1
|
Faccenda V, Colciago RR, Bianchi SP, De Ponti E, Panizza D, Arcangeli S. Dosimetric and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Single-Isocenter Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3243. [PMID: 39335214 PMCID: PMC11430701 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2024] [Revised: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To report on predictive factors in Linac-based SRT for single and multiple BM. Methods: Consecutive patients receiving either one or three fractions of single-isocenter coplanar VMAT SRT were retrospectively included. The GTV-PTV margin was 1-2 mm. The delivered target dose was estimated by recalculating the original plans on roto-translated CT according to errors recorded by post-treatment CBCT. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated local progression-free survival (LPFS), intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS), and overall survival (OS). Log-rank and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests evaluated inter-group differences, whereas Cox regression analysis assessed prognostic factors. Results: Fifty females and fifty males, with a median age of 69 years, received 107 SRTs. A total of 213 BM (range, 1-10 per treatment) with a median volume of 0.22 cc were irradiated with a median minimum BED of 59.5 Gy. The median delivered GTV D95 reduction was -0.3%. The median follow-up was 11 months. Nineteen LP events and a 1-year LC rate of 90.1% were observed. The GTV coverage did not correlate with LC, while the GTV volume was a risk factor for LP, with the 1-year rate dropping to 73% for volumes ≥ 0.88 cc. The median LPFS, IPFS, and OS were 6, 5, and 7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with melanoma histology and those receiving a second or subsequent systemic therapy line had the worst outcomes, whereas patients with adenocarcinoma histology and mutations showed better results. Conclusions: The accuracy and efficacy of the Linac-based SRT approach for BM were confirmed, but the dose distribution alone failed to predict the treatment response, suggesting that other factors must be considered to maximize SRT outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Faccenda
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | | | - Sofia Paola Bianchi
- Radiation Oncology Department, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Elena De Ponti
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Denis Panizza
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iori F, Torelli N, Unkelbach J, Tanadini-Lang S, Christ SM, Guckenberger M. An in-silico planning study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for polymetastatic patients with more than ten extra-cranial lesions. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100567. [PMID: 38516028 PMCID: PMC10950805 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Limited data is available about the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for treating more than five extra-cranial metastases, and almost no data for treating more than ten. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of SBRT in this polymetatstatic setting. Materials and methods Consecutive metastatic melanoma patients with more than ten extra-cranial metastases and a maximum lesion diameter below 11 cm were selected from a single-center prospective registry for this in-silico planning study. For each patient, SBRT plans were generated to treat all metastases with a prescribed dose of 5x7Gy, and dose-limiting organs (OARs) were analyzed. A cell-kill based inverse planning approach was used to automatically determine the maximum deliverable dose to each lesion individually, while respecting all OARs constraints. Results A total of 23 polymetastatic patients with a medium of 17 metastases (range, 11-51) per patient were selected. SBRT plans with sufficient target coverage and respected OARs dose constraints were achieved in 16 out of 23 patients. In the remaining seven patients, the lungs V5Gy < 80 % and the liver D700 cm3 < 15Gy were most frequently the dose-limiting constraints. The cell-kill based planning approach allowed optimizing the dose administration depending on metastases total volume and location. Conclusion This retrospective planning study shows the feasibility of definitive SBRT for 70% of polymetastatic patients with more than ten extra-cranial lesions and proposes the cell-killing planning approach as an approach to individualize treatment planning in polymetastatic patients'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Iori
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nathan Torelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian M. Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laskowski M, Błaszczyk B, Setlak M, Kuca M, Lech A, Kłos K, Rudnik A. Assessment of Radiation Dosage to the Hippocampi during Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases Using Gamma Knife Therapy. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:246. [PMID: 38399534 PMCID: PMC10889917 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Brain metastases (BMs) pose significant clinical challenges in systemic cancer patients. They often cause symptoms related to brain compression and are typically managed with multimodal therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). With modern oncology treatments prolonging survival, concerns about the neurocognitive side effects of BM treatments are growing. WBRT, though widely used for multiple BMs, has recognized neurocognitive toxicity. SRS, particularly Gamma Knife (GK) therapy, offers a minimally invasive alternative with fewer side effects, suitable for patients with a quantifiable number of metastases and better prognoses. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients with multiple BMs treated exclusively with GK at an academic medical center. Patients with prior WBRT were excluded. This study focused on the mean radiation dose received by the hippocampal area, estimated according to the 'Hippocampal Contouring: A Contouring Atlas for RTOG 0933' guidelines. Results: The precision of GK equipment results in mean doses of radiation that are lower than those suggested by RTOG 0933 and observed in other studies. This precision may help mitigate cognitive dysfunction and other side effects of hippocampal irradiation. Conclusions: GK therapy facilitates the administration of smaller, safer radiation doses to the hippocampi, which is advantageous even for lesions in the temporal lobe. It is feasible to treat multiple metastases, including cases with more than 10, but it is typically reserved for patients with fewer metastases, with an average of 3 in this study. This underlines GK's potential for reducing adverse effects while managing BMs effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Laskowski
