Better Hemodynamics and Less Antihypertensive Medication: Comparison of Scalp Block and Local Infiltration Anesthesia for Skull-Pin Placement in Awake Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

Dexmedetomidine for awake craniotomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

For awake craniotomy, monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) had shown relatively lower failure rates. Nevertheless, the conclusion of the appropriate anaesthetic agents, and complications, has not been proposed. Therefore, the systematic review and meta-analysis was done to compare the clinical profile, surgical outcomes, and anesthesia-related complications between dexmedetomidine-based and non-dexmedetomidine regimens during monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for this procedure.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Published clinical trials described MAC, including the amount of anaesthetic drugs, or the number of patients for awake craniotomy between January 1st, 2009 and March 31st, 2022 were reviewed through PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and grey literature index. The standard methodological procedures were following the PRISMA statement with the PROSPERO registration. Twenty-two articles with 2,137 awake craniotomy patients identified as epilepsy surgery, deep brain stimulation procedure, and intracranial surgery closed to an eloquent area with intraoperative awakening for neuro-evaluation were included. The relative risk (RR) regarding surgical outcomes, and anaesthesia-related complications were compared.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Dexmedetomidine-based versus non-dexmedetomidine anaesthetic regimen revealed no statistically significant differences in surgical outcomes (RR 1.08, 95 %CI 0.94-1.24), conversion to general anaesthesia (RR 0.45, 95 %CI 0.05-3.83), respiratory complications (RR 0.4, 95 %CI 0.12-1.27), and intraoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.30, 95 %CI 0.08-1.14). However, the intraoperative seizure was higher in non-dexmedetomidine group (RR 4.26, 95 %CI 1.49-12.16).

CONCLUSION

MAC for awake craniotomy with dexmedetomidine seems to be effective and safe. Randomized controlled trials with standard protocol in specific group of patients and surgical interventions would further demonstrate a clear benefit of dexmedetomidine in awake craniotomy under MAC.

Effectiveness and reliability of hypnosis in stereotaxy: a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD) may experience pain during stereotactic frame (SF) fixation in deep brain stimulation (DBS). We assessed the role of hypnosis during the SF fixation in PD patients undergoing awake bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS.

METHODS

N = 19 patients were included (N = 13 males, mean age 63 years; N = 10 allocated to the hypnosis and N = 9 allocated to the control groups). Patients were randomly assigned to the interventional (hypnosis and local anesthesia) or non-interventional (local anesthesia only) groups. The primary outcome was the pain perceived (the visual analogue scale (VAS)). Secondary outcomes were stress, anxiety, and depression, as measured by the perceived stress scale (PSS) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Procedural distress was measured using the peritraumatic distress inventory (PDI-13).

RESULTS

In the hypnosis group, VASmean was 5.6 ± 2.1, versus 6.4 ± 1.2 in the control group (p = 0.31). Intervention and control groups reported similar VASmax scores (7.6 ± 2.1 versus 8.6 ± 1.6 (p = 0.28), respectively). Both groups had similar HADS scores (6.2 ± 4.3 versus 6.7 ± 1.92, p = 0.72 (HADSa) and 6.7 ± 4.2 versus 7.7 ± 3, p = 0.58 (HADSd)), so were the PSS scores (26.1 ± 6.3 versus 25.1 ± 7, p = 0.75). Evolutions of VASmean (R2 = 0.93, 95% CI [0.2245, 1.825], p = 0.03) and PDI-13 scores (R2 = 0.94, 95% CI [1.006, 6.279], p = 0.02) significantly differ over follow-up with patients in the hypnosis groups showing lower scores.

CONCLUSION

In this unblinded, randomized study, hypnosis does not influence pain, anxiety, and distress during awake SF fixation but modulates pain memory over time and may prevent the integration of awake painful procedures as a bad experience into the autobiographical memory of patients suffering from PD. A randomized controlled study with more data is necessary to confirm our findings.

