Impact of disease state on arrhythmic event detection by action potential modelling in cardiac safety pharmacology

OUP accepted manuscript

The content of this article derives from a Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) consortium with a focus to improve cardiac safety during drug development. A detailed literature review was conducted to evaluate the concordance between nonclinical repolarization assays and the clinical thorough QT (TQT) study. Food and Drug Administration and HESI developed a joint database of nonclinical and clinical data, and a retrospective analysis of 150 anonymized drug candidates was reviewed to compare the performance of 3 standard nonclinical assays with clinical TQT study findings as well as investigate mechanism(s) potentially responsible for apparent discrepancies identified. The nonclinical assays were functional (I_Kr) current block (Human ether-a-go-go related gene), action potential duration, and corrected QT interval in animals (in vivo corrected QT). Although these nonclinical assays demonstrated good specificity for predicting negative clinical QT prolongation, they had relatively poor sensitivity for predicting positive clinical QT prolongation. After review, 28 discordant TQT-positive drugs were identified. This article provides an overview of direct and indirect mechanisms responsible for QT prolongation and theoretical reasons for lack of concordance between clinical TQT studies and nonclinical assays. We examine 6 specific and discordant TQT-positive drugs as case examples. These were derived from the unique HESI/Food and Drug Administration database. We would like to emphasize some reasons for discordant data including, insufficient or inadequate nonclinical data, effects of the drug on other cardiac ion channels, and indirect and/or nonelectrophysiological effects of drugs, including altered heart rate. We also outline best practices that were developed based upon our evaluation.

Inflammation as a Risk Factor in Cardiotoxicity: An Important Consideration for Screening During Drug Development

Numerous commonly prescribed drugs, including antiarrhythmics, antihistamines, and antibiotics, carry a proarrhythmic risk and may induce dangerous arrhythmias, including the potentially fatal Torsades de Pointes. For this reason, cardiotoxicity testing has become essential in drug development and a required step in the approval of any medication for use in humans. Blockade of the hERG K⁺ channel and the consequent prolongation of the QT interval on the ECG have been considered the gold standard to predict the arrhythmogenic risk of drugs. In recent years, however, preclinical safety pharmacology has begun to adopt a more integrative approach that incorporates mathematical modeling and considers the effects of drugs on multiple ion channels. Despite these advances, early stage drug screening research only evaluates QT prolongation in experimental and computational models that represent healthy individuals. We suggest here that integrating disease modeling with cardiotoxicity testing can improve drug risk stratification by predicting how disease processes and additional comorbidities may influence the risks posed by specific drugs. In particular, chronic systemic inflammation, a condition associated with many diseases, affects heart function and can exacerbate medications’ cardiotoxic effects. We discuss emerging research implicating the role of inflammation in cardiac electrophysiology, and we offer a perspective on how in silico modeling of inflammation may lead to improved evaluation of the proarrhythmic risk of drugs at their early stage of development.

General Principles for the Validation of Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Models: An Extension of the CiPA In Silico Strategy

This white paper presents principles for validating proarrhythmia risk prediction models for regulatory use as discussed at the In Silico Breakout Session of a Cardiac Safety Research Consortium/Health and Environmental Sciences Institute/US Food and Drug Administration-sponsored Think Tank Meeting on May 22, 2018. The meeting was convened to evaluate the progress in the development of a new cardiac safety paradigm, the Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA). The opinions regarding these principles reflect the collective views of those who participated in the discussion of this topic both at and after the breakout session. Although primarily discussed in the context of in silico models, these principles describe the interface between experimental input and model-based interpretation and are intended to be general enough to be applied to other types of nonclinical models for proarrhythmia assessment. This document was developed with the intention of providing a foundation for more consistency and harmonization in developing and validating different models for proarrhythmia risk prediction using the example of the CiPA paradigm.