Is It Possible To Evaluate the Ideal Cervical Alignment for Each Patient Needing Surgery? An Easy Rule To Determine the Appropriate Cervical Lordosis in Preoperative Planning

Are Patients With Segmental Cervical Kyphosis Appropriate Candidates for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA)? A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis Compared to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) in patients with preoperative segmental kyphosis.

METHODS

Patients with segmental cervical kyphosis at the operative levels undergoing 1- or 2-level ACDF or CDA from 2017 to 2020 with 2 years of follow were identified. Patient demographics, perioperative data, complication rates, radiographic findings and reported outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in our study (ACDF: n = 24, CDA: n = 24). Patient demographic data between the 2 cohorts was similar expect for proportion of males (ACDF: 62.5% vs CDA: 33.3%, P = .043). There was no statistical significance in the change of segmental lordosis (ACDF: +8.09° vs CDA: +5.88°, P = .075) between the preoperative and final postoperative period. Additionally, the change in cervical lordosis was similar between groups (ACDF:+ 9.86° vs CDA: +7.60°, P = .226). VAS scores were similar between the 2 groups at every follow-up interval. NDI scores were significantly different at the 6-month, 12 month and the final follow-up. Mean improvements between preoperative and final postoperative periods were statistically superior in the CDA cohort compared to the ACDF cohort (ACDF: 22.8 vs CDA: 24.1, P = .0375).

CONCLUSION

CDA was superior to ACDF in regards to NDI scores following index procedure in patients with preoperative segmental cervical kyphosis. Those in the CDA cohort had similar complication rates, revision rates and radiographic outcomes as those who underwent ACDF.

Analysis of sagittal parameters for easier and more accurate determination of cervical spine alignment

Cross-sectional comparative study. This study aimed to analyze the role of cervical parameters, in terms of the perception process, when evaluating cervical sagittal balance on an X-ray image. Reports on the role of cervical parameters in the perception of cervical sagittal balance have not been made. The study included 4 board-certified neurosurgeons and 6 residents of a neurosurgical department. They were instructed to answer a total of 40 questions. The parameter that was the most helpful in deriving the answer was checked. The correct answer rate, dependency on the parameter, and correct answer contribution of the parameter were analyzed. Among the various parameters, 5 parameters [C2-7 angle (C2-7A), T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1s-CL), C2 slope (C2s), C7 slope (C7s), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis) were selected. The simple parameter (C2s, C7s) has a higher dependency and correct answer contribution than the complex parameter (C2-7A, T1s-CL). The angular (C2-7A, T1s-CL, C2s, C7s) parameters have a higher dependency; however, both the length and angular parameters correct answer contribution were similar. The cervical parameters that have simpler properties were highly preferred and had a lower perception error.

Cervical Spine Inhomogeneously Enhancing Lesion: Avoiding Confirmation Bias

Confirmation bias is the tendency to seek information and evidence in order to confirm a preexisting hypothesis while giving less importance and overlook an alternative solution. This report describes the case of a 52-year-old man with a long history of neck pain and bilateral upper limbs paresthesias with a cervical intracanal inhomogeneously enhancing lesion. Despite all the preoperative radiological findings, a spinal meningioma an anterior approach was performed. The mass ended up being a large migrated hernia with the involvement of two levels. Before suggesting treatment, especially surgery, physicians and practitioners need to evaluate all of the possible alternatives in order to optimize patient outcome.

Analyzing the Significance of T1 Slope minus Cervical Lordosis in Patients with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery

Objective

Accurate measurement of T1 slope (a component of T1s minus cervical lordosis [CL]) is often constrained by anatomical limitations. In this situation, efforts should be made to find the exact meaning of T1s-CL and whether there are any alternatives to it.

Methods

We enrolled 117 patients who received two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Occipital slope, C2 slope (C2s), C7 slope (C7s), T1, O-C2 angle (O-C2A), C2-7 angle (C2-7A), O-C7 angle (O-C7A), T1s-CL, C7-T1 angle (C7-T1A), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis were measured. We determined 16° (T1s-CL) as the reference point for dividing subjects into the mismatch group and the balance group, and a comparative analysis was performed.

