Distribution of clinical events across platelet aggregation values in all-comers treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor

Comparison of Clopidogrel, Prasugrel and Ticagrelor Response of Patients by PFA-100-Innovance Test Results

Devices such as stents and flow diverters require the use of safe and fast antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to compare the responses to clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor by assessing the Platelet Function Analysis (PFA-100)-Innovance test results of patients undergoing endovascular stenting to determine their resistance rates. Sixty-one women and 55 men, aged 18-87 years, were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups: clopidogrel treatment, prasugrel treatment, and ticagrelor treatment. The systemic diseases of the patients, especially hypertension and diabetes, were recorded. The test results were evaluated according to the results for the collagen/epinephrine (COL-EPI), collagen/adenosine (COL-ADP), and P2Y results. The PFA-100-Innovance results for COL-EPI and P2Y were significantly higher for patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with patients treated with clopidogrel (COL-EPI, p = 0.001; P2Y, p = 0.001). Clopidogrel resistance was identified in 31 patients (26.7%), and prasugrel resistance was identified in 4 patients (3.4%). Ticagrelor resistance was not detected. Therefore, 30.1% of patients were classified as drug-resistant. Perioperative bleeding was not detected in any patient. Hypertension was the most common disease recorded for patients being treated for cerebral aneurysm, and diabetes was the most common disease recorded for patients who underwent peripheral artery stenting (p = 0.002). Potent antiplatelet agents, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, have a low rate of resistance but are associated with an increased bleeding risk. Thus, the choice of a suitable drug during the treatment window remains a critical factor when determining treatment strategies.

Use of Thromboelastography with Platelet Mapping to Identify Prothrombotic Coagulation Profiles in Patients with History of Cardiac Intervention Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization

BACKGROUND

Patients with concomitant coronary and peripheral artery disease (CAD and PAD) are at significant risk for major adverse limb events (MALEs). Prevention of thrombosis in this population is of paramount importance. Identifying prothrombotic coagulation profiles in this cohort may facilitate targeted thromboprophylaxis. We compared coagulation profiles of those with CAD and PAD to those with PAD alone during the perioperative period of lower extremity revascularization.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization underwent thromboelastography-platelet mapping (TEG-PM) analysis preoperatively and at serial intervals for up to 6 months. Coagulation profiles of patients with significant CAD (defined as history of coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention) and PAD were compared with those with PAD alone. MALE in the postoperative period was recorded.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-seven TEG-PM samples from 114 patients were analyzed; 28.1% had a history of significant CAD. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was higher in this group. The significant CAD group had lower ADP-platelet inhibition, higher ADP-platelet aggregation, and greater maximum clot strength compared with patients with PAD alone. Patients with significant CAD were more frequently on full-dose anticoagulation, but less frequently on dual antiplatelet therapy; 28.1% of patients with significant CAD developed postoperative MALE compared with 22.9% of patients with PAD alone (p = 0.40). For both groups, patients who developed postoperative MALE demonstrated greater ADP-platelet aggregation and lower ADP-platelet inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a history of significant CAD undergoing lower extremity revascularization demonstrated prothrombotic TEG-PM profiles, less frequent use of dual antiplatelet therapy, and greater rates of full-dose anticoagulation. Decreased platelet inhibition was also associated with postoperative MALE. This study underscores the potential utility of viscoelastic assays for coagulation profiling in complex cardiovascular patients.

Monitoring of Antiplatelet Therapy

In the late 1990s, the antithrombotic antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, a P2Y12 inhibitor, was introduced. Around the same time, there was an increase in a number of new methods to measure platelet function (e.g., PFA-100 in 1995), and this has continued. It became evident that not all patients responded to clopidogrel in the same way and that some patients had a relative "resistance" to therapy, termed "high on-treatment platelet reactivity." This then led to some publications to advocate platelet function testing being used for patients on antiplatelet therapy. Platelet function testing was also suggested for use in patients awaiting cardiac surgery after stopping their antiplatelet therapy as a way of balancing thrombotic risk pre-surgery and bleeding risk perioperatively. This chapter will discuss some of the commonly used platelet function tests used in these settings, particularly those that are sometimes referred to as point-of-care tests or that require minimal laboratory sample manipulation. The latest guidance and recommendations for platelet function testing will be discussed following several clinical trials looking at the usefulness of platelet function testing in these clinical settings.