Evaluating the Anatomic Spread of Selective Nerve Scalp Blocks Using Methylene Blue: A Cadaveric Analysis

BACKGROUND

The modern scalp block consists of local anesthesia injections that target the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, and greater and lesser occipital nerves. Limited data exist on the local anesthetic spread that occurs with this technique. This study examines the extent of the spread of a scalp block using methylene blue in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

A traditional landmark-based scalp block was performed on 6 unembalmed human cadavers using 25-G, 1.5-inch needles to inject 1 to 2 mL of methylene blue 0.1% at each nerve bilaterally; a total volume of 20 mL was injected. The cadavers were then dissected, and the spread of injectate was measured and recorded.

RESULTS

All the nerves required for analgesic coverage were appropriately stained by the injections, except for in 2 specimens where the lesser occipital nerve could not be identified. The zygomatic (stained in 2 of 8 specimens) and temporal (stained in 5 of 8 specimens) branches of the facial nerve were stained as a result of the zygomaticotemporal and/or auriculotemporal injections. Tracking from the zygomatic injection site was noted as far inferior as the temporalis muscle attachments on the mandible.

CONCLUSIONS

This cadaveric study confirms that the landmark-based technique for scalp blocks consistently stained all 6 nerves involved in scalp innervation. There was significant unintentional spread to the branches of the facial nerve when using the landmark technique.

Delayed Recovery After Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease Under General Anesthesia-Cases Report

Objective

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative syndrome, and deep-brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for carefully screened patients with PD. However, delayed recovery after anesthesia, which occurs after taking prolonged general anesthesia for such patients, has been reported less frequently in literature. This report explores the possible causes of postoperative awakening delay in patients undergoing DBS surgery due to general anesthesia and provides a reference for anesthesia management of similar operations in the future.

Case Presentation

Three patients with PD elective underwent DBS surgery. The first patients demonstrated walking disability, gait deficits, unstable posture, limb stiffness, and imbalance. The second demonstrated left limb static tremor, stiffness, and bradykinesia. The third demonstrated bradykinesia, rigidity, walking deficits, and decreased facial expression. These included two males and one female with a mean patient age of 60.7 ± 6.7year, weight of 63.7 ± 11 kg, the height of 163.3 ± 7.6 cm, and preoperative American Society of Anesthesiology rating of 2.3 ± 0.6. The preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale mean score was 15. All patients completed the operation under general anesthesia (the mean anesthesia time was 5.3 ± 1.1 h). The mean operation time was 252 ± 60 min. The mean bleeding volume was 50 ml, and the urine volume was 867 ± 569 ml. However, all the patients showed unconsciousness after 95 ± 22 min after stopping the anesthetic, and the respiratory function was in good condition, but they could not cooperate with anesthesiologists and had no response to the anesthesiologist's instructions. The mean hospital stay was 17 ± 7 days. All patients were discharged uneventfully. The average number of days patients followed up postoperatively was 171 ± 28.5 days. Motor and speech were improved significantly postoperatively in three patients compared with preoperatively. Taking anti-Parkinson medication was markedly reduced. There were no complications during postoperative follow-up.

Conclusions

To prevent delayed recovery occurring after DBS surgery in Parkinson's disease, it is recommended to take scalp nerve block + general anesthesia to complete the procedure while avoiding general anesthesia.

A Modified Dura Puncture Procedure to Reduce Brain Shift in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: One Institution's Experience

Objective

The therapeutic effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery mainly depends on the accuracy of electrode placement and the reduction in brain shift. Among the standard procedures, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) loss or pneumocephalus caused by dura incision (DI) is thought to be the main reason for brain shift and inaccuracy of electrode placement. In the current study, we described a modified dura puncture (DP) procedure to reduce brain shift and compare it with the general procedure of DBS surgery in terms of electrode placement accuracy.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a series of 132 patients who underwent DBS surgery in Wuhan Union Hospital from December 2015 to April 2021. According to the different surgery procedures, patients were classified into two cohorts: the DI group (DI cohort) had 49 patients who receive the general procedure, and the DP group (DP cohort) had 83 patients who receive the modified procedure. Postoperative pneumocephalus volume (PPV) and CSF loss volume, electrode fusion error (EFE), and trajectory number were calculated. Meanwhile, intraoperative electrophysiological signal length (IESL), electrode implantation duration, and other parameters were analyzed.

