Direct Midline Posterior Corpectomy and Fusion of a Lumbar Burst Fracture with Retrospondyloptosis

In-Fracture Pedicular Screw Placement During Ligamentotaxis Following Traumatic Spine Injuries, a Randomized Clinical Trial on Outcomes

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of two different techniques for spinal ligamentotaxis. Spine ligamentotaxis reduces the number of retropulsed bone fragments in the fractured vertebrae. Two different ligamentotaxis techniques require clinical evaluation.

Methods

This was a randomized clinical trial. The case group was defined as one pedicular screw insertion into a fractured vertebra, and the control group as a no-pedicular screw in the index vertebra. Spine biomechanical values were defined as primary outcomes and complications as secondary outcomes.

Results

A total of 105 patients were enrolled; 23 were excluded for multiple reasons, and the remaining were randomly allocated into the case (n=40) and control (n=42) groups. The patients were followed up and analyzed (n=56). The postoperative mid-sagittal diameter of the vertebral canal (MSD), kyphotic deformity correction, and restoration of the anterior height of the fractured vertebrae showed equal results in both groups. Postoperative retropulsion percentage and pain were significantly lower in the case group than in the control group (p=0.003 and p=0.004, respectively). There were no group preferences for early or long-term postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Regarding clinical and imaging properties, inserting one extra pedicular screw in a fractured vertebra during ligamentotaxis results in better retropulsion reduction and lower postoperative pain.

L4 Corpectomy: Surgical Approaches and Mitigating the Risk of Femoral Nerve Injuries

OBJECTIVE

Because of the challenging anatomic location, corpectomies are performed less often at the fourth lumbar vertebral body than at other levels. Our objective was to review the literature of L4 corpectomy and anterior column reconstruction.

METHODS

A literature search in the Medline/PubMed database was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify all relevant cases and cases series describing corpectomies of the L4 vertebral body using "lumbar" AND "corpectomy" as search terms. We present an illustrative case to describe the technique.

RESULTS

We identified 18 articles with 30 patients who met the search criteria. Including our case illustration, the most common approach used was the lateral retroperitoneal approach (n = 17, 54.8%), of which 8 (26.7%) were performed via a transpsoas approach. Seven (23%) patients underwent corpectomy through a posterior approach, 4 (12.9%) through an anterior retroperitoneal approach, and 3 (10%) through combined anterior and lateral retroperitoneal. The overall complications rate was 19.3% including 1 case each of femoral nerve injury and iatrogenic lumbar nerve root injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Corpectomies of the L4 vertebral body are challenging. None of the various approaches described clearly demonstrates any superiority in mitigating the risk of neural complications. Decision making about which surgical approach to use should be based on patient-specific characteristics.

Technical nuances and approach-related morbidity of anterolateral and posterolateral lumbar corpectomy approaches-a systematic review of the literature

Purpose

Approaches for lumbar corpectomies can be roughly categorized into anterolateral (AL) and posterolateral (PL) approaches. It remains controversial to date whether one approach is superior to the other, and no comparative studies exist for the two approaches for lumbar corpectomies.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed through a MEDLINE/PubMed search. Studies and case reports describing technique plus outcomes and possible complications were included. Thereafter, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of operation (LOO), utilized implants, neurological outcomes, complication rates, and reoperation rates were analyzed.

Results

A total of 64 articles reporting on 702 patients including 513 AL and 189 PL corpectomies were included in this paper. All patients in the PL group were instrumented via the same approach used for corpectomy, while in the AL group the majority (68.3%) of authors described the use of an additional approach for instrumentation. The EBL was higher in the AL group (1393 ± 1341 ml vs. 982 ± 567 ml). The LOO also was higher in the AL group (317 ± 178 min vs. 258 ± 93 min). The complication rate (20.5% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.048) and the revision rate (3.1% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.004) were higher in the PL group. Neurological improvement rates were 43.8% (AL) vs. 39.2% (PL), and deterioration was only noted in the AL group (6.0%), while 50.2% (AL) and 60.8% (PL) showed no change from initial presentation to the last follow-up.

Conclusion

While neurological outcomes of both approaches are comparable, the results of the present review demonstrated lower complication and revision rates in anterolateral corpectomies. Nevertheless, individual patient characteristics must be considered in decision-making.

