Neuroanatomical Determinants of Secondary Trigeminal Neuralgia: Application of 7T Ultra-High-Field Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

A novel indicator to predict the outcome of percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia patients: diffusivity metrics of MR-DTI

Magnetic resonance-diffusion tensor imaging (MR-DTI) has been used in the microvascular decompression and gamma knife radiosurgery in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) patients; however, use of percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency rhizotomy (PSR) to target an abnormal trigeminal ganglion (ab-TG) is unreported. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean and radial diffusivity (MD and RD, respectively), and axial diffusivity (AD) of the trigeminal nerve (CNV) were measured in 20 TN patients and 40 healthy control participants immediately post PSR, at 6-months, and at 1 year. Longitudinal alteration of the diffusivity metrics and any correlation with treatment effects, or prognoses, were analyzed. In the TN group, either low FA (value < 0.30) or a decreased range compared to the adjacent FA (dFA) > 17% defined an ab-TG. Two-to-three days post PSR, all 15 patients reported decreased pain scores with increased FA at the ab-TG (P < 0.001), but decreased MD and RD (P < 0.01 each). Treatment remained effective in 10 of 14 patients (71.4%) and 8 of 12 patients (66.7%) at the 6-month and 1-year follow-ups, respectively. In patients with ab-TGs, there was a significant difference in treatment outcomes between patients with low FA values (9 of 10; 90%) and patients with dFA (2 of 5; 40%) (P < 0.05). MR-DTI with diffusivity metrics correlated microstructural CNV abnormalities with PSR outcomes. Of all the diffusivity metrics, FA could be considered a novel objective quantitative indicator of treatment effects and a potential indicator of PSR effectiveness in TN patients.

Comparing 1.5 T and 3.0 T MR data for 3D visualization of neurovascular relationships in the posterior fossa

BACKGROUND

Neurovascular relationships in the posterior fossa are more frequently investigated due to the increasing availability of 3.0 Tesla MRI. For an assessment with 3D visualization, no systematic analyzes are available so far and the question arises as to whether 3.0 Tesla MRI should be given preference over 1.5 Tesla MRI.

METHODS

In a prospective study, a series of 25 patients each underwent MRI investigations with 3D-CISS and 3D-TOF at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla. For both field strengths separately, blood vessel information from the TOF data was fused into the CISS data after segmentation and registration. Four visualizations were created for each field strength, with and without optimization before and after fusion, which were evaluated with a rating system and verified with the intraoperative situation.

RESULTS

When only CISS data was used, nerves and vessels were better visualized at 1.5 Tesla. After fusion, flow and pulsation artifacts were reduced in both cases, missing vessel sections were supplemented at 3.0 Tesla and 3D visualization at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla led to anatomically comparable results. By subsequent manual correction, the remaining artifacts were further eliminated, with the 3D visualization being significantly better at 3.0 Tesla, since the higher field strength led to sharper contours of small vessel and nerve structures.

CONCLUSION

3D visualizations at 1.5 Tesla are sufficiently detailed for planning microvascular decompression and can be used without restriction. Fusion further improves the quality of 3D visualization at 3.0 Tesla and enables an even more accurate delineation of cranial nerves and vessels.

Trigeminal neuralgia in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors: should we always blame the tumor? A case report and review of literature

OBJECTIVES

This report seeks to highlight a pitfall that may be encountered in the management of patients with trigeminal neuralgia with imaging showing both neurovascular conflict as well as tumors.

CASE PRESENTATION

A case of a 53 year old male with simultaneous neurovascular conflict and a vestibular schwannoma with trigeminal neuralgia is presented and the management is discussed with reference to managing this particular subset. Pain was noted to be likely generated by neurovascular conflict and not by the tumor, which is usually not the case.

CONCLUSIONS

It is suggested that in such cases, microvascular decompression should always be performed in addition to removal of the tumor.

Chronic Facial Pain: Trigeminal Neuralgia, Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain, and Myofascial Pain Syndrome-An Evidence-Based Narrative Review and Etiological Hypothesis

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), the most common form of severe facial pain, may be confused with an ill-defined persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP). Facial pain is reviewed and a detailed discussion of TN and PIFP is presented. A possible cause for PIFP is proposed. (1) Methods: Databases were searched for articles related to facial pain, TN, and PIFP. Relevant articles were selected, and all systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. (2) Discussion: The lifetime prevalence for TN is approximately 0.3% and for PIFP approximately 0.03%. TN is 15-20 times more common in persons with multiple sclerosis. Most cases of TN are caused by neurovascular compression, but a significant number are secondary to inflammation, tumor or trauma. The cause of PIFP remains unknown. Well-established TN treatment protocols include pharmacotherapy, neurotoxin denervation, peripheral nerve ablation, focused radiation, and microvascular decompression, with high rates of relief and varying degrees of adverse outcomes. No such protocols exist for PIFP. (3) Conclusion: PIFP may be confused with TN, but treatment possibilities differ greatly. Head and neck muscle myofascial pain syndrome is suggested as a possible cause of PIFP, a consideration that could open new approaches to treatment.