- Student Scientific Society, Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
| | - Bartłomiej Błaszczyk
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Center, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland
- Exira Gamma Knife, 40-952 Katowice, Poland
| | - Marcin Setlak
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Center, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland
| | - Maciej Kuca
- Student Scientific Society, Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
| | | | - Kamil Kłos
- Student Scientific Society, Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
| | - Adam Rudnik
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Center, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sherman WJ, Romiti E, Michaelides L, Moniz-Garcia D, Chaichana KL, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Porter AB. Systemic Therapy for Melanoma Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1962-1977. [PMID: 38158477 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01155-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain which portends a poorer prognosis. With advanced radiation techniques and targeted therapies, outcomes however are improving. Melanoma brain metastases are best managed in a multi-disciplinary approach, including medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons. The sequence of therapies is dependent on the number and size of brain metastases, status of systemic disease control, prior therapies, performance status, and neurological symptoms. The goal of treatment is to minimize neurologic morbidity and prolong both progression free and overall survival while maximizing quality of life. Surgery should be considered for solitary metastases, or large and/or symptomatic metastases with edema. Stereotactic radiosurgery offers a benefit over whole-brain radiation attributed to the relative radioresistance of melanoma and reduction in neurotoxicity. Thus far, data supports a more durable response with systemic therapy using combination immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab, though targeting the presence of BRAF mutations can also be utilized. BRAF inhibitor therapy is often used after immunotherapy failure, unless a more rapid initial response is needed and then can be done prior to initiating immunotherapy. Further trials are needed, particularly for leptomeningeal metastases which currently require the multi-disciplinary approach to determine best treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy J Sherman
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| | - Edoardo Romiti
- Vita e Salute San Raffaele University in Milan, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Loizos Michaelides
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Diogo Moniz-Garcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Kaisorn L Chaichana
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | | | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rozati H, Chen J, Williams M. Overall survival following stereotactic radiosurgery for ten or more brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1004. [PMID: 37858075 PMCID: PMC10585836 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11452-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumours. Variation exists in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with 10 or more brain metastases. Concerns include an increasing number of brain metastases being associated with poor survival, the lack of prospective, randomised data and an increased risk of toxicity. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess overall survival of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery as primary therapy. The search strings were applied to MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Log hazard ratios and standard errors were estimated from each included study. A random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian and Laird method was applied using the derived log hazard ratios and standard errors on studies which included a control group. RESULTS 15 studies were included for systematic review. 12 studies were used for pooled analysis for overall survival at set time points, with a predicted 12 month survival of 20-40%. The random-effects meta-analysis in five studies of overall survival comparing ten or greater metastases against control showed statistically worse overall survival in the 10 + metastases group (1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.18, p-value = < 0.01, I2 = 6%). A funnel plot showed no evidence of bias. There was insufficient information for a meta-analysis of toxicity. DISCUSSION Overall survival outcomes of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with SRS is acceptable and should not be a deterrent for its use. There is a lack of prospective data and insufficient real-world data to draw conclusions on toxicity. PROSPERO ID CRD42021246115.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamoun Rozati
- London Gamma Knife Centre, Platinum Medical Centre, Wellington Hospital, Lodge Road, London, UK
- Computational Oncology Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jiarong Chen
