Surgical Evacuation of Spontaneous Supratentorial Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Aspiration, Endoscopic Surgery, and Craniotomy

Endoscopic Evacuation of Putaminal Hemorrhage Using the Trans-Middle Temporal Gyrus Approach: Technical Notes and Case Presentations

BACKGROUND

 The development of minimally invasive endoscopic neurosurgery has enabled widespread application of endoscopic surgery via the ipsilateral transfrontal approach for putaminal hematoma evacuation. However, this approach is unsuitable for putaminal hematomas that extend into the temporal lobe. We adopted the endoscopic trans-middle temporal gyrus approach, instead of the conventional surgical approach, for the management of these complicated cases and determined its safety and feasibility.

METHODS

 Twenty patients with putaminal hemorrhage underwent surgical treatment at the Shinshu University Hospital between January 2016 and May 2021. Of these, two patients with left putaminal hemorrhage that extended into the temporal lobe underwent surgical treatment using the endoscopic trans-middle temporal gyrus approach. The procedure entailed the use of a thinner transparent sheath to reduce the technique's invasiveness, a navigation system to determine the location of the middle temporal gyrus and the sheath's trajectory, and an endoscope with a 4K camera for higher image quality and utility. The sylvian fissure was compressed superiorly using our novel "port retraction technique" (i.e., by tilting the transparent sheath superiorly) to avoid damage to the middle cerebral artery and Wernicke's area.

RESULTS

 The endoscopic trans-middle temporal gyrus approach allowed sufficient hematoma evacuation and hemostasis under endoscopic observation without any surgical complexities or complications. The postoperative course was uneventful in both patients.

CONCLUSION

 The endoscopic trans-middle temporal gyrus approach for putaminal hematoma evacuation helps avoid damage to normal brain tissue, which could result from the wide range of motion of the conventional technique, particularly when the hemorrhage extends to the temporal lobe.

Traditional craniotomy versus current minimally invasive surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: A propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and craniotomy (CI) are the current treatments for spontaneous supratentorial cerebral haemorrhage (SSTICH).

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and CI for the treatment of SSTICH.

METHODS

Clinical and imaging data of 557 consecutive patients with SSTICH who underwent MIS or CI between January 2017 and December 2022 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into two subgroups: The MIS group and CI group. Propensity score matching was performed to minimise case selection bias. The primary outcome was a dichotomous prognostic (favourable or unfavourable) outcome based on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months; an mRS score of 0–2 was considered favourable.

RESULTS

In both conventional statistical and binary logistic regression analyses, the MIS group had a better outcome. The outcome of propensity score matching was unexpected (odds ratio: 0.582; 95%CI: 0.281–1.204; P = 0.144), which indicated that, after excluding the interference of each confounder, different surgical modalities were more effective, and there was no significant difference in their prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Deciding between MIS and CI should be made based on the individual patient, considering the hematoma size, degree of midline shift, cerebral swelling, and preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score.

Feasibility Study of Endoscopic Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Large Hematoma: a Comparison with Craniotomy Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with large hematomas is commonly treated with craniotomy combined with decompressive craniectomy, procedures that involve huge trauma and require subsequent cranioplasty. Recently, endoscopic surgery has shown significant promise in treating ICH, but its feasibility for large hematomas remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to compare endoscopic surgery with craniotomy and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery in treating large hematomas ICH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data from patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH and hematoma volumes exceeding 50 mL who underwent either endoscopic surgery or craniotomy. Propensity score matching analysis was employed to reduce selection bias. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery were evaluated by analyzing blood loss, postoperative edema, mortality rate, complications, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 113 cases that met the criteria were collected, with 65 in the endoscopic surgery group and 48 in the craniotomy group. After propensity score matching, each group contained 34 cases. The mean hematoma volume was 64.84 ± 11.02 mL in the endoscopy group and 66.57 ± 12.77 mL in the craniotomy group (p = 0.554). Hematoma evacuation rates were 93.27% in the endoscopy group and 89.34% in the craniotomy group (p = 0.141). The endoscopy group exhibited lower blood loss, shorter surgical time, and reduced postoperative edema volume at 24 h compared to the craniotomy group. The rate of pulmonary infection was slightly lower in the endoscopy group compared to the craniotomy group (70.59% vs. 91.18%, p = 0.031), but there were no statistically significant differences in overall complications and mortality rate between the two groups. GOS scores were similar in both groups at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic surgery is safe and feasible for treating spontaneous supratentorial ICH with large hematomas, demonstrating efficacy similar to that of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy.

The Usefulness of the 3.1-mm-diameter 4K Rigid Endoscope for Intracerebral Hematoma Evacuation

The indication for surgical intervention in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage remains controversial. Although many clinical trials have failed to demonstrate its efficacy over medical treatment, less invasive endoscopic treatment is expected to demonstrate its superiority. A novel endoscopic system for hematoma removal consisting of a 3.1-mm-diameter 4K high-resolution rigid endoscope was used.The system was used in eight cases of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. It provided improved maneuverability of the surgical instrument while maintaining satisfactory image quality. The surgical goal was achieved in all cases without any complications, including perioperative rebleeding.Endoscopic hematoma removal using the 3.1 mm high-resolution endoscope is an alternative minimally invasive approach to spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with improved reliability.

Neuroendoscopic Surgery Versus Stereotactic Aspiration in the Treatment of Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Debate persists over the relative merits of neuroendoscopic surgery (NS) compared to stereotactic aspiration (SA) for treating supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Consequently, we undertook this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of NS versus SA.

