Surgery as an Effective Therapy for Ulnar Nerve Neuropathic Pain Caused by Gunshot Wounds: A Retrospective Case Series

Concepts of Pain Management Following Nerve Injuries: Multidisciplinary Approach

Purpose

A systematic review to identify treatment approaches for the management of pain following peripheral nerve injury.

Methods

A published literature search was performed for the concepts of peripheral nerve injury and pain management with related synonyms. The strategies were created using a combination of controlled vocabulary terms and keywords and were executed in Embase.com, Ovid-Medline All, and Scopus from database inception. Database searches were completed on August 22, 2023.

Results

The initial search resulted in a total of 1,793 citations. In total, 724 duplicates were removed, leaving 1,069 unique citations remaining for analysis. This review excluded all papers that were not specific to pain following peripheral nerve injury. Case and cohort studies (n < 5) were also excluded. Thirty-two articles on pain management strategies after peripheral nerve injury remained, with years of publication ranging from 1981 to 2023. An additional four articles were identified by manual search. Of the 36 articles reviewed, 15 articles reported on the approach to the treatment of pain after a peripheral nerve injury, and the other 22 articles consisted of cohort and case series studies.

Conclusions

There is a lack of literature describing efficacy of various treatment strategies for pain following peripheral nerve injuries. Few studies provide clear, stepwise clinical guidance for practicing physicians and other health care providers on the treatment of these complicated patients.

Upper Extremity Ballistic Nerve Injury: A Scoping Review and Algorithm for Management

» Gunshot injuries to the upper extremity (UE) have high likelihood for causing peripheral nerve injury secondary to the high density of vital structures. Roughly one-fourth of patients sustaining a gunshot wound (GSW) to the UE incur a nerve injury. Of these nerve injuries, just over half are neurapraxic. In cases of surgical exploration of UE nerve injuries, nearly one-third demonstrate a transected or discontinuous nerve.» Existing literature regarding surgical management of nerve injuries secondary to GSWs comes from both military and civilian injuries. Outcomes are inconsistently reported, and indications are heterogeneous; however, reasonable results can be obtained with nerve reconstruction.» Our proposed management algorithm hinges on 4 treatment questions: if there is a nerve deficit present on examination, if there is a concomitant injury in the extremity (i.e., fracture or vascular insult), whether the injured nerve would be in the operative field of the concomitant injury, and whether there was an identified nerve lesion encountered at the time of surgery by another surgeon?» Early exploration rather than continued expectant management may offer improved recovery from GSW nerve injuries in particular situations. When an UE nerve deficit is present, establishing follow-up after the initial GSW encounter and early referral to a peripheral nerve surgeon are pivotal.

Reconstructing Pinch Strength after Ulnar Nerve Injury by Transferring the Opponens Pollicis Motor Branch

BACKGROUND

With ulnar nerve injuries, paralysis of the first dorsal interosseous and adductor pollicis muscle weakens the patient's pinch. In the palm, we transferred the opponens pollicis motor branch to the deep terminal division of the ulnar nerve for pinch reconstruction.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with ulnar nerve injuries around the elbow underwent reconstruction and were followed up postoperatively for a minimum of 14 months. Their mean age was 41 ± 16 years, and the mean interval between injury and surgery was 134 ± 126 days (range, 2 to 390 days). Preoperatively and postoperatively, grasp, key, and subterminal key pinch strength were measured using dynamometers.

RESULTS

Reinnervation of the first dorsal interosseous muscle was observed in 15 of the 16 patients. Mean grasp strength improved from 15.5 ± 8.5 kg preoperatively to 24 ± 10 kg postoperatively, achieving 57% ± 16% of contralateral hand strength. Preoperatively, terminal key pinch averaged 3 ± 1 kg, which improved postoperatively to 5.5 ± 2 kg, achieving 71 ± 24% of the strength measured contralaterally. Preoperatively to postoperatively, subterminal key pinch force increased from 0 to 2.4 ± 1.3 kg, achieving 61% ± 27% that of the unaffected side. Patients who underwent surgery within 6 months of their injury showed a mean subterminal key pinch strength recovery of 63% ± 27% of the normal side, whereas those who underwent surgery between 7 and 13 months after injury showed a mean subterminal key pinch strength recovery of 51% ± 29%.

CONCLUSION

Transferring the opponens pollicis motor branch to the deep terminal division of the ulnar nerve improved pinch and grasp strength without jeopardizing thumb function.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Gunshot-related nerve injuries of the upper extremities: clinical, electromyographic, and ultrasound features in 22 patients

Objectives

Gunshot wounds of the upper extremities may cause permanent neurovascular injuries, leading to significant morbidity, chronic pain, functional loss, and disability. While there are many reports on the incidence and intraoperative findings in gunshot-related nerve injuries (GSNI) sustained during wars, there is a paucity of details pertaining to GSNI of the upper extremities in civilians. The goal of this paper is to provide the clinical, electrodiagnostic (EDX), and ultrasound (US) findings in 22 patients with GSNI of the upper extremities.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients referred for EDX studies to evaluate the presence of nerve injury after sustaining GSWs to the upper extremities. All patients underwent EDX studies, and 16 patients had US evaluations. Numerous metrics were documented including presenting symptoms, neurological abnormalities, EDX findings, and US features.

Results

The forearm was the most frequent location of injury (8 [36%] patients). The ulnar nerve was the most common injured nerve (10 [45%] patients), followed by the brachial plexus (7 [32%] patients). All patients complained of muscle weakness; the most frequently affected muscles were the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) (14 [64%] patients) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) (11 [50%] patients). Muscle atrophy was noted in 19 (86%) patients, 15 of whom had atrophy of the FDI. Axonotmesis was the type of nerve injury in all patients based on EDX studies. Of the 16 patients who underwent US studies, a neuroma in continuity was noted in 4 (25%) patients and neurotmesis in 1 (6.2%) patient. Eleven (69%) patients had enlarged and/or hypoechoic nerves.

Conclusions

Axonotmesis of the ulnar nerve was the most common finding among patients sustaining gunshot injuries to the upper extremities. EDX and US studies provide valuable insight into the underlying pathophysiology and guidance for management of patients with GSNI of the upper extremities.