Management of Incidental Dural Tear During Lumbar Spine Surgery. To Suture or Not to Suture?

Sacral fracture associated with a Tarlov cyst causing an anterior sacral CSF fistula and intraventricular fat emboli - a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Sacral fractures are rare and either associated with high-energy trauma or osteoporosis in most cases. A search of the current literature on sacral fractures and cerebrospinal fluid fistula identified only few cases. Pathological fractures are uncommon and exceedingly rare in case of Tarlov cysts. Sacral fractures can be missed in oligosymptomatic patients. However, severe complications may emerge as shown by this case report.

METHODS

We present the case of a pathological sacral fracture at the level S2/3 following a low-impact trauma, associated with a Tarlov cyst, which was complicated by an anterior CSF fistula and intraventricular fat emboli.

RESULTS

The patient was treated conservatively with strict bedrest and a CT-guided blood patch. Postponed mobilization was successful with decreasing orthostatic symptoms. Follow-up MRI and CT imaging showed a complete resolution of the ventral CSF fistula and ossification of the fracture. The intraventricular fat did not resolve, however, there was no radiological sign of hydrocephalus with excellent clinical outcome at 6-months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although exceedingly rare, sacral Tarlov cysts may be associated with pathological fractures of the sacrum. Relevant complications can emerge and need to be properly addressed.

Comparison of dural closure methods for dural repair to reduce the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage

PURPOSE

Cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL) is a common complication during spinal surgery. This study aimed to compare dural closure with different suture types, sizes, and techniques, and adhesives to reduce the occurrence of CSFL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a pig spine model, the PDS II 4-0, 5-0, 6-0, Vicryl 4-0, 5-0, 6-0, and Prolene 4-0, 5-0, 6-0 sutures were compared by calculating the permeability after suturing. Spraying bioprotein glue was also tried. Next, 120 patients who underwent surgery for intraspinal subdural tumors were enrolled and received 5-0 PDSII, Vicryl, or Prolene for dura repair.

RESULTS

In the animal model study, Vicryl 5-0 showed a reduced leakage flow rate compared with 5-0 Prolene and 5-0 PDS II. In the clinical study, postoperative drainage in the Vicryl group was smaller than that in the other groups during the first 3 days after surgery (p < 0.05). Drainage volume of patients with postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in the Vicryl group was smaller than that in the other groups during the first 3 days after surgery (p < 0.05). There were 12 patients (23.1%, 12/52) in the Vicryl group, 20 patients (55.6%, 20/36) in the PDS group, and 16 patients (50.0%, 16/32) in the Prolene group who had CSFL.The incidence of CSFL was significantly reduced in Vicryl group compared with the other groups(P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

5-0 Vicryl sutures significantly reduced the dural leakage flow rate in an animal spine model. Fibrin glue can reinforce dural repair after surgery. 5-0 Vicryl was associated with a lower occurrence of CSFL in patients.

Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature

STUDY DESIGN

: Retrospective Chart Review.

OBJECTIVES

Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed.

RESULTS

We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Management of Incidental Durotomies During Open Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Incidental durotomy is a common intraoperative complication of lumbar spine surgery. Intra and postoperative protocols in the management of this common complication vary considerably, with no consensus in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review (1) lumbar dural repair techniques for open degenerative procedures; (2) review described postoperative protocols after lumbar dural repairs.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed for all articles published from inception until September 2022 using Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases to identify articles assessing the management of durotomy in open surgery for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Two independent reviewers assessed the articles for inclusion criteria, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Outcomes included persistent leaks, return to the operating room, recurrent symptoms, medical complications, or patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 10,227 articles were initially screened. After inclusion criteria were applied, 9 studies were included (n=1270 patients) for final review. Repair techniques included; no primary repair, suture repair in running or interrupted manner with or without adjunctive sealants, sealants alone, or patch repair with muscle, fat, epidural blood patch, or synthetic graft. Postoperative protocols included the placement of a subfascial drain with varying durations of bed rest. Notable findings included no benefit of prolonged bedrest compared with early ambulation ( P =0.4), reduced cerebrospinal fluid leakage with fat graft compared with muscle grafts ( P <0.001), and decreased rates of revision surgery in studies that used subfascial drains (1.7%-2.2% vs 4.34%-6.66%).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability in intraoperative durotomy repair techniques and postoperative protocols exists. Primary repair with fat graft augmentation seems to have the highest success rate. Postoperatively, the use of a subfascial drain with early ambulation reduces the risk of pseudomenignocele formation, medical complications, and return to the operating room. Further research should focus on prospective studies with the goal to standardize repair techniques and postoperative protocols.

Subfascial Lumbar Spine Drain Output Does Not Affect Outcomes After Incidental Durotomies in Elective Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative drains have long been regarded as a preventive measure to mitigate the risks of complications such as neurological impairment by reducing fluid accumulation following spine surgery. Our study aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge by examining the effects of postoperative drain output on the 90-day postoperative outcomes for patients who experienced an incidental durotomy after lumbar decompression procedures, with or without fusion.

METHODS

All patients aged ≥18 years with an incidental durotomy from spinal decompression with or without fusion surgery between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. The patient demographics, surgical characteristics, method of dural tear repair (DuraSeal, suture, and/or DuraGen), surgical outcomes, and drain data were collected via medical record review. Patients were grouped by readmission status and final 8-hour drain output. Those with a final 8-hour drain output of ≥40 mL were included in the high drain output (HDO) group and those with <40 mL were in the low drain output (LDO) group.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative patient demographics, surgical characteristics, method of dural tear repair, length of stay (HDO, 4.02 ± 1.90 days; vs. LDO, 4.26 ± 2.10 days; P = 0.269), hospital readmissions (HDO, 10.6%; vs. LDO, 7.96%; P = 0.744), or occurrence of reoperation during readmission (HDO, 6.06%; vs. LDO, 2.65%; P = 0.5944) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing primary lumbar decompression with or without fusion and experiencing an incidental durotomy, no significant association was found between the drain output and 90-day patient outcomes. Adequate fascial closure and the absence of symptoms may be satisfactory criteria for standard patient discharge regardless of drain output.

