1
|
Patel PP, Cao Y, Chen X, LeCompte MC, Kleinberg L, Khan M, McNutt T, Bydon A, Kebaish K, Theodore N, Larry Lo SF, Lee SH, Lubelski D, Redmond KJ. Oncologic and Functional Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for High-Grade Malignant Spinal Cord Compression. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101327. [PMID: 38260225 PMCID: PMC10801652 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although surgical decompression is the gold standard for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) from solid tumors, not all patients are candidates or undergo successful surgical Bilsky downgrading. We report oncologic and functional outcomes for patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to high-grade MESCC. Methods and Materials Patients with Bilsky grade 2 to 3 MESCC from solid tumor metastases treated with SBRT at a single institution from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received upfront surgery before SBRT were included only if postsurgical Bilsky grade remained ≥2. Neurologic examinations, magnetic resonance imaging, pain assessments, and analgesic usage were assessed every 3 to 4 months post-SBRT. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence was calculated with death as a competing risk, and overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Results One hundred forty-three patients were included. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 5.1%, 7.5%, and 14.1% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. At first post-SBRT imaging, 16.2% of patients with initial Bilsky grade 2 improved to grade 1, and 53.8% of patients were stable. Five of 13 patients (38.4%) with initial Bilsky grade 3 improved to grade 1 to 2. Pain response at 3 and 6 months post-SBRT was complete in 45.4% and 55.7%, partial in 26.9% and 13.1%, stable in 24.1% and 27.9%, and worse in 3.7% and 3.3% of patients, respectively. At 3 and 6 months after SBRT, 17.8% and 25.0% of patients had improved ambulatory status and 79.7% and 72.4% had stable status. Conclusions We report the largest series to date of patients with high-grade MESCC treated with SBRT. The excellent local control and functional outcomes suggest SBRT is a reasonable approach in inoperable patients or cases unable to be successfully surgically downgraded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palak P. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yilin Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xuguang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael C. LeCompte
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lawrence Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Majid Khan
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Todd McNutt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Khaled Kebaish
- Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Sheng-fu Larry Lo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hoftstra, Manhasset, New York
| | - Sang H. Lee
- Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Kristin J. Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shiber M, Kimchi G, Knoller N, Harel R. The Evolution of Minimally Invasive Spine Tumor Resection and Stabilization: From K-Wires to Navigated One-Step Screws. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020536. [PMID: 36675466 PMCID: PMC9865379 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimization of the surgical approaches to spinal extradural metastases resection and stabilization was advocated by the 2012 Oncological Guidelines for Spinal Metastases Management. Minimally invasive approaches to spine oncology surgery (MISS) are continually advancing. This paper will describe the evolution of minimally invasive surgical techniques for the resection of metastatic spinal lesions and stabilization in a single institute. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent minimally invasive extradural spinal metastases resection during the years 2013-2019 by a single surgeon was performed. Medical records, imaging studies, operative reports, rates of screw misplacement, operative time and estimated blood loss were reviewed. Detailed description of the surgical technique is provided. Of 138 patients operated for extradural spinal tumors during the study years, 19 patients were treated in a minimally invasive approach and met the inclusion criteria for this study. The mortality rate was significantly improved over the years with accordance of improve selection criteria to better prognosis patients. The surgical technique has evolved over the study years from fluoroscopy to intraoperative 3D imaging and navigation guidance and from k-wire screw insertion technique to one-step screws. Minimally invasive spinal tumor surgery is an evolving technique. The adoption of assistive devices such as intraoperative 3D imaging and one-step screw insertion systems was safe and efficient. Oncologic patients may particularly benefit from the minimization of surgical decompression and fusion in light of the frailty of this population and the mitigated postoperative outcomes associated with MIS oncological procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Shiber
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
- Sackler Medical School, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
- Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
| | - Gil Kimchi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
- Sackler Medical School, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| | - Nachshon Knoller
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
- Sackler Medical School, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| | - Ran Harel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
- Sackler Medical School, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +972-3-5302650
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harel R, Kaisman-Elbaz T, Emch T, Elson P, Chao ST, Suh JH, Angelov L. A quantitative and comparative evaluation of stereotactic spine radiosurgery local control: proposing a consistent measurement methodology. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 53:E10. [DOI: 10.3171/2022.8.focus22363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a precise and conformal treatment modality used in the management of metastatic spine tumors. Multiple studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy for pain and tumor control. However, no uniform quantitative imaging methodology exists to evaluate response to treatment in these patients. This study presents radiographic local control rates post-SBRT, systematically compares measurements acquired according to WHO and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and explores the relationship to patient outcome.