- Computational Oncology Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Clinical Experimental Center, Jiangmen Key Laboratory of Clinical Biobanks and Translational Research, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529030, China
| | - Matt Williams
- Computational Oncology Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
- Department of Radiotherapy, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuntz L, Le Fèvre C, Jarnet D, Keller A, Meyer P, Mazzara C, Cebula H, Noel G, Antoni D. Repeated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Local Brain Metastases Failure or Distant Brain Recurrent: A Retrospective Study of 184 Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4948. [PMID: 37894315 PMCID: PMC10605441 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main advantages of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) are to delay whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and to deliver ablative doses. Despite this efficacy, the risk of distant brain metastases (BM) one year after SRT ranges from 26% to 77% and 20 to 40% of patients required salvage treatment. The role and consequences of reirradiation remain unclear, particularly in terms of survival. The objective was to study overall survival (OS) and neurological death-free survival (NDFS) and to specify the prognostic factors of long-term survival. METHODS we retrospectively reviewed the data of patients treated between 2010 and 2020 with at least two courses of SRT without previous WBRT. RESULTS In total, 184 patients were treated for 915 BMs with two-to-six SRT sessions. Additional SRT sessions were provided for local (5.6%) or distant (94.4%) BM recurrence. The median number of BMs treated per SRT was one with a median of four BMs in total. The mean time between the two SRT sessions was 8.9 months (95%CI 7.7-10.1) and there was no significant difference in the delay between the two sessions. The 6-, 12- and 24-month NDFS rates were 97%, 82% and 52%, respectively. The 6-, 12- and 24-month OS rates were 91%, 70% and 38%, respectively. OS was statistically related to the number of SRT sessions (HR = 0.48; p < 0.01), recursive partitioning analysis (HR = 1.84; p = 0.01), salvage WBRT (HR = 0.48; p = 0.01) and brain metastasis velocity (high: HR = 13.83; p < 0.01; intermediate: HR = 4.93; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Lung cancer and melanoma were associated with a lower NDFS compared to breast cancer. A low KPS, a low number of SRT sessions, synchronous extracerebral metastases, synchronous BMs, extracerebral progression at SRT1, a high BMV grade, no WBRT and local recurrence were also associated with a lower NDFS. A high KPS at SRT1 and low BMV grade are prognostic factors for better OS, regardless of the number of BM recurrence events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Kuntz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (L.K.); (C.L.F.); (A.K.); (D.A.)
| | - Clara Le Fèvre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (L.K.); (C.L.F.); (A.K.); (D.A.)
| | - Delphine Jarnet
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (D.J.); (P.M.); (C.M.)
| | - Audrey Keller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (L.K.); (C.L.F.); (A.K.); (D.A.)
| | - Philippe Meyer
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (D.J.); (P.M.); (C.M.)
| | - Christophe Mazzara
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (D.J.); (P.M.); (C.M.)
| | - Hélène Cebula
- Neurosurgery Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Georges Noel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (L.K.); (C.L.F.); (A.K.); (D.A.)
| | - Delphine Antoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (L.K.); (C.L.F.); (A.K.); (D.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wei Z, Luy DD, Jose S, Deng H, Yavan S, Worrell S, Belkhir JR, Tang LW, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. Single-Session Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Patients With 20 or More Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:857-866. [PMID: 37018427 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely accepted treatment modality for brain metastases. The role of SRS in patients with higher numbers of metastases remains controversial. OBJECTIVES To define outcomes in patients with ≥20 brain metastases managed using single-session SRS. METHODS This single-institution retrospective cohort study studied 75 patients (26 non-small-cell lung cancer, 21 small-cell lung cancer, 14 breast cancer, and 14 melanoma) undergoing single-session SRS. The median number of tumors per patient was 24, and the median cumulative tumor volume was 3.70 cc. The median margin dose prescribed to each individual tumor was 16 Gy. The median integral cranial dose was 5492 mJ. The median beam on time was 160 minutes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS The median overall survival after SRS was 8.8 months (patients with non-small-cell lung cancer), 4.6 months (patients with small-cell lung cancer), 11.3 months (patients with breast cancer), and 4.1 months (patients with melanoma). Primary cancer type, number of brain metastases, and concurrent immunotherapy were significant factors in predicting survival. Local tumor control rate per patient was 97.3% and 94.6% at 6 and 12 months after SRS, respectively. Thirty-six patients underwent additional SRS for new tumor development with a median time after SRS of 5 months. Three patients experienced adverse radiation events. CONCLUSION Single-session SRS is a well-tolerated palliative treatment option even in patients with ≥20 brain metastases, achieving local control rate >90% with low risks of neurotoxicity while continuing concurrent systemic oncological care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Diego D Luy
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Shalini Jose
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Hansen Deng
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Sila Yavan
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Stephen Worrell
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - J Raouf Belkhir
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Lilly W Tang
