1
|
Devillier P, Saf S, Rolland C, Canonica GW, Demoly P. Respiratory allergic diseases and allergen immunotherapy: A French patient survey before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. World Allergy Organ J 2024; 17:100902. [PMID: 38623320 PMCID: PMC11017353 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented global disruption to both healthcare providers and patients with respiratory allergies. There are limited real-life data on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the risk perception of patients with allergy treated with allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Objective To understand the risk perception of allergic patients treated with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) before and during the pandemic, and their attitudes towards COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Methods This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional survey conducted from October to November 2021 in France. Adult patients, who had been prescribed and had received a Stallergenes SLIT (liquid or liquid and tablets) before the pandemic (from August 1, 2018 to March 10, 2020) and during the pandemic (from March 11, 2020 to August 31, 2021), were identified from the Stallergenes named-patient products (NPP) database. Patients completed an online questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results A total of 5258 patients from all over France completed the questionnaire. Mean (±SD) age of the respondents was 39.3 (±13.0) years and 66.9% were female. Some of them (11.8%) were obese (BMI >30 kg/m2). Main allergic diseases were rhinitis (80.0% of patients) with or without conjunctivitis, and asthma (39.0%). More than half of the patients experienced moderate to severe (58.0%) and persistent allergic rhinitis profile (70.4%). Most patients were poly-allergic (72.7%), mostly to house dust mites (61.9%), grass pollens (61.5%), tree pollens (57.8%), and cat dander (37.2%). Only 14.1% of patients experienced an aggravation of their allergy symptoms during lockdown and 14.8% were infected with COVID-19, with hospitalization required for 1.8%. Only 3.1% of patients reported their SLIT initiation as being postponed due to the pandemic. SLIT was changed, temporarily interrupted or permanently discontinued during the pandemic in 21.9% of patients. Changes mainly concerned the maintenance dose for SLIT-liquid (63.2%). SLIT modification was due to COVID-19 infection in only 4.2%. Most patients did not feel vulnerable (53.1%), anxious (55.2%), at risk to present severe symptoms of COVID-19 (77.1%), or at risk to transmit coronavirus (80.4%). However, greater anxiety was reported in patients with allergic asthma (33.6%) or other respiratory disorders (50.4%). Patients who felt vulnerable partly assigned their vulnerability to their allergic disease (59.3%). Suffering from an allergic disease did not make patients feel more vulnerable to side effects of COVID-19 vaccine for 79.6% of them. Conclusion Overall, most patients with allergy and under SLIT were not strongly concerned by the COVID-19 infection. SLIT did not have a negative impact on the COVID-19 symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Devillier
- VIM (Laboratoire de Recherche en Pharmacologie respiratoire, Virologie et Immunologie Moléculaire) Suresnes – UMR_0892 & Clinical Research Unit, Foch Hospital, University Versailles Saint-Quentin, Suresnes, France
| | - Sarah Saf
- Department of Pediatric, Hospital Centre of Arpajon, Arpajon, France
- Department of Pediatric Allergology, Armand Trousseau University Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Personalized Medicine Asthma & Allergy Unit-IRCCS, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Pascal Demoly
- University Hospital of Montpellier and IDESP, University of Montpellier – INSERM – INRIA PreMediCal, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acute Kidney Injury with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pediatric Patients Receiving High-Dose Methotrexate Chemotherapy: A Report of Three Cases. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:children10020331. [PMID: 36832467 PMCID: PMC9954875 DOI: 10.3390/children10020331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methotrexate is renally excreted. HDMTX (high dose-methotrexate)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) is a non-oliguric decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) heralded by an acute rise in serum creatinine. Moreover, AKI is also a frequent complication of COVID-19. Among our patients treated with HDMTX, some of these developed AKI during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, we wondered whether our patients' kidney failure might have been triggered by their underlying SARS-CoV-2 positivity. METHODS Data were collected from the database at the Pediatric Oncology Unit of the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan (Italy) regarding patients who matched the following selective criteria: (a) treatment with HDMTX during the pandemic period; (b) SARS-CoV-2 infection during the treatment; (c) development of AKI during HDMTX treatment and SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS From March 2020 to March 2022, a total of 23 patients were treated with HDMTX; 3 patients were treated with HDMTX during SARS-CoV-2 infection and all 3 developed AKI. CONCLUSIONS Clinical manifestations associated with this virus are many, so we are not yet able to lower our guard and rule out this infection as a cause of clinical manifestations with any certainty.
