Multilevel Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Devices: Analysis of Safety and Feasibility, with Focus on Sagittal Alignment and Impact on Clinical Outcome: Single-Institution Experience and Review of Literature

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer Versus Plate and Cage for 3-Level Contiguous Cervical Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety, clinical outcomes, and radiological results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with zero-profile anchored spacer (ZPAS) versus plate and cage (PC) for 3-level contiguous cervical degenerative disease.

METHODS

The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024512706). The Web of Science core collection, PubMed, and Embase were searched up to February 12, 2024. Review Manager 5.3 was used. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval were evaluated for dichotomous data. Continuous data were assessed using the mean difference and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Nine studies comparing ACDF with ZPAS versus PC for 3-level contiguous cervical degenerative disease were included. The intraoperative blood loss and operation time in ZPAS were significantly less than those in PC. The subsidence rate, loss of cervical alignment, fusion segmental height, and intervertebral disc height were significantly greater in ZPAS than in PC. The cervical alignment and dysphagia rate within 6 months were significantly lower in ZPAS than in PC. The ASD of ZPAS was significantly lower than that of PC according to the sensitivity analysis when 1 study was excluded. No significant differences were identified in the other aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ACDF with ZPAS and PC were safe and effective procedures. PC was associated with increased surgical trauma. The ZPAS could better decrease the incidence of ASD and dysphagia. ZPAS was also accompanied by high subsidence rate and poor cervical alignment.

No Difference in Surgical Outcomes Between Stand-Alone Devices and Anterior Plating for 1-2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A 1:1 Exact Matched Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of all-cause surgical and medical complications between zero-profile (ZP; stand-alone) implants versus any graft type with an anterior plate in patients undergoing 1-2 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for treatment of degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy is increasingly prevalent in older adults. ACDF is a common surgical procedure for decompression of neural structures and stabilization and has been shown to have excellent outcomes. Although ACDFs performed with graft and plate have been the gold standard, more recently, ZP implants were developed to decrease implant-related complications, such as severe postoperative dysphagia. However, there is a paucity of papers comparing the surgical and medical complications profile of ZP (stand-alone) implants to grafts with plating systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from the PearlDiver Mariner Database using Current Procedural Terminology codes to classify patients into 1 level, 2 levels, and a total of 1-2 level ACDFs. Patients undergoing surgery for non-degenerative pathologies such as tumors, trauma, or infection were excluded.

RESULTS

1:1 exact matching created 2 equal groups of 7284 patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDF with either grafting with a plate or ZP (stand-alone) implant. There were no statistically significant differences in all-cause surgical complications, pseudarthrosis rate, dysphagia, or need for revision surgery between both cohorts (risk ratio: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80-1.21, P = 0.95). In addition, all-cause medical complications were similar between both cohorts (risk ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.862-1.330, P = 0.573) or any specific surgical or medical complication included in this study.

CONCLUSION

After 1:1 exact matching, the results of this study suggest that ZP (stand-alone) implants have similar outcomes compared with grafts with plating systems, with no observed differences in all-cause surgical or medical complications profile.

Blade-Related Vertebral Fracture After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with a Zero-Profile Cage: A Case Report

CASE

We present a case of a 79-year-old man with degenerative cervical myelopathy treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a zero-profile cage. Postoperatively, the patient experienced a rare complication of anchoring blade-related adjacent vertebral fracture leading to construct failure and recurrence of myelopathic symptoms, necessitating revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

This case emphasizes the importance of precision in the surgical technique, specifically in the placement of Caspar pins and anchoring blades. It also underscores the need for a high index of suspicion for potential hardware-related complications in patients presenting with recurring symptoms post-ACDF, contributing to the understanding of such rare complications.

Changes in cervical alignment of Zero-profile device versus conventional cage-plate construct after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been widely accepted as a gold standard for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, there was insufficient evidence to compare the changes in the cervical alignment with different fusion devices in a long follow-up period. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the radiologic outcomes and loss of correction (LOC) in cervical alignment of Zero-profile (ZP) device versus cage-plate (CP) construct for the treatment of CSM.