METHODS

We searched for the all-relevant studies systematically from English databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Three independent researchers identified and selected these literatures that met the inclusion criteria. Then we evaluated the quality of these studies according to the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used to conduct this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies, including 2722 supratentorial ICH patients, were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that NS could effectively improve the functional prognosis (P = 0.002), reduce the postoperative mortality (P < 0.00001), and increase the hematoma evacuation rate (P < 0.00001). In addition, SA had more advantages in shortening operation time (P < 0.00001) and reducing intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.0001). However, there was no obvious statistical difference in intensive care unit stays (P = 0.23) between NS and SA. Besides, no sufficient evidence could support a significant difference in hospital stays. In the aspect of complications, NS was discovered to have a positive effect on preventing rebleeding (P = 0.005) and intracranial infection (P = 0.003). However, no significant differences between the 2 groups in digestive tract ulcer (P = 0.34), epilepsy (P = 0.99), and pneumonia (P = 0.58) were discovered. In the subgroup analysis, factors including publication time, Glasgow Coma Scale score, age, and follow-up, all significantly influenced the good functional outcome and mortality. Meanwhile, NS behaved more advantageous in improving functional prognosis for patients with hematoma located in the basal ganglia.

CONCLUSIONS

NS may hold more advantages over SA in the treatment of supratentorial ICH. However, SA is also an effective and suitable alternative for elderly patients, especially those with multiple comorbidities intolerant to extended surgical procedures. Further high-quality studies are warranted to substantiate our findings in the future.

Application of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA) for spontaneous intracerebral hematoma aspiration and thrombolytic catheter placement

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for up to 20% of all strokes and results in 40% mortality at 30 days. Although conservative medical management is still the standard treatment for ICH patients with small hematoma, patients with residual hematoma ≤15 mL after surgery are associated with better functional outcomes and survival rates. This study reported our clinical experience with using Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA) as a safe and effective approach for stereotactic ICH aspiration and intra-clot catheter placement.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with spontaneous ICH who underwent ROSA-guided ICH aspiration surgery. ROSA-guided ICH surgical techniques, an aspiration and intra-clot catheter placement protocol, and a specific operative workflow (pre-operative protocol, intraoperative procedure and postoperative management) were employed to aspirate ICH using the ROSA One Brain, and appropriate follow-up care was provided.

RESULTS

From September 14, 2021 to May 4, 2022, a total of 7 patients were included in the study. Based on our workflow design, ROSA-guided stereotactic ICH aspiration effectively aspirated more than 50% of hematoma volume (or more than 30 mL for massive hematomas), thereby reducing the residual hematoma to less than 15 mL. The mean operative time of entire surgical procedure was 1.3 ± 0.3 h, with very little perioperative blood loss and no perioperative complications. No patients required catheter replacement and all patients' functional status improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Within our clinical practice ROSA-guided ICH aspiration, using our established protocol and workflow, was safe and effective for reducing hematoma volume, with positive functional outcomes.

Minimally invasive craniotomy for putaminal hemorrhage using a tubular retractor: A technical note

Background

Minimally invasive endoscopic and stereotactic surgery have been established as surgical treatments for putaminal hemorrhage. However, facilities that do not have equipment for endoscopic or stereotactic surgery will likely have to perform conventional craniotomy. Using a tubular retractor, we were able to perform minimally invasive surgery, such as endoscopic surgery.

Methods

A craniotomy was performed for left putaminal hemorrhage after cerebral infarction treatment. A 3-4 cm craniotomy centered at Kocher's point was performed under general anesthesia. A 2 cm incision was made in the cortex, and a tubular retractor was inserted under a microscope. The hematoma was reached at a position 4-5 cm from the cortex.

Results

Thanks to the tubular retractor, it was relatively easy to observe the hematoma, and it was possible to remove it and confirm hemostasis without difficulty. Brain injury caused by the retractor insertion cavity was small, and no hemostasis was required. The surgery was completed by dura mater closure, bone flap fixation, and wound closure as per the standard. Most of the putaminal hemorrhage could be removed, and there was no rebleeding after the operation. The patient is still undergoing rehabilitation because of aphasia and muscle weakness. Manual Muscle Testing was at three points in the upper limb, and four points in the lower limb remained.

Conclusion

For putaminal hemorrhage, microscopic craniotomy was performed using a tubular retractor and an approach such as endoscopic surgery. Craniotomy, hematoma removal, and hemostasis operations are also considered to be minimally invasive surgeries.

Endoscopic Surgery Versus Stereotactic Aspiration in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic surgery (ES) and stereotactic aspiration (SA) in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH).

METHODS

We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 31, 2023. Studies comparing ES and SA for sICH treatment were also included. Outcome measures included primary outcomes (mortality and good functional outcome [GFO]) and secondary outcomes (evacuation rate, residual hematoma, perihematomal edema (PHE), operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay duration, intensive care unit stay duration, hospital cost, complications, and reoperation). Subgroup analyses assessed the influence of age, hematoma volume, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and time to surgery on the outcomes.

RESULTS

Nine studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 8 observational studies) with 2105 patients (705 and 1400 in the ES and SA groups, respectively) were included in this meta-analysis. The final analysis indicated that compared with SA, ES was associated with enhanced GFO and a higher evacuation rate 1 day post-surgery along with reduced mortality and residual hematoma. Conversely, ES did not confer benefits in terms of perihematomal edema, operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, or hospital stay duration compared with SA. Subgroup analysis highlighted the significant influences of age and hematoma volume on mortality, whereas hematoma volume and Glasgow Coma Scale score affected GFO.

CONCLUSIONS

ES is a safe and effective approach for sICH treatment, leading to improved patient prognosis and quality of life compared to SA.

