Effects of Carotid Calcification on Restenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting: A Follow-Up Study with Computed Tomography Angiography

Association of stroke or death with severity of carotid lesion calcification in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting

OBJECTIVE

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for heavily calcified lesions is controversial due to concern for stent failure and increased perioperative stroke risk. However, the degree to which calcification affects outcomes is poorly understood, particularly in transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). With the precipitous increase in TCAR use and its expansion to standard surgical-risk patients, we aimed to determine the impact of lesion calcification on CAS outcomes to ensure its safe and appropriate use.

METHODS

We identified patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative who underwent first-time transfemoral CAS (tfCAS) and TCAR between 2016 and 2021. Patients were stratified into groups based on degree of lesion calcification: no calcification, 1% to 50% calcification, 51% to 99% calcification, and 100% circumferential calcification or intraluminal protrusion. Outcomes included in-hospital and 1-year composite stroke/death, as well as individual stroke, death, and myocardial infarction outcomes. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between degree of calcification and these outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 21,860 patients undergoing CAS, 28% patients had no calcification, 34% had 1% to 50% calcification, 35% had 51% to 99% calcification, and 3% had 100% circumferential calcification/protrusion. Patients with 51% to 99% and circumferential calcification/protrusion had higher odds of in-hospital stroke/death (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.6; P = .034; OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9; P = .004, respectively) compared with those with no calcification. Circumferential calcification was also associated with increased risk for in-hospital myocardial infarction (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.0; P = .003). In tfCAS patients, only circumferential calcification/protrusion was associated with higher in-hospital stroke/death odds (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4; P = .013), whereas for TCAR patients, 51% to 99% calcification was associated with increased odds of in-hospital stroke/death (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2; P = .025). At 1 year, circumferential calcification/protrusion was associated with higher odds of ipsilateral stroke/death (12.4% vs 6.6%; hazard ratio, 1.64; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing CAS, there is an increased risk of in-hospital stroke/death for lesions with >50% calcification or circumferential/protruding plaques. Increasing severity of carotid lesion calcification is a significant risk factor for stroke/death in patients undergoing CAS, regardless of approach.

Management of Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis or Occlusion in Tandem Lesion with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Which Is More Appropriate Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty or Stent?

OBJECTIVE

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is the established treatment strategy of the cervical internal carotid artery (cICA) stenosis, but its use for acute tandem lesions remains controversial. We investigated the clinical and procedural outcomes of management of cICA lesions and evaluated the risk factors for complications.

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent acute mechanical thrombectomy for tandem lesion between January 2014 and June 2022 were included. Treatment of the cICA lesion was classified into the CAS group or the non-CAS group. The risk factors for postoperative ischemic events or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The CAS group included 36 patients (72%) and the non-CAS group 14 (28%). Postoperative complications were observed in 9 patients (18%). Thromboembolic complications occurred in 4 patients (29%) of the non-CAS group but in 1 patient (3%) of the CAS group. Severe calcification of the cICA (P = 0.04), non-CAS (P = 0.018), and more than 60% residual stenosis (P = 0.016) were significant risk factors associated with thromboembolic complications. sICH occurred in 4 patients (11%) of the CAS group but in none of the non-CAS group. More than 80% stenosis improvement was significantly associated with sICH (P = 0.049). Twenty-nine patients (58%) had a good clinical outcome at 90 days after onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute CAS is effective for the management for cICA tandem lesions during mechanical thrombectomy, but care not to overextend may be important to reduce the risk of sICH. Severe calcification of the cICA may increase the risk of postoperative thromboembolic complications using non-CAS treatment.

Carotid computed tomography angiography after cobalt-based alloy carotid artery stenting using ultra-high-resolution computed tomography with model-based iterative reconstruction

In conventional carotid computed tomographic angiography, the artifacts of the stent vary depending on the structure and characteristics of the alloy type. Cobalt-based alloy stents have been reported to exhibit high artifacts, and accurate evaluation of the internal lumen can be difficult. Recently, ultra-high-resolution computed tomography scanner systems have become available for clinical practice. The primary features of this computed tomography scanner are a 0.25-mm detector row width and a 1024 × 1024 matrix. We report a case-series of carotid artery stenting using a cobalt-based alloy stent scanned by an ultra-high-resolution computed tomography scanner system and model-based iterative reconstruction. We also report that the combination of the ultra-high-resolution computed tomography scanner system with model-based iterative reconstruction would be useful to evaluate vessel patency after placement of a cobalt-based alloy stent.

Assessing the Suitability of the Carotid Bifurcation for Stenting: Anatomic and Morphologic Considerations

OBJECTIVE

Over the years where stents have been used to treat carotid lesions, a great deal has been learned about which anatomical characteristics lead to adverse outcomes. This review summarizes the anatomic and morphologic characteristics of the carotid vasculature that can help guide patient selection and clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Each of the carotid artery anatomy and lesion characteristics that are relevant to carotid stenting are described in detail. These are accompanied with evidence-based outcomes and results.

RESULTS

Data on the prevalence of carotid artery lesions that are unsuitable for stenting are summarized and the implications of these data for practice are discussed, especially as they pertain to transcarotid artery revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

CAS can be viable option for carotid revascularization, but the lesion must be acceptable and safe for stent placement. There should be thorough assessment to rule out the presence of severe tortuosity, long-segment disease, severe calcification (circumferential or exophytic), mobile-plaque, swollen ICA sign, and carotid diameters outside the acceptable range. In carefully chosen lesions with the absence of the unfavorable characteristics described-TCAR may offer improved periprocedural success, and CAS may attain better long-term durability.

Shockwave intravascular lithoplasty for the treatment of calcified carotid artery stenosis: A very early single-center experience

Endovascular treatment of calcified carotid disease represents one of the main challenges for the interventionalists. Plaque calcium load is one of the most important factors affecting the risk of procedural complications. A new tool called Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (S-IVL; Shockwave Medical, Inc.) has been recently approved for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary and lower limb arteries but minimal data exist about the treatment of carotid arteries. We report our early experience of carotid stenting using S-IVL. We report two cases of symptomatic patients with severely calcified carotid artery diseases who were turned down for vascular surgeries. The first case was successfully performed through radial access using a distal cerebral embolic protection device in the context of contralateral carotid occlusion. In the second case, a very tight and calcified left internal carotid artery stenosis was successfully treated through femoral access using a proximal cerebral protection device. In both cases, advanced imaging confirmed effective calcium debulking and good stent expansion after IVL treatment. S-IVL effectiveness basically resides in integrating the effect of balloon angioplasty with the calcium-disrupting power of sonic pressure waves. This could be able to minimize the risk of cerebral embolization due to aggressive conventional balloon predilatation or poststenting dilatation usually needed to obtain an adequate luminal gain in carotid stenting. According to our small case series, the use of S-IVL for the treatment of heavily calcified carotid artery lesions seems to be helpful in this particular setting.