The safety and effectiveness of lumbar drainage for cerebrospinal fluid leakage after spinal surgery

PURPOSE

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a frequent complication after spinal surgery. The lumbar drainage procedure (LDP) is the preferred method for early closure of a dural tear. This study was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of LDP after spinal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 122 patients (55 male and 67 female) who underwent LDP after spinal surgery between January 2010 and June 2021. LDP was performed on patients with suspected CSF leakage due to a dural tear during spinal surgery or in whom mixed-color CSF was observed in the hemo-drain after surgery. LDP was performed aseptically by a resident according to our institution's protocol, and the amount drained was from 200cc to 300cc per day. Absolute bed rest was maintained during the lumbar drainage period. The hemo-drain was opened to confirm that CSF was no longer mixed or oozing, at which time the lumbar drain was removed. Culture was performed at the drain tip when the lumbar drain was removed.

RESULTS

The spinal surgery level was cervical in 23 patients, thoracic in 27 patients, and lumbar in 72 patients. The mean duration of the indwelling lumbar drain was 7.2 days (2 days-18 days), and the mean amount of drainage was 1198.2cc (100cc-2542cc). Among the 122 patients, the CSF leakage in 101 patients was resolved with the initial procedure, but 21 patients required re-insertion. Of those 21 patients, improper insertion due to a technical problem occurred in 15 patients, poor line fixation occurred in 2 patients, and CSF leakage was again observed after removal of the lumbar drain in 4 patients. In only 1 case was open surgery done after LDP because follow-up magnetic resonance imaging showed a suspected infection. During lumbar drainage, 76 patients used antibiotics, and 46 patients did not. Four patients showed bacterial growth in the tip culture, and 3 of them had been using antibiotics. All 4 of those patients were treated without complications and discharged. Among the 122 patients, 1 patient was discharged with left hemiparesis due to cerebral venous infarction (CVI) and hemorrhage after LDP, and 1 patient underwent re-operation because the CSF collection was not resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

No major complications such as systemic infection, deep vein thrombosis, or aspiration pneumonia occurred during the lumbar drainage, except for 1 patient (0.8%) with CVI caused by over-drainage. One patient (0.8%) required open surgery after LDP, but no cases of systemic infection occurred while maintaining lumbar drainage, irrespective of antibiotic use. In conclusion, LDP is a safe and effective treatment for CSF leakage after spinal surgery.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Incidental Durotomy during Lumbar Spine Decompression with or without Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for incidental durotomies during lumbar decompression surgeries. In addition, we aimed to determine the changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) based on incidental durotomy status.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

There is limited literature investigating the affect of incidental durotomy on patient reported outcome measures. While the majority of research does not suggest differences in complications, readmission, or revision rates, many studies rely on public databases, and their sensitivity and specificity for identifying incidental durotomies is unknown.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lumbar decompression with or without fusion at a single tertiary care center were grouped based on the presence of a durotomy. Multivariate analysis was performed for length of stay (LOS), hospital readmissions, and changes in PROMs. To identify surgical risk factors for durotomy, 3:1 propensity matching was performed using stepwise logistic regression. The sensitivity and specificity of the International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes (G96.11 and G97.41) were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 3,684 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar decompressions, 533 (14.5%) had durotomies, and a complete set of PROMs (preoperative and 1-year postoperative) were available for 737 patients (20.0%). Incidental durotomy was an independent predictor of increased LOS but not hospital readmission or worse PROMs. The durotomy repair method was not associated with hospital readmission or LOS. However, repair with collagen graft and suture predicted reduced improvement in Visual Analog Scale back (β =2.56, p=0.004). Independent risk factors for incidental durotomies included revisions (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; p<0.001), levels decompressed (OR, 1.11; p=0.005), and preoperative diagnosis of spondylolisthesis or thoracolumbar kyphosis. The sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 codes were 5.4% and 99.9%, respectively, for identifying durotomies.

CONCLUSIONS

The durotomy rate for lumbar decompressions was 14.5%. No differences in outcomes were detected except for increased LOS. Database studies relying on ICD codes should be interpreted with caution due to the limited sensitivity in identifying incidental durotomies.

Dural injury following elective spine surgery - A prospective analysis of risk factors, management and complications

Incidental dural tears being a familiar complication in spine surgery could result in dreaded postoperative outcomes. Though the literature pertaining to their incidence and management is vast, it is limited by the retrospective study designs and smaller case series. Hence, we performed a prospective study in our institute to determine the incidence, surgical risk factors, complications and surgical outcomes in patients with unintended durotomy during spine surgery over a period of one year. The overall incidence in our study was 2.3% (44/1912). Revision spine surgeries in particular had a higher incidence of 16.6%. The average age of the study population was 51.6 years. The most common intraoperative surgical step associated with dural tear was removal of the lamina, and 50% of the injuries were during usage of kerrison rongeur. The most common location of the tear was paramedian location (20 patients) and the most common size of the tear was about 1 mm-5mm (31 patients). We observed that the dural repair techniques, placement of drain and prolonged post-operative bed rest didnot significantly affect the post-operative outcomes. One patient in our study developed persistent CSF leak, which was treated by subarachnoid lumbar drain placement. No patients developed pseudomeningocele or post-operative neurological worsening or re-exploration for dural repair. Wound complications were noted in 4 patients and treated by debridement and antibiotics. Based on our study, we have proposed a treatment algorithm for the management of dural tears in spine surgery.