Clinical Significance of Stiffness during Endoscopic Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study

Studies regarding hematoma stiffness and removal difficulty are scarce. This study explored the association between hematoma stiffness and surgical results of endoscopic hematoma removal for intracerebral hemorrhage. It also aimed to clarify factors associated with hematoma stiffness. We classified intracerebral hematoma as either soft or firm stiffness by retrospectively evaluating operative videos by two neurosurgeons. The interobserver reliability of the classification was assessed by calculating the κ values. We investigated the relationship between hematoma stiffness and surgical results. Favorable hematoma removal (FHR) was defined as a residual hematoma volume of ≤15 mL or removal rate of ≥70%. Furthermore, we compared the background characteristics, imaging findings, and laboratory data between the two groups. Forty patients were included in this study. The mean baseline hematoma volume was 69.9 mL (range, 41.3-97.6 mL). FHR was accomplished in 35 cases (87.5%). Thirty-four patients (85%) were in the soft hematoma group (group S). Six patients (15%) were in the firm hematoma group (group F). Classification of hematoma stiffness demonstrated an excellent degree of interobserver agreement (κ score = 0.91). Patients in group S had a high FHR rate (p = 0.018) and short endoscopic procedure times (p = 0.00034). The island sign was present in group S (p = 0.030). Patients in group F had significantly high fibrinogen levels (p = 0.049) and low serum total calcium (p = 0.032), hemoglobin (p = 0.041), and hematocrit (p = 0.011) levels. Hematoma stiffness during endoscopic surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage correlates with surgical results, including the endoscopic procedure time and accomplishing rate of FHR.

Endoscopic surgery versus craniotomy for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the late elderly patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare the prognosis of late elderly patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) treated by endoscopic evacuation and craniotomy MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent surgery for spontaneous ICH within 48 hours after admission between April 2014 and March 2018. Eligible patients were classified into two groups according to the type of surgery (endoscopic surgery and craniotomy). Propensity-score matching weight analysis was conducted to compare the good neurological outcome modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (0-4) at discharge as the primary endpoint between the two groups. Secondary endpoints were postoperative meningitis, tracheostomy, reoperation within 3 days and total hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

Among the 5,396 eligible patients, endoscopic surgery and craniotomy were performed in 895 and 4,501 patients, respectively. In the propensity-score matching weight analysis, all covariates were well balanced. The proportions of patients with a good prognosis (mRS score at discharge: 0-4) did not significantly differ between the surgical procedures (42.1% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.828). The proportions of meningitis, tracheostomy and reoperation were not significantly different between the two groups. Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the craniotomy group than in the endoscopic surgery group (25,536 vs. 29,603 US dollars, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Inhospital outcomes did not differ between endoscopic and open surgeries for spontaneous ICH in the late-stage elderly patients aged ≥75 years. Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the craniotomy group, suggesting that endoscopic surgery may be more acceptable.

Surgical treatment of traumatic frontal hematoma: comparison of the endoscopic supraorbital approach with frontotemporal approach

Background

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of the endoscopic supraorbital approach and frontotemporal approach for the treatment of traumatic frontal hematoma, with the aim of demonstrating the feasibility of the endoscopic supraorbital approach.

Methods

A total of 24 cases underwent hematoma evacuation, including 10 cases using the endoscopic supraorbital approach and 14 cases using the frontotemporal approach. Baseline demographic data, hematoma clearance rate, blood loss, postoperative complications, and 6-month outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Both approaches effectively evacuated the hematoma, with hematoma clearance rates of 90.97 ± 10.23% in the endoscopic supraorbital group and 85.29 ± 16.15% in the frontotemporal approach group (p > 0.05). The supraorbital approach group demonstrated significantly shorter operation times compared to the frontotemporal approach group (116.50 ± 28.19 min vs. 193.29 ± 72.55 min, p < 0.05), as well as significantly less blood loss (55.00 ± 33.08 mL vs. 685.71 ± 840.20 mL, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications between the two groups, and the majority of patients achieved favorable outcomes with a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4 or 5 in both groups.

Conclusion

Compared to the frontotemporal approach, the endoscopic supraorbital approach offers advantages such as shorter operation times, reduced blood loss, similar treatment effects, and comparable complication rates. Therefore, the endoscopic supraorbital approach may serve as a viable alternative for the treatment of traumatic frontal hematoma.

Treatment outcomes between endoscopic surgery and conventional craniotomy for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been repeatedly evaluated in patients with ICH as a promising procedure for improved survival and functional outcome. Among MIS techniques, endoscopic surgery (ES) has shown superior efficacy for ICH removal due to rapid clot evacuation and immediate bleeding control. However, the results of ES are still uncertain due to insufficient data. In this study, participants with spontaneous supratentorial ICH who were indicated for surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo ES or conventional craniotomy (CC) between March 2019 and June 2022. The primary outcome was a difference in favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcome (0 to 3) at 180-day follow-up evaluated by blind assessors. There were 188 participants, 95 in the ES group and 93 in the CC group, who completed the trial. At 180-day follow-up, 46 (48.4%) participants in the ES group achieved favorable outcomes, compared to 33 (35.5%) in the CC group (risk difference [RD] 12.9, 95% CI - 1.1-27.0, p = 0.07). After covariate adjustment, the difference was slightly higher and significant (adjusted RD 17.3, 95% CI [4.6-30.0], p = 0.01). Moreover, the ES group had less operative duration and less intraoperative blood loss than the CC group. Clot evacuation rate and complications were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed a potential benefit of ES in age < 60 years, time to surgery ≥ 6 h, and deep ICH. This study showed that ES was safe and effective in ICH removal and provided a better functional outcome compared to CC.

Outcomes After Endoscopic Evacuation Versus Evacuation Using Craniotomy or Stereotactic Aspiration for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Analysis Using a Japanese Nationwide Database

BACKGROUND

Various surgical methods are available for managing large intracerebral hemorrhage. This study compared the prognosis of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration, and craniotomy by using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan.

METHODS

Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients who underwent surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage within 48 h after admission between April 2014 and March 2018. Eligible patients were classified into three groups according to the type of surgery (endoscopic surgery, stereotactic surgery, and craniotomy). Propensity score matching weight analysis was conducted to compare poor modified Rankin Scale score at discharge (severe disability or death) and hospitalization cost among the groups.