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Theriault BC, Singh C, Yu J, Knisely J, Shepard M, Wegner RE, Warnick RE, Peker S, Samanci Y, Trifiletti DM, Lee CC, Yang HC, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Tripathi M, Mathieu D, Mantziaris G, Pikis S, Sheehan J, Chiang VL. Selected-Lesion Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SL-SRS) as a Novel Strategy in the Treatment of Patients With Multiple Brain Metastases. Cureus 2023; 15:e45457. [PMID: 37859877 PMCID: PMC10583225 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the diminishing use of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), there is increasing debate regarding the maximum number of brain metastases that should be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). In patients with >10-15 lesions, some groups are proposing a new approach - selected-lesion SRS (SL-SRS) - where only a subset of intracranial lesions are chosen for irradiation. This study is an initial look into this practice. METHODS This is a cross-sectional exploratory survey study. A survey of 19 questions was created by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF) using open-ended and multiple-choice style questions on SL-SRS practices and indications with the goal of qualitatively understanding how SL-SRS is being implemented worldwide. The survey was distributed to physicians in the United States (US) and internationally who are members of the IRRF and who perform SRS frequently. Ten out of 50 IRRF institutions provided responses reflecting the practices of 16 physicians. RESULTS SL-SRS is being performed at 8/10 institutions. The most common reasons for using SL-SRS included patients with prior WBRT, patients with progressing systemic disease with central nervous system (CNS)-penetrating or immunotherapies available, specific requests from medical oncology, and cooperative studies using this approach. Lesion size was cited as the most important factor when choosing to irradiate any single lesion. The majority of respondents reported 30 mm and 40 mm as size cutoffs (by largest dimension) for treatment of a lesion in eloquent and non-eloquent locations, respectively. Eloquence of lesion location and attributable symptoms were also considered important. Progression of untreated lesions was the most common reason reported for bringing patients back for additional treatment. CONCLUSION The responses to this survey show that SL-SRS is being used, allowing for small/asymptomatic brain metastases to be left safely unirradiated. It is currently used in patients who have >10-15 lesions with prior WBRT, those with progression of extracranial disease but with acceptable systemic treatment options, and those with poor functional status. The incorporation of this new approach into clinical trials should be considered for the safe study of the efficacy of new CNS-penetrating systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charu Singh
- Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - James Yu
- Radiation Oncology, St. Francis Hospital, Trinity Health of New England, Hartford, USA
| | | | | | - Rodney E Wegner
- Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | - Selcuk Peker
- Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, TUR
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Neurosurgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, TUR
| | | | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, New Taipei, TWN
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, New Taipei, TWN
| | | | | | - Manjul Tripathi
- Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND
| | - David Mathieu
- Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, CAN
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Neurosurgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Neurosurgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Neurosurgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bankole NDA, Melhaoui A, Arkha Y, Afaf S, Bouyakhlef K, Boutarbouch M, Jiddane M, El Khamlichi A. Outcome of Brain Metastases Treated with Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 205 Cases. World Neurosurg 2023; 176:e462-e475. [PMID: 37257645 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common expansive intracranial lesions in adults. Approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with new BMs will have >1 BM at the diagnosis. We report our experience with BMs treated with Leksell Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSR) and evaluate the outcomes. METHODS Patients treated by GKSR in our institution between 2008 and 2021 for BMs were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS A total of 205 patients (56.6% women) were included, with a median age of 59 years (range, 25-83 years). The breast (n = 85; 42.5%) and lung (n = 76; 38%) were the most common original locations for the primary tumors. Of the 205 patients, 103 (50.3%) had a single BM and 102 (49.7%) had ≥2 BMs. The median number of multiple BMs treated was 4 (range, 2-43). The mean overall survival (OS) time was 6.00 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.07-6.93 months) for all BMs. The median rate of tumor control after radiosurgery was 65% (range, 20%-99%) during a median follow-up of 6.00 months (95% CI, 3-84 months). In the overall population, the 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rate was 37.55%, 25.12%, and 18.51%, respectively. The mean OS time was longer for those with multiple BMs than for those with a single BM (mean, 10 months [95% CI, 6.67-13.33 months] vs. mean, 5 months [95% CI, 4.21-5.70 months]; P = 0.03). Retreatment, tumor stability (control), and progression influenced the OS of patients with BMs, whether single or multiple (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS GKSR provides good results in terms of OS and better quality of life for patients with BMs, whether single or multiple. Tumor stability and retreatment influenced the OS of patients with BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nourou Dine Adeniran Bankole
- Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Unit, National Center for Rehabilitation and Neuroscience, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
| | - Adyl Melhaoui
- Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Unit, National Center for Rehabilitation and Neuroscience, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Yasser Arkha
- Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Unit, National Center for Rehabilitation and Neuroscience, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Semmar Afaf
- Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Unit, National Center for Rehabilitation and Neuroscience, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Khalid Bouyakhlef
- Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Unit, National Center for Rehabilitation and Neuroscience, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Mahjouba Boutarbouch
- Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Unit, National Center for Rehabilitation and Neuroscience, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Mohamed Jiddane
- Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Unit, National Center for Rehabilitation and Neuroscience, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Abdeslam El Khamlichi
- Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Unit, National Center for Rehabilitation and Neuroscience, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Derks SHAE, Jongen JLM, van der Meer EL, Ho LS, Slagter C, Joosse A, de Jonge MJA, Schouten JW, Oomen-de Hoop E, van den Bent MJ, van der Veldt AAM. Impact of Novel Treatments in Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastasis: Real-World Data. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051461. [PMID: 36900253 PMCID: PMC10000692 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) is associated with poor outcome, but targeted therapies (TTs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment over the past decade. We assessed the impact of these treatments in a real-world setting. METHODS A single-center cohort study was performed at a large, tertiary referral center for melanoma (Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Overall survival (OS) was assessed before and after 2015, after which TTs and ICIs were increasingly prescribed. RESULTS There were 430 patients with MBM included; 152 pre-2015 and 278 post-2015. Median OS improved from 4.4 to 6.9 months (HR 0.67, p < 0.001) after 2015. TTs and ICIs prior to MBM diagnosis were associated with poorer median OS as compared to no prior systemic treatment (TTs: 2.0 vs. 10.9 and ICIs: 4.2 vs. 7.9 months, p < 0.001). ICIs directly after MBM diagnosis were associated with improved median OS as compared to no direct ICIs (21.5 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001). Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT; HR 0.49, p = 0.013) and ICIs (HR 0.32, p < 0.001) were independently associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION After 2015, OS significantly improved for patients with MBM, especially with SRT and ICIs. Demonstrating a large survival benefit, ICIs should be considered first after MBM diagnosis, if clinically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie H. A. E. Derks
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L. M. Jongen
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edgar L. van der Meer
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Li Shen Ho
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cleo Slagter
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen Joosse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maja J. A. de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost W. Schouten
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J. van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A. M. van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-10-704-02-52
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rogers SJ, Lomax N, Alonso S, Lazeroms T, Riesterer O. Radiosurgery for Five to Fifteen Brain Metastases: A Single Centre Experience and a Review of the Literature. Front Oncol 2022; 12:866542. [PMID: 35619914 PMCID: PMC9128547 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.866542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is now mainstream for patients with 1-4 brain metastases however the management of patients with 5 or more brain metastases remains controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with 5 or more brain metastases and to compare with published series as a benchmarking exercise. Methods Patients with 5 or more brain metastases treated with a single isocentre dynamic conformal arc technique on a radiosurgery linac were identified from the institutional database. Endpoints were local control, distant brain failure, leptomeningeal disease and overall survival. Dosimetric data were extracted from the radiosurgery plans. Series reporting outcomes following SRS for multiple brain metastases were identified by a literature search. Results 36 patients, of whom 35 could be evaluated, received SRS for 5 or more brain metastases between February 2015 and October 2021. 25 patients had 5-9 brain metastases (group 1) and 10 patients had 10-15 brain metastases (group 2). The mean number of brain metastases in group 1 was 6.3 (5-9) and 12.3 (10-15) in group 2. The median cumulative irradiated volume was 4.6 cm3 (1.25-11.01) in group 1 and 7.2 cm3 (2.6-11.1) in group 2. Median follow-up was 12 months. At last follow-up, local control rates per BM were 100% and 99.8% as compared with a median of 87% at 1 year in published series. Distant brain failure was 36% and 50% at a median interval of 5.2 months and 7.4 months after SRS in groups 1 and 2 respectively and brain metastasis velocity at 1 year was similar in both groups (9.7 and 11). 8/25 patients received further SRS and 7/35 patients received whole brain radiotherapy. Median overall survival was 10 months in group 1 and 15.7 months in group 2, which compares well with the 7.5 months derived from the literature. There was one neurological death in group 2, leptomeningeal disease was rare (2/35) and there were no cases of radionecrosis. Conclusion With careful patient selection, overall survival following SRS for multiple brain metastases is determined by the course of the extracranial disease. SRS is an efficacious and safe modality that can achieve intracranial disease control and should be offered to patients with 5 or more brain metastases and a constellation of good prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne J Rogers
