Stereothresholds for moving line stimuli for a range of velocities

A Joint Lateral Motion-Stereo Constraint

Purpose

We developed a stereo task that is based on a motion direction discrimination to examine the role that depth can play in disambiguating motion direction.

Methods

In this study, we quantified normal adults' static and dynamic (i.e., laterally moving) stereoscopic performance using a psychophysical task, where we dichoptically presented randomly arranged, limited lifetime Gabor elements at two depth planes (one plane was at the fixation plane and the other at an uncrossed disparity relative to the fixation plane). Each plane contained half of the elements. For the dynamic condition, all elements were vertically oriented and moved to the left in one plane and to the right in another plane; for the static condition, the elements were horizontally oriented in one plane and vertically oriented in another plane.

Results

For the range of motion speed that we measured (from 0.17°/s to 5.33°/s), we observed clear speed tuning of the stereo sensitivity (P = 3.0 × 10-5). The shape of this tuning did not significantly change with different spatial frequencies. We also found a significant difference in stereo sensitivity between stereopsis with static and laterally moving stimuli (speed = 0.67°/s; P = 0.004). Such difference was not evident when we matched the task between the static and moving stimuli.

Conclusions

We report that lateral motion modulates human global depth perception. This motion/stereo constraint is related to motion velocity not stimulus temporal frequency. We speculate that the processing of motion-based stereopsis of the kind reported here occurs in dorsal extrastriate cortex.

Stereothresholds during Voluntary Head Movement and Disconjugate Image Motion

SIGNIFICANCE

Stereothresholds increase in the presence of disconjugate image motion, whether this motion results from vergence errors that occur during active head movements or is imposed externally.

PURPOSE

During rapid voluntary oscillations of the head, vergence eye position has been reported to vary with a peak-to-peak amplitude of about 0.5°-a considerably greater amplitude than when the head is still. Concurrently, stereopsis was reported to be unaffected by voluntary head motion. In the present study, we measured stereothresholds during voluntary side-to-side head movements and during imposed disconjugate image motion with the head stationary, to simulate that produced during active head movement.

METHODS

Stereothresholds were measured for a pair of 30-arcmin bright vertical lines presented on an oscilloscope and viewed through a custom mirror haploscope. Data were obtained from four normal observers during voluntary side-to-side head movements at temporal frequencies up to 1.5 Hz and also while the head remained still. In addition, stereothresholds were measured with the head stationary when opposite rotations of the galvanometer-driven mirrors in each channel of the haploscope created disconjugate image motion to simulate vergence variability during active head movement.

RESULTS

During head motion, average stereothresholds increased from about 10 to about 14 arcsec. With imposed disconjugate image motion, stereothresholds rose systematically to about 35 arcsec when the peak-to-peak motion amplitude was 0.5°. Stereothresholds depend primarily on the amplitude of imposed motion and only marginally on variations of the disjunctive-motion wave form.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereothresholds are elevated modestly during active head movements. The results obtained with imposed disjunctive image motion are consistent with a previously proposal that stereothresholds vary according to the unsigned, time-averaged deviation of the stereotarget from the plane of the horopter.

The impact of retinal motion on stereoacuity for physical targets

In a series of studies using physical targets, we examined the effect of lateral retinal motion on stereoscopic depth discrimination thresholds. We briefly presented thin vertical lines, along with a fixation marker, at speeds ranging from 0 to 16 deg·s^-1. Previous investigations of the effect of retinal motion on stereoacuity consistently show that there is little impact of retinal motion up to 2 deg·s^-1, however, thresholds appear to rise steeply at higher velocities (greater than 3 deg·s^-1). These prior experiments used computerized displays to generate their stimuli. In contrast, with our physical targets we find that stereoacuity is stable up to 16 deg·s^-1, even in the presence of appreciable smearing due to visual persistence. We show that this discrepancy cannot be explained by differences in viewing time, prevalence of motion smear or by high frequency flicker due to display updates. We conclude that under natural viewing conditions observers are able to make depth discrimination judgements using binocular disparity signals that are rapidly acquired at stimulus onset.

Degradation of Binocular Coordination during Sleep Deprivation

To aid a clear and unified visual perception while tracking a moving target, both eyes must be coordinated, so the image of the target falls on approximately corresponding areas of the fovea of each eye. The movements of the two eyes are decoupled during sleep, suggesting a role of arousal in regulating binocular coordination. While the absence of visual input during sleep may also contribute to binocular decoupling, sleepiness is a state of reduced arousal that still allows for visual input, providing a context within which the role of arousal in binocular coordination can be studied. We examined the effects of sleep deprivation on binocular coordination using a test paradigm that we previously showed to be sensitive to sleep deprivation. We quantified binocular coordination with the SD of the distance between left and right gaze positions on the screen. We also quantified the stability of conjugate gaze on the target, i.e., gaze–target synchronization, with the SD of the distance between the binocular average gaze and the target. Sleep deprivation degraded the stability of both binocular coordination and gaze–target synchronization, but between these two forms of gaze control the horizontal and vertical components were affected differently, suggesting that disconjugate and conjugate eye movements are under different regulation of attentional arousal. The prominent association found between sleep deprivation and degradation of binocular coordination in the horizontal direction may be used for a fit-for-duty assessment.