Clinical management of dural defects: A review

Dural defects are common in spinal and cranial neurosurgery. A series of complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, occur after rupture of the dura. Therefore, treatment strategies are necessary to reduce or avoid complications. This review comprehensively summarizes the common causes, risk factors, clinical complications, and repair methods of dural defects. The latest research progress on dural repair methods and materials is summarized, including direct sutures, grafts, biomaterials, non-biomaterial materials, and composites formed by different materials. The characteristics and efficacy of these dural substitutes are reviewed, and these materials and methods are systematically evaluated. Finally, the best methods for dural repair and the challenges and future prospects of new dural repair materials are discussed.

Complications after early versus late mobilization after an incidental durotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An incidental durotomy (IDT) is a frequent complication of spinal surgery. The conventional management involving a period of flat bed rest is highly debatable. Indeed, there are scanty data and no consensus regarding the need or ideal duration of post-operative bed rest following IDT.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the literature regarding the outcomes of mobilization within 24 h and after 24 h following IDT in open lumbar or thoracic surgery with respect to the length of hospital stay, minor and major complications.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane and dating up until September 2022 was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed using a modified version of Sackett's Criteria of Evidence Support.

RESULTS

Out of 532 articles, 6 studies met the inclusion criteria (1 Level-I, 4 level-III and 1 Level-IV evidence) and were analyzed. Overall, 398 patients of mean age 59.9 years were mobilized within 24 h. The average length of stay (LOS) for this group was 5.7 days. Thirty-four patients (8.5%) required reoperation while the rate of minor complications was 25.4%. Additionally, 265 patients of mean age 63 years with IDT were mobilized after 24 h. The average LOS was 7.8 days. Twenty patients (7.54%) required reoperation while the rate of minor complications was 55%. Meta-analysis comparing early to late mobilization, showed a significant reduction in the risk of minor complications and shorter overall LOS due to early mobilization, but no significant difference in major complications and reoperation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Although early mobilization after repaired incidental dural tears in open lumbar and thoracic spinal surgery has a similar major complication/ reoperation rates compared to late mobilization, it significantly decreases the risk of minor complications and length of hospitalization.

A comparison between different suture techniques in lumbar spine surgery

As a result of solicited muscles, strong friction, and tensile force on cutaneous tissue, the difference in closure procedure and management strategies and complications of surgical incision healing is a real challenge in lumbar spine surgery. We performed a retrospective study to compare different types of wound closure in lumbar spine surgery. 4383 patients were included in this study. Wound dehiscence was more common in the intracutaneous suture group than in the far- near-near-far suture group. Delayed wound healing occurred more in the far-near near-far suture group than intracutaneous suture group. Also, the far-near near-far interrupted point suture group showed a higher ratio of delayed wound healing compared with crossover suture. The superficial wound infection rate was roughly the same in all types of sutures with an average value of 0.79% with 0.81% SD. This is a preliminary study to compare different types of operative wounds showing the pros and cons related to each option.

Can Cervical and Lumbar Epidural Blood Patches Help Avoid Revision Surgery for Symptomatic Postoperative Dural Tears?

BACKGROUND

Incidental durotomies resulting in symptomatic postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks can be treated with bedrest, subarachnoid lumbar drain, and surgical re-exploration. Another option is an epidural blood patch, which forms a clot over the dural tear in a minimally invasive manner. Our objective was to describe our center's outcomes and complications following epidural blood patches for symptomatic postoperative durotomies.

METHODS

Patients undergoing spine surgeries at one institution from 2012-2020 were included. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, surgical data, rate of dural tear, type of repair, and use of blood patches postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 1392 patients (726 male, 666 female, average age: 56.3 ± 15.4 years), including 436 cervical and 956 posterior thoracolumbar/lumbar spine surgeries were screened. There were 6 (1.4%) cervical, 64 (6.7%) lumbar, and a total of 70 (5.0%) patients with incidental dural tears/blebs. Of these patients, we identified 2 cervical and 8 lumbar spine patients with persistent CSF leaks who received epidural blood patches postoperatively. Nine of 10 (90%) had resolution of symptoms. One lumbar patient failed both an initial blood patch and subsequent surgical re-exploration, but had successful relief after a second blood patch.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of dural tears/blebs was 1.4% in cervical, 6.7% in lumbar, and 5.0% in all spine surgeries. Of the 10 patients with symptomatic CSF leaks, 9 were successfully treated with blood patches. Targeted epidural blood patch is effective in treating symptomatic CSF leaks and minimizes the morbidity of surgical re-exploration.

Open epidural blood patch to augment durotomy repair in lumbar spine surgery: surgical technique and cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Incidental durotomy during elective spine surgery is relatively common. While usually benign and self-limited, it can be associated with morbidity, increased cost, and medicolegal ramifications. Dural repair typically involves performing a primary closure using a suture or dural staple; repairs are then frequently augmented with a sealant, patch, or fat/fascial graft. Although primary repair of an incidental durotomy is standard practice, the ideal secondary sealant or augment choice remains unclear. A wide variety of commercially available dural sealant options exist, and while none have demonstrated consistent superiority, all are associated with single-use costs in the hundreds to thousands of dollars and have concerns regarding swelling, local inflammation, or short-lived dural adherence.

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to compare the results of dural repair augmentation using an open intraoperative epidural blood patch to a hydrogel technique.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective comparative cohort study at an academic referral center PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery from March 2017 to January 2021 who sustained an incidental durotomy. Patients undergoing surgery for infection were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was failure of the repair as determined by a return to the operating room for re-exploration of a persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak within 30 days of the index procedure. A secondary outcome was the incidence of a postoperative positional headache, and if present, the method used to obtain resolution. The primary predictor was use of a suture and hydrogel technique ("hydrogel" group), or the use of an epidural blood patch ("EBP" group).

