1
|
Fares MY, Liu HH, da Silva Etges APB, Zhang B, Warner JJP, Olson JJ, Fedorka CJ, Khan AZ, Best MJ, Kirsch JM, Simon JE, Sanders B, Costouros JG, Zhang X, Jones P, Haas DA, Abboud JA. Utility of Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, and Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Hospital Readmissions After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JBJS Rev 2024; 12:01874474-202408000-00011. [PMID: 39172864 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.24.00075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous applications and strategies have been utilized to help assess the trends and patterns of readmissions after orthopaedic surgery in an attempt to extrapolate possible risk factors and causative agents. The aim of this work is to systematically summarize the available literature on the extent to which natural language processing, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (AI) can help improve the predictability of hospital readmissions after orthopaedic and spine surgeries. METHODS This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched, up until August 30, 2023, for studies that explore the use of AI, natural language processing, and machine learning tools for the prediction of readmission rates after orthopedic procedures. Data regarding surgery type, patient population, readmission outcomes, advanced models utilized, comparison methods, predictor sets, the inclusion of perioperative predictors, validation method, size of training and testing sample, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristics (C-statistic), among other factors, were extracted and assessed. RESULTS A total of 26 studies were included in our final dataset. The overall summary C-statistic showed a mean of 0.71 across all models, indicating a reasonable level of predictiveness. A total of 15 articles (57%) were attributed to the spine, making it the most commonly explored orthopaedic field in our study. When comparing accuracy of prediction models between different fields, models predicting readmissions after hip/knee arthroplasty procedures had a higher prediction accuracy (mean C-statistic = 0.79) than spine (mean C-statistic = 0.7) and shoulder (mean C-statistic = 0.67). In addition, models that used single institution data, and those that included intraoperative and/or postoperative outcomes, had a higher mean C-statistic than those utilizing other data sources, and that include only preoperative predictors. According to the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, the majority of the articles in our study had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION AI tools perform reasonably well in predicting readmissions after orthopaedic procedures. Future work should focus on standardizing study methodologies and designs, and improving the data analysis process, in an attempt to produce more reliable and tangible results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Y Fares
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Jon J P Warner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Catherine J Fedorka
- Cooper Bone and Joint Institute, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey
| | - Adam Z Khan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Panorama City, California
| | - Matthew J Best
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jacob M Kirsch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason E Simon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brett Sanders
- Center for Sports Medicine and Orthopaedics, Chattanooga, Tennessee
| | - John G Costouros
- Institute for Joint Restoration and Research, California Shoulder Center, Menlo Park, California
| | | | | | | | - Joseph A Abboud
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mehta A, El-Najjar D, Howell H, Gupta P, Arciero E, Marigi EM, Parisien RL, Trofa DP. Artificial Intelligence Models Are Limited in Predicting Clinical Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev 2024; 12:01874474-202408000-00012. [PMID: 39172870 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.24.00087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip arthroscopy has seen a significant surge in utilization, but complications remain, and optimal functional outcomes are not guaranteed. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as an effective supportive decision-making tool for surgeons. The purpose of this systematic review was to characterize the outcomes, performance, and validity (generalizability) of AI-based prediction models for hip arthroscopy in current literature. METHODS Two reviewers independently completed structured searches using PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases on August 10, 2022. The search query used the terms as follows: (artificial intelligence OR machine learning OR deep learning) AND (hip arthroscopy). Studies that investigated AI-based risk prediction models in hip arthroscopy were included. The primary outcomes of interest were the variable(s) predicted by the models, best model performance achieved (primarily based on area under the curve, but also accuracy, etc), and whether the model(s) had been externally validated (generalizable). RESULTS Seventy-seven studies were identified from the primary search. Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. Six studies (n = 6,568) applied AI for predicting the achievement of minimal clinically important difference for various patient-reported outcome measures such as the visual analog scale and the International Hip Outcome Tool 12-Item Questionnaire, with area under a receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.572 to 0.94. Three studies used AI for predicting repeat hip surgery with AUC values between 0.67 and 0.848. Four studies focused on predicting other risks, such as prolonged postoperative opioid use, with AUC values ranging from 0.71 to 0.76. None of the 13 studies assessed the generalizability of their models through external validation. CONCLUSION AI is being investigated for predicting clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy. However, the performance of AI models varies widely, with AUC values ranging from 0.572 to 0.94. Critically, none of the models have undergone external validation, limiting their clinical applicability. Further research is needed to improve model performance and ensure generalizability before these tools can be reliably integrated into patient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apoorva Mehta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Dany El-Najjar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Harrison Howell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Puneet Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Emily Arciero