Collapse
|
3
|
Xepapadaki P, Adachi Y, Pozo Beltrán CF, El-Sayed ZA, Gómez RM, Hossny E, Filipovic I, Le Souef P, Morais-Almeida M, Miligkos M, Nieto A, Phipatanakul W, Pitrez PM, Wang JY, Wong GW, Papadopoulos NG. Utility of biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthmatic children. World Allergy Organ J 2022; 16:100727. [PMID: 36601259 PMCID: PMC9791923 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Asthma imposes a heavy morbidity burden during childhood; it affects over 10% of children in Europe and North America and it is estimated to exceed 400 million people worldwide by the year 2025. In clinical practice, diagnosis of asthma in children is mostly based on clinical criteria; nevertheless, assessment of both physiological and pathological processes through biomarkers, support asthma diagnosis, aid monitoring, and further lead to better treatment outcomes and reduced morbidity. Recently, identification and validation of biomarkers in pediatric asthma has emerged as a top priority across leading experts, researchers, and clinicians. Moreover, the implementation of non-invasive biomarkers for the assessment and monitoring of paediatric patients with asthma, has been prioritized; however, only a proportion of them are currently included in the clinical practise. Although, the use of non-invasive biomarkers is highly supported in recent asthma guidelines for documenting diagnosis and supporting monitoring of asthmatic patients, data on the Pediatric population are limited. In the present report, the Pediatric Asthma Committee of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), aims to summarize and discuss available data for the implementation of non-invasive biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring in children with asthma. Information on the most studied biomarkers, including spirometry, oscillometry, markers of allergic sensitization, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and the most recent exhaled breath markers and "omic" approaches, will be reviewed. Practical limitations and considerations based on both experts' opinion and critical review of the literature, on the utility of all "well-known" and newly introduced non-invasive biomarkers will be presented. A critical commentary on biomarkers' use in diagnosing and monitoring asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic, cost and availability of biomarkers in different settings and in developing countries, the differences on the biomarkers use between Primary Practitioners, Pediatricians, and Specialists and their role on the longitudinal aspect of asthma is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevi Xepapadaki
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Corresponding author.
| | - Yuichi Adachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyam, Japan
| | | | - Zeinab A. El-Sayed
- Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology Unit, Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Elham Hossny
- Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology Unit, Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ivana Filipovic
- University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović Hospital Pediatric Department, Serbia
| | - Peter Le Souef
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Child and Adolescent Health Service, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Michael Miligkos
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Antonio Nieto
- Pediatric Pulmonology & Allergy Unit Children's. Health Research Institute. Hospital La Fe, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - Wanda Phipatanakul
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paulo M. Pitrez
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Jiu-Yao Wang
- Center for Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Gary W.K. Wong
- Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alvaro‐Lozano M, Sandoval‐Ruballos M, Giovannini M, Jensen‐Jarolim E, Sahiner U, Tomic Spiric V, Quecchia C, Chaker A, Heffler E, Klimek L, Brough H, Sturm G, Untersmayr E, Bonini M, Pfaar O. Allergic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic-Clinical practical considerations: An European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology survey. Clin Transl Allergy 2022; 12:e12097. [PMID: 35070270 PMCID: PMC8762981 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has affected health care systems unexpectedly. However, data focusing on practical considerations experienced by health care professionals (HCPs) providing care to allergic patients is scarce. METHODS Under the framework of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), a panel of experts in the field of immunotherapy developed a 42-question online survey, to evaluate real-life consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in allergy practice. RESULTS The respondents in the survey were 618. About 80% of HCPs indicated being significantly affected in their allergy practice. A face-to-face visit reduction was reported by 93% of HCPs and about a quarter completely interrupted diagnostic challenges. Patients with severe uncontrolled asthma (59%) and anaphylaxis (47%) were prioritized for in-person care. About 81% maintained an unaltered prescription of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthmatics. About 90% did not modify intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) in patients with allergic rhinitis. Nearly half of respondents kept biological prescriptions unmodified for asthma. About 50% of respondents kept their allergen immunotherapy (AIT) prescription patterns unchanged for respiratory allergies; 60% for insect venom allergies. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) for food allergies was initiated by 27%. About 20% kept carrying out up-dosing without modifications and 14% changed to more prolonged intervals. Telemedicine practice was increased. CONCLUSIONS HCPs providing care to allergic patients were affected during the pandemic in diagnostic, management, and therapeutic approaches, including AIT for respiratory, insect-venom, and food allergies. Most HCPs maintained controller treatments for both asthma, and allergic rhinitis consistent with international recommendations, as well as biological agents in asthma. Remote tools are valuable in delivering allergy care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Montserrat Alvaro‐Lozano
- Pediatric Allergology and Clinical ImmunologyHospital Sant Joan de DéuBarcelonaSpain
- Childhood and Adolescence Allergic Illness GroupInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de DéuBarcelonaSpain
- Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la SalutUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Mónica Sandoval‐Ruballos
- Pediatric Allergology and Clinical ImmunologyHospital Sant Joan de DéuBarcelonaSpain
- Childhood and Adolescence Allergic Illness GroupInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de DéuBarcelonaSpain
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy UnitDepartment of PediatricsMeyer Children's University HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Erika Jensen‐Jarolim
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University ViennaViennaAustria
- The Interuniversity Messerli Research Institute, Medical University Vienna, Veterinary University Vienna, and University ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Umit Sahiner
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and AsthmaHacettepe University School of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
| | - Vesna Tomic Spiric
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
- Clinic of Allergology and ImmunologyClinical Centre of SerbiaBelgradeSerbia
| | - Cristina Quecchia
- “Io e l’Asma” CenterChildren's HospitalASST Spedali CiviliBresciaItaly
| | - Adam Chaker
- Department of Otolaryngology and Center of Allergy and EnvironmentTUM School of MedicineTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and AllergyHumanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCSRozzanoItaly
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityMilanItaly
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and AllergologyWiesbadenGermany
| | - Helen Brough
- Children's Allergy ServiceEvelina Children's HospitalGuy's and St. Thomas' HospitalLondonUK
- Paediatric Allergy GroupDepartment of Women and Children's HealthSchool of Life Course SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Gunter Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and VenerologyMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
- Allergy Outpatient Clinic ReummanplatzViennaAustria
| | - Eva Untersmayr
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Mateo Bonini
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic SciencesFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCSUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
- National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI)Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity Hospital MarburgPhilipps‐Universität MarburgMarburgGermany
| |
Collapse
|