RESULTS

Among 17,860 eligible patients, craniotomy, stereotactic surgery, and endoscopic surgery were performed in 14,354, 474, and 3,032 patients, respectively. In the matching weight analysis, all covariates were well balanced. Compared with the endoscopic surgery group, the proportion of poor prognosis (modified Rankin Scale score at discharge of 5 or 6) was significantly higher in craniotomy groups (odds ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.11-5.68; p = 0.028). Subgroup analysis based on hemorrhage location and consciousness level at the time of admission showed no significant difference between the surgical procedures. Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the craniotomy group than in the endoscopic surgery group (difference US $9,724, 95% confidence interval 2,169-17,259; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage was associated with improved prognosis compared with craniotomy at the hospital discharge. Future large-scale clinical trials are needed to evaluate the optimal surgical techniques for intracerebral hemorrhage.

Endoscopic surgery versus craniotomy in the treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) has high morbidity and mortality, with no clear standard of treatment available. Compared with the craniotomy approach, neuroendoscopy is a relatively minimally invasive treatment method, and may be an efficient alternative. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of neuroendoscopy and craniotomy in SICH patients.

METHODS

The electronic databases Web of Science, PubMed, EmBase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. According to the PRISMA template, we finally selected and analyzed 14 eligible studies that evaluated neuroendoscopy versus craniotomy. Primary outcomes included operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, evacuation rate, residual hematoma, complications, hospital stay duration, clinical outcomes, and other parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 10 retrospective studies (non-RCTs) involving 1652 patients were included in the final analysis. In the neuroendoscopy (NE) group, operation time (p < 0.00001), intraoperative blood loss volume (p < 0.0001), hematoma evacuation rate (p = 0.0002), complications (p < 0.00001), hospitalization days (p = 0.004), and mortality (p < 0.0001) were significantly different from those of the craniotomy (C) group, with a higher rate of good recovery compared with the craniotomy group (P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that patients with SICH and physicians may benefit more from neuroendoscopic surgery than craniotomy.

Trends in surgical procedures for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in Japan

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, there are no reports on the recent trends in surgical procedures for spontaneous ICH. To investigate current trends in surgical methods for spontaneous ICH using a nationwide inpatient database from Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for spontaneous ICH between April 2014 and March 2018 were identified in a nationwide inpatient database from Japan. We examined patient characteristics, diagnoses, types of surgery, complications, and discharge status.

RESULTS

We identified 21,129 inpatients who underwent surgery for spontaneous ICH. The procedures were as follows: 16,256 (76.9%) transcranial hemorrhage evacuations, 3722 (17.6%) endoscopic hemorrhage evacuations, and 1151 (5.4%) stereotactic aspirations of hemorrhage. Patients tended to receive transcranial hemorrhage evacuations in hospitals with fewer surgical cases. The proportions of endoscopic hemorrhage evacuations increased annually, whereas those of stereotactic surgery decreased. The proportions of transcranial surgery remained almost unchanged. Tracheostomy and hospitalization costs were lower in the stereotactic aspirations of hemorrhage group, and the proportions of reoperation were higher in the endoscopic hemorrhage evacuations group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of endoscopic surgery for spontaneous ICH has increased in Japan. This study can form the basis of future clinical investigations into spontaneous ICH surgery.

The role of monitoring platelet function perioperatively and platelet transfusion for operated spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients with long-term oral antiplatelet therapy: A case report

Introduction and importance

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) with long-term oral antiplatelet therapy (LOAPT) is known as a dilemma in balancing the risk of postoperative rebleeding and ischemic events because of confused coagulation function. We herein describe a report of perioperative management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patient on long-term oral antiplatelet therapy.

Case presentation

A 42-year-old male patient on long-term oral antiplatelet therapy presented with coma, and he was diagnosed with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Considering the patient's clinical condition, despite the thromboelastography suggested that the inhibition of platelet function was high preoperatively, an emergency craniectomy were underwent. After platelet transfusion during surgery and taking control of the clotting and platelet function postoperatively, the patient was stable without rebleeding and new ischemic events in perioperative period and recovered satisfactorily.

Clinical discussion

Rare studies have provided evidence for managing operated spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients on long-term oral antiplatelet therapy, and whether platelet transfusion is recommended was controversial. In this case, we presented monitoring and taking control of clotting and platelet function postoperatively would help in preventing rebleeding and ischemic events in such patients; moreover, platelet transfusion may quickly and safely reverse platelet dysfunction for emergency surgery. This case was the first to report platelet function and coagulation function management in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients with long-term oral antiplatelet therapy.

Conclusion

Monitoring and maintaining coagulation and platelet function perioperatively are essential to balance the risk of postoperative rebleeding and ischemic events.

•

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy is known as a dilemma in postoperative management.

•

Antiplatelet therapy may not be the absolute contraindication for surgery in the severe spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

•

It is essential to monitor and take control of platelet function in postoperative patients with antiplatelet therapy.

Contribution of Various Types of Transfusion to Acute and Delayed Intracerebral Hemorrhage Injury

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the second most prevalent type of stroke, after ischemic stroke, and has exceptionally high morbidity and mortality rates. After spontaneous ICH, one primary goal is to restrict hematoma expansion, and the second is to limit brain edema and secondary injury. Various types of transfusion therapies have been studied as treatment options to alleviate the adverse effects of ICH etiopathology. The objective of this work is to review transfusions with platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), and red blood cells (RBCs) in patients with ICH. Furthermore, tranexamic acid infusion studies have been included due to its connection to ICH and hematoma expansion. As stated, the first line of therapy is limiting bleeding in the brain and hematoma expansion. Platelet transfusion is used to promote recovery and mitigate brain damage, notably in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Additionally, tranexamic acid infusion, FFP, and PCC transfusion have been shown to affect hematoma expansion rate and volume. Although there is limited available research, RBC transfusions have been shown to cause higher tissue oxygenation and lower mortality, notably after brain edema, increases in intracranial pressure, and hypoxia. However, these types of transfusion have varied results depending on the patient, hemostasis status/blood thinner, hemolysis, anemia, and complications, among other variables. Inconsistencies in published results on various transfusion therapies led us to review the data and discuss issues that need to be considered when establishing future guidelines for patients with ICH.

Short-term outcomes of endoscopic evacuation of supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: Early experience from developing country

Background:

Minimally invasive endoscopic hematoma evacuation is a promising treatment option for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, the technique still needs improvement.