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Canton Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Nicoletta Lomax
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Canton Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Sara Alonso
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Canton Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Tessa Lazeroms
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Canton Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Riesterer
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Canton Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsui DCC, Camidge DR, Rusthoven CG. Managing Central Nervous System Spread of Lung Cancer: The State of the Art. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:642-660. [PMID: 34985937 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BrM) are common in both non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer. Substantial progress in BrM management has occurred in the past decade related to advances in both radiation and medical oncology. Recent and ongoing radiation trials have focused on increasing the candidacy for focal therapy of BrM with stereotactic radiosurgery; reducing the toxicity and improving patient selection for whole brain radiotherapy; and, in small-cell lung cancer, evaluating brain magnetic resonance imaging surveillance without prophylactic cranial irradiation, hippocampal avoidance in prophylactic cranial irradiation and whole brain radiotherapy, and the role of upfront stereotactic radiosurgery for BrM. In medical oncology, the development of multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors with encouraging CNS activity and emerging data on the CNS activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in some patients have opened the door to novel systemic and multidisciplinary treatment strategies for the management of BrM. Future research will focus on more robust characterizations of the CNS activity of targeted therapy and immunotherapies, as well as optimal integration and patient selection for multidisciplinary strategies involving CNS-active drugs, radiation therapy, and CNS surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Chun Cheong Tsui
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - D Ross Camidge
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vogelbaum MA, Brown PD, Messersmith H, Brastianos PK, Burri S, Cahill D, Dunn IF, Gaspar LE, Gatson NTN, Gondi V, Jordan JT, Lassman AB, Maues J, Mohile N, Redjal N, Stevens G, Sulman E, van den Bent M, Wallace HJ, Weinberg JS, Zadeh G, Schiff D. Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 40:492-516. [PMID: 34932393 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 284] [Impact Index Per Article: 94.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. RECOMMENDATIONS Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Stuart Burri
- Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | - Dan Cahill
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ian F Dunn
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Laurie E Gaspar
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO
| | - Na Tosha N Gatson
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ.,Geisinger Neuroscience Institute. Danville, PA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | | | | | - Julia Maues
- Georgetown Breast Cancer Advocates, Washington, DC
| | - Nimish Mohile
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Navid Redjal
- Capital Health Medical Center - Hopewell Campus, Princeton, NJ
| | | | | | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A new prognostic score for predicting survival in patients treated with robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Sci Rep 2021; 11:20347. [PMID: 34645854 PMCID: PMC8514560 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98847-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to analyze potential prognostic factors in patients treated with robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases irrespective of primary tumor location and create a simple prognostic score that can be used without a full diagnostic workup. A retrospective analysis of 142 patients with 1–9 brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (1–4 fractions) was performed. Volumes of all lesions were calculated using linear dimensions of the tumors (CC, LR, AP) and 4/3*π*(CC/2)*(LR/2)*(AP/2) formula. Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze survival. Variables significantly associated with overall survival in univariate analysis were included in Cox multivariate analysis. The validity of the model was tested with the bootstrap method. Variables from the final model were used to construct a new prognostic index by assigning points according to the impact of a specific variable on overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, four factors: Karnofsky Performance Status (p = 0.000068), number of brain metastases (p = 0.019), volume of the largest lesion (p = 0.0037), and presence of extracerebral metastases (p = 0.0017), were independent predictors of survival. Total scores ranged from 0 to 12 points, and patients were divided into four groups based on median survival of each subgroup: 0–1 points—18.8 months, 2–3 points—16.9 months, 4–5 points—5.6 months, and ≥ 6 points—4.9 months (p < 0.001). The new prognostic index is simple to calculate. It has a strong prognostic value in a heterogeneous population of patients with a various number of brain metastases, but its value requires confirmation in another cohort.