Results

In the current study, we introduced an improved electrode implantation procedure for DBS surgery named the DP procedure. Compared with the general DI cohort (n = 49), the modified DP cohort (n = 83) had a shorter electrode implantation duration (p < 0.0001), smaller PPV, lower CSF leakage volume (p < 0.0001), and smaller EFE (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in IESL (p > 0.05) or adverse events (perioperative cerebral haematoma, skin erosion, epilepsy, p > 0.05) between the two cohorts.

Conclusion

The DP procedure is a modified procedure that can reduce brain shift and ensure implantation accuracy during DBS surgery without adverse events.

Intraoperative seizure outcome of levetiracetam combined with perampanel therapy in patients with glioma undergoing awake brain surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) combined with perampanel (PER) therapy for intraoperative seizure treatment to determine whether a combination of LEV and PER can aid in the prevention of intraoperative intractable seizures during awake surgery.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study in 78 consecutive patients with glioma who underwent awake surgery using intraoperative direct electrical stimulation mapping. To prevent intraoperative seizures, 50 patients were treated with the antiepileptic drug LEV only (LEV group) from January 2017 to January 2019, while the remaining 28 patients were treated with LEV plus PER (LEV + PER group) between March 2019 and January 2020. LEV (1000-3000 mg) and/or PER (2-4 mg) were administered before the surgery.

RESULTS

Preoperative seizures with International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) class II-VI occurred in 44% of the patients in the LEV group and in 35.7% of patients in the LEV + PER group, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.319). Total intraoperative seizures occurred in 18 patients (36.0%) in the LEV therapy group and in 2 patients (7.1%) in the LEV + PER group (p = 0.009). Of these, there were no patients (0%) with intractable seizures in the LEV + PER group. Regarding factors that influence intraoperative seizures in glioma patients during awake brain surgery, multivariate logistic regression models revealed that the occurrence of intraoperative seizures was significantly related to the involvement of motor-related regions (positive vs negative, HR 6.98, 95% CI 1.71-28.56, p = 0.007), preoperative seizure (ILAE class II-VI vs ILAE class I, HR 4.44, 95% CI 1.22-16.11, p = 0.024), and LEV + PER group (positive vs negative, HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.44, p = 0.005). Treatment-related adverse effects were rare and mild, including sleepiness, tiredness, and dizziness in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that LEV + PER therapy is significantly associated with a lower risk of intraoperative seizures compared with LEV therapy alone in patients with glioma during awake brain mapping. These findings will help neurosurgeons conduct safe and reliable awake surgeries and reduce the rate of intraoperative intractable seizures during such procedures.

Anesthesia for deep brain stimulation: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a rapidly expanding surgical modality for the treatment of patients with movement disorders. Its ability to be adjusted, titrated, and optimized over time has given it a significant advantage over traditional more invasive surgical procedures. Therefore, the success and popularity of this procedure have led to the discovery of new indications and therapeutic targets as well as advances in surgical techniques. The aim of this review is to highlight the important updates in DBS surgery and to exam the anesthesiologist's role in providing optimal clinical management.

RECENT FINDINGS

New therapeutic indications have a significant implication on perioperative anesthesia management. In addition, new technologies like frameless stereotaxy and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to guide electrode placement have altered the need for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and hence increased the use of general anesthesia. With an expanding number of patients undergoing DBS implantation, patients with preexisting DBS increasingly require anesthesia for unrelated surgery and the anesthesiologist must be aware of the considerations for perioperative management of these devices and potential complications.

SUMMARY

DBS will continue to grow and evolve requiring adaptation and modification to the anesthetic management of these patients.

