and establishing their detection sensitivity, is vital to ensure the credibility of generated data.

A Historical View and Vision into the Future of the Field of Safety Pharmacology

Professor Gerhard Zbinden recognized in the 1970s that the standards of the day for testing new candidate drugs in preclinical toxicity studies failed to identify acute pharmacodynamic adverse events that had the potential to harm participants in clinical trials. From his vision emerged the field of safety pharmacology, formally defined in the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) S7A guidelines as "those studies that investigate the potential undesirable pharmacodynamic effects of a substance on physiological functions in relation to exposure in the therapeutic range and above." Initially, evaluations of small-molecule pharmacodynamic safety utilized efficacy models and were an ancillary responsibility of discovery scientists. However, over time, the relationship of these studies to overall safety was reflected by the regulatory agencies who, in directing the practice of safety pharmacology through guidance documents, prompted transition of responsibility to drug safety departments (e.g., toxicology). Events that have further shaped the field over the past 15 years include the ICH S7B guidance, evolution of molecular technologies leading to identification of new therapeutic targets with uncertain toxicities, introduction of data collection using more sophisticated and refined technologies, and utilization of transgenic animal models probing critical scientific questions regarding novel targets of toxicity. The collapse of the worldwide economy in the latter half of the first decade of the twenty-first century, continuing high rates of compound attrition during clinical development and post-approval and sharply increasing costs of drug development have led to significant strategy changes, contraction of the size of pharmaceutical organizations, and refocusing of therapeutic areas of investigation. With these changes has come movement away from dedicated internal safety pharmacology capability to utilization of capabilities within external contract research organizations. This movement has created the opportunity for the safety pharmacology discipline to come "full circle" and return to the drug discovery arena (target identification through clinical candidate selection) to contribute to the mitigation of the high rate of candidate drug failure through better compound selection decision making. Finally, the changing focus of science and losses in didactic training of scientists in whole animal physiology and pharmacology have revealed a serious gap in the future availability of qualified individuals to apply the principles of safety pharmacology in support of drug discovery and development. This is a significant deficiency that at present is only partially met with academic and professional society programs advancing a minimal level of training. In summary, with the exception that the future availability of suitably trained scientists is a critical need for the field that remains to be effectively addressed, the prospects for the future of safety pharmacology are hopeful and promising, and challenging for those individuals who want to assume this responsibility. What began in the early part of the new millennium as a relatively simple model of testing to assure the safety of Phase I clinical subjects and patients from acute deleterious effects on life-supporting organ systems has grown with experience and time to a science that mobilizes the principles of cellular and molecular biology and attempts to predict acute adverse events and those associated with long-term treatment. These challenges call for scientists with a broad range of in-depth scientific knowledge and an ability to adapt to a dynamic and forever changing industry. Identifying individuals who will serve today and training those who will serve in the future will fall to all of us who are committed to this important field of science.

Safety Pharmacology Evaluation of Biopharmaceuticals

Biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals or biopharmaceuticals (BPs) are molecules such as monoclonal antibodies, soluble/decoy receptors, hormones, enzymes, cytokines, and growth factors that are produced in various biological expression systems and are used to diagnose, treat, or prevent various diseases. Safety pharmacology (SP) assessment of BPs has evolved since the approval of the first BP (recombinant human insulin) in 1982. This evolution is ongoing and is informed by various international harmonization guidelines. Based on these guidelines, the potential undesirable effect of every drug candidate (small molecule or BP) on the cardiovascular, central nervous, and respiratory systems, referred to as the "core battery," should be assessed prior to first-in-human administration. However, SP assessment of BPs poses unique challenges such as choice of test species and integration of SP parameters into repeat-dose toxicity studies. This chapter reviews the evolution of SP assessment of BPs using the approval packages of marketed BPs and discusses the past, current, and new and upcoming approach and methods that can be used to generate high-quality data for the assessment of SP of BPs.