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Erick M Marigi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - David P Trofa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huffman N, Pasqualini I, Khan ST, Klika AK, Deren ME, Jin Y, Kunze KN, Piuzzi NS. Enabling Personalized Medicine in Orthopaedic Surgery Through Artificial Intelligence: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev 2024; 12:01874474-202403000-00006. [PMID: 38466797 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.23.00232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
» The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of orthopaedic surgery holds potential for revolutionizing health care delivery across 3 crucial domains: (I) personalized prediction of clinical outcomes and adverse events, which may optimize patient selection, surgical planning, and enhance patient safety and outcomes; (II) diagnostic automated and semiautomated imaging analyses, which may reduce time burden and facilitate precise and timely diagnoses; and (III) forecasting of resource utilization, which may reduce health care costs and increase value for patients and institutions.» Computer vision is one of the most highly studied areas of AI within orthopaedics, with applications pertaining to fracture classification, identification of the manufacturer and model of prosthetic implants, and surveillance of prosthesis loosening and failure.» Prognostic applications of AI within orthopaedics include identifying patients who will likely benefit from a specified treatment, predicting prosthetic implant size, postoperative length of stay, discharge disposition, and surgical complications. Not only may these applications be beneficial to patients but also to institutions and payors because they may inform potential cost expenditure, improve overall hospital efficiency, and help anticipate resource utilization.» AI infrastructure development requires institutional financial commitment and a team of clinicians and data scientists with expertise in AI that can complement skill sets and knowledge. Once a team is established and a goal is determined, teams (1) obtain, curate, and label data; (2) establish a reference standard; (3) develop an AI model; (4) evaluate the performance of the AI model; (5) externally validate the model, and (6) reinforce, improve, and evaluate the model's performance until clinical implementation is possible.» Understanding the implications of AI in orthopaedics may eventually lead to wide-ranging improvements in patient care. However, AI, while holding tremendous promise, is not without methodological and ethical limitations that are essential to address. First, it is important to ensure external validity of programs before their use in a clinical setting. Investigators should maintain high quality data records and registry surveillance, exercise caution when evaluating others' reported AI applications, and increase transparency of the methodological conduct of current models to improve external validity and avoid propagating bias. By addressing these challenges and responsibly embracing the potential of AI, the medical field may eventually be able to harness its power to improve patient care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nickelas Huffman
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Shujaa T Khan
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alison K Klika
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Matthew E Deren
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kyle N Kunze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adida S, Legarreta AD, Hudson JS, McCarthy D, Andrews E, Shanahan R, Taori S, Lavadi RS, Buell TJ, Hamilton DK, Agarwal N, Gerszten PC. Machine Learning in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Neurosurgery 2024; 94:53-64. [PMID: 37930259 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) can offer revolutionary advances in their application to the field of spine surgery. Within the past 5 years, novel applications of ML have assisted in surgical decision-making, intraoperative imaging and navigation, and optimization of clinical outcomes. ML has the capacity to address many different clinical needs and improve diagnostic and surgical techniques. This review will discuss current applications of ML in the context of spine surgery by breaking down its implementation preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Ethical considerations to ML and challenges in ML implementation must be addressed to maximally benefit patients, spine surgeons, and the healthcare system. Areas for future research in augmented reality and mixed reality, along with limitations in generalizability and bias, will also be highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Adida
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Andrew D Legarreta
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Joseph S Hudson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - David McCarthy
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Edward Andrews
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Regan Shanahan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Suchet Taori
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Raj Swaroop Lavadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Thomas J Buell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Peter C Gerszten