A comparative study of serotonin and norepinephrine as adjuncts to improve cutaneous antinociception of mexiletine in response to skin pinpricks in rats

As adrenaline, serotonin and norepinephrine are two other vasoconstrictors and both of which have been proved to increase the quality and duration of local anesthetics when added as adjuvants. However, the difference in the improvement of the nociception of local anesthetics between the two adjuvants remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the cutaneous nociception of mexiletine by coadministration with serotonin and norepinephrine. Subcutaneous injection of drugs or combinations includes mexiletine 0.6, 1.8, 6.0 μmol, serotonin 1.6500 μmol, noradrenaline 0.8895 nmol, saline, mexiletine 1.8 and 6.0 μmol, respectively combined with serotonin 0.4125, 0.8250, 1.6500 μmol and noradrenaline 0.0356, 0.1779, 0.8895 nmol, with each injection dose of 0.6 ml. The nociception of mexiletine alone and mexiletine coadministered with serotonin and norepinephrine was assessed after subcutaneous injection. Subcutaneous injections of mexiletine elicited dose-related cutaneous antinociception (P < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001). Compared with mexiletine (1.8 μmol), adding norepinephrine (except for lowest dose) and serotonin to mexiletine (1.8 μmol) solutions for skin nociceptive block potentiated and prolonged the action (P < 0.01 or 0.001). Mexiletine (6.0 μmol) combined with norepinephrine and serotonin extended the duration of cutaneous antinociception when compared with mexiletine (6.0 μmol) alone (P < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001). Both serotonin and norepinephrine improve the sensory block and enhances the nociceptive block duration of mexiletine, and serotonin is superior to that of norepinephrine.

How to avoid pneumocephalus in deep brain stimulation surgery? Analysis of potential risk factors in a series of 100 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Accuracy of lead placement is the key to success in deep brain stimulation (DBS). Precise anatomic stereotactic planning usually is based on stable perioperative anatomy. Pneumocephalus due to intraoperative CSF loss is a common procedure-related phenomenon which could lead to brain shift and targeting inaccuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential risk factors of pneumocephalus in DBS surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center analysis in patients undergoing bilateral DBS. We quantified the amount of pneumocephalus by postoperative CT scans and corrected the data for accompanying brain atrophy by an MRI-based score. Automated computerized segmentation algorithms from a dedicated software were used. As potential risk factors, we evaluated the impact of trephination size, the number of electrode tracks, length of surgery, intraoperative blood pressure, and brain atrophy.

RESULTS

We included 100 consecutive patients that underwent awake DBS with intraoperative neurophysiological testing. Systolic and mean arterial blood pressure showed a substantial impact with an inverse correlation, indicating that lower blood pressure is associated with higher volume of pneumocephalus. Furthermore, the length of surgery was clearly correlated to pneumocephalus.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis identifies intraoperative systolic and mean arterial blood pressure as important risk factors for pneumocephalus in awake stereotactic surgery.

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Assessment in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery and its Impact on Lead Placement

OBJECTIVES

 While the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat various neurological disorders is undisputed, the surgical methods differ widely and the importance of intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) or macrostimulation (MS) remains controversially debated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of MER and MS on intraoperative lead placement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 We included 101 patients who underwent awake bilateral implantation of electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus with MER and MS for Parkinson's disease from 2009 to 2017 in a retrospective observational study. We analyzed intraoperative motor outcomes between anatomically planned stimulation point (PSP) and definite stimulation point (DSP), lead adjustments and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Item III (UPDRS-III), levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), and adverse events (AE) after 6 months.

RESULTS

 We adjusted 65/202 leads in 47/101 patients. In adjusted leads, MS results improved significantly when comparing PSP and DSP (p < 0.001), resulting in a number needed to treat of 9.6. After DBS, UPDRS-III and LEDD improved significantly after 6 months in adjusted and nonadjusted patients (p < 0.001). In 87% of leads, the active contact at 6 months still covered the optimal stimulation point during surgery. In total, 15 AE occurred.

CONCLUSION

 MER and MS have a relevant impact on the intraoperative decision of final lead placement and prevent from a substantial rate of poor stimulation outcome. The optimal stimulation points during surgery and chronic stimulation strongly overlap. Follow-up UPDRS-III results, LEDD reductions, and DBS-related AE correspond well to previously published data.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery

BACKGROUND

The peri-operative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block (GANB) in patients, especially in adult patients undergoing middle ear microsurgery remains unclear. We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided GANB would decrease the hemodynamic responsiveness to incision and opioid consumption in middle ear microsurgery as well as the post-operative analgesia requirement.