Collapse
|
15
|
Skourou C, Hickey D, Rock L, Houston P, Sturt P, O' Sullivan S, Faul C, Paddick I. Treatment of multiple intracranial metastases in radiation oncology: a contemporary review of available technologies. BJR Open 2021; 3:20210035. [PMID: 34877458 PMCID: PMC8611687 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20210035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of stereotactic radiosurgery to treat multiple intracranial metastases, frequently concurrently, has become increasingly common. The ability to accurately and safely deliver stereotactic radiosurgery treatment to multiple intracranial metastases (MIM) relies heavily on the technology available for targeting, planning, and delivering the dose. A number of platforms are currently marketed for such applications, each with intrinsic capabilities and limitations. These can be broadly categorised as cobalt-based, linac-based, and robotic. This review describes the most common representative technologies for each type along with their advantages and current limitations as they pertain to the treatment of multiple intracranial metastases. Each technology was used to plan five clinical cases selected to represent the clinical breadth of multiple metastases cases. The reviewers discuss the different strengths and limitations attributed to each technology in the case of MIM as well as the impact of disease-specific characteristics (such as total number of intracranial metastases, their size and relative proximity) on plan and treatment quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Clare Faul
- St. Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ian Paddick
- Queen Square Radiosurgery Centre, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kavi A, Gurewitz J, Benjamin CG, Silverman JS, Bernstein K, Mureb M, Oh C, Sulman EP, Donahue B, Kondziolka D. Hippocampal sparing in patients receiving radiosurgery for ≥25 brain metastases. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:65-71. [PMID: 34052342 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To report our dosimetric analysis of the hippocampi (HC) and the incidence of perihippocampal tumor location in patients with ≥25 brain metastases who received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in single or multiple sessions. MATERIALS/METHODS Analysis of our prospective registry identified 89 patients treated with SRS for ≥25 brain metastases. HC avoidance regions (HA-region) were created on treatment planning MRIs by 5 mm expansion of HC. Doses from each session were summed to calculate HC dose. The distribution of metastases relative to the HA-region and the HC was analyzed. RESULTS Median number of tumors irradiated per patient was 33 (range 25-116) in a median of 3 (range1-12) sessions. Median bilateral HC Dmin (D100), D40, D50, Dmax, and Dmean (Gy) was 1.88, 3.94, 3.62, 16.6, and 3.97 for all patients, and 1.43, 2.99, 2.88, 5.64, and 3.07 for patients with tumors outside the HA-region. Multivariate linear regression showed that the median HC D40, D50, and Dmin were significantly correlated with the tumor number and tumor volume (p < 0.001). Of the total 3059 treated tumors, 83 (2.7%) were located in the HA-region in 57% evaluable patients; 38 tumors (1.2%) abutted or involved the HC itself. CONCLUSIONS Hippocampal dose is higher in patients with tumors in the HA-region; however, even for patients with a high burden of intracranial disease and tumors located in the HA-regions, SRS affords hippocampal sparing. This is particularly relevant in light of our finding of eventual perihippocampal metastases in more than half of our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami Kavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Maimonides Cancer Center, Brooklyn, USA.