METHODS
The authors performed a retrospective review of prospectively obtained data from a cohort of 59 consecutive patients (81 metastatic isocenters) treated with SBRT and followed with serial MRI scans. Measurements were performed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the patients’ clinical course. Local control status was determined according to both WHO and RECIST measurements, and agreement between the measuring methodologies was calculated and reported.
RESULTS
Eighty-one isocenters (111 vertebral bodies) were treated with SBRT. The mean treatment dose was 13.96 Gy and the median follow-up duration was 10.8 months, during which 408 MRI scans were evaluated with both WHO and RECIST criteria for each scan point. Imaging demonstrated a mean unidimensional size decrease of 0.2 cm (p = 0.14) and a mean area size decrease of 0.99 cm2 (p = 0.03). Although 88% of the case classifications were concordant and the agreement was significant, WHO criteria were found to be more sensitive to tumor size change. The local control rates according to WHO and RECIST were 95% and 98%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Although WHO volumetric measurements are admittedly superior for tumor size measurement, RECIST is simpler, reproducible, and for the first time is shown here to be comparable to WHO criteria. Thus, the application of RECIST methodology appears to be a suitable standard for evaluating post-SBRT treatment response. Moreover, using comprehensive and consistent measuring approaches, this study substantiates the efficacy of SBRT in the treatment of spine metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Harel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sheba Medical Center Affiliated to Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Todd Emch
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Paul Elson
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John H Suh
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guo L, Ke L, Zeng Z, Yuan C, Wu Z, Chen L, Lu L. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review. Med Oncol 2022; 39:103. [DOI: 10.1007/s12032-021-01613-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
5
|
Xu L, Huang W, Cai W, Sun Z, Fang M, Ji Y, Wang S, Zhang J, Hu T, Cheng M, Yan W. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Separation Surgery and Piecemeal Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 8:686930. [PMID: 34881284 PMCID: PMC8645642 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.686930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes between piecemeal spondylectomy and separation surgery for patients with spinal metastasis. Summary of Background Data: Piecemeal spondylectomy and separation surgery are two widely-used treatment options for spinal metastasis. However, no studies have compared the surgical outcomes between both treatment modalities. Methods: Patients with spinal metastasis who underwent piecemeal spondylectomy or separation surgery between August 2017 and April 2020 at our spine center were recruited. Demographic, preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with spinal metastasis. Results: Overall, 26 patients were treated with piecemeal spondylectomy, and 29 underwent separation surgery with postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in neurological status. The piecemeal spondylectomy group had significantly more blood loss (1784.62 ± 833.64 vs. 1165.52 ± 307.38 ml) and required longer operative time (4.76 ± 0.93 vs. 3.73 ± 1.15 h) than the separation surgery group. No significant difference in OS was found between the groups (P = 0.064); however, patients in the separation surgery group experienced less local recurrence than those in the piecemeal spondylectomy group (P = 0.0014). Notably, significant differences were detected in the development of complications between the groups (P = 0.029). Conclusion: Separation surgery led to less blood loss and reduced complications and had shorter operation time than piecemeal spondylectomy. Although no significant differences were found in OS between the groups, separation surgery was associated with better PFS compared with piecemeal spondylectomy. These findings suggest that separation surgery has some advantages over piecemeal spondylectomy for patients with spinal metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lun Xu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wending Huang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiluo Cai
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - ZhengWang Sun
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Meng Fang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingzheng Ji
- Department of Orthopedic, Naval Medical Center of PLA, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuoer Wang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianing Zhang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tu Hu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mo Cheng
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wangjun Yan
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Faruqi S, Chen H, Fariselli L, Levivier M, Ma L, Paddick I, Pollock BE, Regis J, Sheehan J, Suh J, Yomo S, Sahgal A. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Postoperative Spine Malignancy: A Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:e65-e78. [PMID: 34673275 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine safety and efficacy of postoperative spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the published literature, and to present practice recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed, specific to postoperative spine SBRT, using PubMed and Embase databases. A meta-analysis for 1-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF) probability was conducted. RESULTS The literature search revealed 251 potentially relevant articles after duplicates were removed. Of these 56 were reviewed in-depth for eligibility and 12 met all the inclusion criteria for analysis. 7 studies were retrospective, 2 prospective observational and 3 were prospective phase I/II clinical trials. Outcomes for a total of 461 patients and 499 spinal segments were reported. 