1
|
de Boisanger J, Brewer M, Fittall MW, Tran A, Thomas K, Dreibe S, Creak A, Solda F, Konadu J, Taylor H, Saran F, Welsh L, Rosenfelder N. Survival after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Era of Targeted Therapy: Number of Metastases No Longer Matters. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2994-3005. [PMID: 38920712 PMCID: PMC11202506 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31060228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Randomised control trial data support the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in up to 4 brain metastases (BMs), with non-randomised prospective data complementing this for up to 10 BMs. There is debate in the neuro-oncology community as to the appropriateness of SRS in patients with >10 BMs. We present data from a large single-centre cohort, reporting survival in those with >10 BMs and in a >20 BMs subgroup. A total of 1181 patients receiving SRS for BMs were included. Data were collected prospectively from the time of SRS referral. Kaplan-Meier graphs and logrank tests were used to compare survival between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to account for differences in group characteristics. Median survival with 1 BM (n = 379), 2-4 BMs (n = 438), 5-10 BMs (n = 236), and >10 BMs (n = 128) was 12.49, 10.22, 10.68, and 10.09 months, respectively. Using 2-4 BMs as the reference group, survival was not significantly different in those with >10 BMs in either our univariable (p = 0.6882) or multivariable analysis (p = 0.0564). In our subgroup analyses, median survival for those with >20 BMs was comparable to those with 2-4 BMs (10.09 vs. 10.22 months, p = 0.3558). This study contributes a large dataset to the existing literature on SRS for those with multi-metastases and supports growing evidence that those with >10 BMs should be considered for SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James de Boisanger
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | | | | | - Amina Tran
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Frank Saran
- Cancer and Blood Service, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
| | - Liam Welsh
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kinj R, Hottinger AF, Böhlen TT, Ozsahin M, Vallet V, Dunet V, Bouchaab H, Peters S, Tuleasca C, Bourhis J, Schiappacasse L. Long-Term Results of Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients with at Least 10 Brain Metastases at Diagnosis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1742. [PMID: 38730695 PMCID: PMC11083879 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE to evaluate an SRT approach in patients with at least 10 lesions at the time of BM initial diagnosis. METHODS This is a monocentric prospective cohort of patients treated by SRT, followed by a brain MRI every two months. Subsequent SRT could be delivered in cases of new BMs during follow-up. The main endpoints were local control rate (LCR), overall survival (OS), and strategy success rate (SSR). Acute and late toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS Seventy patients were included from October 2014 to January 2019, and the most frequent primary diagnosis was non-small-cell lung cancer (N = 36, 51.4%). A total of 1174 BMs were treated at first treatment, corresponding to a median number of 14 BMs per patient. Most of the patients (N = 51, 72.6%) received a single fraction of 20-24 Gy. At 1 year, OS was 62.3%, with a median OS of 19.2 months, and SSR was 77.8%. A cumulative number of 1537 BM were treated over time, corresponding to a median cumulative number of 16 BM per patient. At 1-year, the LCR was 97.3%, with a cumulative incidence of radio-necrosis of 2.1% per lesion. Three patients (4.3%) presented Grade 2 toxicity, and there was no Grade ≥ 3 toxicity. The number of treated BMs and the treatment volume did not influence OS or SSR (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS SRT was highly efficient in controlling the BM, with minimal side effects. In this setting, an SRT treatment should be proposed even in patients with ≥10 BMs at diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémy Kinj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Felix Hottinger
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Departments of Medical Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Véronique Vallet
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Dunet
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Departement of Medical Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hasna Bouchaab
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Solange Peters
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Constantin Tuleasca