Results

The mean value of C7-T1A was constantly maintained within 2.6° peri-operatively. In addition, C2s and T1s-CL showed the same absolute change (Δ|0.8|°). The mean values of T1s-CL of the mismatch and balance groups were 23.0° and 7.6°, respectively. The five factors with the largest differences between the two groups were as follows : C2s (Δ13.3°), T1s-CL (Δ15.4°), O-C2A (Δ8.7°), C2-7A (Δ14.7°), and segmental angle (Δ7.9°) before surgery. Only four factors showed statistically significant change between the two groups after ACDF : T1s-CL (Δ4.0° vs. Δ0.2°), C2s (Δ3.2° vs. Δ0.7°), O-C2A (Δ2.6° vs. Δ1.3°), C2-7A (Δ6.3° vs. Δ1.3°). A very strong correlation between T1s-CL and C2s was also found (r=|0.88–0.96|).

Conclusion

C2s itself may be the essential key to represent T1s-CL. The amounts and directions of change of these two factors (T1s-CL and C2s) were also almost identical. The above phenomenon was re-confirmed once again through the correlation analysis.

Etiology and treatment of cervical kyphosis: state of the art review-a narrative review

Objective

To provide state of the art review regarding cervical kyphosis.

Background

Cervical spine kyphosis has been increasingly common due to the growing elderly population. Clinicians should comprehensively understand its symptoms, biomechanics, etiology, radiographic evaluation, classification, and treatment options and complications of each treatment. Comprehensive review will help clinicians improve the management for patients with cervical kyphosis.

Methods

The available literature relevant to cervical kyphosis was reviewed. PubMed, Medline, OVID, EMBASE, and Cochrane were used to review the literature.

Conclusions

This article summarizes current concepts regarding etiology, evaluation, surgical treatment, complications and outcomes of cervical kyphosis. Major etiologies of cervical kyphosis include degenerative, post-laminectomy, and ankylosing spondylitis. Clinical presentations include neck pain, myelopathy, radiculopathy, and problems with horizontal gaze, swallowing and breathing. Cervical lordosis, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, chin-brow to vertical angle, and T1 slope should be evaluated from upright lateral 36-inch film. The most widely used classification system includes a deformity descriptor and 5 modifiers. A deformity descriptor provides a basic grouping of the deformity consisting of five types, cervical, cervicothoracic, thoracic, coronal cervical deformity, and cranio-vertebral junction deformity. The 5 modifiers include C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, chin-brow to vertical angle, T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, myelopathy based on modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and SRS-Schwab classification for thoracolumbar deformity. Current treatment options include anterior discectomy and fusion, anterior osteotomy, Smith-Peterson osteotomy, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, or a combination of these based on careful preoperative evaluation.

Does Cervical Alignment Matter? The Effect of 2-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Sagittal Alignment and Patient-reported Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the change in cervical sagittal balance following 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and whether the degree of change was associated with improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Sagittal balance in cervical spine surgery has been recognized as an important surgical goal. However, its influence on clinical outcomes following anterior decompressive procedures remains debatable.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent primary 2-level ACDF for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and/or myelopathy were identified from an institutional spine registry. Radiographic measurements were done preoperatively, postoperatively, and at minimum 24 months follow-up. Measurements comprised segmental lordosis (SL), C2-C7 cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope (C7S), T1 slope (T1S) and C7 slope minus cervical lordosis (C7S-CL). Disk heights were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. PROs including the Neck Disability Index, Short Form-36, and Visual Analog Scale for neck pain and arm pain were collected preoperatively and at 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