Methods:

We report our early clinical experience of using this technique to evacuate supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hematomas and evaluate its short-term outcomes.

Results:

The study included 15 patients, basal ganglia hematoma was the most common location 62.5%, mean preoperative hematoma volume was 61.07 cc, mean ICH score was 3, and mean rate of hematoma evacuation was 89.27%. Factors that could be related to mortality were Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission (P = 0.001), ICH score (P = 0.004); postoperative GCS (P < 0.001), postoperative hematoma volume (P = 0.006); intraventricular extension (P = 0.001), and rate of evacuation (P = 0.001).

Conclusion:

Endoscopic technique is a safe surgical option for evacuation of spontaneous supratentorial ICH. This minimally invasive technique could be helpful to provide better short-term outcomes for selected patients. However, in our experience, this minimally invasive technique did not change the outcome for cases presented with poor GCS on admission 4/15. Our results warrant a future prospective, randomized, controlled efficacy trial.

Hemorrhagic stroke treated by transcranial neuroendoscopic approach

Hemorrhagic stroke (HS) is usually treated under microscopy, but recently, an increasing number of cases have been treated under neuroendoscopy. The objective of this study was to explore the feasibility and efficacy of a transcranial neuroendoscopic approach for HS. Based on etiology and clinical features, 203 HS patients were classified into two groups, with 100 patients in the primary HS (PHS) group and 103 patients in the secondary HS (SHS) group. All patients were treated either by full neuroendoscopy (FNE) or by neuroendoscopy combined with microsurgery (ECM). Outcomes were assessed according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at discharge, and the rate of good plus excellent results was recorded as the GE rate to assess the treatment effect. All 203 patients underwent surgery successfully, with 165 patients who underwent FNE and 38 patients who underwent ECM. No patients died within 3 days after surgery, and the surgery-related mortality rate was 0%, but a total of 4 patients died by discharge, and the overall mortality rate was 1.97%. A total of 133 patients showed an excellent result and 16 showed a good result, for a total GE rate of 73%. Neuroendoscopy can provide excellent illumination, clear visualization, and multiangle views in HS. The transcranial neuroendoscopic approach is feasible and safe for both PHS and SHS and is very effective for hematoma evacuation. However, some aneurysms and most arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulas require ECM.

Minimally Invasive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Techniques: A Review

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) continues to have high morbidity and mortality. Improving ICH outcomes likely requires rapid removal of blood from the parenchyma and restraining edema formation while also limiting further neuronal damage due to the surgical intervention. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches promise to provide these benefits and have become alluring options for management of ICH. This review describes six MIS techniques for ICH evacuation including craniopuncture, stereotactic aspiration with thrombolysis, endoport-mediated evacuation, endoscope-assisted evacuation, adjunctive aspiration devices, and the surgiscope. The efficacy of each modality is discussed based on current literature. The largest clinical trials have yet to demonstrate definitive effects of MIS intervention on mortality and functional outcomes for ICH. Thus, there is a significant need for further innovation for ICH treatment. Multiple ongoing trials promise to better clarify the potential of the newer, non-thrombolytic MIS techniques.

Clinical Value of 3D-Printed Navigation Technology Combined with Neuroendoscopy for Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most common form of hemorrhagic stroke with high morbidity and mortality. Rapid and massive bleeding may compress the brain tissue, causing space-occupying and pathological effects, such as reduced local cerebral blood flow, acidosis, and inflammatory and immune responses. Although the development of minimally invasive technique provides a new option for the treatment of ICH, their application is limited due to the difficulty in achieving accurate puncture localization under the guidance of the marks on CT. We selected 30 patients treated with neuroendoscopic surgery guided by 3D-printed navigation technology (experimental group) and 30 patients treated with neuroendoscopic surgery guided by hand-painted on the patient's body surface according to the marks on CT (control group). Our results showed that patients in the experimental group had a lower number of intraoperative punctures, shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, higher hematoma clearance rate, and smaller volume of perihematomal edema than the patients in the control group. Moreover, patients in the experimental group had higher Glasgow Coma Scale score at discharge, shorter postoperative hospitalization time and ICU stay, and a lower rate of postoperative complications, despite the lack of statistically significant differences. In addition, no statistically significant differences were observed in mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale score between the two groups. In conclusion, 3D-printed navigation technology used for the neuroendoscopic hematoma removal is a more reliable and less invasive approach in the treatment of ICH. This technique has great application prospects and deserves promotion in the future clinical practice.

Surgical treatment for antiplatelet intracerebral hemorrhage (SAP-ICH): protocol for a prospective cohort study of emergency surgery for severe spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients on long-term oral antiplatelet treatment

Background

Despite the capability of emergency surgery to reduce the mortality of severe spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SSICH) patients, the effect and safety of surgical treatment for severe spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SSICH) patients receiving long-term oral antiplatelet treatment (LOAPT) remains unclear. In consideration of this, the cohort study is aimed at figuring out the effect and safety of emergency surgery for SSICH patients on LOAPT.

Methods

As a multicenter and prospective cohort study, it will be conducted across 7 representative clinical centers. Starting in September 2019, the observation is scheduled to be completed by December 2022, with a total of 450 SSICH patients recruited. The information on clinical, radiological, and laboratory practices will be recorded objectively. All of the patients will be monitored until death or 6 months after the occurrence of primary hemorrhage.

Results

In this study, two comparative cohorts and an observational cohort will be set up. The primary outcome is the effect of emergency surgery, which is subject to assessment using the total mortality and comparison in the survival rate of SSICH patients on LOAPT between surgical treatment and conservative treatment. The second outcome is the safety of surgery, with the postoperative hemorrhagic complication which is compared between the operated SSICH patients on and not on LOAPT. Based on the observation of the characteristics and outcome of SSICH patients on LOAPT, the ischemic events after discontinuing LOAPT will be further addressed, and the coagulation function assessment system for operated SSICH patients on LOAPT will be established.