10 studies used an MRI fused to CT-simulation for treatment planning, 2 investigations reported on all patients receiving a CT-myelogram at the time of planning. Meta-analysis for 1 year LC and OS was 88.9% and 57%, respectively. The crude reported VCF rate was 5.6%. One case of myelopathy was described in a patient with a previously irradiated spinal segment. One patient developed an esophageal fistula requiring surgical repair. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative spine SBRT delivers a high 1-year LC with acceptably low toxicity. Patients that may benefit from this include those with oligometastatic disease, radioresistant histology, paraspinal masses and/or those with a history of prior irradiation to the affected spinal segment. The ISRS recommends a minimum interval of 8 to 14 days after invasive surgery prior to simulation for SBRT, with initiation of radiotherapy within 4 weeks of surgery. An MRI fused to the planning CT, and/or the use of a CT-myelogram, are necessary for target and organ-at-risk delineation. A planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV) of 1.5 to 2mm for the spinal cord is advised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salman Faruqi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura Fariselli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milano, Unità di Radioterapia, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc Levivier
- Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lijun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ian Paddick
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bruce E Pollock
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jean Regis
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - John Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Patel J, Pennington Z, Hersh AM, Hung B, Schilling A, Antar A, Elsamadicy AA, de la Garza Ramos R, Lubelski D, Larry Lo SF, Sciubba DM. Drivers of Readmission and Reoperation After Surgery for Vertebral Column Metastases. World Neurosurg 2021; 154:e806-e814. [PMID: 34389529 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine those clinical, demographic, and operative factors that predict 30-day unplanned reoperation and readmission within a population of adults who underwent spinal metastasis surgery at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS Adults who underwent spinal metastasis surgery at a comprehensive cancer center were analyzed. Data included baseline laboratory values, cancer history, demographics, operative characteristics and medical comorbidities. Medical comorbidities were quantified using the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Values associated with the outcomes of interest were then subjected to multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of readmission and reoperation. RESULTS A total of 345 cases were identified. Mean age was 59.4 ± 11.7 years, 56% were male, and the racial makeup was 64% white, 29% black, and 7.3% other. Forty-two patients (12.2%) had unplanned readmissions, most commonly for wound infection with dehiscence (14.2%), venous thromboembolism (14.2%), and bowel obstruction/complication (11.9%). Thirteen patients required reoperation (4%), most commonly for wound infection with dehiscence (39%) or local recurrence (23%). Multivariable analysis showed that the modified CCI (odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.52; P = 0.03) was an independent predictor of 30-day readmission. Independent predictors of 30-day unplanned reoperation were: black (vs. white) race (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.41; P < 0.01), length of stay (OR, 1.05 per day; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09; P = 0.04), and CCI (OR, 1.72 per point; 95% CI, 1.29-2.28; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Increasing medical comorbidities is independently predictive of both 30-day unplanned readmission and reoperation after spinal metastasis surgery. Unplanned reoperation is also positively predicted by a longer index admission. Neither tumor pathology nor age predicted outcome, suggesting that poor wound-healing factors and increased surgical morbidity may best predict these adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaimin Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Andrew M Hersh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Bethany Hung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrew Schilling
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Albert Antar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Aladine A Elsamadicy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Daniel Lubelski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sheng-Fu Larry Lo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rothrock RJ, Li Y, Lis E, Lobaugh S, Zhang Z, McCann P, Santos PMG, Yang TJ, Laufer I, Bilsky MH, Schmitt A, Yamada Y, Higginson DS. Hypofractionated spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy for high-grade epidural disease. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:680-687. [PMID: 32707555 DOI: 10.3171/2020.4.spine20118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the clinical outcomes when stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) alone is used to treat high-grade epidural disease without prior surgical decompression, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2014 and 2018. The authors report locoregional failure (LRF) for a cohort of 31 cases treated with hypofractionated SBRT alone for grade 2 epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) with radioresistant primary cancer histology. METHODS High-grade epidural disease was defined as grade 2 ESCC, which is notable for radiographic deformation of the spinal cord by metastatic disease. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and cumulative incidence functions were generated to examine the survival and incidence experiences of the sample level with respect to overall survival, LRF, and subsequent requirement of vertebral same-level surgery (SLS) due to tumor progression or fracture. Associations with dosimetric analysis were also examined. