Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation for C2 Fractures: Surgical Nuances, Complications, and Factors Affecting Fracture Union

Feasibility of Two-Screw Anterior Fixation for Odontoid Fractures in a Chinese Population: A Morphometric Study Based on Computed Tomography

Background

To evaluate the feasibility of treating odontoid fractures in the Chinese population with two cortical screws based on computed tomography (CT) scans and describe a new measurement strategy to guide screw insertion in treating these fractures.

Methods

A retrospective review of cervical computed tomographic scans of 128 patients (aged 18-76 years; men, 55 [43.0%]) was performed. The minimum external transverse diameter (METD), minimum external anteroposterior diameter (MEAD), maximum screw length (MSL), and screw projection back angle (SPBA) of the odontoid process were measured on coronal and sagittal CT images.

Results

The mean values of METD and MEAD were 10.0 ± 1.1 mm and 12.0 ± 1.0 mm, respectively, in men and 9.2 ± 1.0 mm and 11.0 ± 1.0 mm, respectively, in women. Both measurements were significantly higher in men (p < 0.001). In total, 87 individuals (68%) had METD > 9.0 mm that could accommodate two 3.5-mm cortical screws. The mean MSL value and SPBA range were 34.4 ± 2.9 mm and 13.5°-24.2°, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between men and women.

Conclusions

The insertion of two 3.5-mm cortical screws was possible for anterior fixation of odontoid fractures in 87 patients (68%) in our study, and there was a statistically significant difference between men and women.

Type II Odontoid Fractures: Is the Anterior Screw a Good Solution for all Patients? A Case Series of 60 Consecutive Patients

OBJECTIVE

Type II odontoid fracture is the most common fracture type, and its treatment remains challenging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of anterior screw fixation for type II odontoid fractures in patients aged over and below 60 years.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients diagnosed with type II odontoid fractures who were surgically treated using the anterior approach by a single surgeon was conducted. Demographic characteristics, including age, sex, type of fracture, time from trauma to surgery, length of stay (LoS), fusion rate, complications, and reoperation, were evaluated. Surgical outcomes were compared between patients over and below 60 years of age.

RESULTS

Sixty consecutive patients underwent odontoid anterior fixation during the analysis period. The mean age of patients was 49.58 ± 23.22 years. Twenty-three (38.3%) patients were aged over 60 years, and the minimum follow-up period was two years. Of the patients, 93.3% developed bone fusion, which was observed in 86.9% of patients over 60 years. Complications related to hardware failure occurred in six (10%) patients. Transient dysphagia was observed in 10% of the cases. Three (5%) patients required reoperation. Patients over 60 years had a significantly increased risk of dysphagia compared with those below 60 years (P = 0.0248). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding nonfusion rate, reoperation rate, or LoS.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior fixation of the odontoid showed high fusion rates with a low rate of complications. It is a technique to be considered for treating type II odontoid fractures in selected cases.