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ghanem M, Ghaith AK, El-Hajj VG, Bhandarkar A, de Giorgio A, Elmi-Terander A, Bydon M. Limitations in Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Imbalanced Binary Outcome Classification in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1723. [PMID: 38137171 PMCID: PMC10741524 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13121723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical prediction models for spine surgery applications are on the rise, with an increasing reliance on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). Many of the predicted outcomes are uncommon; therefore, to ensure the models' effectiveness in clinical practice it is crucial to properly evaluate them. This systematic review aims to identify and evaluate current research-based ML and DL models applied for spine surgery, specifically those predicting binary outcomes with a focus on their evaluation metrics. Overall, 60 papers were included, and the findings were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 13 papers focused on lengths of stay (LOS), 12 on readmissions, 12 on non-home discharge, 6 on mortality, and 5 on reoperations. The target outcomes exhibited data imbalances ranging from 0.44% to 42.4%. A total of 59 papers reported the model's area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), 28 mentioned accuracies, 33 provided sensitivity, 29 discussed specificity, 28 addressed positive predictive value (PPV), 24 included the negative predictive value (NPV), 25 indicated the Brier score with 10 providing a null model Brier, and 8 detailed the F1 score. Additionally, data visualization varied among the included papers. This review discusses the use of appropriate evaluation schemes in ML and identifies several common errors and potential bias sources in the literature. Embracing these recommendations as the field advances may facilitate the integration of reliable and effective ML models in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Ghanem
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA; (M.G.); (A.K.G.); (V.G.E.-H.); (A.B.); (M.B.)
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
- School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos 4504, Lebanon
| | - Abdul Karim Ghaith
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA; (M.G.); (A.K.G.); (V.G.E.-H.); (A.B.); (M.B.)
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| | - Victor Gabriel El-Hajj
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA; (M.G.); (A.K.G.); (V.G.E.-H.); (A.B.); (M.B.)
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Archis Bhandarkar
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA; (M.G.); (A.K.G.); (V.G.E.-H.); (A.B.); (M.B.)
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| | - Andrea de Giorgio
- Artificial Engineering, Via del Rione Sirignano, 80121 Naples, Italy;
| | - Adrian Elmi-Terander
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA; (M.G.); (A.K.G.); (V.G.E.-H.); (A.B.); (M.B.)
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Foley D, Hardacker P, McCarthy M. Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2028. [PMID: 37895410 PMCID: PMC10608700 DOI: 10.3390/life13102028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
New innovations within spine surgery continue to propel the field forward. These technologies improve surgeons' understanding of their patients and allow them to optimize treatment planning both in the operating room and clinic. Additionally, changes in the implants and surgeon practice habits continue to evolve secondary to emerging biomaterials and device design. With ongoing advancements, patients can expect enhanced preoperative decision-making, improved patient outcomes, and better intraoperative execution. Additionally, these changes may decrease many of the most common complications following spine surgery in order to reduce morbidity, mortality, and the need for reoperation. This article reviews some of these technological advancements and how they are projected to impact the field. As the field continues to advance, it is vital that practitioners remain knowledgeable of these changes in order to provide the most effective treatment possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Foley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Pierce Hardacker
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhou S, Zhou F, Sun Y, Chen X, Diao Y, Zhao Y, Huang H, Fan X, Zhang G, Li X. The application of artificial intelligence in spine surgery. Front Surg 2022; 9:885599. [PMID: 36034349 PMCID: PMC9403075 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.885599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to its obvious advantages in processing big data and image information, the combination of artificial intelligence and medical care may profoundly change medical practice and promote the gradual transition from traditional clinical care to precision medicine mode. In this artical, we reviewed the relevant literatures and found that artificial intelligence was widely used in spine surgery. The application scenarios included etiology, diagnosis, treatment, postoperative prognosis and decision support systems of spinal diseases. The shift to artificial intelligence model in medicine constantly improved the level of doctors' diagnosis and treatment and the development of orthopedics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
| | - Feifei Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
- Correspondence: Feifei Zhou
| | - Yu Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
| | - Yinze Diao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
| | - Yanbin Zhao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
| | - Haoge Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Fan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
| | - Gangqiang Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
| | - Xinhang Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
An Evolution Gaining Momentum—The Growing Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Spinal Diseases. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12040836. [PMID: 35453884 PMCID: PMC9025301 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, applications using artificial intelligence have been gaining importance in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal diseases. In our review, we describe the basic features of artificial intelligence which are currently applied in the field of spine diagnosis and treatment, and we provide an orientation of the recent technical developments and their applications. Furthermore, we point out the possible limitations and challenges in dealing with such technological advances. Despite the momentary limitations in practical application, artificial intelligence is gaining ground in the field of spine treatment. As an applying physician, it is therefore necessary to engage with it in order to benefit from those advances in the interest of the patient and to prevent these applications being misused by non-medical partners.