Reprint of "Safety pharmacology in 2014: New focus on non-cardiac methods and models"

"What do you know about Safety Pharmacology?" This is the question that was asked in 2000 with the inception of the Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS). There is now a widespread awareness of the role of safety pharmacology in drug discovery and increasing awareness among the wider community of methods and models used in the assessment of the core battery required set of safety studies. However, safety pharmacology does not stop with core battery studies. New methods are intensively sought in order to achieve a swifter and more reliable assessment of adverse effect liability. The dynamics of the discipline and method expansion are reflected in the content of this issue of the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM). We are into the second decade of publishing on safety pharmacology methods and models, reflected by the annual themed issue in JPTM, and on willingness of investigators to embrace new technologies and methodologies. This years' themed issue is derived from the annual Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) meeting, held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, in 2013.

Detection of QTc interval prolongation using jacket telemetry in conscious non-human primates: comparison with implanted telemetry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

During repeat-dose toxicity studies, ECGs are collected from chemically or physically-restrained animals over a short timeframe. This is problematic due to cardiovascular changes caused by manual restraint stress and anesthesia, and limited ECG sampling. These factors confound data interpretation, but may be overcome by using a non-invasive jacket-based ECG collection (JET). The current study investigated whether a jacketed external telemetry system could detect changes in cardiac intervals and heart rate in non-human primates (NHPs), previously implanted with a PCT transmitter.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Twelve male cynomolgus monkeys were treated weekly with vehicle or sotalol (8, 16, 32 mg kg⁻¹) p.o. ECGs were collected continuously for 24 hours, following treatment, over 4 weeks. A satellite group of six NHPs was used for sotalol toxicokinetics.

KEY RESULTS

Sotalol attained Cmax values 1-3 hours after dosing, and exhibited dose-proportional exposure. In jacketed NHPs, sotalol dose-dependently increased QT/QTc intervals, prolonged PR interval, and reduced heart rate. Significant QTc prolongation of 27, 54 and 76 msec was detected by JET after 8, 16, and 32 mg kg⁻¹ sotalol, respectively, compared with time-matched vehicle-treated animals. Overall, JET-derived PR, QT, QTc intervals, QRS duration, and heart rate correlated well with those derived from PCT.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The current findings clearly support the use of JET to quantify cardiac interval and rhythm changes, capable of detecting QTc prolongation caused by sotalol. JET may be a preferred method compared to restraint-based ECG because high-density ECG sampling can be collected in unstressed conscious monkeys, over several weeks.

Safety pharmacology in 2014: new focus on non-cardiac methods and models

"What do you know about Safety Pharmacology?" This is the question that was asked in 2000 with the inception of the Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS). There is now a widespread awareness of the role of safety pharmacology in drug discovery and increasing awareness among the wider community of methods and models used in the assessment of the core battery required set of safety studies. However, safety pharmacology does not stop with core battery studies. New methods are intensively sought in order to achieve a swifter and more reliable assessment of adverse effect liability. The dynamics of the discipline and method expansion are reflected in the content of this issue of the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM). We are into the second decade of publishing on safety pharmacology methods and models, reflected by the annual themed issue in JPTM, and on willingness of investigators to embrace new technologies and methodologies. This years' themed issue is derived from the annual Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) meeting, held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, in 2013.

Drug attrition during pre-clinical and clinical development: understanding and managing drug-induced cardiotoxicity

Cardiovascular toxicity remains a major cause of concern during preclinical and clinical development as well as contributing to post-approval withdrawal of medicines. This issue is particularly relevant for anticancer drugs where, the significant improvement in the life expectancies of patients has dramatically extended the use and duration of drug therapies. Nevertheless, cardiotoxicity is also observed with other classes of drugs, including antibiotics, antidepressants, and antipsychotics. This article summarizes the clinical manifestations of drug-induced cardiotoxicity by various cancer chemotherapies and novel drugs for the treatment of other diseases. Furthermore, it presents on overview of biomarker and imaging techniques for the detection of drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Guidelines for the management of patients exposed to drugs with cardiotoxic potential are presented as well as a checklist for collecting information when a safety signal is observed in clinical trials to more effectively assess the risk of cardiotoxicity and manage patient safety.

Influence of surgically implantable telemetry solutions on in-life and post-mortem toxicology endpoints

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the appropriate application of telemetry and other technologies for nonclinical investigation of functional safety issues in the context of ongoing toxicology evaluations is a current industry challenge. One major issue is related to the potential impact of surgical implantation of a telemetry device on contemporarily established measures of drug toxicity, and potential for confounding pathological issues related to the systemic and local response of the experimental animal to the presence of a foreign body. This study was designed to evaluate the potential local and systemic impact of different implanted telemetry devices with varying requisite degrees of surgical complexity on general toxicology study endpoints.

