Between the hammer and the anvil: An unusual power hammer fatality

Power hammers are mechanised forging devices that constitute a pivotal part of steel manufacturing. Power hammer-associated injuries are a rare occurrence. We report a noteworthy case of a 52-year-old man who sustained a high-energy penetrating injury while working with a power (counterblow) hammer. The man used a sizable disc-shaped metallic object to dislodge the forging wedged in the machine by applying the force of the striking ram on it. On impact, the object ejected and struck the man in the right lateral portion of the chest. The autopsy disclosed extensive damage to the thoracic and abdominal organs. The cause of death was opined to be exsanguination due to penetrating trauma of the heart and transection of the descending aorta. The investigation confirmed a breach of safety regulations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first power (counterblow) hammer-related fatality in medico-legal literature.

Management of Occupational Risk Prevention of Nanomaterials Manufactured in Construction Sites in the EU

Currently, nanotechnology plays a key role for technological innovation, including the construction sector. An exponential increase is expected in its application, although this has been hampered by the current degree of uncertainty regarding the potential effects of nanomaterials on both human health and the environment. The accidents, illnesses, and disease related to the use of nanoproducts in the construction sector are difficult to identify. For this purpose, this work analyzes in depth the products included in recognized inventories and the safety data sheets of these construction products. Based on this analysis, a review of the recommendations on the use of manufactured nanomaterials at construction sites is performed. Finally, a protocol is proposed with the aim of it serving as a tool for technicians in decision-making management at construction sites related to the use of manufactured nanomaterials. This proposed protocol should be an adaptive and flexible tool while the manufactured nanomaterials-based work continues to be considered as an "emerging risk," despite the expectation that the protocol will be useful for the development of new laws and recommendations for occupational risk prevention management.

Awareness of safety protocols for prevention of needle stick injuries in anaesthesiologists from Maharashtra: A survey study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Needle stick injury (NSI) has a serious risk of transmission of various blood borne pathogens amongst healthcare personnel and more so in anaesthesiologists. This survey assessed the prevalence of NSI and awareness of safety protocols for its prevention amongst the anaesthesiologists from Maharashtra, India.

METHODS

This self-administered survey was completed by 403 anaesthesiologists across Maharashtra from August 2019 to October 2019. The pre-validated and pretested 18-item questionnaire was administered using Google forms and the link was circulated amongst anaesthesiologists electronically. The questionnaire items included information on the awareness of safety protocols and immediate measure after NSI, knowledge of immunisation and safety practices followed in routine practice. Data were collected, tabulated and coded in Microsoft Excel. Descriptives are presented for the different items and prevalence of NSI. Comparison of prevalence of NSI in subgroups based on gender, period of experience and type of practice were analysed using Chi-square test.

RESULTS

The prevalence of NSI was 73.7% (n = 403) in anaesthesiologists with 71.1% (n = 235) in males and 77.4% (n = 168) in females. The anaesthesiologists from the medical schools had a prevalence of 75.0% (n = 148), those in private practice had a prevalence of 72.7% (n = 216), whereas those working in both medical school and private practice had a prevalence of 74.4% (n = 39). A greater prevalence was observed in those working for longer periods.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of NSI's is alarmingly high amongst anaesthesiologists and there is an immediate need of creating awareness and practice safety protocols in routine practice. Training and education are required in the formative years of healthcare curriculum.

Clinical experience of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacing devices: unrestricted patient population

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac pacing devices has become available despite previously being considered absolutely contraindicated. However, most institutional safety protocols have included several limitations on patient selection, leaving MRI unavailable for many patients.

Purpose

To evaluate the first 1000 MRI examinations conducted on patients with cardiac pacing devices at Helsinki University Hospital for any potential safety hazards and also to evaluate the long-term functionality of the safety protocol in “real-life” clinical practice.

Material and Methods

A total of 1000 clinically indicated MRI scans were performed with a 1.5-T MRI scanner according to the safety protocol. The following information was collected from the electronic medical record (EMR): patients’ date of birth; sex; pacing device generator model; date of MRI scan; date of the latest pacing device generator implantation; and the body region scanned. The EMR of these patients was checked and especially searched for any pacing device related safety hazards or adverse outcomes during or after the MRI scan.

Results

Only one potentially dangerous adverse event was noted in our study group. In addition, patients with abandoned leads, temporary pacing devices, and newly implanted pacing device generators were scanned successfully and safely.

Conclusion

MRI scans can be performed safely in patients with cardiac pacing devices if the dedicated safety protocol is followed.

[Protocols Related to Food Allergies and Intolerances in Preschools in Reykjavik, Iceland]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to explore prevalence of food allergies and intolerances among children in preschools in Reykjavik, Iceland. Also, to investigate how well preschools maintain a safe environment for children with food allergies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2014, a questionnaire designed specifically for this study, was sent to 65 preschools. Forty-nine participated (75%) representing a total of 4225 children. Prevalence of food allergy and intolerance was determined based on medical certificates from physi-cians delivered to the preschools. Descriptive statistics were used to assess whether there were protocols related to food allergy, and if there was a difference between schools based on staff's education and number of children.

RESULTS

The prevalence of documented food allergies/intolerances in children aged 2-6 years was 5%, 1% had severe allergy and 1% had multiple food allergies. Lactose intolerance was most frequent (2%), then milk allergy (2%) and egg allergy (1%). Only 41% preschools had a protocol that was activated if food with an allergen was accidentally given. Moreover, only 55% of preschools with children with severe -allergy reported all of their staff to have knowledge of symptoms related to anaphylaxis and only 64% were trained to respond to an anaphylactic shock. The education of preschool principals, kitchen employees and number of children in preschool were not related to having an active protocol at site.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of food allergy and intolerance was 5% in preschools in Reykjavik. Strategy for an active protocol related to food allergy was lacking in 59% of pre-schools.

Safe Discharge of Patients From an Ambulatory Care Center After Incidental Durotomy During Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Background

Incidental durotomy is a well-known complication of spinal surgery that may occur occasionally. Increasingly, minimally invasive techniques are being used for spinal decompressions in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) setting. The management of this complication in an ASC setting has not been reported.

Methods

A total of 832 consecutive minimally invasive decompressive spinal surgeries were performed by a single surgeon in an ASC during the course of 1 year. Incidental durotomies with cerebrospinal fluid leakage were repaired and patients were discharged to home. Patients with a watertight suture dural repair did not receive any modifications to the usual discharge activities allowed. All other patients were treated with bed rest overnight and head of bed restrictions. A protocol for close patient follow-up after discharge was followed. The complications were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.

Results

There were 30 incidental durotomies (3.6%), with all occurring in the lumbar spine. Suture repair was accomplished in 28 patients (93%). Patch repair was performed in 2 patients (7%). All patients were discharged to home from the ASC. There were 2 short-term complications noted after discharge. The patient safety protocols in place identified the complications and allowed timely interventions.

Conclusions

Incidental durotomy occurring during minimally invasive spinal decompressive surgery is an occasional event. Suture repair of the laceration is feasible in most instances. Lumbar spine patients may be safely discharged to home from the ASC. Patients can be stratified into those with, or without, a watertight suture dural closure. Those with such a closure, who are without symptoms of intracranial hypotension, do not require modification of their activities. A short period of bedrest with head of bed modification successfully treated the remainder. Hospitalization or routine prolonged bed rest is not necessary. Protocols must be put in place to identify and timely manage potentially serious sequelae.