Influence of the Ratio of C2–C7 Cobb Angle to T1 Slope on Cervical Alignment After Laminoplasty

Cervical sagittal alignment changes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, laminectomy with fusion, and laminoplasty for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy

OBJECTIVE

Cervical sagittal alignment changes (CSACs) influence outcomes and health-related quality-of-life. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), laminectomy with fusion (LCF), and laminoplasty (LP) are common treatments for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy; however, these approaches need to be compared.

METHODS

Our study included 167 patients who underwent ACDF, LCF, or LP. Patients were divided into four groups according to C2-C7 Cobb angle (CL): kyphosis (CL < 0°), straight (0° ≤ CL < 10°), lordosis (10° ≤ CL < 20°), and extreme lordosis (20° ≤ CL) groups. CSACs consist of two parts. CSAC from the preoperative period to the postoperative period is surgical correction change (SCC). CSAC from the postoperative period to the final follow-up period is postoperative lordosis preserving (PLP). Outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and the neck disability index.

RESULTS

ACDF, LCF, and LP had equivalent outcomes. ACDF had greater SCC than LCF and LP. During follow-up, lordosis decreased in the ACDF and LCF groups but increased in the LP group. For straight alignment, ACDF had greater CSAC and greater SCC than the LCF and LP groups but similar PLP. For lordosis alignment, ACDF and LP had positive PLP, and LCF had negative PLP. For extreme lordosis, ACDF, LP, and LCF had negative PLP; however, cervical lordosis in the LP group was relatively stable during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF, LCF, and LP have different CSAC, SCC, and PLP according to a four-type cervical sagittal alignment classification. Preoperative cervical alignment is an important consideration in deciding the type of surgical treatment in CSM.

Impact of cervical and global spine sagittal alignment on cervical curvature changes after posterior cervical laminoplasty

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the correlation between the changes in cervical curvature and the sagittal parameters of spino-pelvic and clinical efficacy after posterior laminoplasty (LP).

METHODS

The patients with cervical spondylosis treated with LP from June 2018 to December 2020 were reviewed. The preoperative and follow-up spine full-length films were measured. The measured data included C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1S), pelvic incidence, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and C7-SVA. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and neck disability index (NDI) score were recorded before surgery and follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 56 patients in this study. There were no significant differences in spino-pelvic sagittal parameters before and after surgery; however, the JOA score significantly improved. The changes in postoperative cervical lordosis correlated with SS, PT, LL, T1S, and C7-SVA (P < 0.05). Regression analysis showed that T1S and C7-SVA were associated with reducing cervical lordosis (P = 0.021 and P = 0.001, respectively). Patients with larger T1S combined with larger C7-SVA had more cervical lordosis loss, poor JOA improvement, and high postoperative NDI scores (P < 0.001, P = 0.018, and P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients should be examined with full-length spine film before surgery to evaluate the cervical and spino-pelvic sagittal balance. T1S and C7-SVA correlated with changes in cervical sagittal alignment after LP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Does the asymmetry and extension function of the preoperative cervical paraspinal extensor predict postoperative cervical sagittal deformity in patients who undergo modified laminoplasty?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

A previous study found that the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the preoperative cervical paraspinal extensors (CPEs) was associated with loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty, while a recent study found that CPE asymmetry was associated with symptoms of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Whether preoperative CPE asymmetry can predict cervical sagittal deformity (CSD) after laminoplasty is unknown.

PURPOSE

To assess whether asymmetry, degree of degeneration, and extension function of the CPE can be used as predictors of postoperative CSD in patients who undergo laminoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

From January 2017 to December 2019, 55 patients with multilevel cord compression and myelopathic symptoms were enrolled.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) were used to assess cervical spinal function and quality of life.

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2019, 55 patients undergoing modified laminoplasty were included. The following parameters were measured preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively on X-ray: (1) C0-C2 Cobb angle; (2) C2-C7 Cobb angle (CL); (3) T1 slope (T1S); (5) C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA); (6) T1S minus CL; (7) Preoperative extension function: Extension CL minus Neutral CL (EF). Preoperative global alignment parameters: (8) spino cranial angle, (9) C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (C7 SVA), (10) pelvic incidence, (11) lumbar lordosis, (12) thoracic kyphosis. (13) Preoperative CPE parameters: Summation of bilateral total cross-sectional area (STCSA), summation of bilateral total cross-sectional area ratio (STCSAR), total cross-sectional area asymmetry, summation of bilateral functional cross-sectional area of muscle (SFCSA), summation of bilateral functional cross-sectional area of muscle ratio (FCSAR), and functional cross-sectional area of muscle asymmetry (FCSAA). The VAS, mJOA, and NDI were used to evaluate cervical spine function and quality of life. Patients were divided into the CSD group and the non-deformed group (N-CSD) group postoperatively, and the parameters between the two groups were compared. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the parameters, and multiple regression analysis and ROC curve analysis were used to determine the predictors and key values.

