Sport-Related Structural Brain Injury: 3 Cases of Subdural Hemorrhage in American High School Football

Positive Head Computed Tomography Findings in the Setting of Sport Head Injuries: Can These Athletes Return-to-Play?

BACKGROUND

The literature on athletes with positive head computed tomography (HCT) findings in the setting of sport head injuries remains sparse.

OBJECTIVE

To report the proportions of athletes with a positive HCT and compare acute injury characteristics and recovery between those with and without a positive HCT.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-institution, cohort study was performed with all athletes aged 12 to 23 years seen at a regional concussion center from 11/2017 to 04/2022. The cohort was dichotomized into positive vs negative HCT (controls). Acute injury characteristics (ie, loss of consciousness and amnesia) and recovery, as measured by days to return-to-learn (RTL), symptom resolution, and return-to-play (RTP) were compared. χ 2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed.

RESULTS

Of 2061 athletes, 226 (11.0%) received an HCT and 9 (4.0%) had positive findings. HCT findings included 4 (44.4%) subdural hematomas, 1 (11.1%) epidural hematoma, 2 (22.2%) facial fractures, 1 (11.1%) soft tissue contusion, and 1 (11.1%) cavernous malformation. All 9 (100.0%) athletes were treated nonoperatively and successfully returned-to-play at a median (IQR) of 73.0 (55.0-82.0) days. No differences in loss of consciousness or amnesia were seen between positive HCT group and controls. The Mann-Whitney U test showed differences in RTL (17.0 vs 4.0 days; U = 45.0, P = .016) and RTP (73.0 vs 27.0 days; U = 47.5, P = .007) but not in symptom resolution. Our subanalysis showed no differences across all recovery metrics between acute hemorrhages and controls.

CONCLUSION

Among athletes seen at a regional concussion center who underwent an acute HCT, positive findings were seen in 4%. Although athletes with a positive HCT had longer RTL and RTP, symptom resolution was similar between those with a positive and negative HCT. All athletes with a positive HCT successfully returned to play. Despite a more conservative approach to athletes with a positive HCT, clinical outcomes are similar between those with and without a positive HCT.

Sport-related Structural Brain Injury in High School and College American Football Athletes, 2002-2020: Effect of Lystedt Law

BACKGROUND

A previous report revealed an average of 7.2 (0.67 per 100,000 participants) sport-related structural brain injuries (SRSBIs) with macroscopic lesions per year in high school (HS) and college football players. The Lystedt law and other rule changes have been implemented with intent to reduce the risk of brain injury in football.

HYPOTHESIS

To update the profile of SRSBIs in HS and college football players and evaluate the efficacy of legislation intended to reduce brain injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiology study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 18 academic years (July 2002 through June 2020) of SRSBIs catalogued by the National Registry of Catastrophic Sports Injuries. The incidence of SRSBIs was assessed at the HS level during the pre (July 2002 through June 2009), transitional (July 2009 through June 2014), and post (July 2014 through June 2020) universal adoption time periods of the Lystedt law. In addition, the incidence of SRSBIs during the second half of the study (2011-2012 through 2019-2020) was compared with the first half of the study (2002-2003 through 2010-2011).

RESULTS

During the study period, there was a total of 228 SRSBIs (12.7 per year, 1.01 per 100,000 participants): 212 (93%, 11.8 per year, 1.00 per 100,000) in HS athletes and 16 (7%, 0.89 per year, 1.17 per 100,000) in college athletes. There were 52 fatalities (2.9 per year, 0.22 per 100,000 participants) with 46 (2.56 per year, 0.22 per 100,000) in HS athletes and 6 (0.33 per year, 0.43/100,000) in college athletes. There was no significant difference in risk of HS total SRSBIs or fatalities during the 3 Lystedt periods. The risk of combined SRSBI cases [relative risk (RR) = 1.22, P = 0.13] and fatalities (RR = 1.20, P = 0.52) was similar in the second half of the study compared with the first half of the study.

CONCLUSION

Despite implementation of rule changes intended to reduce head injury, in particular the Lystedt law, the incidence of SRSBIs has remained unchanged. Further research is necessary to develop effective prevention programs for SRSBIs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

SRSBIs remain a persistent problem in HS and college American football. The recent head injury rule changes have not been effective at reducing SRSBIs.