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients undergoing 31 episodes of hypofractionated SBRT alone for grade 2 ESCC between 2014 and 2018 were identified. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative incidences of LRF were 10.4% (95% CI 0-21.9) and 22.0% (95% CI 5.5-38.4), respectively. The median survival was 9.81 months (95% CI 8.12-18.54). The 1-year cumulative incidence of SLS was 6.8% (95% CI 0-16.0) and the 2-year incidence of SLS was 14.5% (95% CI 0.6-28.4). All patients who progressed to requiring surgery had index lesions at the thoracic apex (T5-7). CONCLUSIONS In carefully selected patients, treatment of grade 2 ESCC disease with hypofractionated SBRT alone offers a 1-year cumulative incidence of LRF similar to that in low-grade ESCC and postseparation surgery adjuvant hypofractionated SBRT. Use of SBRT alone has a favorable safety profile and a low cumulative incidence of progressive disease requiring open surgical intervention (14.5%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Patrick McCann
- 5Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kumar N, Madhu S, Bohra H, Pandita N, Wang SSY, Lopez KG, Tan JH, Vellayappan BA. Is there an optimal timing between radiotherapy and surgery to reduce wound complications in metastatic spine disease? A systematic review. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2020; 29:3080-3115. [DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06478-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
10
|
Hu JX, Gong YN, Jiang XD, Jiang L, Zhuang HQ, Meng N, Liu XG, Wei F, Liu ZJ. Local Tumor Control for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Following Separation Surgery with Adjuvant CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiotherapy or Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. World Neurosurg 2020; 141:e76-e85. [PMID: 32360927 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to compare local tumor control after conventionally fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus adjuvant CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients who underwent separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with MESCC who were treated at our hospital. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local progression and overall survival. RESULTS Fifty-six patients with MESCC underwent separation surgery between 2013 and 2018, among whom 6 were lost to follow-up, 24 received conventionally fractionated image-guided IMRT, and 26 were treated with CyberKnife SBRT. The median follow-up was 16.5 months (range, 2.1-47.5 months). Eleven patients experienced local failure including 9 and 2 from the IMRT and SBRT groups, respectively. The local progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in the SBRT group than IMRT group at 6 months (95.5% vs. 82.0%), 1 year (90.9% vs. 71.8%), and 2 years (90.9% vs. 57.6%) (P = 0.035). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified radiotherapy method (P = 0.034) and receipt of preoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.047) as significant predictors of local control, while visceral metastasis (P = 0.048) and high-malignancy primary tumor type (P = 0.002) were negative predictors of overall survival. Moreover, postoperative SBRT was noninferior to IMRT in terms of pain control, adverse effects, and performance in treating irradiated spinal metastases. CONCLUSIONS Hybrid surgery-radiosurgery therapy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with MESCC. SBRT provided higher local control rates compared with IMRT. Thus postoperative SBRT should be considered for patients expected to have relatively long survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Xin Hu
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Ning Gong
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Dong Jiang
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Liang Jiang
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| | - Hong Qing Zhuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Peking University Health Science Center, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Na Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Peking University Health Science Center, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Guang Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Wei
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Zhong Jun Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Redmond KJ, Sciubba D, Khan M, Gui C, Lo SFL, Gokaslan ZL, Leaf B, Kleinberg L, Grimm J, Ye X, Lim M. A Phase 2 Study of Post-Operative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Solid Tumor Spine Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:261-268. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
12
|
Immediate Reconstruction of Oncologic Spinal Wounds Is Cost-Effective Compared with Conventional Primary Wound Closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144:1182-1195. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Versteeg AL, van der Velden JM, Hes J, Eppinga W, Kasperts N, Verkooijen HM, Oner FC, Seravalli E, Verlaan JJ. Stereotactic Radiotherapy Followed by Surgical Stabilization Within 24 h for Unstable Spinal Metastases; A Stage I/IIa Study According to the IDEAL Framework. Front Oncol 2019; 8:626. [PMID: 30619760 PMCID: PMC6306560 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Routine treatment for unstable spinal metastases consists of surgical stabilization followed by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after a minimum of 1–2 weeks to allow for initial wound healing. Although routine treatment, there are several downsides. First, radiotherapy induced pain relief is delayed by the time interval required for wound healing. Second, EBRT often requires multiple hospital visits and only 60% of the patients experience pain relief. Third, spinal implants cause imaging artifacts hindering SBRT treatment planning and delivery. Reversing the order of surgery and radiotherapy, with dose sparing of the surgical area by SBRT, could overcome these disadvantages and by eliminating the interval between the two treatments, recovery, and palliation