Antiplatelet Activity of Tetramethylpyrazine via Regulation of the P2Y12 Receptor Downstream Signaling Pathway

Background

Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) is an alkaloid in Chinese herbal medicine, which possesses antiplatelet activity. TMP inhibits platelet activation in many ways. The platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor for adenosine 5′ diphosphate (ADP) plays a central role in platelet function, hemostasis, and thrombosis. Here, we investigated the inhibitory effect of TMP on P2Y₁₂ receptor-related platelet function.

Methods

The inhibitory potential of TMP was assessed using agonist-induced platelet aggregation, flow cytometric analysis of CD62p expression, PAC-1 activation, and fibrin clot retraction. After the P2Y12 receptor-related signaling pathway was inhibited using the blocker, platelet activation was studied by platelet aggregation, CD62p expression, and PAC-1 activation. The secretion of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the expression of signaling pathway protein, phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, and phosphorylation of Akt were investigated using western blotting. The release of platelet inflammatory mediators was measured using ELISA.

Results

TMP had an antiplatelet effect by inhibiting ADP-induced aggregation, P-selectin secretion, and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa expression and reducing the release of atherosclerotic-related inflammatory mediators (sCD40L and IL-1β). TMP decreased the area of clot retraction, reflecting inhibition of GPIIb/IIIa activation. TMP inhibited adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet activation via increased cAMP production, VASP^ser157 phosphorylation, and Akt dephosphorylation.

Conclusion

TMP selectively inhibits ADP-induced platelet activation via P2Y₁₂ receptor-related signaling pathways.

Pre-operative platelet reactivity is a strong, independent predictor of bleeding complications after branched endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) an alternative to open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). The effect of EVAR on platelet reactivity is unknown. We prospectively determined the effect of branched EVAR (bEVAR) on platelet reactivity in patients with TAAA, and evaluated the predictive value of preoperative platelet reactivity for post-operative bleeding in 50 consecutive patients undergoing elective bEVAR (mean age 70.9 ± 5.7 years, 66% male). Blood samples were collected within 24 hours before bEVAR, after bEVAR and at hospital discharge. Platelet reactivity was assessed with impedance aggregometry using ASPI, ADP and TRAP tests. Platelet reactivity decreased within 24 hours after bEVAR compared to the measurement before bEVAR in all tests (p ≤ 0.04), with a further decrease in hospital discharge in the ADP test (p = .004). Twenty-three patients experienced post-operative bleeding complications (transfusion ≥2 red blood cell [RBC] units). Preoperative platelet reactivity below the cutoff value of 30 AUC units predicted post-operative bleeding with 78% sensitivity and 59% specificity (p = .045). In the multivariable analysis, platelet reactivity was the only independent predictor of postoperative bleeding (OR 6.507, 95% CI 1.227-34.506, p = .028). We conclude that platelet reactivity decreases following bEVAR of TAAA and is a strong and independent predictor for postoperative bleeding complications.

Plasma Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Is an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome

To investigate the association of liver metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) with cardiovascular disease (CV)-related and all-cause mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Our prospective observational study enrolled 292 patients with ACS. Plasma concentrations of TMAO were measured during the hospitalization for ACS. Observation period lasted seven yr in median. Adjusted Cox-regression analysis was used for prediction of mortality. ROC curve analysis revealed that increasing concentrations of TMAO levels assessed at the time point of ACS significantly predicted the risk of CV mortality (c-index=0.78, p < 0.001). The cut-off value of >4 μmol/L, labeled as high TMAO level (23% of study population), provided the greatest sum of sensitivity (85%) and specificity (80%) for the prediction of CV mortality and was associated with a positive predictive value of 16% and a negative predictive value of 99%. A multivariate Cox regression model revealed that high TMAO level was a strong and independent predictor of CV death (HR = 11.62, 95% CI: 2.26-59.67; p = 0.003). High TMAO levels as compared with low TMAO levels were associated with the highest risk of CV death in a subpopulation of patients with diabetes mellitus (27.3 vs. 2.6%; p = 0.004). Although increasing TMAO levels were also significantly associated with all-cause mortality, their estimates for diagnostic accuracy were low. High TMAO level is a strong and independent predictor of long-term CV mortality among patients presenting with ACS.

Ticagrelor and prasugrel are independent predictors of improved long-term survival in ACS patients

AIM

To investigate the long-term clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with potent P2Y12 inhibitors compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter observational study, we enrolled 708 patients with ACS treated with clopidogrel (n = 137), ticagrelor (n = 260) or prasugrel (n = 311). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE; over 1 year) and long-term mortality (median: 5.6 years; interquartile range [IQR] 4.9-6.5 years) were assessed. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) was used to measure adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation.