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Luis Schiappacasse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Samanci Y, Askeroglu MO, Düzkalir AH, Peker S. Assessing the impact of distortion correction on Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple metastasis: Volumetric and dosimetric analysis. BRAIN & SPINE 2024; 4:102791. [PMID: 38584868 PMCID: PMC10995810 DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a robust neuroimaging technique and is the preferred method for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning. However, MRI data always contain distortions caused by hardware and patient factors. Research question Can these distortions potentially compromise the effectiveness and safety of SRS treatments? Material and methods Twenty-six MR datasets with multiple metastatic brain tumors (METs) used for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were retrospectively evaluated. A commercially available software was used for distortion correction. Geometrical agreement between corrected and uncorrected tumor volumes was evaluated using MacDonald criteria, Euclidian distance, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). SRS plans were generated using uncorrected tumor volumes, which were assessed to determine their coverage of the corrected tumor volumes. Results The median target volume was 0.38 cm3 (range,0.01-12.38 cm3). A maximum displacement of METs of up to 2.87 mm and a median displacement of 0.55 mm (range,0.1-2.87 mm) were noted. The median DSC between uncorrected and corrected MRI was 0.92, and the most concerning case had a DSC of 0.46. Although all plans met the optimization criterion of at least 98% of the uncorrected tumor volume (median 99.55%, range 98.1-100%) receiving at least 100% of the prescription dose, the percent of the corrected tumor volume receiving the total prescription dose was a median of 95.45% (range,23.1-99.5%). Discussion and conclusion MRI distortion, though visually subtle, has significant implications for SRS planning. Regular utilization of corrected MRI is recommended for SRS planning as distortion is sometimes enough to cause a volumetric miss of SRS targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- Gamma Knife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - M. Orbay Askeroglu
- Gamma Knife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Haluk Düzkalir
- Gamma Knife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- Gamma Knife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bellur S, Khosla AA, Ozair A, Kotecha R, McDermott MW, Ahluwalia MS. Management of Brain Metastases: A Review of Novel Therapies. Semin Neurol 2023; 43:845-858. [PMID: 38011864 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most common intracranial tumors in adults, and most commonly originate from lung, followed by breast, melanoma, kidney, and colorectal cancer. Management of BM is individualized based on the size and number of brain metastases, the extent of extracranial disease, the primary tumor subtype, neurological symptoms, and prior lines of therapy. Until recently, treatment strategies were limited to local therapies, like surgical resection and radiotherapy, the latter in the form of whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. The next generation of local strategies includes laser interstitial thermal therapy, magnetic hyperthermic therapy, post-resection brachytherapy, and focused ultrasound. New targeted therapies and immunotherapies with documented intracranial activity have transformed clinical outcomes. Novel systemic therapies with intracranial utility include new anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors like brigatinib and ensartinib; selective "rearranged during transfection" inhibitors like selpercatinib and pralsetinib; B-raf proto-oncogene inhibitors like encorafenib and vemurafenib; Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene inhibitors like sotorasib and adagrasib; ROS1 gene rearrangement (ROS1) inhibitors, anti-neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase agents like larotrectinib and entrectinib; anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 agent like poziotinib; and antibody-drug conjugates like trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. This review highlights the modern multidisciplinary management of BM, emphasizing the integration of systemic and local therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreyas Bellur
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Ahmad Ozair
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
- Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bodensohn R, Maier SH, Belka C, Minniti G, Niyazi M. Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases: A Review of Treatment Techniques. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5404. [PMID: 38001664 PMCID: PMC10670108 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The advancement of systemic targeted treatments has led to improvements in the management of metastatic disease, particularly in terms of survival outcomes. However, brain metastases remain less responsive to systemic therapies, underscoring the significance of local interventions for comprehensive disease control. Over the past years, the threshold for treating brain metastases through stereotactic radiosurgery has risen. Yet, as the number of treated metastases increases, treatment complexity and duration also escalate. This trend has made multi-isocenter radiosurgery treatments, such as those with the Gamma Knife, challenging to plan and lengthy for patients. In contrast, single-isocenter approaches employing linear accelerators offer an efficient and expeditious treatment option. This review delves into the literature, comparing different linear-accelerator-based techniques with each other and in relation to dedicated systems, focusing on dosimetric considerations and feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sebastian H. Maier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.H.M.); (C.B.)