Motion deblurring during pursuit tracking improves spatial-interval acuity

The extent of perceived blur produced by a moving retinal image is less when the image motion occurs during pursuit eye movements compared to fixation. This study examined the effect of this reduced perception of motion blur during pursuit on spatial-interval acuity. Observers judged during pursuit at 4 or 8 deg/s whether the horizontal separation between two stationary lines was larger or smaller than a standard. Three different line separations were tested for each pursuit velocity. Each observer performed these judgments also during fixation, for spatial-interval stimuli that moved with the same mean and standard deviation of speeds as the distribution of eye velocities during pursuit. Spatial-interval acuity was better during pursuit than fixation for small or intermediate line separations. The results indicate that a reduction of perceived motion blur during pursuit eye movements can lead to improved visual performance.

Spatial-bisection acuity in infantile nystagmus

This study measured spatial bisection acuity for horizontally and vertically separated line targets in five observers with infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) and no obvious associated sensory abnormalities, and in two normal observers during comparable horizontal retinal image motion. For small spatial separations between the line targets, bisection acuity for both horizontally and vertically separated lines is worse in the observers with IN than normal observers. In four of the five observers with IN, bisection acuity for small target separations is poorer for horizontally compared to vertically separated lines. Because the motion smear generated by the retinal image motion during IN would be expected to influence horizontally separated targets, the degradation of bisection acuity for both vertical and horizontally separated lines indicates that a sensory neural deficit contributes to impaired visual functioning in observers with idiopathic IN.

The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements

Because the visual system integrates information across time, an image that moves on the retina would be expected to be perceived as smeared. In this article, we summarize the previous evidence that human observers perceive a smaller extent of smear when retinal image motion results from an eye or head movement, compared to when a physically moving target generates comparable image motion while the eyes and head are still. This evidence indicates that the reduction of perceived motion smear is asymmetrical, occurring only for targets that move against the direction of an eye or head movement. In addition, we present new data to show that no reduction of perceived motion smear occurs for targets that move in either direction during a visually-induced perception of self motion. We propose that low-level extra-retinal eye- and head-movement signals are responsible for the reduction of perceived motion smear, by decreasing the duration of the temporal impulse response. Although retinal as well as extra-retinal mechanisms can reduce the extent of perceived motion smear, available evidence suggests that improved visual functioning may occur only when an extra-retinal mechanism reduces the perception of smear.

How well can people judge when something happened?

One way to estimate the temporal precision of vision is with judgments of synchrony or temporal order of visual events. We show that irrelevant motion disrupts the high temporal precision that can be found in such tasks when the two events occur close together, suggesting that the high precision is based on detecting illusory motion rather than on detecting time differences. We also show that temporal precision is not necessarily better when one can accurately anticipate the moments of the events. Finally, we illustrate that a limited resolution of determining the duration of an event imposes a fundamental problem in determining when the event happened. Our experimental estimates of how well people can explicitly judge when something happened are far too poor to account for human performance in various tasks that require temporal precision, such as interception, judging motion or aligning moving targets spatially.

The temporal impulse response function in infantile nystagmus

Despite rapid to-and-fro motion of the retinal image that results from their incessant involuntary eye movements, persons with infantile nystagmus (IN) rarely report the perception of motion smear. We performed two experiments to determine if the reduction of perceived motion smear in persons with IN is associated with an increase in the speed of the temporal impulse response. In Experiment 1, increment thresholds were determined for pairs of successively presented flashes of a long horizontal line, presented on a 65-cd/m2 background field. The stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) between the first and second flash varied from 5.9 to 234 ms. In experiment 2, temporal contrast sensitivity functions were determined for a 3-cpd horizontal square-wave grating that underwent counterphase flicker at temporal frequencies between 1 and 40 Hz. Data were obtained for 2 subjects with predominantly pendular IN and 8 normal observers in Experiment 1 and for 3 subjects with IN and 4 normal observers in Experiment 2. Temporal impulse response functions (TIRFs) were estimated as the impulse response of a linear second-order system that provided the best fit to the increment threshold data in Experiment 1 and to the temporal contrast sensitivity functions in Experiment 2. Estimated TIRFs of the subjects with pendular IN have natural temporal frequencies that are significantly faster than those of normal observers (ca. 13 vs. 9 Hz), indicating an accelerated temporal response to visual stimuli. This increase in response speed is too small to account by itself for the virtual absence of perceived motion smear in subjects with IN, and additional neural mechanisms are considered.