METHODS

The method for applying an open epidural blood patch is presented in detail and involves primarily repairing the durotomy followed by allowing whole blood to pool and clot in the operative field until the durotomy is completely covered. This was compared with a group of patients undergoing secondary augmentation with commercially available hydrogel. In both groups, mechanical resistance to CSF leakage was confirmed with direct visualization and a Valsalva maneuver, respectively. Patients were instructed to remain flat until the morning after surgery. Chart review was used for data abstraction on preoperative, demographic, perioperative, and postoperative clinical factors. To compare between the hydrogel and EBP group, Wilcoxon rank-sum testing was used to test for non-parametric comparisons of means, and chi-square testing between binomial data.

RESULTS

Of 732 patients during the study period, forty-eight patients met study criteria. Twenty-five patients were in the hydrogel group and 23 in the EBP group. Mean age was 69.3 years (standard error 1.3 years). Patients were predominantly female (n = 31, 64.6%) with a mean BMI of 29.5 (SE 0.8), with no significant baseline differences between the hydrogel and EBP groups. Two patients in the hydrogel group (8.0%) and two in the EBP group (8.7%) had mild positional headaches postoperatively that resolved without intervention within 24 hours. One (4.3%) patient in the EBP group had positional headaches following an initial headache-free period; this patient was returned to the operating room and no evidence of a persistent CSF leak was found despite meticulous exploration.

CONCLUSIONS

An open, intraoperatively placed epidural blood patch may be an efficacious and cost-effective way to manage an incidental durotomy. This method merits further study as an allergy-free, no swell, cost-neutral method of dural repair augmentation.

Incidence of Dural Tears in Open versus Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Single-Center Prospective Study

Study Design

A prospective comparative study.

Purpose

To compare the incidence of unintended durotomy and return to work after open surgery versus minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) for degenerative lumbar pathologies.

Overview of Literature

The incidence of accidental durotomy varies between 0.3% and 35%. Most of these are from open surgeries, and only a handful of studies have involved the MIS approach. No single-center studies have compared open surgery with MIS, especially in the context of early return to work and dural tear (DT).

Methods

This study included 420 operated cases of degenerative lumbar pathology with a prospective follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients were divided into the open surgery and MIS groups, and the incidences of DT, early return to work, and various demographic and operative factors were compared.

Results

A total of 156 and 264 patients underwent MIS and open surgery, respectively. Incidental durotomy was documented in 52 cases (12.4%); this was significantly less in the MIS group versus the open surgery group (6.4% vs. 15.9%, p<0.05). In the open surgery group, four patients underwent revision for persistent dural leak or pseudomeningocele, but none of the cases in the MIS group had revision surgery due to DT-related complications. The incidence of DT was higher among patients with high body mass index, patients with diabetes mellitus, and patients who underwent revision surgery (p<0.05) regardless of the approach. The MIS group returned to work significantly earlier.

Conclusions

MIS was associated with a significantly lower incidence of DT and earlier return to work compared with open surgery among patients with degenerative lumbar pathology.

Posterior and postero-lateral incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery: primary repair versus augmented primary repair

Background

Incidental durotomy (ID) during lumbar spine surgery is a frequent complication of lumbar spine surgical procedures. Many surgical techniques were described in literature for repair of durotomy, however it is a matter of debate if one technique is a gold standard method of repair. Our study described two groups with posterior and postero-lateral ID that occurred during lumbar spine surgery: group A with 34 cases with a mean age of 49.85 years repaired by primary water tight closure using prolene or silk sutures, and group B with 34 cases with a mean age of 47.18 years treated with augmented primary repair (sutures augmented with a graft from lumbar fascia and tissue sealant "Fibrin glue"). Patients were evaluated for risk factors for durotomy, post-operative clinical outcome, and need for revision surgery.

Results

Eleven cases of group A and nine cases of group B had previous spine surgery. The dural tear was < 2 cm in 41.7% of group A and 83.3% of group B. Better outcome was achieved in 32 patients of group A and 30 patients of group B. Among our study cases 2 patients from group A and 4 patients from group B needed revision surgery due to CSF leak which failed to stop with conservative management and percutaneous blood patch.

Conclusions

Dural closure technique after ID does not seem to influence revision surgery rates due to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and its complications. Durotomies that were immediately recognized and treated did not lead to any significant consequences.

Nerve root herniation with entrapment in the facet joint gap after lumbar decompression surgery: a case presentation

Background

An incidental dural tear is a well-known complication during spine surgery. A rare consequence is a postoperative nerve root herniation. The purpose of this report is to describe a case of such a herniation with entrapment in the facet gap joint and to present the first MR images of this rare surgical complication.

Case presentation

We report a case of a patient who underwent lumbar decompression surgery and afterwards suffered a sudden intractable sciatica. Postoperative MRI showed a new facet joint gap effusion. During revision surgery an entrapped nerve root was found in the facet joint gap. In retrospective, the herniated nerve root is visible on postoperative MRI.

Conclusion

This case report highlights a rare complication during spine surgery. This finding is important as signs suggestive for nerve root herniation can easily be overlooked on MRI. Furthermore, this represents the first MRI documentation of this complication.

Comparison of Transthecal Approach With Traditional Conservative Approach for Primary Closure After Incidental Durotomy in Anterior Lumbar Tear

BACKGROUND

Incidental durotomies (IDs) are frequent complications of spinal surgeries which are mostly posterior or lateral. Anterior IDs are rare; however, they may lead to severe complications. We compared the transthecal approach with the conservative approach for primary closure after durotomy in anterior lumbar dural tear to assess the efficacy of these approaches to decrease postsurgical complications and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 21 patients undergoing L2-S1 laminectomy with anterior ID were randomly divided into a transthecal group (n = 9) and a conservative group (n = 12) based on the surgical dural closure technique. Postoperative pseudomeningocele, wound infection, rootlet herniation, pneumocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, headache, meningitis, in addition to surgery duration and length of hospitalization were examined and compared in both groups.