Single-Stage Posterior Transpedicular Corpectomy and 360-Degree Reconstruction for Thoracic and Lumbar Burst Fractures: Technical Nuances and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

 We evaluate the feasibility of a single-stage posterior corpectomy and circumferential arthrodesis with the aid of spinal navigation for the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

 This was a single-center, retrospective study. Demographics, clinical, and radiologic data of 19 patients who underwent surgery at our institution for thoracolumbar burst fractures between 2016 and 2019 were collected. All patients enrolled in the present study underwent surgery by means of posterior fixation and transpedicular corpectomy with the aid of an intraoperative image-guided neuronavigation system.

RESULTS

 Postoperative correction of the vertebral height ratio was achieved in all cases, with an average increase of 23.6% (p = 0.0005). No statistical differences (p = 0.9) were found comparing 1- and 3-month postoperative CT scans, in relation to vertebral height ratio. A statistically significant difference was found between the pre- and postoperative kyphotic angles for the thoracolumbar and lumbar segments (p = 0.0018 and 0.005, respectively), but no difference was found between kyphotic angles at the 3-month follow-up. A unilateral approach was performed on 15 patients (79%), while 4 cases (21%) required a bilateral laminectomy. We did not observe any significant intraoperative complication.

CONCLUSION

 Single-stage posterior corpectomy and fixation is a safe and effective approach for thoracic and lumbar burst fractures. It provides excellent 360-degree reconstruction in a single surgical stage with satisfactory results in terms of kyphosis reduction, biomechanical stability, and reduced invasiveness. Spinal navigation represents a fundamental tool to overcome some anatomical limits of the presented technique.

Multilevel L4 and L5 Corpectomy for Burst Fracture via an Anterior Transperitoneal Approach Followed by Posterior Stabilization: Technical and Anatomic Considerations

Lower lumbar spine burst fractures make up only 1% of all lumbar spine fractures. A burst fracture with neurological compromise, ligamentous injury, severe kyphotic deformity, or loss of anterior column support typically requires surgical stabilization. Treatment options at the L4 and L5 levels are challenging and often require an anterior/posterior approach. Very little has been reported on anterior approaches to the L4 and L5 levels when a corpectomy is required. Hence, we present a patient with a complex burst fracture of L4 and L5. She underwent a corpectomy of L4 and L5 and placement of an expandable cage through a window created between the aorta and the inferior vena cava via an anterior transperitoneal abdominal approach followed by posterior stabilization and fusion from L2 to the pelvis.

Fracture-dislocation of L5 Combined with Multi-level Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Lower Lumbar Spine Treated via the Posterior-only Approach: A Case Report

Fracture-dislocation of the lower lumbar spine, which is commonly caused by high-impact trauma and can lead to instability in the spine, is relatively rare. Surgical treatment is indicated to restore spinal balance, weight-bearing ability, and decompression of the neural elements. There are various available surgical options, including the posterior-only or anterior-only approaches, or a combination of them. However, there is still no definite classification and treatment strategy for fracture-dislocation of the lower lumbar spine. In this report, we describe a 65-year-old man presenting cauda equina syndrome caused by a fracture-dislocation of L5 combined with multi-level traumatic spondylolisthesis of the lower lumbar spine. The patient was treated via the posterior-only approach with neural decompression and anterior reconstruction with posterior instrumentation. We discuss the reasons why the posterior-only approach was decided upon and several meaningful points during the surgery in detail.

L5 Fracture Dislocation Secondary to Cold Abscess Treated by Posterior Corpectomy With Expandable Cage Placement

Infections of the lumbar spine can have serious sequelae, including neurological deficits, paralysis, and death. Prolonged infection can result in fracture of the vertebrae, local abscesses, and infiltration and compression of local vascular structures. In cases with significant instability or neurological compromise, a common treatment approach is vertebral corpectomy with interbody cage followed by long-term antibiotics.

The following case describes a patient with a three-month history of progressively worsening lower back pain, lower extremity radiculopathy, and bilateral lower extremity edema, in the setting of a nontraumatic three-column fracture dislocation of L5 with grade 4 retrolisthesis of L4 on L5. A posterior-only corpectomy with placement of an expandable cage, to be followed by pedicle screw placement from L3-S1/ilium, was performed. The procedure was successful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without complication and with resolution of his edema. Histopathological analysis demonstrated acute and chronic inflammation, but extensive tests and cultures failed to identify a causative organism.

This case highlights several interesting features, including a technically challenging and seldom-performed procedure, as well as the ability of lumbar spinal infections to present with leg edema due to involvement the inferior vena cava and iliac vessels. For patients with three-column fractures of L5 due to an inflammatory process or trauma, a single-stage posterior corpectomy with placement of an expandable cage may be considered as an appropriate treatment option.