METHODS

Retrospective and prospective studies directly comparing the outcomes between the ZP device and CP construct in ACDF were included. Data extraction was conducted and study quality was assessed independently. A meta-analysis was carried out by using fixed effects and random effects models to calculate the odds ratio and mean difference in the ZP group and the CP group.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials with a total of 1067 participants were identified. ZP group had a lower rate of postoperative dysphagia at the 2- or 3-month and 6-month follow-up than CP group, and ZP group was associated with a decreased ASD rate at the last follow-up when compared with the CP group. The pooled data of radiologic outcomes revealed that there was no significant difference in postoperative and last follow-up IDH. However, postoperative and last follow-up cervical Cobb angle was significantly smaller in the ZP group when compared with the CP group. In subgroup analyses, when the length of the last follow-up was less than 3 years, there was no difference between two groups. However, as the last follow-up time increased, cervical Cobb angle was significantly lower in the ZP group when compared with the CP group.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of our analysis, the application of ZP device in ACDF had a lower rate of postoperative dysphagia and ASD than CP construct. Both devices were safe in anterior cervical surgeries, and they had similar efficacy in correcting radiologic outcomes. However, as the last follow-up time increased, ZP group showed greater changes cervical alignment. In order to clarify the specific significance of LOC, additional large clinical studies with longer follow-up period are required.

Is the Zero-P Spacer Suitable for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in Terms of Sagittal Alignment Reconstruction: A Comparison Study with Traditional Plate and Cage System

The Zero-P spacer was primarily developed aiming to reduce the morbidity associated with the traditional anterior cervical plate. During the past decade, many authors have reported the use of Zero-P spacers for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) of one or two segments. Nevertheless, there is still a paucity of knowledge on the safety and feasibility of using Zero-P spacers for 3-level fixation. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes, with a focus on the sagittal alignment reconstruction of 3-level ACDF surgery using Zero-P spacers versus those using a traditional plate and cage system. From Sep 2013 to Aug 2016, a total of 44 patients who received 3-level ACDF surgery due to cervical spondylotic myelopathy were recruited. The Zero-P spacer was used in 23 patients (group ZP) and the traditional plate and cage system in 21 (group PC). Clinical outcomes were analyzed by Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and dysphagia was evaluated using the Bazaz score. Radiological outcomes, including fusion rate, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), and especially changes in cervical sagittal alignment, were analyzed. The NDI and JOA scores did not differ significantly between the two groups postoperatively (p > 0.05); however, there was significantly less dysphagia in patients using Zero-P spacers at the 3- and 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05). At the 24-month follow-up, the fusion rate and ASD were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). Interestingly, patients using Zero-P spacers had a significantly lower postoperative C2-7 Cobb angle and fused segment Cobb angle, compared to those using a traditional plate and cage system (p < 0.05); meanwhile, the fused segment disc wedge was also found to be significantly smaller in patients using Zero-P spacers after surgery (p < 0.05). Moreover, we further divided patients into subgroups according to their cervical lordosis. In patients with a preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle ≤ 10°, significantly less cervical and local lordosis, as well as disc wedge, were seen in group ZP after surgery (p < 0.05), while in others with a preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle > 10°, no significant difference in postoperative changes of the cervical sagittal alignment was seen between group ZP and group PC (p > 0.05). Zero-P spacers used in 3-level ACDF surgery could provide equivalent clinical outcomes and a lower rate of postoperative dysphagia, compared to the traditional plate and cage system. However, our results showed that it was inferior to the cervical plate in terms of sagittal alignment reconstruction for 3-level fixation. We recommend applying Zero-P spacers for 3-level ACDF in patients with good preoperative cervical lordosis (C2-7 Cobb angle > 10°), in order to restore and maintain physiological curvature of the cervical spine postoperatively.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile versus stand-alone cages for two-level cervical spondylosis: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the mid-long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of zero-profile (ZP) compared with stand-alone (ST) cages for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