RESULTS

Type of P2Y12 inhibitor emerged as an independent predictor of long-term mortality and MACE: patients treated with potent platelet inhibitors prasugrel or ticagrelor were at lower risk for long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.92; P = .028) or MACE (adjusted HR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20-0.73; P = .004) than those treated with clopidogrel independent from clinical risk factors. In contrast, the efficacy of clopidogrel decreased with increasing severity of ACS: platelet aggregation was 37% higher in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 25% higher in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) compared to patients with unstable angina (P = .039). Patients with diabetes achieved less potent ADP- and AA-induced platelet inhibition under clopidogrel, compared to patients without diabetes (P = .045; P = .030, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of ACS, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel reduced long-term mortality and 1-year MACE as compared to clopidogrel.

Interleukin-6 level is a powerful predictor of long-term cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

The interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway has a crucial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, the main cause of cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to characterize the predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers on long-term cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 322 consecutive patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Blood-derived biomarkers IL-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were assessed at the time point of ACS. Patients were followed-up for 6 years. Long-term cardiovascular mortality was our primary endpoint. Adjusted Cox-regression analysis was used for prediction of events.

RESULTS

Elevated IL-6 values (≥3.3 pg/mL) emerged as an independent and the most powerful predictor for cardiovascular mortality: the ROC analysis showed that IL-6 was more accurate for cardiovascular mortality prediction as compared to hsCRP (IL-6: AUC = 0.72; 95%CI: 0.62-0.81; p = 0.009 vs hsCRP: AUC = 0.56; 95%CI: 0.41-0.72; p = 0.445). The positive predictive value of IL-6 for mortality was 9%, the negative predictive value 99%, sensitivity 94% and specificity 48%. The primary endpoint of long-term cardiovascular death occurred more frequently in patients with high vs low IL-6 (9.0% vs 0.5%, p = 0.001). The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with high IL-6 (≥3.3 pg/mL) values were at 8.6-fold higher hazard to die than those with low IL-6 (<3.3 pg/mL) levels (adj. hazard ratio [HR] = 8.60, 95%CI: 1.07-69.32; p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of ACS, high IL-6 values are associated with substantial long-term cardiovascular mortality. Further, IL-6 performs as a superior predictor for cardiovascular death as compared to hsCRP.

Inflammatory state does not affect the antiplatelet efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in ACS

Inflammation leads to atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We performed a prospective, observational study to assess association between the concentrations of inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein, hsCRP; high sensitivity interleukin6, hsIL-6; soluble CD40 ligand, sCD40 L) and platelet reactivity in 338 patients with ACS treated with ticagrelor and prasugrel. We also assessed whether hsCRP, hsIL-6, and sCD40 L are associated with standard inflammatory markers (white blood cell [WBC] and fibrinogen), and whether they differ according to patient diabetic status and pre-treatment with statins. Concentrations of hsCRP and concentrations of hsIL-6 and sCD40 L were assessed using turbidimetric assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Platelet reactivity was measured using multiple electrode aggregometry. There was only a weak inverse correlation between hsIL-6 and platelet reactivity (r≤-0.125). In contrast, concentration of hsIL6 and hsCRP positively correlated with WBC and fibrinogen (r ≥ 0.199). Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) was associated with higher concentration of hsIL-6 (p = .014), whereas pre-treatment with statins - with lower concentration of hsIL-6 (p = .035). In conclusion, inflammatory state does not affect the antiplatelet efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in the acute phase of ACS, confirming the safety and efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with a high inflammatory burden.

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?

Percutaneous coronary interventions with stent-based restorations of vessel patency have become the gold standard in the treatment of acute coronary states. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been designed to combine the efficiency of drug-eluting stents (DES) at the time of implantation and the advantages of a lack of foreign body afterwards. Complete resolution of the scaffold was intended to enable the restoration of vasomotor function and reduce the risk of device thrombosis. While early reports demonstrated superiority of BVS over DES, larger-scale application and longer observation exposed major concerns about their use, including lower radial strength and higher risk of thrombosis resulting in higher rate of major adverse cardiac events. Further focus on procedural details and research on the second generation of BVS with novel properties did not allow to unequivocally challenge position of DES. Nevertheless, BVS still have a chance to present superiority in distinctive indications. This review presents an outlook on the available first and second generation BVS and a summary of results of clinical trials on their use. It discusses explanations for unfavorable outcomes, proposed enhancement techniques and a potential niche for the use of BVS.