Conclusions

In this study, we will investigate the effect and safety of emergency surgery for SSICH patients on LOAPT, which will provide an evidence for management in the future.

Ethics and dissemination

The research protocol and informed consent in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital (KY2019-096-02). The results of this study are expected to be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals in 2023.

Trial registration

Name: Effect and safety of surgical intervention for severe spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients on long-term oral antiplatelet treatment.

ChiCTR1900024406. Date of registration is July 10, 2019.

A Review of Common Endoscopic Intracranial Approaches

With the evolution of surgical techniques, endoscopy has emerged as a suitable alternative to many instances of more invasive methods. In this review article, we aim to discuss the endoscopic advancements, procedural details, indications, and outcomes of the most commonly practiced neuroendoscopic procedures. We have also summarized the uses, techniques, and challenges of neuroendoscopy in select neurosurgical pathologies.

Lower total protein and absence of neuronavigation are novel poor prognostic factors of endoscopic hematoma removal for intracerebral hemorrhage

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic hematoma removal is widely performed for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage. We investigated the factors related to the prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage after endoscopic hematoma removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2013 to 2019, we retrospectively analyzed 75 consecutive patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent endoscopic hematoma removal. Their characteristics, including neurological symptoms, laboratory data, and radiological findings were investigated using univariate and multivariate analysis. Complications during hospitalization, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on day 7, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 6 months were considered as treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients (33 women, 42 men) was 71.8 (36-95) years. Mean GCS scores at admission and on day 7 were 10.3 ± 3.2 and 11.7 ± 3.8, respectively. The mean mRS score at 6 months was 3.8 ± 1.6, and poor outcome (mRS score ranging from 3 to 6 at 6 months) in 53 patients. Rebleeding occurred in 4 patients, and other complications in 15 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, hematoma in the basal ganglia, lower total protein level, higher glucose level, and absence of neuronavigation were associated with poor outcomes. Of the 75 patients, 9 had cerebellar hemorrhages, and they had relatively favorable outcomes compared to those with supratentorial hemorrhages.

CONCLUSION

Several factors were related to the prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage after endoscopic hematoma removal. Lower total protein level at admission and absence of neuronavigation were novel factors related to poor outcomes of endoscopic hematoma removal for intracerebral hemorrhage.

Endoscopic hematoma removal of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage under local anesthesia reduces operative time compared to craniotomy

The surgical efficacy for supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains unknown. We compared the advantages of the widely practiced endoscopic hematoma removal under local anesthesia with that of craniotomy under general anesthesia for ICH. We also focused on our novel operative concept of intentional hematoma leaving technique to avoid further damage to the brain. We retrospectively analyzed 134 consecutive patients (66 endoscopies and 68 craniotomies) who were surgically treated for supratentorial ICH. The characteristics of the 134 patients were as follows: The median (interquartile range) age was 73 (61-82) years. The median Glasgow Coma Scale scores at admission, on day 7, and the median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 6 months were 10 (7-13), 13 (10-14), and 4 (3-5) respectively. The statistical comparison revealed there were no differences in GCS score on day seven between the endoscopy 13 (12-14) and craniotomy group 12 (9-14). No differences were observed in mRS scores at 6 months between the endoscopy 4 (2-5) and craniotomy group 4 (3-5). However, the patients treated with our technique tended to have favorable outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed the operative time was significantly decreased in the endoscopy group compared to the craniotomy group (p < 0.001).

Stereotactic aspiration of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: Case series

•

Stereotactic hematoma evacuation can be performed without anticoagulant agent.

•

Stereotactic evacuation of intracerebral hematoma can be adopted in any center.

•

Stereotactic evacuation of intracerebral hematoma is a safe procedure.

•

Stereotactic surgery can minimize brain injury.

Introduction

Minimally invasive techniques such as stereotactic aspiration of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma (SICH) evacuation can minimize brain tissue damage due to surgery. We share our experience of adopting stereotactic aspiration of SICH in our center without compromising safety.

Presentation of cases

Three stereotactic aspiration procedures for SICH immediately after 24 h of onset are reported. All cases showed good results. Level of consciousness of all the patient returned to normal. Two patients could carry out routine activities independently. One patient has left hemiparesis.

Discussion

Stereotactic aspiration of SICH has been newly implemented at our center with acceptable results achieved. Patient selection has an important role in determining the choice of technique. The procedures were done without anticoagulant agent. Stereotactic aspiration of SICH is associated with limited brain tissue damage, shorter duration of surgery, reduced length of stay, faster postoperative healing, and better functional improvement.

Conclusion

Stereotactic aspiration of SICH is a minimally invasive defined strategy for hematoma evacuation without compromising safety.

Emergency surgery is an effective way to improve the outcome of severe spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients on long-term oral antiplatelet therapy

The necessity of emergency surgery for severe spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SSICH) patients on long-term oral antiplatelet therapy (LOAPT) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect and safety of emergency surgery for SSICH patients on LOAPT (SSICH-LOAPT patients). In this study, a retrospective review of patients admitted to our institution for SSICH from January 2012 to December 2018 was conducted. The collected data included demographic, clinical, and surgical information. The outcome was recorded at 3 months after primary hemorrhage. The outcome of SSICH-LOAPT patients receiving emergency surgery and conservative treatment were compared. The risk of postoperative intracranial bleeding (PIB) in operated SSICH-LOAPT patients was further investigated. A total of 522 SSICH patients were retrospectively reviewed, including 181 SSICH-LOAPT patients and 269 operated patients. The total mortality and in-hospital mortality were 40.6% and 19.3%, respectively. As compared with SSICH-LOAPT patients receiving conservative treatment, the operated SSICH-LOAPT patients showed a lower total (p = 0.043) and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.024). When compared with operated patients not on LOAPT, the operated patients on LOAPT exhibited a higher rate of PIB (OR, 2.34; 95% CI 1.14-4.79; p = 0.018). As demonstrated by the multivariate logistic analysis, dual antiplatelet therapy were independent risk factors associated with PIB in operated SSICH-LOAPT patients (OR, 3.42; CI, 1.01-11.51; p = 0.047). Despite of increasing risk of PIB, emergency surgery could improve the outcome of SSICH-LOAPT patients as it could be effective in reducing mortality. Dual antiplatelet therapy was the independent risk factor related to the PIB in operated SSICH-LOAPT patients.