We included 77 patients (39 women and 38 men) who underwent two-level ACDF between May 5, 2016, and May 5, 2020, and who were followed up for at least 1 year. The subjects were divided into the ST (n = 38) and ZP (n = 39) group. For the evaluation of functional status, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were used. Additionally, radiological outcomes and procedure complications were observed at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Both groups had excellent clinical outcomes at the final follow-up. There were no significant intergroup (ZP vs. ST) differences in the fusion rate (91.02% vs. 90.79%, P > 0.05) and postoperative dysphagia (15.4% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.108). However, the disc height at the final follow-up in the ZP group was higher than that in the ST group (6.86 ± 0.84 vs. 6.17 ± 1.03, P = 0.002). The ZP group accomplished a lower loss of cervical lordosis (18.46 ± 4.78 vs. 16.55 ± 4.36, P = 0.071), but without reaching statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

ACDF with either ZP or ST cages turns out to be a dependable strategy for two-level ACDF in terms of clinical results. However, compared with the ST, the ZP cage may achieve a significantly lower loss of disc height.

Characterization of dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery

BACKGROUND

Post-operative dysphagia is one of the most common complications of anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS).

OBJECTIVE

Examine post-operative structural and physiologic swallowing changes in patients with dysphagia following ACSS as compared with healthy age and gender matched controls.

METHODS

Videofluoroscopic swallow studies of adults with dysphagia after ACSS were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-five patients were divided into early (≤2 months) and late (> 2 months) post-surgical groups. Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores, and pharyngeal wall thickness (PWT) metrics were compared.

RESULTS

Significant differences were identified for all parameters between the control and early post-operative group. MBSImP Pharyngeal Total (PT) scores were greater in the early group (Interquartile Range (IQR) = 9-14, median = 12) versus controls (4-7, 5, P < 0.001) and late group (0.75-7.25, 2, P < 0.001). The early group had significantly higher maximum PAS scores (IQR = 3-8, median = 7) than both the control group (1-2, 1, P < 0.001) and late post-operative group (1-1.25, 1, P < 0.001). PWT was significantly greater in the early (IQR = 11.12-17.33 mm, median = 14.32 mm) and late groups (5.31-13.01, 9.15 mm) than controls (3.81-5.41, 4.68 mm, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Dysphagic complaints can persist more than two months following ACSS, but often do not correlate with validated physiologic swallowing dysfunction on VFSS. Future studies should focus on applications of newer technology to elucidate relevant deficits.

Subjective and Objective Change in Cervical Spine Mobility After Single-level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to collect objective and especially subjective data on changes in cervical spine mobility after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and to investigate the impact on quality of life and activities of daily living (ADLs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although there are several studies dealing with the objective change in mobility after single-level ACDF, there are few data on how spondylodesis of a motion segment affects subjective restriction of cervical spine mobility.

METHODS

Patients undergoing first-time, single-level ACDF for a symptomatic spondylotic process were eligible. Data were collected before surgery, at 3-month, and 1-year follow-up. Patients were assessed via clinical scores (pain intensity, Short-Form 8 [SF-8], among others) and asked for impairment in ADLs due to restriction of cervical spine mobility. The subjective restriction was acquired by a five-step patient-reported score. The range of motion was measured by the CROM device.

RESULTS

Data of 97 patients could be evaluated. For pain scores and SF-8 there were significant improvements 3 months and 1 year after surgery (P < 0.001). The impairment for most ADLs improved 3 months after surgery and further after 1 year. The subjective restriction showed a significant improvement in general and for all single directions 1 year after surgery. In the objective measurements, a significantly higher total rotation could be found 1 year after surgery compared to preoperatively (101.6° ± 21.2 vs. 93.9° ± 23.4; P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in total flexion-extension and lateral flexion. Increasing age was a significant predictor for objective and subjective restriction.

CONCLUSION

The concern of many patients of being severely restricted in their cervical spine mobility after single-level ACDF can be denied. Objectively, the rotation even showed a significant improvement. Regarding the subjective restriction, which is more important for the patients, we found a significant improvement in general and for all directions of movement after surgery.Level of Evidence: 3.