Sport-Related Structural Brain Injury and Return to Play: Systematic Review and Expert Insight

BACKGROUND

Sport-related structural brain injury (SRSBI) is intracranial pathology incurred during sport. Management mirrors that of non-sport-related brain injury. An empirical vacuum exists regarding return to play (RTP) following SRSBI.

OBJECTIVE

To provide key insight for operative management and RTP following SRSBI using a (1) focused systematic review and (2) survey of expert opinions.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of SRSBI from 2012 to present in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a cross-sectional survey of RTP in SRSBI by 31 international neurosurgeons was conducted.

RESULTS

Of 27 included articles out of 241 systematically reviewed, 9 (33.0%) case reports provided RTP information for 12 athletes. To assess expert opinion, 31 of 32 neurosurgeons (96.9%) provided survey responses. For acute, asymptomatic SRSBI, 12 (38.7%) would not operate. Of the 19 (61.3%) who would operate, midline shift (63.2%) and hemorrhage size > 10 mm (52.6%) were the most common indications. Following SRSBI with resolved hemorrhage, with or without burr holes, the majority of experts (>75%) allowed RTP to high-contact/collision sports at 6 to 12 mo. Approximately 80% of experts did not endorse RTP to high-contact/collision sports for athletes with persistent hemorrhage. Following craniotomy for SRSBI, 40% to 50% of experts considered RTP at 6 to 12 mo. Linear regression revealed that experts allowed earlier RTP at higher levels of play (β = -0.58, 95% CI -0.111, -0.005, P = .033).

CONCLUSION

RTP decisions following structural brain injury in athletes are markedly heterogeneous. While individualized RTP decisions are critical, aggregated expert opinions from 31 international sports neurosurgeons provide key insight. Level of play was found to be an important consideration in RTP determinations.

Acute Subdural Hematoma in High School Rugby Players in Japan: The Importance of Playing Experience for Injury Prevention

OBJECTIVES

Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is known to be devasting sport-related head injury but it is relatively rare in rugby compared with other contact sports. Certain cases of ASDH have happened in high school rugby players in Japan. To prevent them from the injury we report a background of the players.

METHODS

Data of high school rugby players who suffered ASDH were extracted from injury reports in the Japan Rugby Football Union between April 2004 and March 2020. The number of injured players, diagnosis on the report, school year, phase of play where the injury occurred, and playing career were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 30 cases of ASDH including 16 cases in the first year, 9 in the second year, and 5 in the third year of playing. Phase of play was mainly being tackled in 11 (37%), and tackling in 13 (43%). Novice players, defined as a player having less playing experience of rugby during junior high school, accounted for 77% of phase of tackling, 82% of being tackled. First year novice players accounted for 100% of phase of being tackled. Outcome within 6 months after injury was recovery in 14, morbidity in 6, mortality in 2, and unknown in 8.

CONCLUSIONS

Playing experience in high school rugby players should be considered as an important factor for prevention of ASDH-in particular, phase of being tackled is riskier than that of tackling for first year novice players.

Second Impact Syndrome. Myth or reality?

INTRODUCTION

Second impact syndrome (SIS) is a devastating condition occurring in sport-induced mild brain injury. SIS is drastically defined by anamnestic, clinical and radiological criteria, which is unusual in the field of cranial traumatology. The purpose of this study was to provide a literature review of this syndrome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a literature review of all published studies on PubMed. The keywords were "second impact syndrome and catastrophic head injury", "second impact syndrome and sport", "repeat concussion and catastrophic brain injury", "catastrophic head injury and concussion", "catastrophic head injury", "concussion and second impact syndrome", "concussion and repetitive head injury".

RESULTS

Eighty-two full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 41 studies were included in qualitative synthesis and 21 were included in quantitative synthesis.

DISCUSSION

The number of cases reported in the literature was extremely small compared to the population at risk, i.e., the number of athletes exposed to repeated concussions. SIS was similar to talk and die syndrome, with which it shares certain characteristics. If we consider SIS according to "talk and deteriorate tables", it opens up interesting perspectives because they are specific in children and adolescents. Taking into account the scarcity of this syndrome, one may question whether athlete-intrinsic features may be involved in at least some cases of SIS. On a pathophysiological level, many explanations remained unsatisfactory because they were unable to explain all the clinical phenomena and observed lesions. Triggering the trigeminocardiac reflex is a crucial element in explaining the sequence of clinical events. Its association with a state of neurogenic inflammation provides an almost complete explanation for this particular condition. Finally, on a practical level, a concussion occurring during the playing of a sport must be considered as any other injury before allowing a return to play.