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.H.M.); (C.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, A Partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy;
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.H.M.); (C.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Buszek SM, Tran B, Long JP, Luo D, Suki D, Li J, Ferguson S, Chung C. Postoperative Management of Recurrence After Radiosurgery and Surgical Resection for Brain Metastases and Predicting Benefit From Adjuvant Radiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e499-e503. [PMID: 37295724 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often used as upfront treatment for brain metastases. Progression or radionecrosis after SRS is common and can prompt resection. However, postoperative management strategies after resection for SRS failure vary widely, and no standard practice has been established. In this approved study, we retrospectively reviewed patients who received SRS for a brain metastasis followed by resection of the same lesion. We extracted patient-, disease-, and treatment-related variables and information on disease-related outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic variables were used to create a model to predict factors associated with local failure (LF). A total of 225 patients with brain metastases treated with SRS from 2009 to 2017 followed by surgical resection were identified. Overall, 65% of cases had gross total resection (GTR) on postoperative imaging review. Twenty-one patients (9.3%) received adjuvant radiation therapy to the surgical cavity, and 204 (90.7%) were observed. Of these 204 patients, 118 had GTR with evidence of tumor within the pathology specimen. With a median follow-up of 13 months after resection, 47 patients (40%) developed LF after surgery. After salvage resection of a brain metastasis initially treated with SRS, the observed LF rate was 40% among those who had a GTR and evidence of tumor on pathologic examination. This LF rate is sufficiently high that adjuvant radiation to the surgical bed after salvage resection should be considered in these cases when there is tumor in the pathology, even after a GTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Buszek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James P Long
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dershan Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dima Suki
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sherise Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rozati H, Chen J, Williams M. Overall survival following stereotactic radiosurgery for ten or more brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1004. [PMID: 37858075 PMCID: PMC10585836 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11452-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumours. Variation exists in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with 10 or more brain metastases. Concerns include an increasing number of brain metastases being associated with poor survival, the lack of prospective, randomised data and an increased risk of toxicity. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess overall survival of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery as primary therapy. The search strings were applied to MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Log hazard ratios and standard errors were estimated from each included study. A random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian and Laird method was applied using the derived log hazard ratios and standard errors on studies which included a control group. RESULTS 15 studies were included for systematic review. 12 studies were used for pooled analysis for overall survival at set time points, with a predicted 12 month survival of 20-40%. The random-effects meta-analysis in five studies of overall survival comparing ten or greater metastases against control showed statistically worse overall survival in the 10 + metastases group (1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.18, p-value = < 0.01, I2 = 6%). A funnel plot showed no evidence of bias. There was insufficient information for a meta-analysis of toxicity. DISCUSSION Overall survival outcomes of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with SRS is acceptable and should not be a deterrent for its use. There is a lack of prospective data and insufficient real-world data to draw conclusions on toxicity. PROSPERO ID CRD42021246115.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamoun Rozati
- London Gamma Knife Centre, Platinum Medical Centre, Wellington Hospital, Lodge Road, London, UK
- Computational Oncology Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jiarong Chen
- Computational Oncology Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Clinical Experimental Center, Jiangmen Key Laboratory of Clinical Biobanks and Translational Research, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529030, China
| | - Matt Williams
- Computational Oncology Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
- Department of Radiotherapy, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wei Z, Luy DD, Jose S, Deng H, Yavan S, Worrell S, Belkhir JR, Tang LW, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. Single-Session Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Patients With 20 or More Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:857-866. [PMID: 37018427 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely accepted treatment modality for brain metastases. The role of SRS in patients with higher numbers of metastases remains controversial. OBJECTIVES To define outcomes in patients with ≥20 brain metastases managed using single-session SRS. METHODS This single-institution retrospective cohort study studied 75 patients (26 non-small-cell lung cancer, 21 small-cell lung cancer, 14 breast cancer, and 14 melanoma) undergoing single-session SRS. The median number of tumors per patient was 24, and the median cumulative tumor volume was 3.70 cc. The median margin dose prescribed to each individual tumor was 16 Gy. The median integral cranial dose was 5492 mJ. The median beam on time was 160 minutes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS The median overall survival after SRS was 8.8 months (patients with non-small-cell lung cancer), 4.6 months (patients with small-cell lung cancer), 11.3 months (patients with breast cancer), and 4.1 months (patients with melanoma). Primary cancer type, number of brain metastases, and concurrent immunotherapy were significant factors in predicting survival. Local tumor control rate per patient was 97.3% and 94.6% at 6 and 12 months after SRS, respectively. Thirty-six patients underwent additional SRS for new tumor development with a median time after SRS of 5 months. Three patients experienced adverse radiation events. CONCLUSION Single-session SRS is a well-tolerated palliative treatment option even in patients with ≥20 brain metastases, achieving local control rate >90% with low risks of neurotoxicity while continuing concurrent systemic oncological care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Diego D Luy