RESULTS

Compared with functional scores, mJOA in the CSD group was significantly lower than that in the N-CSD group, while NDI and VAS were significantly higher. Postoperative CL was significantly correlated with EF, SFCSA/STCSA (C3-C6), SFCSAR (C4 and C6), STCSAR (C6), and FSCAA (C6). T1S minus CL was significantly correlated with EF, SFCSA/STCSA (C3-4 and C6), SFCSAR (C4 and C6), STCSAR (C6) and FSCAA (C6). C2-7 SVA was significantly correlated with EF, SFCSAR (C4 and C6), STCSAR (C6), and FSCAA (C6). Multiple regression analysis showed that FCSAA (C6), SFCSAR (C6), SFCSAR (C4), and EF were significant predictors of postoperative CSD. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff points were 18.405, 2.95, 4.47, and 11.96.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study found that preoperative extension dysfunction of CPEs, asymmetry at the C6 level cervical extensors, and cervical extensor CSAs without fatty infiltration at the C4 and C6 levels were associated with cervical sagittal imbalance after modified laminoplasty. These factors can be considered when future spine surgeons formulate surgical plans.

The discrepancy between preoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope predisposes inferior clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after cervical laminoplasty

Objective

Cervical sagittal parameters have been widely used to predict clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). This study aims to coin a novel cervical sagittal parameter defined as the ratio of cervical sagittal vertical axis to T1 slope (CSVA/T1S) and to investigate the correlation between CSVA/T1S and postoperative HRQOL after laminoplasty.

Methods

A total of 102 CSM patients treated with cervical laminoplasty from our database were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were followed up for >12 months. Radiological parameters were measured using lateral cervical radiographs, including occiput-C2 lordosis (OC2), cervical lordosis (CL), CSVA, and T1S. Clinical parameters included the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and JOA recovery rate. Patients were grouped by preoperative T1S, T1S-CL, and CSVA/T1S value, respectively. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results

Patients with high CSVA/T1S had greater OC2 and CSVA but lower CL than those in the low CSVA/T1S group pre-and postoperatively. With respect to HRQOL results, the final NDI was 12.46 ± 9.11% in the low CSVA/T1S group, which was significantly lower than that in the high CSVA/T1S group (17.68 ± 8.81%, P = 0.040). Moreover, only CSVA/T1S was detected to be significantly correlated with final NDI (r = 0.310, P = 0.027). No significant correlation was found between clinical results and other cervical sagittal parameters, including T1S, CSVA, and T1S-CL.

Conclusions

Preoperative CSVA/T1S was correlated with postoperative NDI in patients with CSM after cervical laminoplasty. Patients with low preoperative CSVA/T1S achieved better neurological function improvement after cervical laminoplasty. Cervical laminoplasty could be an appropriate choice for patients with lower preoperative CSVA/T1S.

Mechanisms of compensatory for cervical lordosis changes after laminectomy with fusion

Background

The compensatory mechanisms for cervical lordosis change after laminectomy with fusion was not clear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the compensatory behaviors for cervical lordosis change after laminectomy with fusion.

Methods

This was a retrospective radiological analysis of 43 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent laminectomy with fusion (LCF). The following cervical parameters were measured: C2-7 Cobb angle (C2-7), occiput-C2 angle (O-C2), the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and T1 slope (T1S). The difference was calculated for all angle parameters between the two time points using the following formula: the amount of change (Δ) = (value at the follow-up)—(preoperative value). Non-parametric tests and the t-test were used to compare the difference. The Pearson correlation test was performed, and stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the best correlation between ∆cSVA and ∆T1S.

