Natalizumab-Associated Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Serum IgG levels to Epstein-Barr and measles viruses in patients with multiple sclerosis during natalizumab and interferon beta treatment

Background

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) demonstrate higher seroprevalence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and increased anti-EBV IgG levels in serum compared with healthy controls. Intrathecal antibody production to measles virus (MeV) is a common finding in patients with MS.

Objective

To measure serum IgG reactivity to EBV glycoprotein 350 (gp350) and MeV nucleocapsid protein (N_CORE) in patients with MS and healthy controls and to determine if reactivity changed in patients during interferon beta (IFNβ) and/or natalizumab (NAT) treatment. A secondary aim was to determine the seroprevalence of EBV in patients and controls.

Methods

Patients with MS (n=728) were included from the Swedish pharmacovigilance study for NAT. Paired serum samples from 714 patients drawn before and during NAT treatment and paired samples from 170 patients during prior IFNβ treatment were analysed. In total, 156 patients were included in both groups. Samples from 144 matched blood donors served as controls. Indirect ELISA was applied using recombinant EBVgp350 and MeV N_CORE as antigens. EBVgp350 IgG seronegative samples were also analysed using EBV nuclear antigen 1 and viral capsid antigen (VCA).

Results

Patients with MS showed higher serum levels of anti-EBVgp350 and anti-MeV N_CORE IgG compared with controls. During NAT treatment, the levels of anti-EBVgp350 and anti-MeV N_CORE IgG declined, compared with the relatively stable levels noted during prior IFNβ treatment. Ten patients failed to demonstrate anti-EBVgp350 IgG but did show detectable anti-VCA IgG, indicating EBV seropositivity. In contrast, 10/144 controls were EBV seronegative.

Conclusions

Treatment with NAT, which is considered a selective immunosuppressive agent with a compartmentalised effect on the central nervous system, appeared to be associated with a moderate decrease in circulating IgG levels to EBVgp350 and MeV N_CORE. All patients with MS were EBV IgG seropositive, supporting the potential role of EBV in the pathogenesis of MS.

Pharmacovigilance during treatment of multiple sclerosis: early recognition of CNS complications

An increasing number of highly effective disease-modifying therapies for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have recently gained marketing approval. While the beneficial effects of these drugs in terms of clinical and imaging outcome measures is welcomed, these therapeutics are associated with substance-specific or group-specific adverse events that include severe and fatal complications. These adverse events comprise both infectious and non-infectious complications that can occur within, or outside of the central nervous system (CNS). Awareness and risk assessment strategies thus require interdisciplinary management, and robust clinical and paraclinical surveillance strategies. In this review, we discuss the current role of MRI in safety monitoring during pharmacovigilance of patients treated with (selective) immune suppressive therapies for MS. MRI, particularly brain MRI, has a pivotal role in the early diagnosis of CNS complications that potentially are severely debilitating and may even be lethal. Early recognition of such CNS complications may improve functional outcome and survival, and thus knowledge on MRI features of treatment-associated complications is of paramount importance to MS clinicians, but also of relevance to general neurologists and radiologists.

Successful Management of Natalizumab-Associated Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma through Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

Natalizumab is used as a second-line treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Some reports have linked natalizumab to primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), although few have described its management. A 45-year-old woman with Balo’s Concentric Sclerosis presented dizziness, vertigo accompanied by dysarthria, weakness on the left side and blurred vision to the right eye after the fourth dose of natalizumab. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a brain biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of PCNSL. The patient received modified PCNSL chemotherapy (MATRix protocol) followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) supported by an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT) as a consolidation therapy. Thirty months later, she is still in complete remission of her PCNSL and MS. In this case, whole brain radiotherapy was excluded because it may be associated with an increased risk of neurotoxicity in MS. ASCT was preferred because it has been shown to prevent disability progression in less advanced MS stages. Our patient is the second to receive an ASCT in this context and this option of treatment should be the preferred if the patient is eligible.