may occur earlier. Design: The safety of SBRT followed by surgical stabilization within 24 h for the treatment of unstable spinal metastases was investigated. Safety was evaluated using the Common-Toxicity-Criteria-Adverse-Events-4.0, with the occurrence of wound complications within 90-days being the primary concern. Results: Between June-2015 and January-2017, 13 patients underwent SBRT followed by surgical stabilization for unstable spinal metastases. The median time between SBRT and surgery was 17-h (IQR 5–19). None of the patients experienced wound complications. Improvements in pain and quality of life were observed over time for all patients. Conclusion: SBRT followed by surgical stabilization within 24 h for the treatment of unstable spinal metastases is safe. Palliation may be experienced earlier and with both treatments being performed in one hospital admission the treatment burden decreases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L Versteeg
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Jochem Hes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wietse Eppinga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Nicolien Kasperts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - F C Oner
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sharma M, Bennett EE, Rahmathulla G, Chao ST, Koech HK, Gregory SN, Emch T, Magnelli A, Meola A, Suh JH, Angelov L. Impact of cervicothoracic region stereotactic spine radiosurgery on adjacent organs at risk. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42:E14. [DOI: 10.3171/2016.10.focus16364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of the spine is a conformal method of delivering a high radiation dose to a target in a single or few (usually ≤ 5) fractions with a sharp fall-off outside the target volume. Although efforts have been focused on evaluating spinal cord tolerance when treating spinal column metastases, no study has formally evaluated toxicity to the surrounding organs at risk (OAR), such as the brachial plexus or the oropharynx, when performing SRS in the cervicothoracic region. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiation dosimetry and the acute and delayed toxicities of SRS on OAR in such patients.
METHODS
Fifty-six consecutive patients (60 procedures) with a cervicothoracic spine tumor involving segments within C5–T1 who were treated using single-fraction SRS between February 2006 and July 2014 were included in the study. Each patient underwent CT simulation and high-definition MRI before treatment. The clinical target volume and OAR were contoured on BrainScan and iPlan software after image fusion. Radiation toxicity was evaluated using the common toxicity criteria for adverse events and correlated to the radiation doses delivered to these regions. The incidence of vertebral body compression fracture (VCF) before and after SRS was evaluated also.
RESULTS
Metastatic lesions constituted the majority (n = 52 [93%]) of tumors treated with SRS. Each patient was treated with a median single prescription dose of 16 Gy to the target. The median percentage of tumor covered by SRS was 93% (maximum target dose 18.21 Gy). The brachial plexus received the highest mean maximum dose of 17 Gy, followed by the esophagus (13.8 Gy) and spinal cord (13 Gy). A total of 14 toxicities were encountered in 56 patients (25%) during the study period. Overall, 14% (n = 8) of the patients had Grade 1 toxicity, 9% (n = 5) had Grade 2 toxicity, 2% (n = 1) had Grade 3 toxicity, and none of the patients had Grade 4 or 5 toxicity. The most common (12%) toxicity was dysphagia/odynophagia, followed by axial spine pain flare or painful radiculopathy (9%). The maximum radiation dose to the brachial plexus showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.066) in patients with worsening post-SRS pain. De novo and progressive VCFs after SRS were noted in 3% (3 of 98) and 4% (4 of 98) of vertebral segments, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
From the analysis, the current SRS doses used at the Cleveland Clinic seem safe and well tolerated at the cervicothoracic junction. These preliminary data provide tolerance benchmarks for OAR in this region. Because the effect of dose-escalation SRS strategies aimed at improving local tumor control needs to be balanced carefully with associated treatment-related toxicity on adjacent OAR, larger prospective studies using such approaches are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Samuel T. Chao
- 2Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, and
| | | | | | - Todd Emch
- 3Imaging Institute, Section of Neuroradiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and
| | - Anthony Magnelli
- 2Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, and
| | | | - John H. Suh
- 2Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, and
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Harel R, Pfeffer R, Levin D, Shekel E, Epstein D, Tsvang L, Ben Ayun M, Alezra D, Zach L. Spine radiosurgery: lessons learned from the first 100 treatment sessions. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42:E3. [DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.focus16332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Local therapy to spine tumors has been shown to be effective in selected cases. Spinal radiosurgery (SRS) is an evolving radiotherapy regimen allowing for noninvasive, highly efficacious local treatment. The learning curve can compromise the results of any newly employed technology and should be studied to minimize its effects. In this paper the first 100 SRSs performed at several medical centers are presented and analyzed for the effects of the learning curve on outcome.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was undertaken to evaluate data from patients treated with SRS at Sheba Medical Center and Assuta Medical Centers in the period from September 2011 to February 2016. Medical history, clinical and neurological findings, pathological diagnoses, SRS variables, complications, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Local control rates were calculated, and local treatment failure cases were qualitatively studied.