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing middle ear microsurgery were randomized into two equal groups to receive either a GANB with 2 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance (GANB group) or to receive a blank control intervention (without any performed injection) before general anesthesia inductions. The primary outcomes were hemodynamic changes of MAP (mean artery pressure) and HR (heart rate) to skin incision. The secondary endpoints were to determine the consumptions of propofol and remifentanil during the operation and the incidence of remedial analgesia 48 h post-operation to maintain VAS ≤ 3.

RESULTS

The MAP post incision in GANB group was significantly lower than that in control group (GANB group 93.83 ± 11.72 mmHg vs. control group 100.87 ± 12.65 mmHg, P = 0.029). The increases for MAP and HR post incision were also lower in GANB group (∆MAP GANB group 11.90 ± 8.32 mmHg vs. control group 19.83 ± 10.37 mmHg, P = 0.002; ∆HR GANB group 3.67 ± 5.30 beat min^- 1 vs. control group 8.23 ± 8.56 beat min^- 1, P = 0.016). Remifentanil consumption was significantly decreased in GANB group (GANB group 401.55 ± 100.51 μg h^- 1 vs. control group 697.34 ± 215.45 μg h^- 1, P = 0.000). The incidence of remedial analgesia post-operation in GANB group (5/30) was significantly lower than that in control group (20/30, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided GANB decreases the hemodynamic responsiveness to incision and remifentanil consumption in middle ear microsurgery as well as the post-operative analgesia requirement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was retrospectively registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn with the registration number of ChiCTR1800014333 on 6 January, 2018.

Comparison of Adrenaline and Dexmedetomidine in Improving the Cutaneous Analgesia of Mexiletine in Response to Skin Pinpricks in Rats

BACKGROUND

Adrenaline (Adr) and dexmedetomidine (Dex) are commonly used adjuvants of local anesthetics; however, the difference in the improvement of analgesia of local anesthetics between the 2 adjuvants remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this experimental research was to evaluate the cutaneous analgesic effect of mexiletine (Mex) by coadministration with Dex or Adr.

METHODS

The effect of a nociceptive block was assessed based on the inhibition of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex in response to skin pinpricks in rats. The analgesic activity of Mex alone and Mex coadministered with Dex or Adr was evaluated after subcutaneous injections. Subcutaneous injections of drugs or combinations include Mex 0.6, 1.8, and 6.0 μmol; Adr 13.66 nmol; Dex 1.05600 nmol; saline; and Mex 1.8 and 6.0 μmol, respectively, combined with Dex 0.01056, 0.10560, and 1.05600 nmol or Adr 0.55, 2.73, and 13.66 nmol, with each injection dose of 0.6 mL.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous injections of Mex elicited dose-related cutaneous analgesia. Compared with Mex (1.8 μmol), adding Dex or Adr to Mex (1.8 μmol) solutions for skin nociceptive block potentiated and prolonged the action. Mex (6.0 μmol) combined with Dex or Adr extended the duration of cutaneous analgesia when compared with Mex (6.0 μmol) alone. A high dose of Adr is more effective with Mex 1.8 μmol than that of Dex, whereas medium and low doses were less effective. Mex 6.0 μmol combined with any dose of Adr is superior to that of Dex.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Dex and Adr improve the sensory block and enhance the nociceptive block duration of Mex. But in most cases, Adr is superior to Dex. It may be that different mechanisms of action of the 2 adjuvants lead to the differences.

Safety of Noncontrast Imaging-Guided Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement in Parkinson Disease

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is considered standard of care for the treatment of medically refractory Parkinson disease (PD). The placement of brain electrodes is performed using contrast imaging to enhance blood vessel identification during stereotactic planning. We present our experience with a series of patients implanted using noncontrast imaging.

METHODS

All cases of DBS surgery for PD performed between 2012 and 2018 with noncontrast imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical features, postoperative imaging, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 287 deep-seated electrodes were implanted in 152 patients. Leads were placed at the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus internus in 258 and 29 hemispheres, respectively. We identified 2 cases of intracranial hemorrhage (0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

DBS lead placement can be performed without the use of intravenous contrast with a postoperative intracranial hemorrhage rate comparable with other reported series.