Results

The mean age of 43 patients was 65.51 ± 9.80 years. All patients were classified into two subgroups based on ΔcSVA: Group M (maintained) and, Group I (increased). The preoperative O-C2, C2-7, T1S, and cSVA were similar between Group M and group I (p = 0.950, p = 0.731, p = 0.372, and p = 0.152, respectively). Postoperative O-C2 and postoperative cSVA were significantly different (p = 0.036 and p = 0.004, respectively). ∆O-C2, ∆T1S and ∆cSVA were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.006, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000, respectively). ΔcSVA had significant correlations with ΔO-C2 neutral angle (r = 0.377) and ΔT1S (r = 0.582). A linear regression equation was established: ΔcSVA = 0.602 + 0.103 * ΔT1S (R = 0.582, R² = 0.339).

Conclusions

The decrease of TIS should be the first and foremost compensation for the loss of lordosis in C2-7 segments after LCF. When the change of T1S alone can not prevent the deterioration of cervical sagittal balance, further increases in the O-C2 segment occur.

Preoperative Radiological Parameters to Predict Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Laminoplasty

Many studies have focused on pre-operative sagittal alignment parameters which could predict poor clinical or radiological outcomes after laminoplasty. However, the influx of too many new factors causes confusion. This study reviewed sagittal alignment parameters, predictive of clinical or radiological outcomes, in the literature. Preoperative kyphotic alignment was initially proposed as a predictor of clinical outcomes. The clinical significance of the K-line and K-line variants also has been studied. Sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope (T1s), T1s-cervical lordosis (CL), anterolisthesis, local kyphosis, the longitudinal distance index, and range of motion were proposed to have relationships with clinical outcomes. The relationship between loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) and T1s has been widely studied, but controversy remains. Extension function, the ratio of CL to T1s (CL/T1s), and Sharma classification were recently proposed as LCL predictors. In predicting postoperative kyphosis, T1s cannot predict postoperative kyphosis, but a low CL/T1s ratio was associated with postoperative kyphosis.

Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the cervical sagittal parameters between patients with cervical spine disorder and asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

Two independent authors systematically searched online databases including Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Web of Science up to June 2020. Cervical sagittal balance parameters, such as T1 slope, cervical SVA (cSVA), and spine cranial angle (SCA), were compared between the cervical spine in healthy, symptomatic, and pre-operative participants. Where possible, we pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis, by CMA software. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using the I-squared statistic and funnel plots, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 102 studies, comprising 13,802 cases (52.7% female), were included in this meta-analysis. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of studies included in this review. Funnel plot and Begg's test did not indicate obvious publication bias. The pooled analysis reveals that the mean (SD) values were: T1 slope (degree), 24.5 (0.98), 25.7 (0.99), 25.4 (0.34); cSVA (mm), 18.7 (1.76), 22.7 (0.66), 22.4 (0.68) for healthy population, symptomatic, and pre-operative assessment, respectively. The mean value of the SCA (degree) was 79.5 (3.55) and 75.6 (10.3) for healthy and symptomatic groups, respectively. Statistical differences were observed between the groups (all P values < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that the T1 slope and the cSVA were significantly lower among patients with cervical spine disorder compared to controls and higher for the SCA. Further well-conducted studies are needed to complement our findings.

Correlations and Age-Related Changes of Cervical Sagittal Parameters in Adults Without Symptoms of Cervical Spinal Disease

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the correlations and age-related changes of cervical sagittal parameters in adults without obvious cervical spinal disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical sagittal parameters play essential roles in the pathogenesis and therapy of cervical spinal diseases. However, few studies have investigated the correlations and age-related changes of cervical sagittal parameters.

METHODS

The enrolled participants were divided into three age groups and their cervical sagittal parameters were collected. Correlations and age-related changes of these parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

Significant differences in the C2-C7 angle, center of gravity of the head-C7 sagittal vertical axis (CGH-C7 SVA), C2-C7 SVA, neck tilt (NT), and thoracic inlet angle (TIA) were found among the three age groups. Pearson correlation analysis showed positive correlations between the C0-C2 angle and CGH-C7 SVA, C0-C2 angle and C2-C7 SVA, C2-C7 angle and T1 slope, C2-C7 angle and TIA, CGH-C7 SVA and C2-C7 SVA, C2-C7 SVA and T1 slope, T1 slope and TIA, and NT and TIA as well as negative correlations between the C0-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle, C2-C7 angle and CGH-C7 SVA, and C2-C7 angle and C2-C7 SVA. Paired t tests showed significant changes in the C2-C7 angle in groups I and II, and in the CGH-C7 SVA and C2-C7 SVA in all age groups with increasing age.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that cross correlations exist between different cervical sagittal parameters in adults without symptoms of cervical spinal disease, and the lower cervical curvature and SVA change obviously with increasing age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

