Outcomes After Surgery and Radiotherapy for Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region

Papillary Tumors of Pineal Region: A Single-Center Experience in Management of 11 Cases

BACKGROUND

Papillary tumors of pineal region (PTPR) comprise a very rare subset of pineal region tumors that have been recently described. Literature on the management and outcome of PTPR is scarce owing to the rarity of these tumors. To address this lacuna, we analyzed our experience in management of PTPR.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 11 patients with histopathologically proven PTPR who underwent surgical excision at our center.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 33.3 years (range, 12-45 years), and male-to-female ratio was 1.75:1. Headache was the most common presentation followed by visual disturbances, altered sensorium, Perinaud syndrome, and seizures. Cerebrospinal fluid diversion was required in 6 patients. Krause approach was the most common approach used for tumor excision (9/11 cases). There was no perioperative mortality. Two patients were lost to follow-up. In the remaining 9 patients, the average follow-up period was 45 months (range, 12-79 months). On first postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, 8 patients showed no evidence of residual tumor (gross total resection), while 1 patient had small residual tumor (near-total resection) that remained stable during follow-up. Four patients underwent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. None of the patients developed recurrence during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

PTPR are a rare subgroup of pineal region tumors with distinct cells of origin but presentation similar to other pineal region tumors. Surgical resection constitutes the mainstay of management, and the extent of resection appears to be the most important determinant of prognosis. The role of adjuvant therapy still needs to be determined.

Purely Endoscopic Supracerebellar Infratentorial Approach to the Pineal Region in Pediatric Population

Pineal lesions represent less than 1% of all brain tumors (Villani et al., Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109:1-6, 2007). The abysmal location and critical neurovascular structures remain a surgical challenge, despite the advent of microneurosurgery. The classical wide surgical suboccipital craniotomy with the supracerebellar infratentorial approach, described by Sir Victor Horsley (Victor, Proc R Soc Med 3:77-78, 1910), is infamous for its considerable surgical morbidity and mortality. This was later upgraded microneurosurgically by Stein to improve surgical outcomes (Stein, J Neurosurg 35:197-202, 1971).Ruge et al. reported the first purely endoscopic fenestration of quadrigeminal arachnoid cysts via this corridor (Ruge et al., Neurosurgery 38:830-7, 1996). A cadaver-based anatomical study by Cardia et al. demonstrated the viability for endoscope-assisted techniques (Cardia et al., J Neurosurg 2006;104(6 Suppl):409-14). However, the first purely endoscopic supracerebellar infratentorial (eSCIT) approach to a pineal cyst was performed in 2008 by Gore et al. (Gore PA et al., Neurosurgery 62:108-9, 2008).Unlike transventricular endoscopy, eSCIT approach poses no mechanical risk to the fornices and can be utilized irrespective of ventricular size. More vascular control and resultant reduction in uncontrolled hemorrhage improve the feasibility of attaining complete resection, especially around corners (Zaidi et al,, World Neurosurg 84, 2015). Gravity-dependent positioning and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion aid cerebellar relaxation, creating the ideal anatomical pathway. Also, angle of the straight sinus, tentorium, and tectal adherence can often influence the choice of approach; thus direct endoscopic visualization not only counteracts access to the engorged Galenic complex but also encourages sharp dissection of the arachnoid (Cardia et al., J Neurosurg 104:409-14, 2006). These tactics help provide excellent illumination with magnification, making it less fatiguing for the surgeon (Broggi et al., Neurosurgery 67:159-65, 2010).The purely endoscopic approach thwarts the dreaded risk of air embolisms, via simple copious irrigation from a small burr hole (Shahinian and Ra, J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 74:114-7, 2013). The tiny opening and closure are rapid to create, and the smaller wound decreases postoperative pain and morbidity. Recent literature supports its numerous advantages and favorable outcomes, making it a tough contender to traditional open methods.

Long term outcomes following surgery for pineal region tumors

PURPOSE

Pineal region tumors are surgically demanding tumors to resect. Long term neuro-oncologic outcomes following surgical excision of tumors from this region have been underreported. We sought to define the long term outcomes of patients undergoing resection of pineal region tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed on patients who underwent intended surgical excision of pineal region tumors. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were the primary endpoints of this study. Factors associated with OS, PFS and the degree of resection were analyzed, along with 30-day complication rates and dependence on CSF diversion.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients with a mean age of 30.9 ± 15.3 years were analyzed. The median clinical and radiographic follow-up was 95.7 and 48.2 months, respectively. The supracerebellar infratentorial and the occipital transtentorial corridors were utilized in the majority of cases (80.9%). The gross total resection (GTR) rate was 52.9% (n=36). The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 70.2% and 58.5%, respectively. Achieving GTR was associated with improved OS (HR 0.39, p = 0.03) and PFS (HR 0.4, p = 0.006). The 30-day mortality rate was 5.9%. The need for CSF diversion was high with 77.9% of patients requiring a shunt or ETV by last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first modern surgical series providing long term follow-up for patients undergoing surgical resection of pineal region tumors. Obtaining a GTR of these challenging tumors is beneficial with regards to PFS/OS. Higher grade tumors have diminished PFS/OS and are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

Papillary tumor of the pineal region: Is stereotactic radiosurgery efficient for this rare entity?