Cervical spine alignment and clinical outcomes after multilevel anterior cervical decompression and fusion with or without plate: A minimal 5-year follow-up of a CONSORT-compliant article

It was reported imperative on cervical sagittal alignment reconstruction after anterior multilevel procedures with self-locked stand-alone cage (SSC) or anterior cage-with-plate (ACP) system multilevel while there was little knowledge about the relationship on cervical alignment and clinical outcomes.To identify the importance of cervical sagittal alignment after 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on cervical spondylotic myelopathy with SSC and ACP system.Seventy-seven patients with SSC system (SSC group) and 52 cases with ACP system (ACP group) from February 2007 to September 2013 were enrolled with well-matched demographics. Cervical alignment included C2-7 lordosis (CL), operated-segment cervical lordosis (OPCL), upper and lower adjacent-segment cervical lordosis, range of motion of upper and lower adjacent segment at preoperation, immediate postoperation, and the final follow-up. Clinical outcomes contained the neck disability index (NDI), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogous scale (VAS) of arm and neck and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Patients were then divided into CL improved subgroup (IM subgroup) and non-improved subgroup (NIM subgroup).There were improvements on CL and OPCL in both groups. The change of CL and OPCL larger in ACP group (P < .05) but upper adjacent-segment cervical lordosis/lower adjacent-segment cervical lordosis and range of motion of upper adjacent segment/range of motion of lower adjacent segment were of no significance. NDI, JOA, and VAS got improvement in both groups at immediate postoperation and the final follow-up while ASD was in no difference between SSC and ACP group. A total of 80 patients (39 vs 41) acquired CL improvement with a larger population in ACP group. There were no differences on the rate of ASD, NDI, JOA, VAS, and their change between IM and NIM subgroup. The changes of CL were not correlated to NDI, JOA, VAS, and their change.SSC and ACP group both provide improved OPCL and efficacy on 3-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy with little impact on adjacent segment. The change of CL is not correlated to clinical outcomes.

A Comparison of 2 Anterior Hybrid Techniques for 3-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Background

Novel hybrid surgical techniques that incorporate anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with total disc replacement are widely used. Based on the number of implanted discs, 3-level hybrid surgery can be classified as single fusion combined with double replacement and single replacement combined with double fusion. Few studies to date have directly compared these hybrid techniques. The present study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of these methods and assessed their characteristics and benefits.

Material/Methods

Clinical and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated in 64 consecutive patients who underwent 3-level hybrid surgery by single fusion combined with double replacement or single replacement combined with double fusion.

Results

Significant differences between the 2 groups were observed in postoperative range of motion of C2–C7. C2–C7 cervical lordosis assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up differed significantly in patients who underwent single replacement combined with double fusion. This group showed a higher incidence of heterotopic ossification than patients who underwent double replacement combined with single fusion.

Conclusions

Both types of hybrid surgery are safe and effective in treating 3-level cervical degenerative disc diseases. Single replacement combined with double fusion showed greater accuracy in correcting cervical lordosis, but was associated with a higher incidence of heterotopic ossification. In contrast, single fusion combined with double replacement was superior in maintaining cervical range of motion.

Locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of locking stand-alone cage (LSC) compared with anterior plate construct (APC) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to screen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared LSC with APC in ACDF. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used for assessment of study quality. Data were analyzed with the Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of seven RCTs were included. The results revealed no significant differences between LSC and APC in ACDF regarding the fusion rate, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analogue scale score, neck disability index score, hospital stay, subsidence rate, cervical lordosis, segmental Cobb angle, and disc height. However, LSC was associated with a significantly shorter operation time, less blood loss, lower overall incidence of dysphagia, and lower adjacent-level ossification (ALO) rate compared with APC.

CONCLUSION

In summary, LSC is not only a safe and effective device for ACDF but also has the advantages of significantly reduced operation time, blood loss, overall incidence of dysphagia, and ALO rate over APC. Therefore, LSC is a better alternative than APC for the patients undergoing ACDF procedures.

Application of Zero-profile Spacer in the Treatment of Three-level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: 5-year Follow-up Results

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term results of zero-profile spacer for 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although widely used, there are still controversies about the long-term results of zero-profile spacer, especially in multilevel cases.

METHODS

Cases received 3-level ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) using either zero-profile spacer (n = 27) (ZP Group), or plate and cages (n = 34) (PC Group), and with 5-year follow-up were reviewed. Neurological function and life quality were assessed by modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) score. Disc height, cervical lordosis, fusion rate, and surgical complications were observed.