RESULTS

The frequency of pseudomeningocele and CSF leakage in patients undergoing the transthecal approach was significantly lower than those undergoing the conservative approach (P = .045 and .008, respectively). Furthermore, although the differences in the frequency of meningitis, pneumocephalus, headache, and wound infection were not statistically significant between the 2 groups, the effect sizes of the comparison were obtained as 49.4, 19.8, 7.1, and 2.6, respectively. This indicated that the differences were clinically significant between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the transthecal approach was significantly more successful in managing CSF leakage as well as its complications and clinical outcomes. However, further clinical trials with bigger sample sizes are needed to substantiate this claim.

Clinical Outcomes of Incidental Dural Tears During Lumbar Microdiscectomy

Background: A dural tear (DT) is the most commonly encountered complication during lumbar spine surgery. The incidence of DT increases depending on the complexity of the surgical procedure and the presence of a DT is related to a poor outcome and patient satisfaction.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the incidence and clinical outcomes of DTs in those patients who undergo lumbar disc surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the management of a primary single-level lumbar disc herniation at a single institution between 2004 and 2014. Among the studied population, those with DTs were included in the study group. An age- and sex-matched group of randomly selected patients who underwent the same level and type of lumbar spine surgery, but did not develop DTs, were assigned as the control group. The outcomes were compared at 12 months postoperatively between the groups.

Results: A total of 5,476 consecutive patients (2,608 female, 2,868 male; mean age, 54 ± 11.45 [range, 21-86] years) underwent surgery for primary single-level lumbar disc herniation. DT was noted in 192 (2.85%) cases. Of these, 102 patients with complete data were included in the DT group. The DT group had a significantly increased length of hospital stay (p = 0.001). Also, the duration of bed rest in the hospital was significantly higher in patients wherein DT was repaired using hemostatic material and fibrin glue, compared to the patients with primary closure with suturing of the tear.

Conclusion: Incidental DTs, if recognized and treated appropriately, will not lead to poor clinical results and do not adversely impact postoperative outcomes.

Incidental Durotomy in Lumbar Spine Surgery; Risk Factors, Complications, and Perioperative Management

Incidental durotomy (ID) can occur in up to 14% of all lumbar spine surgeries. The risk of this complication is markedly higher among elderly patients with advanced spinal pathology. In addition, revision cases and other more invasive procedures increase the risk of ID. When unrepaired, IDs can increase the risk of developing meningitis and can lead to the formation of cerebrospinal fluid fistulas and pseudomeningoceles. Intraoperative recognition and repair are essential to ID management, although repair techniques vary considerably. Although primary suture repair is considered the "benchmark," indirect repair alone has shown comparable outcomes. Given the concern for infection after ID, many have indicated for prolonged prophylactic antibiotic regimens. However, there is little clinical evidence that this is necessary after adequate repair. The addition of subfascial drains have been shown to promote wound healing and early ambulation, whereas no consensus on duration of indwelling drains exists and such management is largely case dependent. Early ambulation after surgery has not shown to be associated with increased risk of further ID complications and decreases rehabilitation time, length of stay, and risk of venous thromboembolism. However, there remains a role for conservation mobilization protocols in more severe cases where notable symptoms are observed.

Effectiveness of Repair Techniques for Spinal Dural Tears: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Incidental or intentional durotomy in spine surgery is associated with a risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and reoperation. Several strategies have been introduced, but the incomplete closure is still relatively frequent and troublesome. In this study, we review current evidence on spinal dural repair strategies and evaluate their efficacy.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were used to search primary studies about the repair of the spinal dura with different techniques. Of 265 articles found, 11 studies, which specified repair techniques and postoperative outcomes, were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The primary outcomes were CSF leakage and postoperative infection.

RESULTS

The outcomes of different dural repair techniques were available in 776 cases. Pooled analysis of 11 studies demonstrated that the most commonly used technique was a combination of primary closure, patch or graft, and sealant (22.7%, 176/776). A combination of primary closure and patch or graft resulted in the lowest rate of CSF leakage (5.5%, 7/128). In this study, sealants as an adjunct to primary closure (13.7%, 18/131) did not significantly reduce the rate of CSF leakage compared with primary closure alone (17.6%, 18/102). The rates of infection and postoperative neurologic deficit were similar regardless of the repair techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of sealants has become prevalent, available sealants as an adjunct to primary closure did not reduce the rate of CSF leakage compared with primary closure. The combination of primary closure and patches or grafts could be effective in decreasing postoperative CSF leakage.

MRI-based diagnosis and treatment of pediatric brain tumors: is tissue sample always needed?

Traditional management of newly diagnosed pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) consists of cranial imaging, typically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and is frequently followed by tissue diagnosis, through either surgical biopsy or tumor resection. Therapy regimes are typically dependent on histological diagnosis. To date, many treatment regimens are based on molecular biology. The scope of this article is to discuss the role of diagnosis and further treatment of PBTs based solely on MRI features, in light of the latest treatment protocols. Typical MRI findings and indications for surgical biopsy of these lesions are described.

Sub-decapitation in suicidal chainsaw injury: report of a rare case and operative management

Chainsaw accidents are severe injuries, mostly work-related and concerning upper or lower extremities. Few suicidal chainsaw injuries are reported, all of them fatal. We report the case of a 23-year-old man who attempted suicide by sub-decapitation with a chainsaw, its successful (peri-) operative management, and clinical course along with a discussion of the contemporary management and body of evidence of such lesions. Chainsaw injuries are severe traumas. Stepwise surgery with maximal functional reconstruction is safe and optimal clinical outcome can be achieved.