Stratified Approaches to Antiplatelet Therapies Based on Platelet Reactivity Testing

Antiplatelet therapy with P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor) is a cornerstone of medical therapy after percutaneous coronary interventions. Significant prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel treatment led to introduction of more potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors: prasugrel (a third generation thienopyridine), ticagrelor, and cangrelor (cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidines). Nevertheless, more potent platelet inhibition and resulting low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) has led to increased risk of major bleeding events. These limitations resulted in a need for an individualized antiplatelet therapy approach. This review discusses the current role and future perspectives of diagnostic tools such as platelet function testing to optimize antiplatelet therapy with a focus on deescalating therapies to reduce bleeding risks.

Differential Effects of Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin on Platelet Reactivity and Coagulation Activation: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is standard in acute coronary heart disease but confers a bleeding risk. To compare the effects of ticagrelor‐monotherapy with ticagrelor‐based DAPT on hemostatic system activation, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in 44 volunteers using a loading‐dose regimen and measured platelet‐aggregometry triggered by adenosine diphosphate (multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA)‐ADP) and arachidonic acid (MEA‐AA), the vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), prothrombin fragment 1.2 (f1.2), and d‐Dimer. Ticagrelor‐based DAPT and ticagrelor‐monotherapy significantly decreased MEA‐ADP (Δmean: −51.4 (−56.9; −45.8) and −46.2 (−51.7; −40.7)) and VASP (Δmean: −70.3 (−76.2; −64.4) and −69.6 (−75.5; −63.7)) at 2 hours and over 24 hours. MEA‐AA was reduced significantly by both treatments (Δmean: −72.9 (−80.6; −65.3) and −25.7 (−33.3; −18.0)) at 2 hours, and stronger by ticagrelor‐based DAPT over 24 hours. Both treatments decreased f1.2 (geometric mean ratio (GMR): 0.92 (0.84; 1.01) and 0.88 (0.80; 0.96)) and d‐Dimer (GMR: 0.89 (0.86; 0.92) and 0.91 (0.88; 0.94)) at 2 hours and d‐Dimer over 24 hours. Ticagrelor‐monotherapy and ticagrelor‐based DAPT comparably affect hemostatic system activation.

Incidence, predictors, and prognosis of premature discontinuation or switch of prasugrel or ticagrelor: the ATLANTIS - SWITCH study

Aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency and predictors of premature discontinuation or switch of ADP receptor blockers and its association with serious adverse events. For this purpose 571 consecutive ACS patients receiving ticagrelor (n = 258, 45%) or prasugrel (n = 313, 55%) undergoing PCI were enrolled in this prospective, observational, multicenter ATLANTIS-SWITCH substudy. Predictors of premature discontinuation or switch of antiplatelet therapy and their association with major adverse cardiovascular events and TIMI bleeding events were evaluated. Premature stop/switch was found in 72 (12.6%) patients: 34 (5.9%) stopped and 38 (6.7%) switched the ADP blocker. Ticagrelor treated patients were significantly more likely to stop/switch therapy as compared to prasugrel (15.9% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.016). We identified 4 independent predictors for stop/switch of ADP blocker: major surgery, need for oral anticoagulation (OAC), TIMI major bleeding and drug intolerance. TIMI major bleeding was a driver of stop/switch actions and occurred in 4.3% vs 0.2% in patients with vs without stop/switch (p = 0.001). The majority of stop/switch actions (75%) were physicians driven decisions. Importantly, stop/switch of therapy was not associated with increased risk of MACE (p = 0.936). In conclusion premature switch/stop of ADP blockers appears to be safe when mainly driven by physician’s decision and clinical indication.

Platelet reactivity patterns in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy

AIM

The aim of the present study was to investigate the patterns of platelet reactivity and discriminators of therapeutic response to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

DESIGN

In this multicentre prospective observational study, 492 patients with ACS were enrolled. Platelet aggregation was determined by multiple electrode aggregometry after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or arachidonic acid (AA) as agonists in the maintenance phase of treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor.