RESULTS

Neurological recovery and life quality improvement were similar in both groups. Disc height and cervical lordosis (C2-7 Cobb angle) were well restored after operations, but lost in both groups during follow-up. Loss of correction (LOC) in disc height was larger in ZP Group (11.38% vs 5.71%, P < 0.05) at 5-year follow-up. LOC of cervical lordosis in ZP group constantly grew from 11.28% to 48.13% during 5-year follow-up, significantly higher than that in the PC group (from 7.43% to 14.01%) (P < 0.05). The rate of postoperative dysphagia was no statistical difference between the two groups, and symptoms were all disappeared within 1 year. There were 10 levels of adjacent segment degeneration (1 in ZP Group, and 10 in PC Group, P = 0.02). Cage subsidence (11 of 81 levels, 13.58%) and screw migration (2 of 81 levels, 2.47%) were only observed in the ZP Group. The migrated screws in one case were surgically removed. Fusion was achieved in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In long-term follow-up of 3-level ACDF for CSM, zero-profile spacer has the similar clinical results, but loss of correction of disc height and cervical alignment were significantly higher, compared with anterior plate and cages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Correlation Between Different Interbody Grafts and Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Compared with Control Group: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cervical spine degenerative disease is one of the main causes of myelopathy. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most common surgical procedure used to treat cervical myelopathy. Therefore, it is important to study pseudarthrosis rates after ACDF and correlate them with the graft used.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to evaluate the relationship between pseudarthrosis after ACDF and the interbody graft used.

RESULTS

A total of 3732 patients were evaluated in 46 studies. The mean age of the included patients was 51.5 ± 4.18 years (range, 42-59.6 years). ACDF is most often perforemd as single-level surgery and the level most impaired is C5-C6. The use of titanium cages, zero profile, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2, and carbon cages was seen as a protective factor for pseudarthrosis compared with the autograft group (control group); with an odds ratio of 0.29, 0.51, 0.03, and 0.3, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. The use of polyetheretherketone, poly(methyl methacrylate), and trabecular metal was a risk factor for development of pseudarthrosis compared with the control group, with an odds ratio of 1.7, 8.7, and 6.8, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. Radiologic follow-up was an important factor for the pseudarthrosis rate; paradoxically, a short follow-up (<1 year) had lower rates of pseudarthrosis and follow-up >2 years increased the chance of finding pseudarthrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Different types of grafts lead to a significant difference in pseudarthrosis rates. Follow-up time is also an important factor that affects the rate of pseudarthrosis after ACDF.

Sagittal Reconstruction and Clinical Outcome Using Traditional ACDF, Versus Stand-alone ACDF Versus TDR: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the difference in postoperative sagittal alignment when single level cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy is treated with an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a structural graft and plate, a stand-alone ACDF, or a total disc arthroplasty (TDR). We also wanted to determine if postoperative sagittal alignment impacted clinical outcomes in this patient population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although there are several accepted techniques for interbody reconstruction during single level anterior cervical surgery, little is known on the impact of any of them on segmental and regional sagittal alignment.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Only studies which contained pre and postoperative C2-7 Cobb angles as well as Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores following single level traditional ACDF with plate and cage, stand-alone ACDF, or TDR with at least 1 year follow up were included.

RESULTS

There were 12 publications that fulfilled the inclusion criteria with a total of 658 patients. Cluster regression analysis showed no difference between treatment arms at each respective time-point or in the overall change in NDI from preoperative to postoperative (P = 0.88). Cluster regression analysis showed no difference between treatment arms at each respective time point or in the overall change in lordosis from pre-op to post-op (P = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

This review provides evidence that while NDI scores improved across all devices, there was no significant difference in NDI improvement or C2-7 Cobb angle change between single level traditional ACDF, stand-alone ACDF, or TDR. Although TDR has not been considered a lordosis producing operation, our investigation shows it does not differ significantly in sagittal profile from other cervical fusion techniques. Moreover, we show that the NDI score improved, regardless of device implanted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Three-Dimensional, High-Definition Exoscopic Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Valid Alternative to Microscope-Assisted Surgery

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains one of the most commonly taught procedures during residency and one of the most frequently performed by neurosurgeons. Neurosurgeons use microscopes to perform surgery and to train other surgeons. Although the microscope provides excellent illumination and magnification, its use will be limited to 2 people: the surgeon and the assistant. Consequently, the scrub nurse and residents watching 2-dimensional images on monitors will have a reduced perception of the surgical field depth and anatomical details. The exoscope has been introduced as an alternative to microscopes and endoscopes. We used a 3-dimensional (3D), high-definition exoscope (3D Vitom [Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany]) in 2 patients undergoing 2-level ACDF for cervical myeloradiculopathy.