Collapse
|
9
|
Saravi B, Hassel F, Ülkümen S, Zink A, Shavlokhova V, Couillard-Despres S, Boeker M, Obid P, Lang GM. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12040509. [PMID: 35455625 PMCID: PMC9029065 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthcare systems worldwide generate vast amounts of data from many different sources. Although of high complexity for a human being, it is essential to determine the patterns and minor variations in the genomic, radiological, laboratory, or clinical data that reliably differentiate phenotypes or allow high predictive accuracy in health-related tasks. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are increasingly applied to image data for various tasks. Its use for non-imaging data becomes feasible through different modern machine learning techniques, converting non-imaging data into images before inputting them into the CNN model. Considering also that healthcare providers do not solely use one data modality for their decisions, this approach opens the door for multi-input/mixed data models which use a combination of patient information, such as genomic, radiological, and clinical data, to train a hybrid deep learning model. Thus, this reflects the main characteristic of artificial intelligence: simulating natural human behavior. The present review focuses on key advances in machine and deep learning, allowing for multi-perspective pattern recognition across the entire information set of patients in spine surgery. This is the first review of artificial intelligence focusing on hybrid models for deep learning applications in spine surgery, to the best of our knowledge. This is especially interesting as future tools are unlikely to use solely one data modality. The techniques discussed could become important in establishing a new approach to decision-making in spine surgery based on three fundamental pillars: (1) patient-specific, (2) artificial intelligence-driven, (3) integrating multimodal data. The findings reveal promising research that already took place to develop multi-input mixed-data hybrid decision-supporting models. Their implementation in spine surgery may hence be only a matter of time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babak Saravi
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79108 Freiburg, Germany; (S.Ü.); (P.O.); (G.M.L.)
- Department of Spine Surgery, Loretto Hospital, 79100 Freiburg, Germany; (F.H.); (A.Z.)
- Institute of Experimental Neuroregeneration, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg (SCI-TReCS), Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
- Correspondence:
| | - Frank Hassel
- Department of Spine Surgery, Loretto Hospital, 79100 Freiburg, Germany; (F.H.); (A.Z.)
| | - Sara Ülkümen
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79108 Freiburg, Germany; (S.Ü.); (P.O.); (G.M.L.)
- Department of Spine Surgery, Loretto Hospital, 79100 Freiburg, Germany; (F.H.); (A.Z.)
| | - Alisia Zink
- Department of Spine Surgery, Loretto Hospital, 79100 Freiburg, Germany; (F.H.); (A.Z.)
| | - Veronika Shavlokhova
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Sebastien Couillard-Despres
- Institute of Experimental Neuroregeneration, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg (SCI-TReCS), Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
- Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, 1200 Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Boeker
- Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Medical Center Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Peter Obid
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79108 Freiburg, Germany; (S.Ü.); (P.O.); (G.M.L.)