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Shalini Jose
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Hansen Deng
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Sila Yavan
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Stephen Worrell
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - J Raouf Belkhir
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Lilly W Tang
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Levis M, Gastino A, De Giorgi G, Mantovani C, Bironzo P, Mangherini L, Ricci AA, Ricardi U, Cassoni P, Bertero L. Modern Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer: Current Trends and Future Perspectives Based on Integrated Translational Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4622. [PMID: 37760591 PMCID: PMC10526239 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent metastatic event in the course of lung cancer patients, occurring in approximately 50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in up to 70% in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Thus far, many advances have been made in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, allowing improvements in the prognosis of these patients. The modern approach relies on the integration of several factors, such as accurate histological and molecular profiling, comprehensive assessment of clinical parameters and precise definition of the extent of intracranial and extracranial disease involvement. The combination of these factors is pivotal to guide the multidisciplinary discussion and to offer the most appropriate treatment to these patients based on a personalized approach. Focal radiotherapy (RT), in all its modalities (radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (aSRT)), is the cornerstone of BM management, either alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. We review the modern therapeutic strategies available to treat lung cancer patients with brain involvement. This includes an accurate review of the different technical solutions which can be exploited to provide a "state-of-art" focal RT and also a detailed description of the systemic agents available as effective alternatives to SRS/SRT when a targetable molecular driver is present. In addition to the validated treatment options, we also discuss the future perspective for focal RT, based on emerging clinical reports (e.g., SRS for patients with many BMs from NSCLC or SRS for BMs from SCLC), together with a presentation of innovative and promising findings in translational research and the combination of novel targeted agents with SRS/SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Levis
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Alessio Gastino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Greta De Giorgi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Cristina Mantovani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paolo Bironzo
- Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy;
| | - Luca Mangherini
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Alessia Andrea Ricci
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bodensohn R, Kaempfel AL, Boulesteix AL, Orzelek AM, Corradini S, Fleischmann DF, Forbrig R, Garny S, Hadi I, Hofmaier J, Minniti G, Mansmann U, Pazos Escudero M, Thon N, Belka C, Niyazi M. Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with 4-10 brain metastases: A nonrandomized controlled trial. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109744. [PMID: 37330054 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There is no randomized evidence comparing whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. This prospective nonrandomized controlled single arm trial attempts to reduce the gap until prospective randomized controlled trial results are available. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included patients with 4-10 brain metastases and ECOG performance status ≤ 2 from all histologies except small-cell lung cancer, germ cell tumors, and lymphoma. The retrospective WBRT-cohort was selected 2:1 from consecutive patients treated within 2012-2017. Propensity-score matching was performed to adjust for confounding factors such as sex, age, primary tumor histology, dsGPA score, and systemic therapy. SRS was performed using a LINAC-based single-isocenter technique employing prescription doses from 15-20Gyx1 at the 80% isodose line. The historical control consisted of equivalent WBRT dose regimens of either 3Gyx10 or 2.5Gyx14. RESULTS Patients were recruited from 2017-2020, end of follow-up was July 1st, 2021. 40 patients were recruited to the SRS-cohort and 70 patients were eligible as controls in the WBRT-cohort. Median OS, and iPFS were 10.4 months (95%-CI 9.3-NA) and 7.1 months (95%-CI 3.9-14.2) for the SRS-cohort, and 6.5 months (95%-CI 4.9-10.4), and 5.9 months (95%-CI 4.1-8.8) for the WBRT-cohort, respectively. Differences were non-significant for OS (HR: 0.65; 95%-CI 0.40-1.05; P =.074) and iPFS (P =.28). No grade III toxicities were observed in the SRS-cohort. CONCLUSION This trial did not meet its primary endpoint as the OS-improvement of SRS compared to WBRT was non-significant and thus superiority could not be proven. Prospective randomized trials in the era of immunotherapy and targeted therapies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anna-Lena Kaempfel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anne-Laure Boulesteix
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Maria Orzelek
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Felix Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Forbrig