The ratio of C2-C7 Cobb angle to T1 slope is an effective parameter for the selection of posterior surgical approach for patients with multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, laminectomy with fusion (LCF) and laminoplasty alone (LP) are both effective posterior surgical approaches for decompression of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, which one is suitable for patients has no standard answer. This study estimated whether the ratio of C2-C7 Cobb angle to T1 slope (CL/T1S) could be an indication of posterior surgical approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients with at least 6 months of follow-up who underwent LCF or LP. Radiological measurements, including C2-C7 Cobb angle, decompressed Cobb angle, T1 slope, cervical sagittal vertical axis, and curvature index (CI), and clinical outcomes, including Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analogue scale were evaluated. ROC curve analysis was used to identify discriminative power of CL/T1S ratio to predict kyphotic deformity and severe lordosis loss. The t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to evaluate the difference between LCF and LP. Kruskal-Wallis H - test and ANOVA were used to evaluate the difference among different ratio CL/T1S groups.

RESULTS

The cervical lordosis decreased after LCF or LP (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Based on ROC curve analysis, CL/T1S ratio had a good discriminative power to predict kyphotic deformity and severe lordosis loss (AUC = 0.70, AUC = 0.88, respectively). According to CI value changes, cervical lordosis losses in group LP were larger than that in group LCF (p = 0.006). However, there was no significant difference in CI changes of fair-ratio CL/T1S group between LCF and LP. For patients with low CL/T1S ratio or high CL/T1S ratio, CI changes in group LP were greater than that in group LCF (p = 0.037, p = 0.042, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CL/T1S ratio could be an indication of posterior surgical approach. Compared with LP, LCF reduces postoperative cervical lordosis losses in low-ratio and high-ratio CL/T1S groups.

Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review

Background:

Laminoplasty is a method of posterior cervical decompression which indirectly decompresses the spinal column. Unfortunately, many patients undergoing laminoplasty develops postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine even though they have sufficient preoperative lordosis which results in poor surgical outcome.

Objective:

We would like to highlight the relationship between various radiological parameters of cervical alignment and postoperative LCL in patients undergoing laminoplasty.

Methods:

We performed extensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for relevant articles that report factors affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.

Results:

On reviewing the literature, patients with high T1 slope have more lordotic alignment of cervical spine preoperatively. They also have more chances of LCL following laminoplasty. C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has no role in predicting LCL following laminoplasty though patients with low T1 slope (≤20°) and high C2–C7 SVA (>22 mm) had correction of kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty. C2–C7 lordosis, Neck Tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis has no predictive value for LCL. Lower value of T1 slope (T1S-CL) and CL/T1S has more incidence of developing LCL following laminoplasty. The role of C2–C3 disc angle has not yet been evaluated in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Dynamic extension reserve determines the contraction reserve of SPMLC and lower dynamic extension reserve is associated with higher chances of LCL following laminoplasty.

Conclusions:

Cervical lordotic alignment is important in maintaining cervical sagittal balance which ultimately is responsible for global spinal sagittal balance and horizontal gaze. Among various radiological parameters, T1 Slope has been reported to be the most important factor affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.

Which factors predict the loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty? A review of various indices and their clinical implications

Background:

Many patients undergoing laminoplasty develop postoperative loss of cervical lordosis or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine despite sufficient preoperative lordosis. This results in poor surgical outcomes.

Methods:

Here, we reviewed the relationship between multiple radiological parameters of cervical alignment that correlated with postoperative loss of cervical lordosis in patients undergoing laminoplasty.

Results:

Patient with a high T1 slope (T1S) has more lordotic alignment of the cervical spine preoperatively and is at increased risk for the loss of cervical lordosis postlaminoplasty. Those with lower values of difference between T1S and Cobb’s angle (T1S-CL) and CL-T1S ratio have higher risks of developing a loss of the cervical lordosis postoperatively. Alternatively, C2-C7 lordosis, neck tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis had no role in predicting the postlaminoplasty kyphosis.

Conclusion:

Among various radiological parameters, the preoperative T1S is the most important factor in predicting the postoperative loss of the cervical lordosis/alignment following laminoplasty.