| | - Gernot Michael Lang
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79108 Freiburg, Germany; (S.Ü.); (P.O.); (G.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Maielli LF, Tebet MA, Rosa AF, Lima MC, Mistro Neto S, Cavali PTM, Pasqualini W, Risso Neto MÍ. IDENTIFICATION OF RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH 30-DAY READMISSION OF PATIENTS SUBMITTED TO ANTERIOR OR POSTERIOR ACCESS CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY. COLUNA/COLUMNA 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/s1808-185120222103262527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Aim: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify risk factors associated with 30-day readmission of patients submitted to anterior or posterior access cervical spine surgery. Methods: The databases used to select the papers were PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane, using the following search strategy: patient AND readmission AND (30 day OR “thirty day” OR 30-day OR thirty-day) AND (spine AND cervical). Results: Initially, 179 papers that satisfied the established search stringwere selected. After reading the titles and abstracts, 46 were excluded from the sample for not effectively discussing the theme proposed for this review. Of the 133 remaining papers, 109 were also excluded after a detailed reading of their content, leaving 24 that were included in the sample for the meta-analysis. Conclusions: The average readmission rate in the studies evaluated was 4.85%. Only the occurrence of infections, as well as the presence of patients classified by the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) assessment system with scores greater than III, were causal factors that influenced the readmission of patients. No significant differences were noted when comparing the anterior and posterior surgical access routes. Level of evidence II; Systematic Review of Level II or Level I Studies with discrepant results.
Collapse
|
11
|
Rodríguez-Tomàs E, Iftimie S, Castañé H, Baiges-Gaya G, Hernández-Aguilera A, González-Viñas M, Castro A, Camps J, Joven J. Clinical Performance of Paraoxonase-1-Related Variables and Novel Markers of Inflammation in Coronavirus Disease-19. A Machine Learning Approach. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021; 10:antiox10060991. [PMID: 34205807 PMCID: PMC8234277 DOI: 10.3390/antiox10060991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infection produces a response of the innate immune system causing oxidative stress and a strong inflammatory reaction termed ‘cytokine storm’ that is one of the leading causes of death. Paraoxonase-1 (PON1) protects against oxidative stress by hydrolyzing lipoperoxides. Alterations in PON1 activity have been associated with pro-inflammatory mediators such as the chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), and the glycoprotein galectin-3. We aimed to investigate the alterations in the circulating levels of PON1, CCL2, and galectin-3 in 126 patients with COVID-19 and their interactions with clinical variables and analytical parameters. A machine learning approach was used to identify predictive markers of the disease. For comparisons, we recruited 45 COVID-19 negative patients and 50 healthy individuals. Our approach identified a synergy between oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrogenesis in positive patients that is not observed in negative patients. PON1 activity was the parameter with the greatest power to discriminate between patients who were either positive or negative for COVID-19, while their levels of CCL2 and galectin-3 were similar. We suggest that the measurement of serum PON1 activity may be a useful marker for the diagnosis of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Rodríguez-Tomàs
- Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain; (E.R.-T.); (H.C.); (G.B.-G.); (A.H.-A.); (J.J.)
| | - Simona Iftimie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain; (S.I.); (M.G.-V.); (A.C.)
| | - Helena Castañé
- Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain; (E.R.-T.); (H.C.); (G.B.-G.); (A.H.-A.); (J.J.)
| | - Gerard Baiges-Gaya
- Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain; (E.R.-T.); (H.C.); (G.B.-G.); (A.H.-A.); (J.J.)
| | - Anna Hernández-Aguilera
- Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain; (E.R.-T.); (H.C.); (G.B.-G.); (A.H.-A.); (J.J.)
| | - María González-Viñas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain; (S.I.); (M.G.-V.); (A.C.)
| | - Antoni Castro
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain; (S.I.); (M.G.-V.); (A.C.)
| | - Jordi Camps
- Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain; (E.R.-T.); (H.C.); (G.B.-G.); (A.H.-A.); (J.J.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-977-310-300
| | - Jorge Joven
- Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain; (E.R.-T.); (H.C.); (G.B.-G.); (A.H.-A.); (J.J.)
| |
Collapse
|