Pedicled Multifidus Muscle Flap To Treat Inaccessible Dural Tear In Spine Surgery: Technical Note And Preliminary Experience

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usefulness, feasibility, and limitations of pedicled multifidus muscle flaps (PMMFs) for the treatment of inaccessible dural tears during spine surgery.

METHODS

The technique of PMMF harvesting was investigated together with relevant anatomy. We prospectively evaluated 8 patients treated with the PMMF technique between January 2017 and December 2019. Results were compared with a retrospective series of 9 patients treated with a standard technique between January 2014 and December 2016. Inclusion criteria were inaccessible dural tear or dural tear judged not amenable to direct repair because of tissue loosening. Exclusion criteria were surgical treatment of intradural disease. Clinical and demographic data of all patients were collected. Clinical evaluations were performed according to American Spinal Injury Association criteria and Oswestry Disability Index. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography was performed in all patients. The primary end point was wound healing (cerebrospinal fluid leakage, infection, and fluid collection); secondary end points were neurologic outcome and complications.

RESULTS

Control group: 1 death as a result of wound infection secondary to cerebrospinal fluid fistula and 2 patients needed lumbar subarachnoid drain; neurologic outcome: 3 patients improved and 6 were unchanged. Flap group: no wound-related complications were observed; neurologic outcome: 3 patients improved and 5 were unchanged. No flap-related complications were described. Flap harvesting was feasible in all cases, with an average 20 minutes adjunctive surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

The PMMF technique was feasible and safe; in this preliminary experience, its use is associated with lower complications as a result of dural tears but larger series are needed to confirm its effectiveness.

A Narrative Review of Development of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery

In the first phase of development of lumbar endoscopic spine surgery, the focus was on removal of soft disc material through the working corridor of Kambin’s triangle using transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. With the introduction of the interlaminar approach and increased interest from both industry and surgeons, there has been an exponential development of endoscopic surgical equipment and a corresponding expansion of endoscopic techniques. Endoscopic treatment strategies are applied to conditions ranging from contained prolapsed intervertebral discs to noncontained migrated herniated discs, hard calcified discs, spinal stenosis in the central or lateral recess and the foraminal and extraforaminal region, and other combinations of degenerative conditions requiring decompression or fusion surgery. The further expansion of endoscopic surgical management involving complicated spinal cases and the final quartet of trauma, infections, tumors, and possibly deformities could be the future stage of endoscopic spine surgery development. This article covers the full range of current treatment strategies and presents possible future developments of endoscopic spine surgery for the management of lumbar spinal conditions.

Development of cerebrospinal fluid fistula after incidental durotomy in spinal decompression surgery

BACKGROUND

Incidental durotomy (ID) during spinal surgery is a risk factor for the development of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula. The rates of ID with or without consecutive CSF fistula vary according to the extent of the surgical procedure. Revision surgery has the highest rates of dural tears. However, not every case of ID leads to CSF fistula requiring revision surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the predictors for the development of CSF fistula after ID.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 6024 consecutive patients who had been surgically treated for degenerative spinal disease at our clinic over the past 15 years. Patients who had undergone surgical revision for CSF fistula were assigned to the CSF fistula group. A matched 3:1 control group (ID group) was formed of patients with ID but without CSF fistula. Charts, surgical reports, and radiographic data were reviewed and statistically analyzed for demographics, duration of symptoms, co-morbidities, surgical strategy, and pre- and postoperative neurological performance.

RESULTS

The 15-year incidence of CSF fistula in the overall population was 0.36% (n=22). The following locations were affected: n=18 lumbar (81.8%), n=2 cervical (9.1%), and n=2 thoracic (9.1%). The extent of ID was similar in both groups. The two groups did not significantly differ with regard to the intraoperative management of dural repair with primary suturing (p=0.345), dural patches, sealant, or collagen matrix (p=0.228; p=0.081; p=0.081). In the postoperative period, bed rest in supine position for 48 hours (p=0.037) and laxative therapy (p=0.034) were the most beneficial treatment modalities for preventing CSF fistula. Patients with CSF fistula were hospitalized significantly longer (21 days vs. 10 days in the control group; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This large test group showed a low incidence of postoperative CSF fistula after intraoperative ID. Bed rest and laxative treatment were important approaches to preventing CSF fistula.

No benefit of early versus late ambulation after incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Incidental durotomy (ID) is a complication occurring in 4-17% of decompressive spinal surgeries. Persisting CSF leakage can occur even after ID repair and requires revision surgery. Prolonged flat bed rest (BR) to reduce the incidence of persisting CSF leakage is frequently applied but highly debated. A randomized controlled trial comparing prolonged BR versus early ambulation after ID repair is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of revision surgery as a result of persistent cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) leakage and medical complications after immediate or late post-operative ambulation following ID during decompressive spinal surgery.

METHODS

Ninety-four of 1429 consecutive cases undergoing lumbar spine surgery (6.58%) were complicated by an ID. Sixty patients (mean age of 64 ± 13.28 years) were randomized to either early post-operative ambulation (EA, n = 30) or flat BR for 48 h (BR, n = 30). The incidence of CSF leakage resulting in revision surgery, medical complications and duration of hospitalization were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Two patients in the BR group and two patients in the EA group underwent revision surgery as a result of persisting CSF leakage. Four patients in the BR group experienced medical complications associated with prolonged immobilization. The duration of hospitalization was 7.25 ± 3.0 days in the BR group versus 6.56 ± 2.64 days in the EA group, p = 0.413.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate no benefit of prolonged BR after an adequately repaired ID in lumbar spine surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1b (individual randomized controlled trial). These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Prognostic impact of intra- and postoperative management of dural tear on postoperative complications in primary degenerative lumbar diseases

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for complications associated with dural tear (DT), including the types of DT, and the intra- and postoperative management of DT.