RESULTS

Age emerged as the strongest variable influencing aspirin response status: The mean AA-induced platelet aggregation in patients <49 years of age was 49% higher than in those >49 years (13.1 U vs 8.8 U; P = 0.011). The second strongest discriminator of aspirin response was sex: Male patients had a 40% higher AA-induced platelet aggregation values than female patients (9.5 U vs 6.8 U; P = 0.026). Platelet count emerged as the only variable influencing ADP antagonists response status showing that patients with platelet count >320 g/L displayed higher ADP-induced platelet aggregation. About 12% of patients had high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to aspirin, 3% and 4% a HTPR to prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively, and only 2% displayed HTPR to dual antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSION

When potent platelet inhibitors as prasugrel and ticagrelor are administered with aspirin, HTPR to DAPT plays only a marginal role.

A brief review on resistance to P2Y12 receptor antagonism in coronary artery disease

Background

Platelet inhibition is important for patients with coronary artery disease. When dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is required, a P2Y₁₂-antagonist is usually recommended in addition to standard aspirin therapy. The most used P2Y₁₂-antagonists are clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor. Despite DAPT, some patients experience adverse cardiovascular events, and insufficient platelet inhibition has been suggested as a possible cause. In the present review we have performed a literature search on prevalence, mechanisms and clinical implications of resistance to P2Y₁₂ inhibitors.

Methods

The PubMed database was searched for relevant papers and 11 meta-analyses were included. P2Y₁₂ resistance is measured by stimulating platelets with ADP ex vivo and the most used assays are vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), Multiplate, VerifyNow (VN) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA).

Discussion/conclusion

The frequency of high platelet reactivity (HPR) during clopidogrel therapy is predicted to be 30%. Genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions are discussed to explain a significant part of this inter-individual variation. HPR during prasugrel and ticagrelor treatment is estimated to be 3–15% and 0–3%, respectively. This lower frequency is explained by less complicated and more efficient generation of the active metabolite compared to clopidogrel. Meta-analyses do show a positive effect of adjusting standard clopidogrel treatment based on platelet function testing. Despite this, personalized therapy is not recommended because no large-scale RCT have shown any clinical benefit. For patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, platelet function testing is not recommended due to low occurrence of HPR.

Assessment of adherence to medication in patients after myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Is there a place for newself-reported questionnaires?

INTRODUCTION

Non-adherence to medication regimen after myocardial infarction (MI) leads to increased morbidity and mortality and generates additional cost to the healthcare system.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to critically discuss assessment methods of adherence to medication in patients after myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and the possible application of a new self-reported questionnaire.

METHODS

A systematic investigation of all published literature was conducted to minimize the risk of bias. A database search (PubMed, CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases) from January 1998 through December 2017.

RESULTS

Adequate assessment of patient adherence to treatment is necessary to understand the potential for adverse outcomes. Methods developed for adherence evaluation are classified as subjective and objective or as direct and indirect. Direct, objective measures reflect pharmacokinetics and include measurement of the drug or its metabolite concentration, evaluation of the presence of biological markers given with the drug and direct observation of patients' medication-taking behavior. Several indirect, objective methods are based on evaluation of the availability of prescribed medications assuming that medication is taken exactly as prescribed. Assessment of the effectiveness of treatment, both at the pharmacodynamic and clinical level, indirectly but objectively reflects adherence to treatment. Subjective methods, including patient-kept diaries, patient interviews and self-reported questionnaires, due to their simplicity, real-time feedback and low cost, are often used for adherence evaluation in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the availability, convenience and variety of methods, measuring adherence still remains a real challenge. Using a well designed questionnaire provides an opportunity to identify patients at increased risk of non-adherence and the obstacles impeding implementation of the treatment plan, allowing implementation of tailored interventions in order to improve patient medication-taking behavior.

On-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral and coronary blood in patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Pre-analytical variables may influence platelet function analysis results. Our aim was to evaluate the on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral artery vs coronary blood in patients with STEMI. We enrolled one hundred and nine patients who consecutively underwent p-PCI at Cardiology Unit of Padua University Hospital between June 2014 and June 2015. Before the procedure, all patients received intravenous aspirin 250 mg and either of the thienopyridines; clopidogrel 600 mg, prasugrel 60 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg. ASPI-test and ADP-test using multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) were performed in samples collected from both a peripheral artery and the culprit coronary artery. 'Low responders' were patients with an ASPI-test or ADP-test value greater than or equal to a pre-established normal range. No significant differences were observed in ASPI-test values between peripheral (19 (median) [3-49 (10-90 percentiles)] U) vs coronary (12 [1-40] U, p = .06) blood and in ADP-test (40 [14-82] U vs 33 [7-79] U, p =.68) blood. In peripheral blood, fifteen (14%) patients were 'low aspirin' and forty-one (38%) 'low thienopyridines' responders. The prevalence of 'low clopidogrel' responders was higher (45%) than prasugrel (36%) and ticagrelor (33%). Similar results were observed in coronary blood. In patients undergoing p-PCI for STEMI, MEA platelet function observed in coronary arteries was consistent with peripheral artery blood's independently of the antiplatelet drug used. The clinical significance of peripheral and coronary on-aspirin/thienopyridines platelet reactivity needs further clarification.

