Influence of Bilateral Cerebellar Infarction on Functional Outcome After Endovascular Treatment for Basilar Artery Occlusion

Contact aspiration for basilar artery occlusion safely reduces the puncture-to-recanalization time

OBJECTIVE

Effective thrombectomies in the posterior circulation remain controversial. Previous reports have demonstrated the superiority of contact aspiration in anterior circulation. Aspiration catheters and stent retrievers are often used alone on a global scale, while combined techniques are commonly used in Japan. This study evaluated the effect of first-line contact aspiration with other strategies for the treatment of basilar artery occlusion.

METHODS

The primary outcome was the frequency of the first-pass effect, and the secondary outcome was the time from puncture to the first-pass effect. A multicenter observational registry including 16 Japanese stroke centers was used. Between December 2013 and February 2021, enrolled patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion. The efficacy of contact aspiration compared to other methods (including stent retrievers and combined techniques) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were included, all of whom had achieved effective recanalization. Twenty-six patients were treated with contact aspiration, 13 with combined technique, and 45 with stent retrievers. The two groups: contact aspiration and non-contact aspiration, had different backgrounds. Both had similar frequencies of effective recanalization and first-pass effects. The contact aspiration group experienced better functional outcomes without statistical significance, while this strategy was significantly associated with a shorter puncture-to-recanalization time (38 vs. 55 minutes, P=0.036). In particular, in the 55 patients with the first-pass effect, multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that contact aspiration was significantly associated with a shorter time from puncture to first-pass effect, independent of age and etiology of large-artery atherosclerosis (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% confidence intervals 1.10-3.69, P=0.023).

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that contact aspiration for basilar artery occlusion may shorten the puncture-to-first-pass effect, compared to stent retrievers and combined techniques.

Impact of cancer history on long-term outcome after elective neuro-endovascular treatment in patients aged 80 years or older: A retrospective multicenter observational study

AIM

Assessing the indication for elective neuro-endovascular treatment (EVT) in older patients requires consideration of the impact of systemic comorbidities on their overall reduced life expectancy. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of elective neuro-EVT in patients aged ≥80 years, and to investigate the impact of pre-existing cancer on their long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Of the patients enrolled in multicenter observational registry, those aged ≥80 years undergoing elective neuro-EVT between 2011 and 2020 were enrolled. A history of cancer was defined as a pre-existing solid or hematologic malignancy at the time of EVT. The primary outcome was time to death from elective neuro-EVT.

RESULTS

Of the 6183 neuro-EVT cases implemented at 10 stroke centers, a total of 289 patients (median age, 82 years [interquartile range 81-84 years]) were analyzed. A total of 58 (20.1%) patients had a history of cancer. A total of 78 patients (27.0%) died during follow up. The 5-year survival rate of enrolled patients was 64.6%. Compared with patients without a history of cancer, those with a history of cancer showed significantly worse survival (log-rank test, P = 0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed history of cancer was an independent predictor of time to death from elective neuro-EVT (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.01-3.00, P = 0.047). Cancer was the leading cause of death, accounting for 25.6% of all deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that history of cancer has a significant impact on time to death from elective neuro-EVT in patients aged ≥80 years. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 211-217.