METHODS

Sixteen male beagle dogs 1) no surgical instrumentation [n=4], 2) Jacketed External Telemetry (JET) with femoral artery blood pressure implant (PA-C10 LA) [n=4], or 3) fully implantable (DSI-D70-CCTP) devices [n=8], were assigned to experimental groups and evaluated within the context of a standard repeat-dose toxicology design to determine the potential impact of these treatments on routine in-life and post-mortem toxicological endpoints.

RESULTS

Device implantation, regardless of the level of invasiveness/complexity was without effect on any in-life safety parameter, including clinical chemistry and hematology, assessed in the experimental design. Histopathological findings were limited to the expected, primarily minimal to mild localized effects characteristic of a foreign body reaction (fibrosis, inflammation) in the area immediately in contact with the body of the transmitter device and associated sites of ECG lead and pressure catheter interface with local tissues.

DISCUSSION

This study represents the first definitive evaluation of the influence of variably invasive telemetry device implantation on standardized, essential toxicology endpoints in the context of a simulated repeated dose experimental design. The data suggest that, when carefully evaluated, the local effects of implanted telemetry devices can be managed in the context of a standard Investigational New Drug (IND)-enabling toxicology study. This study provides support for the potential incorporation of unrestrained cardiovascular assessments via implanted or external telemetry into standard multi-dose toxicology studies.

How can we improve our understanding of cardiovascular safety liabilities to develop safer medicines?

Given that cardiovascular safety liabilities remain a major cause of drug attrition during preclinical and clinical development, adverse drug reactions, and post-approval withdrawal of medicines, the Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science hosted a workshop to discuss current challenges in determining, understanding and addressing 'Cardiovascular Toxicity of Medicines'. This article summarizes the key discussions from the workshop that aimed to address three major questions: (i) what are the key cardiovascular safety liabilities in drug discovery, drug development and clinical practice? (ii) how good are preclinical and clinical strategies for detecting cardiovascular liabilities? and (iii) do we have a mechanistic understanding of these liabilities? It was concluded that in order to understand, address and ultimately reduce cardiovascular safety liabilities of new therapeutic agents there is an urgent need to: • Fully characterize the incidence, prevalence and impact of drug-induced cardiovascular issues at all stages of the drug development process. • Ascertain the predictive value of existing non-clinical models and assays towards the clinical outcome. • Understand the mechanistic basis of cardiovascular liabilities; by addressing areas where it is currently not possible to predict clinical outcome based on preclinical safety data. • Provide scientists in all disciplines with additional skills to enable them to better integrate preclinical and clinical data and to better understand the biological and clinical significance of observed changes. • Develop more appropriate, highly relevant and predictive tools and assays to identify and wherever feasible to eliminate cardiovascular safety liabilities from molecules and wherever appropriate to develop clinically relevant and reliable safety biomarkers.

Interferences of the autonomic nervous system with drug induced QT prolongation: a point to consider in non-clinical safety studies

INTRODUCTION

QT interval assessment by telemetry has become one of the most useful models in testing strategies adopted for detection of drug induced QT prolongation in non-clinical safety pharmacology studies. This study reports experimental data showing that the autonomic nervous system might influence drug induced QT prolongation.

METHODS

Animals were instrumented with telemetric transmitters and epicardial ECG leads. Effects on QT interval of reference drugs such as thioridazine and terfenadine were analysed with different approaches, the Holzgrefe's probabilistic method, the QT shift method and an individual analysis of beat-to-beat QT/RR pair distribution visualised as points-cloud.

RESULTS

Two cases of unexpected absence of QT interval prolongation are reported with thioridazine and terfenadine in conscious beagle dogs under conditions of concomitant tachycardia. The pro-arrhythmic properties of these two molecules were unmasked by co-treatment with sympatholytic agents, atenolol and clonidine respectively suggesting that sympathetic activation and/or parasympathetic withdrawal might impair a drug induced QT prolongation.

DISCUSSION

The apparent absence of changes in the QT interval due to novel drug candidates should be interpreted cautiously under conditions of concomitant tachycardia or elevated heart rate levels in non-clinical safety studies.

Beyond the safety assessment of drug-mediated changes in the QT interval... what's next?