Efficacy of neuroendoscopic surgery versus craniotomy for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage (HCH) is a potentially life-threatening neurological condition with an extremely high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, neuroendoscopy has been used to treat intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, the choice of neuroendoscopic surgery versus craniotomy for patients with intracerebral hemorrhages is controversial.

AIM

We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of neuroendoscopic surgery compared with craniotomy in patients with supratentorial hypertensive ICH.

METHODS

A systematic electronic search was conducted of online electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library updated on December 2017. The meta-analysis only included randomized controlled studies.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis of death showed that neuroendoscopic surgery decreased the rate of death when compared with craniotomy (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.26-1.29; p = .18). The pooled result of complications indicated that neuroendoscopic surgery has a tendency toward lower complications (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.28-0.49; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that neuroendoscopic surgery has lower complications, but no superior advantages in morbidity rates. Since the advantage of neuroendoscopic surgery has been performed in some area, the continuation of multi-center comparative investigation with craniotomy may be necessary. Moreover, some efforts need to be taken in selecting appropriate patients with different treatments.

Different surgical interventions for patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracranial hemorrhage: A network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to explore the efficacy and safety of different surgical interventions in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracranial hemorrhage (SSICH) and determine which intervention is most suitable for such patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Medline, OVID, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The quality of the included studies was assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using the software Stata 13.0 and RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

Endoscopic surgery (ES), minimally invasive surgery combined with urokinase (MIS + UK), minimally invasive surgery combined with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (MIS + rt-PA), and craniotomy were associated with higher survival rates and a lower risk of intracranial rebleeding than standard medical care (SMC) in patients with SSICH, especially in younger patients with few comorbidities. The order from highest to lowest survival rate was ES, MIS + UK, MIS + rt-PA, craniotomy, and SMC. The order from lowest to highest intracranial rebleeding risk was ES, MIS + UK, craniotomy, MIS + rt-PA, and SMC. Additionally, compared with SMC, all four surgical interventions (ES, MIS + rt-PA, MIS + UK, and craniotomy) improved the prognosis and reduced the proportion of patients with serious disability. The order from most to least favorable prognosis was MIS + rt-PA, ES, MIS + UK, craniotomy, and SMC. The order from highest to lowest proportion of patients with serious disability was ES, MIS + rt-PA, MIS + UK, craniotomy, and SMC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the efficacy and safety of different surgical interventions (ES, MIS + UK, MIS + rt-PA, craniotomy) were superior to those of SMC in the patients with SSICH, especially in younger patients with few comorbidities. Among them, ES was the most reasonable and effective intervention. ES was found not only to improve the survival rate and prognosis but also to have the lowest risk of intracranial rebleeding and the lowest proportion of patients with serious disability.

Neuroendoscopic Surgery versus Craniotomy for Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

No consensus has been achieved on the superiority between neuroendoscopy (NE) and craniotomy (CT) for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of NE versus CT for supratentorial HICH.

METHODS

A systematic search of English databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) was performed to identify related studies reported from September 1994 to June 2019. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 5.0.0 were separately used to evaluate the quality of the included observational studies and randomized controlled trials. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted to conduct the meta-analysis. The outcome measures included the primary and secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the impact of year of publication, initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, age, time to surgery, hematoma volume, and surgical methods on the outcome measures.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 12 observational studies), comprising 1859 patients with supratentorial HICH, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that NE could increase the good functional outcome (GFO) (P < 0.0003) and hematoma evacuation rate (P = 0.0007) and reduce the mortality (P < 0.00001), blood loss (P = 0.004), operation time (P < 0.00001), hospital stays (P = 0.006), and intensive care unit stays (P < 0.0001) compared with CT. In addition, NE could also have a positive effect on preventing postoperative infection (P < 0.00001) and total complications (P < 0.00001). However, in postoperative rebleeding incidence (P = 0.12), no obvious difference was found between the 2 groups. Publication bias was low regarding GFO, mortality, and hematoma evacuation rate. Subgroup analysis suggested that year of publication, initial GCS score, age, hematoma volume, and surgical methods did not affect the hematoma evacuation rate significantly. The difference in mortality was not statistically significant in the subgroup of hematoma volume <50 mL (P = 0.44) and initial GCS score >8 (P = 0.09). In addition, the data suggested that time to surgery and surgical methods might be the important factors affecting GFO and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

NE might be a safer and more effective surgical method than CT in the treatment of patients with supratentorial HICH. However, because of the existence of some limitations, the safety and validity of NE were weakened. More high-quality trials should be included to verify our conclusion.

A Meta-analysis for Evaluating Efficacy of Neuroendoscopic Surgery versus Craniotomy for Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Objective

Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is a potentially life-threatening neurological deficit with the highest morbidity and mortality. In recent years, neuroendoscopy has been used to treat intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs). However, the choice of neuroendoscopic surgery or craniotomy for patients with ICHs is controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of neuroendoscopic surgery compared to craniotomy in patients with supratentorial hypertensive ICH.

Materials and Methods

A systematic electronic search was performed using online electronic databases such as Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library updated on December 2017. The meta-analysis was performed by only including studies designed as randomized controlled trials.

Results

Three randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis of death showed that neuroendoscopic surgery decreased the rate of death compared to craniotomy (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.26-1.29; P=0.18). Pooled results of complications showed that neuroendoscopic surgery tended to have fewer complications than craniotomy had (RR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.28-0.49; P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Although the presenting analyses suggest that neuroendoscopic surgery should have fewer complications than craniotomy dose, it had no superior advantage in morbidity rate definitely. Therefore, it may be necessary for the neurosurgeons to select best optimal patients for individual treatment.