Association of PCSK9 with platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor: The PCSK9-REACT study

BACKGROUND

Circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) enzyme might be associated with increased activation of platelets. We aimed to assess the relationship between PCSK9 levels, platelet reactivity and ischemic outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive ACS patients receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in a prospective, observational study. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was determined by Multiplate Analyzer in the maintenance phase of treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, ischemic stroke were evaluated at 12months.

RESULTS

A direct association was found between increased PCSK9 serum levels and platelet reactivity (r=0.30; p=0.004). When assessed according to tertile values of PCSK9, there was a significant increase in platelet reactivity in the upper vs lower tertile (p=0.02). Clinical outcome was available at follow-up in 178 subjects. In the upper PCSK9 tertile 13/59 (22.03%) patients experienced a clinical MACE at one year, vs 2/59 (3.39%) patients in the lower PCSK9 tertile. At one-year follow-up, PCSK9 was independently associated with increased ischemic MACEs: hazard ratio for upper vs lower PCSK9-level tertile was 2.62 (95% confidence interval 1.24-5.52; p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that increased PCSK9 levels are associated with higher platelet reactivity and are a possible predictor of ischemic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Which platelet function test best reflects the in vivo plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite? The HARMONIC study

Aim of this study was assessment of the relationship between concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) and results of selected platelet function tests. In a single-centre, cohort study, patients with myocardial infarction underwent blood sampling following a 180 mg ticagrelor loading dose intake (predose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours postdose) to perform pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. Platelet reactivity was evaluated using the VASP-assay, the VerifyNow device and the Multiplate analyzer. Analysis of 36 patients revealed high negative correlations between ticagrelor concentrations and platelet reactivity evaluated with all three platelet function tests (the VASP-assay: RS=-0.722; p<0.0001; the VerifyNow device: RS=-0.715; p<0.0001; the Multiplate analyzer: RS=-0.722; p<0.0001), with no significant differences between correlation coefficients. Similar results were found for AR-C124910XX. Platelet reactivity values assessed with all three methods generally correlated well with each other; however, a significantly higher correlation (p<0.02) was demonstrated between the VerifyNow and Multiplate tests (RS=0.707; p<0.0001) than in other assay combinations (the VASP-assay and the VerifyNow device: RS=0.595; p<0.0001; the VASP-assay and the Multiplate analyzer: RS=0.588; p<0.0001). With respect to the recognition of high platelet reactivity, we found higher measurement concordance between the VerifyNow and Multiplate tests compared with other assay combinations, while for low platelet reactivity, only results of the VerifyNow and Multiplate assay were related to each other. Platelet reactivity measurements performed with the VASP, VerifyNow and Multiplate tests show comparably strong negative correlations with ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX concentrations.

Abciximab as a bridging strategy to overcome morphine-prasugrel interaction in STEMI patients

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated whether the glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab might be a successful bridging strategy to achieve adequate levels of platelet inhibition rapidly in cases where prasugrel is used in morphine-pretreated ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.

METHODS

In a prospective observational cohort study, 32 patients presenting with STEMI were given prasugrel at a loading dose of 60 mg. Patients were stratified into four groups, according to morphine and/or abciximab use. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was measured at four time points: at baseline, and at 2 h, 1 day and 2 days after prasugrel loading.

RESULTS

Morphine use was associated with a three-fold higher level of ADP-induced platelet aggregation 2 h after prasugrel loading compared with no morphine/no abciximab (P = 0.019). However, when abciximab was infused in the catheterization laboratory, the effect of morphine on ADP-induced platelet aggregation disappeared (P = 0.884). This interaction was also seen in the presence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) at 2 h; while HTPR was seen in 88% of morphine users/no abciximab users, it was found in only 17-20% in the three other groups (P = 0.003). The effect of morphine disappeared by day 1 - 2.

CONCLUSION

The infusion of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab allows immediate and efficient platelet inhibition in STEMI patients concomitantly receiving the oral ADP receptor blocker prasugrel and morphine.