Virus-like particle formation and translational start site choice of the plant retrotransposon Tto1

How Retroviruses and Retrotransposons in Our Genome May Contribute to Autoimmunity in Rheumatological Conditions

More than 200 human disorders include various manifestations of autoimmunity. The molecular events that lead to these diseases are still incompletely understood and their causes remain largely unknown. Numerous potential triggers of autoimmunity have been proposed over the years, but very few of them have been conclusively confirmed or firmly refuted. Viruses have topped the lists of suspects for decades, and it seems that many viruses, including those of the Herpesviridae family, indeed can influence disease initiation and/or promote exacerbations by a number of mechanisms that include prolonged anti-viral immunity, immune subverting factors, and mechanisms, and perhaps “molecular mimicry”. However, no specific virus has yet been established as being truly causative. Here, we discuss a different, but perhaps mechanistically related possibility, namely that retrotransposons or retroviruses that infected us in the past and left a lasting copy of themselves in our genome still can provoke an escalating immune response that leads to autoimmune disease. Many of these loci still encode for retroviral proteins that have retained some, or all, of their original functions. Importantly, these endogenous proviruses cannot be eliminated by the immune system the way it can eliminate exogenous viruses. Hence, if not properly controlled, they may drive a frustrated and escalating chronic, or episodic, immune response to the point of a frank autoimmune disorder. Here, we discuss the evidence and the proposed mechanisms, and assess the therapeutic options that emerge from the current understanding of this field.

Retrotransposon replication in plants

Retrotransposons comprise the bulk of large plant genomes, replicating via an RNA intermediate whereby the original, integrated element remains in place. Of the two main orders, the LTR retrotransposons considerably outnumber the LINEs. LINEs integrate into target sites simultaneously with the RNA transcript being copied into cDNA by target-primed reverse transcription. LTR retrotransposon replication is basically equivalent to the intracellular phase of retroviral life cycles. The envelope gene giving extracellular mobility to retroviruses is in fact widespread in plants and their retrotransposons. Evolutionary analyses of the retrotransposons and retroviruses suggest that both form an ancient monophyletic group. The particular adaptations of LTR retrotransposons to plant life cycles enabling their success remain to be clarified.

Epigenetic control of transposon transcription and mobility in Arabidopsis

The mobility of genetic elements called transposable elements (TEs) was discovered half a century ago by Barbara McClintock. Although she had recognized them as chromosomal controlling elements, for much of the consequent time TEs were primarily considered as parasites of the host genome. However the recent explosion of discoveries in the fields of genomics and epigenetics have unambiguously shown the importance of TEs in genome function and evolution. Bursts of endogenous TEs have been reported in plants with epigenetic misregulation, revealing the molecular mechanisms underlying their control. We review here the different steps in TE invasion of the host genome involving epigenetic control and environmental stress responses. As TEs propagate in plant genomes and attract epigenetic marks, their neo-insertions can lead to the formation of new, heritable epigenetic variants (epialleles) of genes in their vicinity and impact on host gene regulatory networks. The epigenetic interplay between TE and genes thus plays a crucial role in the TE-host co-evolution.

Deletion analysis of the 3' long terminal repeat sequence of plant retrotransposon Tto1 identifies 125 base pairs redundancy as sufficient for first strand transfer

Retroviruses and many retrotransposons are flanked by sequence repeats called long terminal repeats (LTRs). These sequences contain a promoter region, which is active in the 5′ LTR, and transcription termination signals, which are active in the LTR copy present at the 3′ end. A section in the middle of the LTR, called Redundancy region, occurs at both ends of the mRNA. Here we show that in the copia type retrotransposon Tto1, the promoter and terminator functions of the LTR can be supplied by heterologous sequences, thereby converting the LTR into a significantly shorter sub-terminal repeat. An engineered Tto1 element with 125 instead of the usual 574 base pairs repeated in the 5′ and 3′ region can still promote strand transfer during cDNA synthesis, defining a minimal Redundancy region for this element. Based on this finding, we propose a model for first strand transfer of Tto1.

A synthetic biology approach allows inducible retrotransposition in whole plants

Retrotransposons are mobile genetic elements that transpose by reverse transcription of element RNA, followed by insertion of the cDNA into new positions of the host genome. Although they are major constituents of eukaryotic genomes, many facets of their biology remain to be understood. Transposition is generally rare, suggesting that it is subject to tight regulation. However, only the first regulatory step (transcriptional induction) is currently amenable to investigation in higher eukaryotes. To investigate the complete life cycle of a long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon in plants, we established a synthetic biology program on tobacco retrotransposon Tto1, and achieved transposition in whole plants triggered by an inducible promoter. The engineered element, iTto (inducible Tto1), is a novel tool for analysis of retrotransposition in plants. In addition, it allows to explore the potential of an inducible retrotransposon for insertional mutagenesis.