RESULTS
One hundred treatment sessions were performed for 118 lesions at 179 spinal levels in 80 patients. The complication rate was low and did not correlate with a learning curve. Mean follow-up time was 302 days, and the overall local control rate was 95%. The local control rate was dose dependent and increased from 87% (among 35 patients receiving a dose of 16 Gy) to 97% (among 65 patients receiving a dose of 18 Gy). The 6 treatment failure cases are discussed in detail.
CONCLUSIONS
Spinal radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment. Comprehensive education of the treating team and continuous communication are essential to limit the effects of the learning curve on outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Harel
- 1Stereotactic Radiosurgery Unit and
- 2Spine Surgery Unit, Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan
- 3Sackler Medical School, Tel-Aviv University
| | - Raphael Pfeffer
- 4Department of Radiotherapy, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel-Aviv; and
| | - Daphne Levin
- 4Department of Radiotherapy, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel-Aviv; and
| | - Efrat Shekel
- 4Department of Radiotherapy, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel-Aviv; and
| | - Dan Epstein
- 4Department of Radiotherapy, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel-Aviv; and
| | - Lev Tsvang
- 5Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Maoz Ben Ayun
- 5Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Dror Alezra
- 5Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Leor Zach
- 3Sackler Medical School, Tel-Aviv University
- 5Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pasquier D, Martinage G, Mirabel X, Lacornerie T, Makhloufi S, Faivre JC, Thureau S, Lartigau É. Radiothérapie stéréotaxique des métastases osseuses vertébrales. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:500-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.07.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
17
|
Redmond KJ, Robertson S, Lo SS, Soltys SG, Ryu S, McNutt T, Chao ST, Yamada Y, Ghia A, Chang EL, Sheehan J, Sahgal A. Consensus Contouring Guidelines for Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Solid Tumor Malignancies to the Spine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 97:64-74. [PMID: 27843035 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop consensus contouring guidelines for postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten spine SBRT specialists representing 10 international centers independently contoured the clinical target volume (CTV), planning target volume (PTV), spinal cord, and spinal cord planning organ at risk volume (PRV) for 10 representative clinical scenarios in postoperative spine SBRT for metastatic solid tumor malignancies. Contours were imported into the Computational Environment for Radiotherapy Research. Agreement between physicians was calculated with an expectation minimization algorithm using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation with κ statistics. Target volume definition guidelines were established by finding optimized confidence level consensus contours using histogram agreement analyses. RESULTS Nine expert radiation oncologists and 1 neurosurgeon completed contours for all 10 cases. The mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (range, 0.71-0.89) and 0.94 (range, 0.90-0.99) for the CTV and 0.79 (range, 0.70-0.95) and 0.92 (range, 0.87-0.99) for the PTV), respectively. Mean κ agreement, which demonstrates the probability that contours agree by chance alone, was 0.58 (range, 0.43-0.70) for CTV and 0.58 (range, 0.37-0.76) for PTV (P<.001 for all cases). Optimized consensus contours were established for all patients with 80% confidence interval. Recommendations for CTV include treatment of the entire preoperative extent of bony and epidural disease, plus immediately adjacent bony anatomic compartments at risk of microscopic disease extension. In particular, a "donut-shaped" CTV was consistently applied in cases of preoperative circumferential epidural extension, regardless of extent of residual epidural extension. Otherwise more conformal anatomic-based CTVs were determined and described. Spinal instrumentation was consistently excluded from the CTV. CONCLUSIONS We provide consensus contouring guidelines for common scenarios in postoperative SBRT for spinal metastases. These consensus guidelines are subject to clinical validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Scott Robertson
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Samuel Ryu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Todd McNutt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amol Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Norris Cancer Center and Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Spine Metastases: A Critical Review to Guide Practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:1414-1428. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2015] [Revised: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|