| | - Jason Gurewitz
- Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | | | - Joshua S Silverman
- Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Monica Mureb
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, USA
| | - Cheongeun Oh
- Department of Population Health, Division of Biostatistics, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Bernadine Donahue
- Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Maimonides Cancer Center, Brooklyn, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA; Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jiang C, Wallington DG, Anker CJ, Lawson DH, Yushak ML, Kudchadkar RR, Tarhini A, Khan MK. Changing Therapeutic Landscape for Melanoma With Multiple Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2020; 87:498-515. [PMID: 32315430 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Over 90 000 people are expected to be diagnosed with melanoma in the United States this year. The development of brain metastases is particularly difficult to manage. Over the past few years, melanoma patients with multiple unresectable brain metastases for which stereotactic surgery might also not be a viable option have fortunately experienced a dramatic expansion in available management options given improvements made to targeted agents, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy. Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is a long-standing radiation technique that has become increasingly sophisticated. In this review, we summarize retrospective and prospective studies on individual advances in targeted agents, immunotherapy, and WBRT, highlighting important variables such as overall survival, intracranial progression-free survival, control and response rates, and toxicities. We also discuss the recent integration of these therapies into a multimodality approach, which has shown promise in the clinical setting although toxicities have not been insignificant. Finally, we describe ongoing prospective trials relevant to melanoma with brain metastases, and we conclude with our own thoughts on the optimal approach for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Jiang
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David G Wallington
- Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
| | - David H Lawson
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Melinda L Yushak
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ragini R Kudchadkar
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmad Tarhini
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mohammad K Khan
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.,H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT With greater understanding of underlying biology and development of effective BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy, along with remarkable advances in local treatment such as stereotactic radiosurgery, melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) is witnessing continually improving outcome, with 1-year overall survival rate approaching 85%. Given disease complexity and myriad treatment options, all patients with MBM should ideally be evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting to allow an individualized treatment approach based on prognostic groups, molecular classification, number and size of brain metastasis, and performance status. With improving outcome, pendulum has now swayed to focus more on effective treatment modalities with minimal neurological toxicity while maintaining quality of life. Surgery is usually considered in symptomatic and large MBMs, while stereotactic radiosurgery considered in 1-4 lesions, and now also being explored for up to 15 brain metastases for improved local control. The role of whole brain radiotherapy is diminishing given its neurocognitive toxicities and is reserved for patients with diffuse brain involvement. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has largely been ineffective without evidence for survival benefit. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the cornerstone of management for melanoma brain metastasis with durable intracranial tumor control and excellent toxicity profile. For patients with asymptomatic MBMs, ipilimumab and nivolumab have shown intracranial response near 60% and provides comparable clinical benefit in MBMs as for extracranial metastases. For patients with driver BRAF mutation, BRAFi-/MEKi-targeted agents are proven to be effective in MBM with high rate intracranial responses (44-59%). However, the durability of intracranial responses induced by BRAFi/MEKi seems to be shorter than that of extracranial disease. Emerging data support novel combination of systemic therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, which appears to be safe and effective; however, potential benefits and risks should be evaluated prospectively. Promising ongoing trials will further expand therapeutic evidence in MBM, and patients should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anupam Rishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nieder C, Yobuta R, Mannsåker B. LabBM Score and Extracranial Score As New Tools for Predicting Survival in Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Focal Radiotherapy. Cureus 2020; 12:e7633. [PMID: 32399365 PMCID: PMC7213767 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Two recently validated, untraditional prognostic scores include serum albumin and lactate dehydrogenase, among other parameters. The latter are hemoglobin, platelet counts, and C-reactive protein (three-tiered LabBM score), whereas the four-tiered extracranial score includes more than one extracranial site of metastatic involvement. Until now, head-to-head comparisons of these two scores in patients treated with focal radiotherapy for newly diagnosed brain metastases are not available. Methods This was a retrospective single-institution analysis of 51 patients, most of whom were managed with first-line stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Survival was stratified by the LabBM score and extracranial score. Results Both scores predicted survival, but the analyses were hampered by small subgroups. In particular, very few patients belonged to the unfavorable groups. Survival shorter than two months, which was recorded in 14%, was not well predicted by the LabBM score and extracranial score. Conclusions Very few patients treated with focal radiotherapy (largely SRS) had unfavorable prognostic features according to the two untraditional scores, which do not include the number of brain metastases and performance status. Additional research is needed to improve the tools that predict short survival because overtreatment during the terminal phase of metastatic disease continues to represent a relevant issue.
Collapse
|