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sylvia Garny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Indrawati Hadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Hofmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Ulrich Mansmann
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Merkin RD, Chiang VL, Goldberg SB. Management of patients with brain metastases from NSCLC without a genetic driver alteration: upfront radiotherapy or immunotherapy? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231175438. [PMID: 37275964 PMCID: PMC10233588 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231175438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Brain metastases (BM) are detected in 21% of patients with lung cancer at the time of diagnosis and are the sole metastatic site in 35% of patients with stage IV disease. The best upfront therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer depends on both tumor programmed death 1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and the presence or absence of a targetable genetic alteration in genes such as epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase. In the absence of a targetable genetic alteration, options include chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and ICI combined with chemotherapy. Upfront local therapy followed by systemic therapy is the current standard of care for the management of BM, and may include whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or craniotomy for surgical resection followed by consolidative SRS. This paradigm is effective in achieving local control, but it remains unclear if this approach is necessary for every patient. Prospective and retrospective data suggest that ICIs with or without chemotherapy can have activity against BM; however, appropriately selecting patients who are able to safely forgo local therapy and start an ICI-based treatment remains a challenge. To be considered for upfront ICI-based therapy, a patient should be free of neurologic symptoms, lesions should be small and not located in a critical region of the central nervous system, if corticosteroids are indicated the requirement should be low (prednisone 10 mg/d or less), and PD-L1 expression should be high. The decision to proceed with upfront ICI without local therapy to BM should be made in a multidisciplinary fashion and patients should undergo frequent surveillance imaging so that salvage local therapy can be administered when necessary. Prospective clinical trials are needed to validate this approach before it can be widely adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Veronica L. Chiang
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical
Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven,
CT, USA
| | - Sarah B. Goldberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University
School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kumagai M, Kawamura M, Kato Y, Okudaira K, Naganawa S. The Impact of System-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Geometric Distortion in Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Case Report. Cureus 2022; 14:e27269. [PMID: 36039267 PMCID: PMC9403780 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
13
|
Ippolito E, Silipigni S, Matteucci P, Greco C, Pantano F, D’Auria G, Quattrocchi CC, Floreno B, Fiore M, Gamucci T, Tonini G, Ramella S. Stereotactic Radiation and Dual Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Blockade with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in the Treatment of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Single Institution Series. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020303. [PMID: 35053467 PMCID: PMC8774076 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of fractionated SRT (fSRT) and pertuzumab-trastuzumab (PT) in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). (2) Methods: Patients with HER2+ BCBM who received FSRT from 2015 to 2019 were identified. Patients were included if they were treated with fSRT within 21 days of receiving PT. All lesions were treated with LINAC-based fSRT to a total dose of 27 Gy delivered in three consecutive fractions. All patients received concurrent PT. Patients were evaluated 4-6 weeks after SRS and subsequently every 2-3 months with MRI re-imaging (3) Results: A total of 49 patients with HER2+ brain metastases were identified. Of these patients, a total of 10 patients with 32 HER2+ BCBM were treated with concurrent SRT and PT and included in the analysis. No local progression was observed. Overall response rate was 68.7%. Only one patient developed asymptomatic radionecrosis. Median time to BM occurrence was 15.6 (range: 1-40.5 months). Distant intracranial failure occurred in 4/10 patients (40.0%). Overall BCBM median survival was 33.9 months (95%CI 24.1-43.6). Mean duration of PT treatment was 27.9 months (range: 10.1-53.7 months). (4) Conclusions: In our single institution experience, fSRT and PT showed to be a safe treatment for patients with BCBM with an adequate overall response rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edy Ippolito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (P.M.); (C.G.); (B.F.); (M.F.); (S.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-06-22541-1708
| | - Sonia Silipigni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (P.M.); (C.G.); (B.F.); (M.F.); (S.R.)
| | - Paolo Matteucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (P.M.); (C.G.); (B.F.); (M.F.); (S.R.)
| | - Carlo Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (P.M.); (C.G.); (B.F.); (M.F.); (S.R.)
| | - Francesco Pantano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (F.P.); (G.T.)
| | - Giuliana D’Auria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, 00157 Rome, Italy; (G.D.); (T.G.)
| | - Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy;
| | - Barnaba Floreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (P.M.); (C.G.); (B.F.); (M.F.); (S.R.)
| | - Michele Fiore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (P.M.); (C.G.); (B.F.); (M.F.); (S.R.)
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, 00157 Rome, Italy; (G.D.); (T.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (F.P.); (G.T.)
| | - Sara Ramella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (P.M.); (C.G.); (B.F.); (M.F.); (S.R.)
| |
Collapse
|