Is it dangerous to treat spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage by minimally invasive surgery plus local thrombolysis in patients with coexisting unruptured intracranial aneurysms?

OBJECTIVES

Limited evidence supports the presumed increased frequency of hemorrhage caused by the unruptured intracranial aneurysms which coexist in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage treated with minimally invasive surgery plus local thrombolysis. Subsequently, we sought to determine the safety of local thrombolysis for this particular subset of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients treated with minimally invasive surgery plus local thrombolysis for intracerebral hemorrhage between November 2013 to December 2015 in an intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. Depending upon the vascular images, unruptured intracranial aneurysms were identified. The primary outcome was any of postoperative intracranial rebleeding. The second outcome included the 30-day death and 6-month follow up graded by Modified Rank Scale. Blind abstractors reviewed the medical data and binary logistic regression was performed to investigate the risk factors of poor prognosis.

RESULTS

We identified a cohort of consecutive 188 patients, of whom 23 (12.2%) harbored unruptured intracranial aneurysms. There were 28 aneurysms documented in this study, among which 3 were in the posterior circulation. And in total, 20 (11.3%) cases suffered from postoperative hematoma growth, of which 4 were with aneurysms. Additionally,the 30-day mortality after stroke in patients with aneurysms was 8.69% (2/23), comparable to 13.33% in without (22/165,p = 0.744). The proportion of the favorable outcome at 6-month follow-up in patients with aneurysms was comparable to that in without (47.8% versus 48.5%,p = 1.000) Insignificant associations were demonstrated between the unruptured intracranial aneurysms and postoperative intracranial rehemorrhage (p = 0.092), 30-day death(p = 0.588) and poor long-term prognosis (p = 0.332), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that unruptured intracranial aneurysms seem to represent no increased risks of poor outcome after local thrombolysis for intracerbral hematomas.

Indication, Timing, and Surgical Treatment of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Systematic Review and Proposal of a Management Algorithm

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the most recommendable treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages and the indication for surgery, its timing, and the best surgical technique to be adopted case by case.

METHODS

Based on PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, a systematic review of the literature was performed using as keywords the terms "spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage," "surgical management," "medical management," "supratentorial," and "infratentorial." Because of the highest level of evidence, only randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and comparative cohort studies reported within the last 12 years were selected. An updated and evidence-based treatment algorithm was reported also.

RESULTS

The search initially returned 255 articles. After application of the exclusion criteria, only 19 studies were selected. According to the site and volume of the hematoma, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and progressive neurologic decline, specific subgroups were identified. Surgery must be considered in patients with an admission GCS score ranging between 5 and 12 and a hematoma volume >30 mL. The best time-window has been reported to be 7-24 hours after ictus. Endoscopic surgery is recommendable for patients with a supratentorial hematoma >60 mL and with a poor GCS score (4-8). Alternative techniques, such as minimally invasive puncture and thrombolysis, may be considered for deeper hematoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful selection of patients eligible for surgery is mandatory. The optimal timing falls into a time-window ranging between 7 and 24 hours after ictus. Minimal invasive techniques are valuable surgical options for patients in a poor GCS score or harboring large deep-seated hemorrhages.

Minimally Invasive Surgery is Superior to Conventional Craniotomy in Patients with Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus conventional craniotomy (CC) for patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) have not been compared previously. We reviewed the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of MIS compared with CC in patients with SICH.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing MIS and CC in patients with computed tomography-confirmed SICH published between January 2000 and April 2018 in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register based on PRISMA inclusion and exclusion criteria. Binary outcomes comparisons between MIS and CC were described using odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 prospective controlled studies (non-RCTs), involving a total of 2466 patients, met our inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference in mortality rate between MIS and CC (OR, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.97). MIS was associated with a lower rate of rebleeding (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.64) and a higher rate of good recovery compared with CC (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.34-3.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SICH may benefit more from MIS than CC. Our study could help clinicians optimize treatment strategies in SICH.

Effect and Feasibility of Endoscopic Surgery in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage remains a major cause of death and dependence. Endoscopic surgery (ES) is potential to improve outcomes, but a consensus on the superiority of ES has not been achieved. We conducted a systematic review to clarify the effect of ES in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage and compare it with other treatment options (craniotomy, conservation, and stereotactic aspiration [SA]).

METHODS

We performed this review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis. The subgroup analyses were stratified by study type, location, hematoma volume, interval to treatment, follow-up time, and stereotactic frame assistance.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies were included containing 1213 patients, most of whom harbored a hematoma greater than 50 mL. Compared with craniotomy and conservation, ES significantly reduced the mortality (P < 0.0001), poor outcomes (P < 0.00001), rebleeding (P = 0.0009), and pneumonia (P < 0.00001). In the subgroup analyses, late surgery (<48 hours) benefited more from ES than early surgery (<24 hours). The study location, hematoma volume, and stereotactic frame assistance insignificantly influenced the therapeutic effect of ES. Comparing ES and SA, we found that differences in mortality, poor outcomes, and rebleeding were insignificant, but ES had a greater evacuation rate and SA had shorter operative times.

CONCLUSIONS

ES achieves a better performance than craniotomy and conservation in terms of reducing mortality, dependence, and specific complications. Despite being similarly effective in improving functional outcomes, ES and SA have respective advantages. ES is a feasible alternation to craniotomy and conservation, and the comparison between ES and SA warrants further study.

Stroke and Craniectomy

Neurosurgical involvement in the care of major stroke complications has yielded striking results in the subtentorial region but equivocal outcomes in the supratentorial compartment. Most neurosurgeons want to see some degree of deterioration before proceeding; thus, timing will be debated. Viewpoints have changed over the years regarding surgical or medical intervention, but in many patients the procedure has not produced a definitive change in outcome other than preventing death from terminal brainstem shift. The introduction of craniectomy (and craniotomy) to treat swollen ischemic brain or intracranial hemorrhage has historical interest.