Assessing drug-induced changes (particularly prolongation) in the QT interval has been the major preoccupation of safety pharmacology since its inception, under the assumption that QT widening represents a surrogate biomarker for torsades de pointes (TdeP) liability. While evidence of changes in QT remains a bane to the development of novel therapeutic agents, non-clinical and clinical methods have been developed (with a certain amount of validation) to limit this potential liability of a new chemical entity (NCE). Because of the associated withdrawal of numerous drugs from clinical use, determining whether or not a drug development candidate exhibits a TdeP liability has been the motivation in the implementation of discussions between 'pharmaceutical companies', academicians, clinicians and regulatory authorities worldwide that has led to the development of the ICHS7A and ICHS7B guidance documents (Anon, 2001, 2005). Simultaneously, it has resulted in the firm establishment of safety pharmacology as a standalone discipline within the drug development scheme (Pugsley et al., 2008). As far as TdeP liability is concerned, QT widening remains the most poignant issue, in that QT widening in humans is immediately regarded as a cause for concern, yet QT widening in preclinical models (and indeed in man) is not a quantitative predictor of TdeP liability (and indeed may not even be a qualitative predictor by itself (Pugsley et al., 2008). The present focused issue of the journal returns to safety pharmacology, and contains papers arising from the 8th annual SPS Meeting that was held in Madison, WI in 2008. Indeed, so many papers have arisen from the meeting that this issue of the Journal is only part 1. Part 2 will be published as the next issue of the Journal. Some topics which have been addressed include whether an assessment method for drugs that produce a shortened QT interval is needed, what the role of the slow component of the delayed rectifier K current (I(Ks)) should be in a safety assessment and whether safety pharmacology endpoints can or should be added to repeat dose Toxicology studies.

Measuring the risk of torsades de pointes: electrocardiographic evaluation of PNU-142093 in conscious cynomolgus non-human primates using restraint and non-restraint procedures

OBJECTIVE

Drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) arrhythmia is a serious public health concern that has significantly slowed the advancement of promising new therapeutic agents to the marketplace. Modeling for the potential to produce TdP has relied in part on the surrogate biomarker QT interval prolongation, measured in vivo in animals and in the clinic in man. This study was a comparison of the effects of PNU-142093, a selective 5HT1D-serotonin receptor agonist, on QT interval prolongation under restraint and non-restraint conditions in conscious cynomolgus non-human primates.

METHODS

Lead II electrocardiograms (ECG) were collected following an oral single-dose (non-restraint conditions using radio-telemetry) and single- and multiple-doses for 14 days (restraint conditions using electrodes applied to the surface) at doses of 0, 5, 15, and 25 mg/kg. ECG were collected from non-restrained animals predose and for up to 5 hrs, and again at 7 hrs, postdose on 4 different days in a Latin-square crossover design; N=4/sex/dose level. ECG were collected from restrained animals on days 1, 7, and 13, predose and at approximately 4 hrs postdose; N=2/sex/group.

RESULTS

Non-restrained animal heart rate ranged from 159+/-22.1 to 168+/-21.4 beats/minute when compared to restrained animal heart rate (ranging from 242+/-17.2 to 246+/-11.5 beats/minute), suggesting that non-restrained animals were under less stress. In non-restrained animals, PNU-142093 produced a non-dose related decrease in heart rate, associated with a dose-related increase in QT and QTc (QT interval corrected for changes in heart rate) intervals, which was accompanied by alterations in T-wave morphology (e.g., widening and notching of the T wave). In restrained non-human primates, PNU-142093 had no effect on heart rate or ECG morphology on any day of dosing and no statistically significant effect on QT or QTc intervals on days 1 or 7 of dosing. By day 13 there were statistically significant increases in QT and QTc intervals at 15 and 25 mg/kg. The increase in QTc interval in restrained animals on day 13 was 29+/-12 and 30+/-19 msec at 15 and 25 mg/kg/day, respectively, and that in non-restrained animals was 65+/-23 and 73+/-28 msec.

DISCUSSION

These data demonstrate an ability to detect problematic drugs in conscious cynomolgus non-human primates using both restraint and non-restraint procedures. They further show that the sensitivity of these assays to identify this signal of cardiac risk is significantly improved under the condition of non-restraint.