Patients and Methods

Between 2012 and 2017, 12 171 patients with degenerative lumbar diseases underwent primary lumbar spine surgery. We investigated five categories of potential predictors: patient factors (sex, age, body mass index, and primary disease), surgical factors (surgical procedures, operative time, and estimated blood loss), types of DT (inaccessible for suturing/clipping and the presence of cauda equina/nerve root herniation), repair techniques (suturing, clipping, fibrin glue, polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel, and polyglycolic acid sheet), and postoperative management (drainage duration). Postoperative complications were evaluated in terms of dural leak, prolonged bed rest, headache, nausea/vomiting, delayed wound healing, postoperative neurological deficit, surgical site infection (SSI), and reoperation for DT. We performed multivariable regression analyses to evaluate the predictors of postoperative complications associated with DT.

Results

In total, 429/12 171 patients (3.5%) had a DT. Multivariable analysis revealed that PEG hydrogel significantly reduced the incidence of dural leak and prolonged bed rest, and that patients treated with sealants (fibrin glue and PEG hydrogel) significantly less frequently suffered from headache. A longer drainage duration significantly increased the incidence of headache, nausea/vomiting, and delayed wound healing. Headache and nausea/vomiting were significantly more prevalent in younger female patients. Postoperative neurological deficit and reoperation for DT significantly depended on the presence of cauda equina/nerve root herniation. A longer operative time was the sole independent risk factor for SSI and was also a risk factor for dural leak, prolonged bed rest, and nausea/vomiting.

Conclusion

Sealants, particularly PEG hydrogel, may be useful in reducing symptoms related to cerebrospinal fluid leakage, whereas prolonged drainage may be unnecessary. Younger female patients should be carefully treated when DT occurs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1115–1121.

Influence of incidental dural tears and their primary microendoscopic repairs on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing microendoscopic lumbar surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Dural tear represents a common complication of microendoscopic spine surgery that may lead to postoperative sequelae including insufficient decompression, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, intracranial hypotension, and subdural/intraparenchymal bleeding. The gold standard to manage intraoperative dural tears is primary repair. However, the downside of conversion to open surgery can be detrimental. Therefore, understanding the most appropriate strategy for microendoscopic dural repair and its impact on postoperative outcomes is of importance.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of dural tears in patients undergoing microendoscopic lumbar surgery and to elucidate their influence on surgical outcomes whenever proper repair is accomplished microendoscopically without conversion to open surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective multicenter cohort study of prospectively enrolled patients using a propensity-matched analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 922 consecutive patients underwent microendoscopic surgery of the lumbar spine between February and December 2012 in the three institutions belonging to our study group.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included the Numeric Rating Scale for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Short Form-36, and a patients' satisfaction scale.

METHODS

All incidental dural tears were repaired by microendoscopic suture of the dura mater from inside to outside using double-arm needles and/or by fibrin glue coverage without being converted to open surgery. Surgical outcomes were compared between patients with and without dural tears using a propensity-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation was performed on 474 patients, whereas microendoscopic laminectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar canal stenosis were performed on 271 and 177 patients, respectively. Dural tears occurred in 49 (5.3%) patients. Of these, 23 (2.5%) patients required suture repair, whereas the rest received a fibrin patch for a pinhole tear, all of which were successfully performed under microendoscopy. Six hundred (65.1%) patients responded pre- and postoperatively to the questionnaire. Of them, the responses of 38 patients with dural tears were compared with those of 38 matched patients. No significant differences in any outcome measures were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, all dural tears in our cases were managed without conversion to open surgery and did not influence surgical outcomes.

Safe Discharge of Patients From an Ambulatory Care Center After Incidental Durotomy During Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Background

Incidental durotomy is a well-known complication of spinal surgery that may occur occasionally. Increasingly, minimally invasive techniques are being used for spinal decompressions in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) setting. The management of this complication in an ASC setting has not been reported.

Methods

A total of 832 consecutive minimally invasive decompressive spinal surgeries were performed by a single surgeon in an ASC during the course of 1 year. Incidental durotomies with cerebrospinal fluid leakage were repaired and patients were discharged to home. Patients with a watertight suture dural repair did not receive any modifications to the usual discharge activities allowed. All other patients were treated with bed rest overnight and head of bed restrictions. A protocol for close patient follow-up after discharge was followed. The complications were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.

Results

There were 30 incidental durotomies (3.6%), with all occurring in the lumbar spine. Suture repair was accomplished in 28 patients (93%). Patch repair was performed in 2 patients (7%). All patients were discharged to home from the ASC. There were 2 short-term complications noted after discharge. The patient safety protocols in place identified the complications and allowed timely interventions.

Conclusions

Incidental durotomy occurring during minimally invasive spinal decompressive surgery is an occasional event. Suture repair of the laceration is feasible in most instances. Lumbar spine patients may be safely discharged to home from the ASC. Patients can be stratified into those with, or without, a watertight suture dural closure. Those with such a closure, who are without symptoms of intracranial hypotension, do not require modification of their activities. A short period of bedrest with head of bed modification successfully treated the remainder. Hospitalization or routine prolonged bed rest is not necessary. Protocols must be put in place to identify and timely manage potentially serious sequelae.