METHODS

The exoscope was used during soft tissue dissection, discectomy, osteophytectomy, and cage insertion. Microsurgical drilling of the posterior osteophytes, which will usually require adequate magnification and proper microscope angulation, was also performed using the exoscope.

RESULTS

The exoscope provided a 3D view of the surgical field similar to that provided by a microscope and allowed us to effectively and safely perform the required surgical steps. The main advantage of 3D exoscope-assisted surgery, compared with microscope-assisted surgery, is the possibility to generate videos with a similar view and image quality as perceived by the surgeon. Therefore, the didactic capabilities of exoscopic videos are greater than those provided by microscopic videos. Exoscopes are also smaller compared with microscopes, allowing for comfortable use from the early surgical steps to device implantation.

CONCLUSION

We believe that exoscope-assisted surgery could become a safe and effective alternative to microscope-assisted surgery in ACDF.

Can Self-Locking Cages Offer the Same Clinical Outcomes as Anterior Cage-with-Plate Fixation for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Mid-Term Follow-Up?

Background

Self-locking stand-alone cages (MC+) and cage-with-pate fixation system are 2 different surgical methods used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), but few systematic comparative studies comparing the 2 methods in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) have been published.

Material/Methods

Sixty-two patients with MCSM who underwent multilevel ACDF were enrolled and completed at least a 3-year postoperative follow-up. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, and clinical and radiological results were compared between the MC+ self-locking cages group and the cage-with-plate fixation group. Clinical parameters, including VAS for neck pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and neck disabled index (NDI), were evaluated. Surgical results according to Odom’s criteria and postoperative dysphagia status, C5 nerve root palsy, and loosening of the instrumentation were recorded. Postoperative radiological results, including fusion rates, fusion segmental Cobb’s angle (FSC), cervical lordosis, fusion segmental height (FSH), cage subsidence, and adjacent segment degeneration, were assessed.

Results

The VAS score, JOA score, and NDI score were significantly improved in both groups. However, the patients in the cage-with-plate group were more likely to have neck pain at the last follow-up. The cervical lordosis, FSC, and FSH showed significant correction immediately after surgery. The loss of the cervical lordosis and FSH were higher in the MC+ group.

Conclusions

We found that use of MC+ cages is safe and effective in treating MCSM, but for patients who require strong postoperative stabilization and maintaining the cervical alignment better, the cage-with-plate fixation may best.

Outcome Evaluation of Zero-Profile Device Used for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Osteoporosis Compared without Osteoporosis: A Minimum Three-Year Follow-Up Study

OBJECTIVE

We compared the mid-term efficacy and safety of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a Zero-Profile device for cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) with and without osteoporosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of elderly patients with CDDD treated by single-level ACDF with a Zero-Profile device. The patients were divided into group A (osteoporosis) and group B (no osteoporosis) according to the bone mineral density. The clinical outcomes (Japanese Orthopaedic Association, neck disability index, visual analog scale, and short-form 36 scores), radiological outcomes (cervical lordosis and fusion rate), and complications were reviewed at each follow-up examination.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully performed in all patients. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association, neck disability index, visual analog scale, and short-form 36 scores and cervical lordosis were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups at each follow-up point (P > 0.05). No significant difference was found in the fusion rate at 3 months postoperatively (group A, 88.9%; group B, 90.0%), dysphagia rate at 1 month postoperatively (group A, 11.1%; group B, 15.0%), or cage subsidence rate at the final follow-up visit (group A, 11.1%; group B, 10.0%; P > 0.05). All patients achieved solid fusion, and no patient had dysphagia at the final follow-up examination.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF with the Zero-Profile device can be used as an effective and reliable treatment for single-level CDDD with osteoporosis.