Comparison of Quality Metrics for Pediatric Shunt Surgery and Proposal of the Negative Shunt Revision Rate

Analysis of neurosurgical procedures with unplanned reoperation for quality improvement: A 5-year single hospital study

The unplanned return to the operating room rate is a quality metric for assessing hospital performance. This study aimed to evaluate the cause, incidence, and time interval of unplanned returns in index neurosurgical procedures within 30 days of the initial surgery as an internal audit. We retrospectively analyzed neurosurgical procedures between January 2015, and December 2019, in a single regional hospital. The definition of an unplanned return to the operating room was a patient who underwent two operations within 30 days when the second procedure was not planned, staged, or related to the natural course of the disease.A total of 4365 patients were identified in our analysis, of which 93 (2%) had an unplanned return to the operating room within 30 days of their initial surgery during admission. The most common reason for an unplanned return to the operating room for a cranial procedure was hemorrhage, followed by hydrocephalus and subdural effusion, which accounted for 49.5%(46/93), 12%(11/93), and 5.4%(5/93) of cases, respectively. In spinal procedures, the most common cause of return was a residual disc, followed by surgical site infection, which accounted for 5.4%(5/93) and 4.3%(4/93) of cases, respectively. The overall median time interval for unplanned returns to the operating room was 3 days (interquartile range, 1-9).Lowering the rate of postoperative hemorrhage in cranial surgery and postoperative residual disc in spine surgery was crucial as an internal audit in a 5-year single institute follow-up. However, the unplanned reoperation rate is less helpful in benchmarking because of the heterogeneity of patients between hospitals.

Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?

BACKGROUND

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients.

METHODS

In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007-2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data.

RESULTS

Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery.

CONCLUSION

Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.

The Preventable Shunt Revision Rate: A Multicenter Evaluation

BACKGROUND

The Preventable Shunt Revision Rate (PSRR) was recently introduced as a novel quality metric.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the PSRR across multiple centers and determine associated variables.

METHODS

Nine participating centers in North America provided at least 2 years of consecutive shunt operations. Index surgery was defined as new shunt implantation, or revision of an existing shunt. For any index surgery that resulted in a reoperation within 90-days, index surgery information (demographic, clinical, and procedural) was collected and a decision made whether the failure was potentially preventable. The 90-day shunt failure rate and PSRR were calculated per institution and combined. Bivariate analyses were performed to evaluate individual effects of each independent variable on preventable shunt failure followed by a final multivariable model using a backward model selection approach.

RESULTS

A total of 5092 shunt operations were performed; 861 failed within 90 days of index operation, resulting in a 16.9% combined 90-day shunt failure rate and 17.6% median failure rate (range, 8.7%-26.9%). Of the failures, 307 were potentially preventable (overall and median 90-day PSRR, 35.7% and 33.9%, respectively; range, 16.1%-55.4%). The most common etiologies of avoidable failure were infection (n = 134, 44%) and proximal catheter malposition (n = 83, 27%). Independent predictors of preventable failure (P < .05) were lack of endoscopy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.26), recent shunt infection (OR = 3.65), shunt type (OR = 2.06) and center.

CONCLUSION

PSRR is variable across institutions, but can be 50% or higher. While the PSRR may never reach zero, this study demonstrates that overall about a third of early failures are potentially preventable.

Application of the Preventable Shunt Revision Rate to an Adult Population

BACKGROUND

The preventable shunt revision rate (PSRR) was recently introduced in pediatric hydrocephalus as a quality metric for shunt surgery. We evaluated the PSRR in an adult hydrocephalus population.

METHODS

All ventricular shunt operations (January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2018) performed at a university-based teaching hospital were included. For any index surgery (de novo or revision) resulting in reoperation within 90 days, the index surgery details were collected, and a consensus decision was reached regarding whether the failure had been potentially avoidable. Preventable failure was defined as failure due to infection, malposition, disconnection, migration, or kinking. The 90-day shunt failure rate and PSRR were calculated. Bivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the individual effects of each independent variable on preventable shunt failure.

RESULTS

A total of 318 shunt operations had been performed in 245 patients. Most patients were women (62%), with a median age of 48.2 years (interquartile range, 31.2-63.2 years). Most had had ventriculoperitoneal shunts placed (86.5%), and just more than one half were new shunts (51.6%). A total of 53 cases (16.7%) in 42 patients experienced shunt failure within 90 days of the index operation. Of these, 27 failures (8.5% of the total cases; 51% of the failures) were considered potentially preventable. The most common reasons were infection (37%; n = 10) and malposition of the proximal and distal catheters (both 25.9%; n = 7). Age was the only statistically significant difference between the 2 groups, with the patients experiencing preventable shunt failure older than those without preventable shunt failure (51.4 vs. 37.1 years; P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The 90-day PSRR can be applied to an adult population and serve as a quality metric.