Results of TachoSil® associated with fibrin glue as dural sealant in a series of patients with spinal intradural tumors surgery. Technical note with a review of the literature

A major problem of surgery for intradural spinal tumors (IST) is the occurrence in the post-operative period of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. To the best of our knowledge, here we report on the largest series of IST patients in whom the TachoSil® associated to fibrin glue was used as dural sealant in this kind of surgery. Moreover, we extensively reviewed the literature reporting the results of TachoSil® in spine surgery. The data of 35 consecutive surgically treated IST patients were reviewed. In all cases TachoSil® associated with fibrin glue was used as dural sealant. Mean age was 58.14 ± 15.56 years and mean follow-up (FU) was 23.20 ± 9.76 months. The Modified McCormick Scale (MMS) was used to assess the functional status of patients pre-operatively and at latest FU. All article dealing with the use of TachoSil® in spine surgery were included in the literature review. A CSF collection (treated conservatively with needle aspiration and bed rest with no consequence) was observed only in 1 out of 35 cases. No wound infection nor adverse reaction to the TachoSil® occurred during the FU. At latest FU we observed an improvement of MMS grade in 23 patients (65.71%) and a stable functional status in 12 cases (34.28%). According to our experience and the literature review using the TachoSil® after dural closure is safe and effective in IST surgery. Better standardized studies are needed to establish the usefulness of TachoSil® for incidental dural tear in degenerative spine surgery.

Spinal Dural Repair: A Canadian Questionnaire

STUDY DESIGN

Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES

Iatrogenic dural tear is a complication of spinal surgery with significant morbidity and cost to the health care system. The optimal management is unclear, and therefore we aimed to survey current practices among Canadian practitioners.

METHODS

A questionnaire was administered to members of the Canadian Neurological Surgical Society designed to explore methods of closure of iatrogenic durotomy.

RESULTS

Spinal surgeons were surveyed anonymously with a 55% response rate (n = 91). For pinhole-sized tears, there is no agreement in the methods of closure, with a trend toward sealant fixation (36.7%). Medium- and large-sized tears are predominantly closed with sutures and sealant (67% and 80%, respectively). Anterior tears are managed without primary closure (40.2%), or using sealant alone (48%). Posterior tears are treated with a combination of sutures and sealant (73.8%). Nerve root tears are treated with either sealant alone (50%), or sutures and sealant (37.8%). Tisseal is the preferred sealant (79.7%) over alternatives. With the exception of pin-hole sized tears (39.5%) most respondents recommended bed rest for at least 24 hours in the setting of medium (73.2%) and large (89.1%) dural tears.

CONCLUSIONS

This study elucidates the areas of uncertainty with regard to iatrogenic dural tear management. There is disagreement regarding management of anterior and nerve root tears, pinhole-sized tears in any location of the spine, and whether patients should be admitted to hospital or should be on bed rest following a pinhole-sized dural tear. There is a need for a robust comparative research study of dural repair strategies.

“Birdlime” technique using TachoSil tissue sealing sheet soaked with fibrin glue for sutureless vessel transposition in microvascular decompression: operative technique and nuances

OBJECTIVE

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is effective for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), hemifacial spasm (HFS), and glossopharyngeal neuralgia. The transposition technique is the standard procedure to avoid adhesions and granuloma around the decompression site but is more complex and difficult to perform than the interposition technique. The authors describe a simple and safe MVD transposition procedure they call the “birdlime” technique, which uses a tissue glue–coated collagen sponge soaked with fibrin glue, and the results of this technique.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical charts and radiographic findings of 27 consecutive patients with TN (8 patients) and HFS (19 patients) who, between January 2012 and December 2015, had undergone an MVD transposition procedure utilizing a tissue glue–coated collagen sponge (TachoSil tissue sealing sheet) soaked with fibrin glue (Tisseel 2-component fibrin sealant, vapor heated). Offending arteries among the patients with TN were the superior cerebellar artery (SCA) in 5 patients, the SCA and anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) in 2, and the AICA in 1. Those among the patients with HFS were the vertebral artery (VA) in 3 patients, the VA and AICA in 4, the VA and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) in 3, the PICA in 4, the AICA in 1, the AICA-PICA in 3, and the PICA and AICA in 1. Operations were performed according to the Jannetta procedure. The offending artery was transposed and fixed to the dura mater of the petrous bone using TachoSil pieces soaked with fibrin glue. Postoperative constructive interference in steady-state MRI was performed to evaluate the change in the position of the offending artery.

RESULTS

Transposition of the offending artery was easily and safely performed in all patients. All patients had total remission of symptoms directly after the procedure. No severe complications occurred. The postoperative course was uneventful. No recurrences, adhesions, or dysfunction of the cranial nerves was observed in any of the patients. Postoperative MRI showed that the offending vessels were displaced and fixed in the appropriate position.

CONCLUSIONS

The described transposition technique provides an easy and adjustable way to perform MVD safely and effectively. In addition, this transposition and fixation technique is simple and avoids the risk of needle injury close to the cranial nerves and vessels. This simple sutureless technique is recommended for MVD to reduce the risk of intraoperative neurovascular injury.

Anterior Lumbar Dural Tear: A Transthecal Route for Primary Closure After Iatrogenic Durotomy

BACKGROUND

Durotomies are not infrequent in spine surgery and have increased complication rates. Primary repair is the gold standard and is feasible when access is not limited by the anatomy. A patient who presented 1 week after spinal fusion with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak underwent a novel transthecal approach to repair an anterior dural tear.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility, durability, and safety of a transthecal reconstruction to repair an anterior dural tear.

METHODS

A patient with spinal stenosis at L4-L5 and a spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 underwent an L4-S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The procedure was complicated by a CSF leak during graft placement of the anterior dura. This location did not allow for a primary closure, and a fat graft was placed with fibrin glue. Nine days later, the patient developed postural headaches, and CSF was leaking from the wound. The patient underwent an exploration, and the most lateral aspect of the tear was visualized when retracting medially, although not enough for a primary repair. A posterior durotomy was made and the anterior dural tear was repaired from the inside.

RESULTS

The patient symptoms resolved and had radiologic improvement of the pseudomeningocele. This represents the first reported transthecal route to repair an anterior dural tear in the lumbar spine. The procedure was technically feasible, effective, and durable, with the patient having complete resolution of his CSF leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal transthecal access to the ventral aspect of the lumbar thecal sac for inadvertent anterior dural tears is a safe, feasible, and durable surgical management strategy.