In total, 90 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 58.6±22.9 months. Significant improvement in all PROs was achieved at 24 months (P<0.05). SL was -1.2±8.2 degrees preoperatively, increased to 5.2±5.9 degrees postoperatively (P<0.001), and decreased to 1.2±6.2 degrees at follow-up (P=0.005). CL was 8.5±12.5 degrees preoperatively, increased to 10.8±12.4 degrees postoperatively (P=0.018), and maintained at 10.9±11.2 degrees at follow-up (P=0.030). Sagittal vertical axis, C7S, T1S, and C7S-CL did not change significantly. Significant increases in disk heights were achieved postoperatively (P<0.001). Fusion rate was 98.9% at follow-up. PROs were not related to radiologic measurements. Maintaining or increasing CL or SL was not related to a greater degree of improvement in PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-level ACDF restored segmental and global CL, but changes in cervical sagittal alignment did not correlate with the magnitude of improvement in PROs. Adequate decompression with solid fusion remains fundamental to achieving good clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical disease.

The Short-Term to Midterm Follow-Up of Patients with Hirayama Disease After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment is widely used to treat patients with Hirayama disease (HD). However, postoperative follow-up with abundant samples is still scarce. This study investigated short-term to midterm clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) among patients with HD.

METHODS

We enrolled 115 patients with HD who had undergone ACDF. Radiographic parameters included cervical lordosis (CL), sagittal vertical axis, segment lordosis (SL), T1 slope (T1S), T1S minus CL, range of motion (ROM), upper/lower adjacent segment ROM, and upper adjacent SL. Electrophysiologic parameters included the maximal compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) of abductor digit minimi and abductor pollicis brevis, the latency of the ulnar nerve F reaction, and abnormal spontaneous action potentials. Clinical assessment included the selected brief-Michigan Hand Questionnaire and Odom scale.

RESULTS

The average age was 19.5 ± 4.5 years. The mean follow-up time was 16.35 ± 9.21 months. CL, SL, and T1S increased, whereas sagittal vertical axis and ROM decreased at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). Upper adjacent SL, upper adjacent ROM, and lower adjacent ROM were stable after ACDF (P > 0.05). The maximal CMAPs of abductor digit minimi and the latency of the ulnar nerve F reaction improved bilaterally (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significance in the maximal CMAPs of abductor pollicis brevis (P > 0.05). Abnormal spontaneous action potentials reduced remarkably. The selected brief-Michigan Hand Questionnaire score increased after surgery (P < 0.001). The Odom scale showed a ratio of 79.1% (excellent and good ratio).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed favorable radiologic, electrophysiologic, and clinical outcomes after ACDF among patients with HD.

Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the cervical sagittal parameters between patients with cervical spine disorder and asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

Two independent authors systematically searched online databases including Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Web of Science up to June 2020. Cervical sagittal balance parameters, such as T1 slope, cervical SVA (cSVA), and spine cranial angle (SCA), were compared between the cervical spine in healthy, symptomatic, and pre-operative participants. Where possible, we pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis, by CMA software. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using the I-squared statistic and funnel plots, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 102 studies, comprising 13,802 cases (52.7% female), were included in this meta-analysis. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of studies included in this review. Funnel plot and Begg's test did not indicate obvious publication bias. The pooled analysis reveals that the mean (SD) values were: T1 slope (degree), 24.5 (0.98), 25.7 (0.99), 25.4 (0.34); cSVA (mm), 18.7 (1.76), 22.7 (0.66), 22.4 (0.68) for healthy population, symptomatic, and pre-operative assessment, respectively. The mean value of the SCA (degree) was 79.5 (3.55) and 75.6 (10.3) for healthy and symptomatic groups, respectively. Statistical differences were observed between the groups (all P values < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that the T1 slope and the cSVA were significantly lower among patients with cervical spine disorder compared to controls and higher for the SCA. Further well-conducted studies are needed to complement our findings.

Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Literature Review and Future Directions

Cervical alignment as a concept has come to the forefront for spine deformity research in the last decade. Studies on cervical sagittal alignment started from normative data, and expanded into correlation with global sagittal balance, prognosis of various conditions, outcomes of surgery, definition and classification of cervical deformity, and prediction of targets for ideal cervical reconstruction. Despite the recent robust research efforts, the definition of normal cervical sagittal alignment and cervical spine deformity continues to elude us. Further, many studies continue to view cervical alignment as a continuation of thoracolumbar deformity and do not take into account biomechanical features unique to the cervical spine that may influence cervical alignment, such as the importance of musculature connecting cranium-cervical-thoracic spine and upper extremities. In this article, we aim to summarize the relevant literature on cervical sagittal alignment, discuss key results, and list potential future direction for research using the '5W1H' framework; "WHO" are related?, "WHY" important?, "WHAT" to evaluate and "WHAT" is normal?, "HOW" to evaluate?, "WHEN" to apply sagittal balance?, and "WHERE" to go in the future?

Anterior head translation following cervical fusion-a probable cause of post-surgical pain and impairment: a CBP® case report

[Purpose] To present the case of the dramatic reduction in pain, disability, and neurologic symptoms following the reduction of forward head translation and increased cervical curvature in a patient suffering from post-surgical radiculopathy. [Subject and Methods] A 52-year-old male mechanic presented with chronic neck pain, unilateral paresthesia along the C5 and C6 dermatome distributions and diminished unilateral grip strength for 12 years following a C5–C6 cervical discectomy and fusion. Outcome measures included the neck disability index, the numerical pain rating scale, and the Zebris cervical range of motion system. Radiographs and computerized posture analysis revealed excessive forward head posture. Initial traditional ‘symptom-relief’ chiropractic rehabilitation was provided, followed by CBP^® structural rehabilitation of head and neck posture with a 2.5 year follow-up. [Results] The initial traditional chiropractic rehabilitation did not improve posture or disability scores. CBP methods resulted in radiograph-verified postural alignment improvements corresponding with clinically significant improvements in the patient’s neurologic condition, pain and disability scores. These results were maintained at a 2.5 year follow-up with minimal treatment. [Conclusion] Patients with post-surgical axial symptoms and/or radicular complaints should be screened for altered cervical alignment and anterior head translation. Future studies should attempt to duplicate these positive results in a trial with long-term follow-up.

Analysis of cervical sagittal alignment variations after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe imbalance: study of 59 cases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate postoperative changes within the cervical alignment following surgical lumbar correction by pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in patients affected with sagittal global malalignment disease.

METHODS

This was a monocentric, radiographic, and prospective study. 79 patients, who underwent sagittal correction by PSO, performed an EOS imaging pre- and postoperatively between January 2008 and December 2013 at the University Hospital of Bordeaux. Inclusion criteria were a performed pre- and postoperative EOS imaging and a preoperative C7SVA > 5 cm. Were excluded patients who did not allow EOS with a viewable cervical spine due to hyperkyphosis. The study involved the analysis of pelvic, lumbar, thoracic, cervical, and cranial parameters before and after the surgery.

RESULTS

59 patients met the criteria. Mean follow-up was 38 months. The lumbar PSO significantly improved sagittal alignment including L1S1 lordosis, T1T12 kyphosis, and C7SVA (p < 0.001). We did not reported a significant change within cervical parameters after PSO (C2C7 lordosis 22.7°-21.5° p = 0.64, C1C7 lordosis 50.6°-48.8° p = 0.56, C1C2 angle 28.2°-27.9° p = 0.82, C7 slope stayed constant 32.3°-30.5° p = 0.47, OC2 angle 15.54°-15.56° p = 0.99). However, cranial slope decreased significantly (p < 0.05). We did not find correlation between lumbar lordosis and cervical lordosis variations (R = 0.265). Cervical lordosis was highly correlated with the C7 slope (R = 0.597) and with the Spino Cranial Angle (R = - 0.867).

CONCLUSION

Reciprocal changes in cervical spine after PSO are difficult to approach. Maintaining a horizontal gaze involves locoregional mechanisms of compensation adapting to the slope of C7. The cranial system by decreasing the cranial slope allows the gaze alignment and is the first compensation mechanism to get involved after a loss of lumbar lordosis. Restoring optimal C7SVA is necessary to prevent the development of secondary cervical painful symptomatology when the cranial compensation is outdated.