Background:

Papillary tumors of the pineal region are rare neuroepithelial lesions that were described for the ^1st time in the WHO 2007 classification. Management of such lesions remains controversial.

Case Description:

We describe the case of a 26-year-old female who presented with intracranial hypertension syndrome secondary to a 1.9 cm³ lesion of the pineal region causing hydrocephalus. The patient benefited from an endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy and a biopsy of her lesion in favor of a papillary tumor of the pineal region. After discussion of the surgical risks, the patient refused the surgical option and a stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was performed. She improved both clinically (allowing her to regain autonomy) and radiologically (reduction of 60% of tumor volume) at 1 year follow-up.

Conclusion:

Because of the rarity of the lesion, literature is yet not able to find consensus concerning management of such lesion, but SRS has proven efficiency for these Grades II or III lesions with high recurrence rates. Therefore, it should be considered as a primary therapeutic option allowing good outcome with low risks for the patient.

Recurrent Papillary Tumor of Pineal Region Misdiagnosed as Pineocytoma 9-Years Ago

Primary tumors of the pineal gland occur infrequently with a preponderance of either parenchymal tumors or germ cells tumors. Papillary tumor of the pineal region is a rare neuroepithelial lesion that arises exclusively in the pineal region. They have been designated as either Grade II or Grade III lesions as per the 2016 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors. Clinically, they usually present with obstructive hydrocephalus and visual disturbance. On imaging, these tumors are solid-cystic, heterogeneously enhancing, and show T2 hyperintensity. Pathologically, they can closely resemble a Grade I pineocytoma and immunohistochemistry is essential to differentiate the two. No definite guidelines exist to confirm the ideal protocol of treatment. Evidence regarding the role of radiation after surgery is limited to case reports and series. Adjuvant therapy is usually recommended for tumors with subtotal excision, high proliferative/mitotic index, or proven metastasis. We describe a case of a 29-year-old male with a recurrent papillary tumor of the pineal region, 9 years after primary surgery where it was misdiagnosed as a pineocytoma. The tumor was effectively controlled with surgical excision, cerebrospinal fluid diversion, and adjuvant radiation for 8 years before showing two recurrences within a span of 6 months with a rising proliferation index.

Pineal Gland Tumors: A Review

Simple Summary

Pineal neoplasms are tumors with different and variable morphological, histological, and radiological characteristics and, consequently different diagnosis and management. Due to their rarity, pineal tumors may be misdiagnosed. Pineal tumors, are divided into germ cell tumors, pineal parenchymal tumors and tumors that derive from adjacent structures. In this review, we report the clinical relevance of the main pineal gland tumors, underlining the importance of studying the triggering causes of pineal region carcinogenesis, to realize appropriate diagnosis and, consequently, better clinical management.

Abstract

The pineal gland is a small, pinecone-shaped endocrine gland that participates in the biological rhythm regulation of vertebrates. The recognized major product of the pineal gland is melatonin—a multifunctional endogenous indoleamine. Accumulating evidence suggests that the pineal gland is important for preserving ideal health conditions in vertebrate. Tumors of the pineal region account for approximately 3–11% of pediatric brain neoplasms but fewer than 1% of brain neoplasms in adults. It is fundamental to expand advanced imaging techniques together with both clinical and laboratory knowledge, to help to differentiate among pineal neoplasms and thus facilitate accurate primary diagnoses and proper therapeutic interventions. In this review, we report the gross anatomy of the pineal gland and its functional significance and discuss the clinical relevance of pineal gland tumors, underlining the importance of identifying the leading causes of pineal region masses.

Papillary tumor of the pineal region in pediatric populations: An additional case and systematic review of a rare tumor entity

Papillary tumors of the pineal region (PTPR) are a rare tumor entity first described in 2003, later codified in the 2007 WHO tumor classification system. PTPRs most commonly occur in the third and fourth decades, with exceedingly rare presentations in pediatric populations. Herein, we present an additional case of a 10-year-old female found to have PTPR in conjunction with Trisomy 21 managed successfully with cerebrospinal fluid diversion and gross total resection (GTR). Three years after resection she has returned to baseline without recurrence. We also performed a comprehensive review of the current literature discussing the diagnosis, treatment, and pathophysiologic correlations in children. Diagnosis and management of PTPRs is a topic that is increasingly garnering attention in the literature given the recent characterization of this tumor entity. However, relatively little is known about the presentation of PTPRs in pediatric populations. In adults, PTPRs have been linked with several chromosomal and genetic abnormalities; however this correlation is limited in pediatric literature. Although GTR is the mainstay for treatment, the application of adult treatment protocols may not be advisable due to age and the developmental changes of the CNS in children.

Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region: Systematic Review and Analysis of Prognostic Factors

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes and biological behavior of papillary tumors of the pineal region (PTPR) are still under investigation. The best therapeutic strategy has not been defined.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comprehensive patient-level analysis of all PTPR cases and identify their clinical features, treatment options, and prognostic factors.

METHODS

A search of the medical databases for case series and reports on PTPRs from January 2003 to June 2017 was performed. Data addressing PTPR's clinical presentation, imaging, treatment, and histological features were. Variables associated with the primary outcome of 36-mo survival were identified through Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 1164 studies, of which 71 were included (60 case reports and 11 case series), containing 177 patients (mean age 33.0 ± 15.3 yr and 53.2% male). Intracranial hypertension and hydrocephalus prevailed as the clinical picture. Surgery was performed on 82.0% and gross total resection (GTR) was achieved on 71.4%. A total of 56.8% recurred after a median 29 mo (quartiles 10.5-45.5). The 36-mo survival rate was 83.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.2-89.2%). Good functional outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4/5) were observed in 60.0%. The variables of interest were inconsistently reported and the multivariable analysis final sample was 133 patients. After adjustment for age, tumor size (each additional centimeter, hazard ratio [HR] 1.99, 95% CI 1.12-3.53, P = .019) and surgical treatment (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.45, P = .001) were associated with 36-mo survival.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size and surgery are associated with improvement in 36-mo survival. We did not observe any significant benefits from GTR or adjuvant treatments.

Radiotherapy for papillary tumor of the pineal region: A systematic review of the literature

Papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR) is a rare neuroepithelial brain tumor, characterized by a high risk of local recurrence (greater than 70 % at 6 years). The aim of our study was to review the available literature on radiotherapy for PTPR in order to evaluate timings, schedules, outcomes and toxicities of this treatment modality. In our review, 72.4 % (84) of the patients diagnosed with PTPR received radiation therapy. There is heterogeneity in the dose prescription, ranging from 45 Gy (25 × 1.8 Gy) to 60 Gy (30 × 2 Gy) for 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy and from 12 Gy to 36 Gy for Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Being considered as a grade II or III tumor, PTPR should receive higher total radiation dose in the adjuvant setting. Our analysis showed a very limited treatment-related toxicity with an expected 10-y OS of 72.5 %. At 5-years from the diagnosis, about 60 % of the patients experienced a local recurrence, whereas at 10 years the rate is higher than 80 %. In the literature, conflicting data about radiotherapy for PTPR are reported, in particular regarding disease progression. Although radiotherapy represents a fundamental treatment in the management of PTPR, prospective studies are required to better define its impact on overall survival and progression-free survival.

Recurrent Pineocytomalike Papillary Tumor of The Pineal Region: A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Papillary tumors of the pineal region (PTPRs) are malignant World Health Organization grade II/III tumors; however, they may perfectly mimic benign tumors (e.g., pineocytomas [World Health Organization grade I]).

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present a case of a 28-year-old man with a 35-mm tumor of the pineal region. Considering the typical radiological and pathologic presentation, the tumor was first diagnosed as pineocytoma. However, despite first total resection, the tumor recurred after 7 years. The recurrent neoplasm was composed mainly of papillary structures with low-grade atypical cells positive for CKAE1/AE3 and CK18. This categorization led to the final diagnosis of PTPR. The patient underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, which vastly improved his neurologic condition and resulted in significant tumor regression.

CONCLUSIONS

This case exemplifies that PTPRs can perfectly mimic pineocytomas and simple staining for cytokeratins may warrant correct diagnosis and better treatment.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Radiosurgery of Papillary Tumor of Pineal Region: 2 Case Reports and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Tumors of the pineal region are rare in adulthood, accounting for approximately 1% of intracranial neoplasms in this age range. Because of their rarity, it has proven to be difficult to establish the optimal therapy. Furthermore, microsurgical total resection in this eloquent location is associated with not low rates of morbidity.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We describe 2 patients diagnosed with papillary tumors of the pineal region by stereotactic biopsy and referred for Gamma Knife radiosurgery after shunting for hydrocephalus. We report a long-term follow-up of 15 and 20 years, respectively, showing a good response to the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

After a diagnosis of papillary tumors of the pineal region, radiosurgery is an alternative treatment, with high local control and low morbidity.

Keyhole Surgery of Pineal Area Tumors - Personal Experience in 22 Patients

Background

Pineal area tumors are challenging for surgery due to their location. However, the removal of the lesion is critical for further treatment and survival of the patients

Material and methods

22 patients with pineal area tumors were surgically treated via keyhole medial suboccipital craniotomy and supracerebellar midline approach All the patients were operated in the sitting position with the use of operating microscope and microsurgical technique.

Results

All patients survived surgery in a perfect condition, and no one patient worsened after surgery. No complications due to the sitting position were noted.

Conclusions

Surgical removal of pineal area tumors via small suboccipital craniotomy is safe and with the use of microsurgical techniques the results of surgical treatment are excellent. The sitting position of the patients gives a better view to the surgeon. We did not observe any intraoperational complications due to the sitting position.