Safety of Newer Disease Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for multiple sclerosis has expanded greatly. Newer more potent disease modifying therapies (DMTs) with varying mechanisms of actions are increasingly used early in the disease course. These newer DMTs include oral therapies (teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and cladribine) and infusion therapies (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab), and are associated with better control of disease activity and long-term outcomes in patients with MS compared to older injectable therapies (interferon beta and glatiramer acetate). However, they are associated with safety concerns and subsequent monitoring requirements. Adverse events are initially observed in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, and further long-term data are collected in phase 3 extension studies, case series, and post-marketing reports, which highlight the need to periodically re-evaluate and adjust monitoring strategies to optimize treatment safety in an individualized approach.

Managing Risks with Immune Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

Since the introduction of the interferons in the 1990s, a multitude of different immunomodulatory and immunosuppressant disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been developed. They have all shown positive effects on clinical endpoints such as relapse rate and disease progression and are a heterogeneous group of therapeutics comprising recombinant pegylated and non-pegylated interferon-β variants, peptide combinations, monoclonal antibodies, and small molecules. However, they have relevant side effect profiles, which necessitate thorough monitoring and straightforward patient education. In individual cases, side effects can be severe and potentially life-threatening, which is why knowledge about (neurological and non-neurological) adverse drug reactions is essential for prescribing neurologists as well as general practitioners. This paper aims to provide an overview of currently available MS therapies, their modes of action and safety profiles, and the necessary therapy monitoring.

Abnormalities and erythroblasts in peripheral blood of multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab

BACKGROUND

In natalizumab treated patients several hematopoietic abnormalities including erythroblasts, myeloblasts and neutrophilic precursors in peripheral blood have been described. So far, long term effects of the hematopoietic changes have not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To describe hematopoietic abnormalities in longitudinally monitored MS patients treated with natalizumab. Patients treated with dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide and fingolimod served as controls. Secondly, the relation between natalizumab serum levels and the occurrence of hematopoietic abnormalities was explored.

METHODS

212 natalizumab treated patients were included, 91 patients with available baseline samples (998 follow-up samples) were compared with patients with dimethyl fumarate (n = 166, 1154 samples), teriflunomide (n = 38, 228 samples) and fingolimod (n = 114, 853 samples). One hundred twenty one patients without baseline samples (1952 follow-up samples) were included in the follow-up group.

RESULTS

More than half of all natalizumab treated patients developed hematopoietic abnormalities, almost a quarter had erythroblasts. Natalizumab use was associated with an increased risk of developing abnormalities in comparison to oral treatment, with a corrected hazard ratio of 2.3, 10.0 and 8.1 in comparison to fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide respectively. No difference in developing abnormalities was observed in relation to natalizumab serum concentrations. None of the patients developed a hematologic malignancy during follow up.

CONCLUSION

Hematopoietic abnormalities are common during natalizumab treatment. Given the lack of consequences of this finding during long-term follow-up, it is generally justifiable to refrain from further diagnostic procedures when observing hematopoietic abnormalities in patients using natalizumab.

Risks and risk management in modern multiple sclerosis immunotherapeutic treatment

In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) owing to the approval of a number of new drugs with very distinct mechanisms of action. All approved disease-modifying drugs primarily work directly on the immune system. However, the identification of an ‘optimal choice’ for individual patients with regard to treatment efficacy, treatment adherence and side-effect profile has become increasingly complex including conceptual as well as practical considerations. Similarly, there are peculiarities and specific requirements with regard to treatment monitoring, especially in relation to immunosuppression, the development of secondary immune-related complications, as well as the existence of drug-specific on- and off-target effects. Both classical immunosuppression and selective immune interventions generate a spectrum of potential therapy-related complications. This article provides a comprehensive overview of available immunotherapeutics for MS and their risks, detailing individual mechanisms of action and side-effect profiles. Furthermore, practical recommendations for patients treated with modern MS immunotherapeutics are provided.

Management of primary central nervous system lymphoma

A rare tumor, primary central nervous system lymphoma can affect immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. While sensitive to radiotherapy or chemotherapy crossing the blood-brain barrier, it often recurs. Modern treatment consists of high-dose methotrexate-based induction chemotherapy, often followed by consolidation with either radiotherapy or further chemotherapy. Neurotoxicity is however a concern with radiotherapy, especially for patients older than 60 years. The benefit of the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy is unclear. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy have been effective in some patients and are tested on a larger scale. Survival has improved in the last decade, but remains poor in older patients.